Rami El Shafie

Generation of a New Disease-specific Prognostic Score for Patients With Brain Metastases From Small-cell Lung Cancer Treated With Whole Brain Radiotherapy (BMS-Score) and Validation of Two Other Indices

&NA; The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic score for patients with brain metastases from SCLC treated with WBRT (BMS‐score). The new BMS score was more prognostic than the RPA and ds‐GPA score. BMS score and RPA showed the most significant differences between classes. Introduction: Patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) demonstrate an exception in the treatment of brain metastases (BM), because in patients with SCLC whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) only is the preferred treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic score for patients with brain metastases from SCLC treated with WBRT. Patients and Methods: The present study was conducted utilizing a single‐institution, previously described, retrospective database of patients with SCLC who were treated with WBRT (n = 221). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to generate the “brain metastases from SCLC score” (BMS score) based on favorable prognostic factors: Karnofsky performance status (KPS > 70), extracerebral disease status (stable disease/controlled), and time of appearance of BM (synchronous). Furthermore, the disease‐specific graded prognostic assessment score as well as the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) were performed and compared with the new BMS score by using the log‐rank (Mantel‐Cox) test. Results: BMS score and RPA showed the most significant differences between classes (P < .001). BMS score revealed a mean overall survival (OS) of 2.62 months in group I (0‐1 points), 6.61 months in group II (2‐3 points), and 12.31 months in group III (4 points). The BMS score also identified the group with the shortest survival (2.62 months in group I), and the numbers of patients in each group were most equally distributed with the BMS score. Conclusion: The new BMS score was more prognostic than the RPA and disease‐specific graded prognostic assessment scores. The BMS score is easy to use and reflects known prognostic factors in contemporary patients with SCLC treated with WBRT. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Robotic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases Diagnosed With Either SPACE or MPRAGE Sequence (CYBER-SPACE)—A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) is recommended in oligometastatic scenarios as a less toxic treatment alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy. Recent findings support SRS for patients with multiple (>3) BM. Furthermore, advances in MR imaging have facilitated the detection of very small BM, as advances in SRS technology have facilitated the highly conformal and simultaneous treatment of multiple target lesions. OBJECTIVE To compare efficacy and toxicity of repeated frameless robotic SRS of up to 10 simultaneous BM through a single-center prospective randomized trial. METHODS Two hundred patients will be randomized and receive imaging and treatment based on either the highly sensitive SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution) or the MPRAGE (magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo) magnetic resonance imaging sequence. If during follow-up new metastases are detected, treatment is repeated. The primary endpoint is reached when a patient develops more than 10 simultaneous new BM and is thus deemed unsuitable for further SRS. Overall survival will be assessed as secondary endpoint. Quality of life and neurocognition will be evaluated every 3 mo using CANTAB tests and EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) questionnaires. EXPECTED OUTCOMES We expect to show that repeated SRS based on sensitive imaging can delay intracranial dissemination while preserving neurocognitive function and quality of life. DISCUSSION The present study is the first to prospectively assess the benefit of sensitive imaging and repeated stereotactic irradiation in the treatment of patients with multiple BM. It represents a novel approach, where in a palliative setting advanced technology in treatment and diagnostics is employed to improve tumor control while also reducing toxicity and preserving quality of life.

Evaluation of Stereotactic Radiotherapy of the Resection Cavity After Surgery of Brain Metastases Compared to Postoperative Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (ESTRON)—A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND Neurosurgical resection is recommended for symptomatic brain metastases, in oligometastatic patients or for histology acquisition. Without adjuvant radiotherapy, roughly two-thirds of the patients relapse at the resection site within 24 mo, while the risk of new metastases in the untreated brain is around 50%. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can reduce the risk of both scenarios of recurrence significantly, although the associated neurocognitive toxicity is substantial, while stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) improves local control at comparably low toxicity. OBJECTIVE To compare locoregional control and treatment-associated toxicity for postoperative SRT and WBRT after the resection of 1 brain metastasis in a single-center prospective randomized study. METHODS Fifty patients will be randomized to receive either hypofractionated SRT of the resection cavity and single- or multisession SRT of all unresected brain metastases (up to 10 lesions) or WBRT. Patients will be followed-up regularly and the primary endpoint of neurological progression-free survival will be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Quality of life and neurocognition will be assessed in 3-mo intervals using standardized tests and EORTC questionnaires. EXPECTED OUTCOMES We expect to show that postoperative SRT of the resection cavity and further unresected brain metastases is a valid means of improving locoregional control over observation at less neurocognitive toxicity than caused by WBRT. DISCUSSION The present study is the first to compare locoregional control as well as neurocognitive toxicity for postoperative SRT and WBRT in patients with up to 10 metastases, while utilizing a highly sensitive and standardized MRI protocol for treatment planning and follow-up.

Supportive Care in Radiotherapy Based on a Mobile App: Prospective Multicenter Survey

Background Consumer electronics and Web-enabled mobile devices are playing an increasing role in patient care, and their use in the oncologic sector opens up promising possibilities in the fields of supportive cancer care and systematic patient follow-up. Objective The objective of our study was to assess the acceptance and possible benefits of a mobile app–based concept for supportive care of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Methods In total, 975 patients presenting for radiotherapy due to breast or prostate cancer were screened; of them, 200 owned a smartphone and consented to participate in the survey. Patients were requested to complete a questionnaire at 2 time points: prior to the initiation (T0) and after the completion (T1) of radiotherapy. The questionnaire included questions about the habits of smartphone usage, technical knowledge and abilities of the participants, readiness to use a mobile app within the context of radiotherapy, possible features of the mobile app, and general attitude toward the different aspects of oncologic treatments. For quantitative analysis, sum scores were calculated for all areas of interest, and results were correlated with patient characteristics. Additionally, answers were quantitatively compared between time points T0 and T1. Results Median patient age was 57 (range 27-78) years. Of the 200 participants, 131 (66.2%) reported having the ability to use their smartphones with minimal to no help and 75.8% (150/200) had not used their smartphones in a medical context before. However, 73.3% (146/200) and 83.4% (166/200) of patients showed a strong interest in using a mobile app for supportive care during radiotherapy and as part of the clinical follow-up, respectively. Patients most commonly requested functionalities regarding appointment scheduling in the clinic (176/200, 88.0%) and the collection of patient-reported outcome data regarding their illness, therapy, and general well-being (130/200, 65.0%). Age was identified as the most influential factor regarding patient attitude, with patients aged <55 years being significantly more inclined toward and versed in smartphone use (P<.001). The acceptance of mobile apps was significantly higher in patients exhibiting a Karnofsky performance index <80% (P=.01). Support in the context of therapy-related side effects was judged most important by patients with poor clinical performance (P=.006). The overall acceptance of mobile apps in the context of radiotherapy surveillance was high at a median item sum score of 71.4/100 and was not significantly influenced by tumor stage, age, gender, treatment setting, or previous radiotherapies. Conclusions The acceptance of mobile apps for the surveillance and follow-up of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy is high; this high acceptance level will serve as a basis for future clinical trials investigating the clinical benefits of mobile app–based treatment support. Introduction of mobile apps into the clinical routine should be considered as an opportunity to improve and intensify supportive treatment for cancer patients.

Quality of Life and Radiation-induced Late Toxicity Following Intensity-modulatedVersusThree-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases: Results of a Randomized Trial

Background/Aim: Quality of life (QOL) is becoming increasingly important to appraise the value of a particular oncologic intervention. This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized trial (NCT02832830) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) as part of palliative management of symptomatic spinal metastases. This study examined QOL, fatigue, emotional distress, and late toxicities between patients having received IMRT versus 3DCRT. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were enrolled in this single-institutional randomized exploratory trial in which all patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The EORTC QLQ-BM22, EORTC QLQ-FA13, and QSC-R10 questionnaires were utilized to evaluate QOL, fatigue, and emotional distress, respectively; endpoints were evaluated at baseline, and at 3, and 6 months. Late (6 months) toxicities were assessed according to the LENT-SOMA criteria. Results: Mean follow-up was 192 days (IQR=77-285). Although QOL was similar between groups, patients in the IMRT arm experienced lower physical (p=0.011) and emotional (p=0.017) fatigue at 6 months. Emotional distress was also lower in IMRT-treated patients after six months (p=0.039). Cohens effect size confirmed the clinically significant improvement of these findings. Late toxicities occurred infrequently and were similar between arms. Conclusion: This is the first randomized study evaluating QOL between IMRT and 3DCRT to palliate vertebral metastases. IMRT resulted in reduced physical and emotional fatigue as well as emotional distress. IMRT should be further studied for these patients given these outcomes.

Treatment planning for MLC based robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: plan comparison with circular fields and suggestions for planning strategies

Abstract To evaluate the possible range of application of the new InCise2 MLC for the CyberKnife M6 system in brain radiosurgery, a plan comparison was made for 10 brain metastases sized between 1.5 and 9cm3 in 10 patients treated in a single fraction each. The target volumes consist of a PTV derived by expanding the GTV by 1mm and were chosen to have diversity in the cohort regarding regularity of shape, location and the structures needed to be blocked for beam transmission in the vicinity. For each case, two treatment plans were optimized: one using the MLC and one using the IRIS-collimator providing variable circular fields. Plan re-quirements were: dose prescription to the 70% isodose line (18 or 20Gy), 100% GTV coverage, ≥98% PTV coverage, undisturbed central high dose region (95% of maximum dose) and a conformity index as low as possible. Plan com-parison parameters were: conformity index (CI), high-dose gradient index (GIH), low-dose gradient index (GIL), total number of monitor units (MU) and expected treatment time (TT). For all cases, clinically acceptable plans could be gen-erated with the following results (mean±SD) for CI, GIH, GIL, MU and TT, respectively for the MLC plans: 1.09±0.03, 2.77±0.26, 2.61±0.08, 4514±830MU and 27±5min and for the IRIS plans: 1.05±0.01, 3.00±0.35, 2.46±0.08, 8557±1335MU and 42±7min. In summary, the MLC plans were on average less conformal and had a shallower dose gradient in the low dose region, but a steeper dose gradient in the high dose region. This is accompanied by a smaller vol-ume receiving 10Gy. A plan by plan comparison shows that usage of the MLC can spare about one half of the MUs and one third of treatment time. From these experiences and results suggestions for MLC planning strategy can be de-duced.