Ralph Wäsch

Ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter survey

Despite major improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation over the past decades, corticosteroid-refractory (SR) acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) cause high mortality. Preclinical evidence indicates the potent anti-inflammatory properties of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. In this retrospective survey, 19 stem cell transplant centers in Europe and the United States reported outcome data from 95 patients who had received ruxolitinib as salvage therapy for SR-GVHD. Patients were classified as having SR-aGVHD (n=54, all grades III or IV) or SR-cGVHD (n=41, all moderate or severe). The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 3 for both SR-aGVHD (1–7) and SR-cGVHD (1–10). The overall response rate was 81.5% (44/54) in SR-aGVHD including 25 complete responses (46.3%), while for SR-cGVHD the ORR was 85.4% (35/41). Of those patients responding to ruxolitinib, the rate of GVHD-relapse was 6.8% (3/44) and 5.7% (2/35) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. The 6-month-survival was 79% (67.3–90.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and 97.4% (92.3–100%, 95% CI) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Cytopenia and cytomegalovirus-reactivation were observed during ruxolitinib treatment in both SR-aGVHD (30/54, 55.6% and 18/54, 33.3%) and SR-cGVHD (7/41, 17.1% and 6/41, 14.6%) patients. Ruxolitinib may constitute a promising new treatment option for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD that should be validated in a prospective trial.

European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma management has undergone profound changes in the past thanks to advances in our understanding of the disease biology and improvements in treatment and supportive care approaches. This article presents recommendations of the European Myeloma Network for newly diagnosed patients based on the GRADE system for level of evidence. All patients with symptomatic disease should undergo risk stratification to classify patients for International Staging System stage (level of evidence: 1A) and for cytogenetically defined high- versus standard-risk groups (2B). Novel-agent-based induction and up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in medically fit patients remains the standard of care (1A). Induction therapy should include a triple combination of bortezomib, with either adriamycin or thalidomide and dexamethasone (1A), or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (2B). Currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be considered for young patients with high-risk disease and preferably in the context of a clinical trial (2B). Thalidomide (1B) or lenalidomide (1A) maintenance increases progression-free survival and possibly overall survival (2B). Bortezomib-based regimens are a valuable consolidation option, especially for patients who failed excellent response after autologous stem cell transplantation (2A). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide are the standards of care for transplant-ineligible patients (1A). Melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance increases progression-free survival, but overall survival data are needed. New data from the phase III study (MM-020/IFM 07-01) of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone reached its primary end point of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared to melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide and provides further evidence for the efficacy of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients (2B).

Efficacy of a 3-day, low-dose treatment with 5-azacytidine followed by donor lymphocyte infusions in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia relapsed after allografting

We have piloted a low-dose schedule of 5-azacytidine followed by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in patients with relapse of AML or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL) after allografting. Of the 26 patients (median age 62 years, range 28–75) with relapsed AML (n=24) or CMMoL (n=2), 11 (42%) had poor-risk cytogenetics. Twenty-three patients had received fludarabine-based reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens, and three had received conventional myeloablative conditioning. Patients received 5-azacytidine s.c., at a total daily dose of 100 mg, on days 1–3, to be followed by DLI on day 10, with the next course of treatment to be started on day 22. A total of 60 courses of 5-azacytidine were administered, with a median of 2 courses (range: 1–10). In 44 courses, 5-azacytidine was followed by DLI, and thus 19/26 (73%) patients received at least one course of this combined treatment. Clinically relevant neutropenic infections not associated with progressive disease developed in four patients, one of them succumbing to sepsis. Only two patients developed de novo acute GvHD after the combination of 5-azacytidine and DLI. Overall, 66% of the patients benefited from this treatment, with continued CRs achieved in 4 (16%) patients, lasting a median of 525 days (range: 450+ to 820+), and a 50% rate of temporary disease control with stable mixed chimerism (median duration 72 days). The median survival from the start of 5-azacytidine treatment was 136 days (range: 23 to 873+), with an estimated 2-year survival probability of 16%. In conclusion, this non-intensive outpatient regimen of 5-azacytidine followed by DLI is feasible, with a very low aGVHD rate. Objective responses, including continuous complete donor chimerism, occurred also in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics.

Rapid achievement of complete donor chimerism and low regimen-related toxicity after reduced conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine, melphalan and allogeneic transplantation.

between august 1998 and july 1999, 21 patients received a novel protocol of reduced conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine and melphalan (fbm) followed by matched-related allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (pbsct) in a prospective multicenter phase i/ii study. cyclosporin a and ‘mini-methotrexate’ were used for gvhd prophylaxis. patients were included because of age, advanced disease, previous transplantation or co-morbidity. hematopoietic engraftment after allogeneic transplantation was rapid with a median white blood count (wbc) >1 × 109/l on day +11 (range 10–17) and a median platelet count >20 × 109/l on day +13 (range 9–36). Donor chimerism was complete in 16/21 (76%) patients at all time points during follow-up and mixed at least on one occasion in 5/21 (24%) patients. The conditioning regimen was well tolerated with low toxicity even in previously transplanted patients. Thirteen patients (62%) developed acute GVHD grades II–IV. Nineteen out of 21 patients achieved complete (CR, n = 15) or partial remission (PR, n = 4) with a median patient follow-up of 354+ days (range 258–577) for patients alive. The reduced intensity protocol FBM is feasible with rapid engraftment, early achievement of complete donor chimerism, low toxicity, especially in heavily pretreated patients, and good response rates in advanced disease patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 243–250.

Non-intensive treatment with low-dose 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC) prior to allogeneic blood SCT of older MDS/AML patients

Novel, non-intensive treatment options in older MDS/AML patients planned for allografting, with the goal of down-staging the underlying disease and bridging time to transplantation, are presently being developed. 5-azacytidine and decitabine (DAC) are of particular interest, as they can be given repetitively, with very limited non-hematologic toxicity and result in responses both in MDS and AML even at low doses. We describe 15 consecutive patients (median age 69 years, range 60–75 years) with MDS (n=10) or AML (n=5) who all received first-line treatment with DAC and subsequent allografting (from sibling donor in four patients, unrelated donor in 11) after reduced-intensity conditioning with the FBM regimen. Successful engraftment was attained in 14/15 patients, all of whom achieved a CR, with a median duration of 5 months (range 1+ to 51+). Six of these 14 patients are alive (4 with complete donor chimerism), 8 have died either from relapse (n=4) or treatment-related complications while in CR (n=4). We conclude that allografting after low-dose DAC and subsequent conditioning with FBM is feasible, with no unexpected toxicities and appears as a valid alternative to standard chemotherapy (‘InDACtion instead of induction’) in elderly patients with MDS/AML.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors using in vivo anti‐T‐cell globulin

Despite improvements in HLA typing, graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) continues to impair the results after volunteer unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (VUD‐BMT) in adult patients compared with matched sibling BMT. Here, the outcome after VUD‐BMT using a specific regimen with high‐dose anti‐T‐lymphocyte globulin (ATG) was analysed. Fifty‐five adult patients, median age 34 years (range 17–55 years), with acute or chronic leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were transplanted in first complete remission (CR1)/first chronic phase (CP1) (early disease) (n = 21) or in advanced (CR2/CP2, no remission) disease (n = 34) from an unrelated marrow donor. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of ATG‐S (Fresenius) 60–90 mg/kg b.w. prior to transplantation, in addition to cyclosporin A and short‐course methotrexate. Graft failure did not occur and white blood cell count (WBC) > 1·0 × 109/l was reached at median day +16. The cumulative incidence of acute (a)GVHD grade II–IV was 15% [95% CI (8%, 28%)] and of chronic GVHD was 51% [95% CI (38%, 68%)]. The cumulative incidence of relapse within 1 year was 0% [95% CI (0%, 19%)] and 21% [95% CI (11%, 40%)] for patients with early and advanced disease respectively. With a median follow‐up of 28 months (range 16–45 months), 2‐year disease‐free and overall survival for patients transplanted in CR1/CP1 was 81% and 81% [95% CI (64%, 98%)], respectively, and for patients with advanced disease was 33% [95% CI (17%, 50%)] and 40% [95% CI (23%, 57%)] respectively. Complete and persistent donor chimaerism was seen in 77·5% of 40 patients evaluated. All 14 chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)‐CP1 patients became bcr–abl negative within 250 d. High‐dose ATG pretransplant results in a low incidence of severe aGVHD without compromising donor chimaerism or elimination of minimal residual disease. Our results are similar to data obtained after matched sibling donor transplantation.

Evaluation of immunomodulatory treatment based on conventional and lineage-specific chimerism analysis in patients with myeloid malignancies after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Both conventional chimerism analysis (CCA) and lineage-specific chimerism analysis (LCA) have potential pitfalls as diagnostic means for the detection of minimal residual disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT). Therefore, the present study examines the results of both methods in order to determine how predictive consecutive evaluations were, with respect to the risk that the patient would relapse during post-transplant follow-up and with respect to responsiveness to immunomodulatory treatment. A total of 168 individuals with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n=137) and myelo dysplastic syndrome (n=31) were investigated with CCA and LCA at mean intervals of 24 days (range: 11–116). The median follow-up after myeloablative aHCT was 22 months (range: 4–49). Of 168 patients, 65 experienced a clinical relapse after aHCT. CCA and LCA were comparatively sensitive and specific for relapse at the intervals of chimerism testing employed in this study. Of 32 patients, 10 who were offered donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) treatment for increasing (n=29) or stable (n=3) mixed chimerism (MC) achieved at least transitory CC. The observation that all patients with increasing MC relapsed despite DLI treatment (54%) or withdrawal of immune suppression (24%) indicates that novel strategies to deal with rapidly evolving relapse in AML patients, such as shortening of chimerism monitoring intervals, need to be evaluated.

Comorbidity as a prognostic variable in multiple myeloma: comparative evaluation of common comorbidity scores and use of a novel MM-comorbidity score.

Comorbidities have been demonstrated to affect progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), although their impact in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is as yet unsettled. We (1) assessed various comorbidities, (2) compared established comorbidity indices (CIs; Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI)), Kaplan Feinstein (KF) and Satariano index (SI) and (3) developed a MM-CI (Freiburger comorbidity index, FCI) in 127 MM patients. Univariate analysis determined moderate or severe pulmonary disease (hazard ratio (HR): 3.5, P<0.0001), renal impairment (via estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); HR: 3.4, P=0.0018), decreased Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS, HR: 2.7, P=0.0004) and age (HR: 2, P=0.0114) as most important variables for diminished OS. Through multivariate analysis, the eGFR ⩽30 ml/min/1.73m2, impaired lung function and KPS ⩽70% were significant for decreased OS, with HRs of 2.9, 2.8 and 2.2, respectively. Combination of these risk factors within the FCI identified significantly different median OS rates of 118, 53 and 25 months with 0, 1 and 2 or 3 risk factors, respectively, (P<0.005). In light of our study, comorbidities are critical prognostic determinants for diminished PFS and OS. Moreover, comorbidity scores are important treatment decision tools and will be valuable to implement into future analyses and clinical trials in MM.

Association of multiple myeloma with different neoplasms: systematic analysis in consecutive patients with myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) has been suggested to be associated with different neoplasms. Of 589 consecutive patients with MM, 59 (10%) had different neoplasms: solid tumors in 78% and hematological neoplasms in 22%. Different neoplasms were separated into those emerging prior or synchronously (p/s; n = 41) versus subsequently after the MM (n = 18). The rate of different neoplasms at the time of MM diagnosis was estimated as 6.6%, and estimated different neoplasm rates at 2, 5, and 10 years were 7.8%, 10.3%, and 11.6%, respectively. Patients with MM with p/s different neoplasms showed a hazard ratio (HR) for impaired overall survival of 1.2 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), whereas in those with subsequent neoplasms the HR was 2.5 (95% CI 1.4–4.4). This demonstrates that (1) p/s are more frequent compared with subsequent different neoplasms, and (2) the prognosis is more impaired with subsequent different neoplasms. Age ≥60 years was a confounding covariable with a HR of 2.021 (95% CI 1.6–2.6).

Consensus statement from European experts on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of multiple myeloma: from standard therapy to novel approaches

Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) has changed beyond recognition over the past two decades. During the early 1980s, MM inevitably resulted in a slow progressive decline in quality of life until death after about 2 years, while today patients can expect a 50% chance of achieving a complete remission, median survival of 5 years, and a 20% chance of surviving longer than 10 years. An international expert opinion meeting (including members of the GIMEMA and DSMM study groups) was held in 2009. One of the outcomes of the meeting was the development of a consensus statement outlining contemporary optimal clinical practice for the treatment of MM. The international panel recommended that the state of the art therapy for MM should comprise: (a) evidence-based supportive care, (b) effective and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic regimens, (c) autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) for patients suitable for intensive conditioning therapy, and (d) evidence-based incorporation of novel anti-MM agents. Maintenance strategies have also become increasingly important for the prolongation of remission after front-line therapies. In addition, improved understanding of the biology of MM has led to the development of novel biological therapeutic agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and others. These agents specifically target intracellular mechanisms and interactions, such as those within the bone marrow microenvironment, and have been integrated into MM treatment. This report reviews recent clinical advances in the treatment strategies available for MM and provides an overview of the state of the art management of patients with MM.