Ram K. Shrestha
University of Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ram K. Shrestha.
Ecological Economics | 2002
Ram K. Shrestha; Andrew Seidl; Andre Steffens Moraes
Abstract Recreational fishing value of the Brazilian Pantanal is measured using travel cost method (TCM). We compare non-linear, Poisson and negative binomial count data models to estimate recreational fishing trip demands. The count data and truncated models are used primarily to account for non-negative integer and truncation properties of recreational fishing trips as suggested by the recreation valuation literature. The results reveal that non-linear and truncated count data models perform relatively well in our study. The economic values of recreational fishing in terms of consumer surplus (CS) are derived using non-linear and truncated models. We estimate the CS values from
Ecological Economics | 2001
Ram K. Shrestha; John B. Loomis
540.54 to
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2003
Ram K. Shrestha; John B. Loomis
869.57 per trip resulting in the total social welfare estimate range from
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2004
Ram K. Shrestha; Janaki R.R. Alavalapati
35 to
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2002
Ram K. Shrestha; Janaki R.R. Alavalapati; Taylor V. Stein; Douglas R. Carter; Christine B. Denny
56 million. The study demonstrates a relatively high value of recreational fishing in the Pantanal in comparison to similar studies conducted in other parts of the world. The findings of this study would be important for resource management decisions in the Pantanal and could serve as a reference in valuing similar resources in other ecosystems around the world.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2005
Sherry L. Larkin; Janaki R.R. Alavalapati; Ram K. Shrestha
The economic values of outdoor recreation are estimated using a benefit transfer approach in which one applies existing consumer surplus measures to value the resources at a new site. In this article, a benefit transfer study was conducted based on meta-analysis of existing research in outdoor recreation use values of the United States from 1967 to 1998. The meta-analysis method was used to estimate a meta-regression model, resulting in a benefit transfer function that could be applied to estimate a wide range of recreation activity values in other countries. The estimated meta-model was tested using original out-of-sample studies from countries around the world for international benefit transfer purposes. The tests reveal that there is mixed evidence in using meta-analysis of existing studies in outdoor recreation in the United States to value the recreational resources in other countries that are used by tourists. In the best case, 18 correlation coefficients between meta-predicted and out-of-sample values were positive and significant at the 5% level or greater, but nine of the 18 t-tests indicated a significant difference between the two sets of values at the 10% level. However, the absolute average percentage error of the meta-predictions was 28%, which may be acceptable for many benefit transfer applications.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2004
G. Andrew Stainback; Janaki R.R. Alavalapati; Ram K. Shrestha; Sherry L. Larkin; Grace Wong
A benefit transfer approach to recreationeconomic valuation using meta-analysis isexamined. Since the meta- regression modeltakes into account some of the study specificeffects on willingness to pay (WTP) estimates,benefit transfer using meta-analysis couldyield a valid WTP estimate of unstudiedrecreation resources. The convergent validityof the meta-analytic benefit transfer is testedusing out-of-sample original studies from theU.S. The analyses are performed usingpercentage difference, paired t-test,regression and correlation tests. The testsreveal mixed results on convergence betweenestimated WTP using meta-analytic benefittransfer function (BTF) and out-of-sampleoriginal WTP values. There is a fairly highpercentage difference between the estimated andoriginal WTP values (80–88%), and the meandifferences are statistically significant asshown by paired t-tests. However, correlationand regression results consistently showsignificant positive relationships betweennational BTF estimated and original WTP valuesindicating some level of convergence. Theresults show that the national BTF outperformthe regional BTF indicating a potential of thenational BTF for recreation benefit transferwhen a “first best” primary valuation study isnot affordable.
Agricultural Systems | 2004
Ram K. Shrestha; Janaki R.R. Alavalapati; R. S. Kalmbacher
Recreational hunting has been an attractive enterprise for some ranchers who are interested in supplementing their income from cattle. Ranchland attributes-such as parcel size, tree cover, and proximity to urban centers-are expected to influence hunters’ preferences and, thus, hunting lease payments. We estimated the effects of these attributes on hunting revenues using a hedonic model. The results reveal that trees and vegetation cover on ranchlands have a positive impact on hunting revenues, indicating opportunities for silvopasture practices. Those ranchers in Florida who maintain about 22% trees and other vegetation cover receive
Forest Policy and Economics | 2006
Michel Masozera; Janaki R.R. Alavalapati; Susan K. Jacobson; Ram K. Shrestha
16.15 acre per year from hunting leases, but doubling the cover would generate only an additional
Journal of Environmental Management | 2007
Ram K. Shrestha; Taylor V. Stein; Julie K. Clark
3.20 per acre per year.