Ramsey K. Kilani

Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter?

OBJECTIVE The purposes of this study were to determine the accuracy of abdominal radiography in the detection of acute small-bowel obstruction (SBO), to assess the role of reviewer experience, and to evaluate individual radiographic signs of SBO. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed in which the subjects were 90 patients with suspected SBO who underwent CT and abdominal radiography within 48 hours of each other. The patients were enrolled from June 1, 2003, to February 2004. Twenty-nine of the patients had proven SBO. Hard-copy radiographs were reviewed by three groups of radiologists: senior staff, junior staff, and second-year radiology residents. Each reviewer evaluated the quality of the radiographs, patient position for acquisition of the radiographs, and whether SBO was present. The reviewers rated their confidence on a five-point scale and recorded the presence or absence of specific radiographic signs of SBO. Chi-square tests were used to compare the three groups. A statistically significant finding was considered p < 0.05. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were fit with a 10-point confidence scale. RESULTS The sensitivity for SBO among the six reviewers ranged from 59% to 93%. The senior staff members were significantly more accurate. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for all six reviewers were 82%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. Three radiographic signs were highly significant (p < 0.001): two or more air-fluid levels, air-fluid levels wider than 2.5 cm, and air-fluid levels differing more than 5 mm from one another in the same loop of small bowel. ROC analysis showed that senior staff is significantly more accurate than the other groups in the detection of acute SBO. CONCLUSION Our results confirmed that abdominal radiographs are accurate in the detection of acute SBO, that more-experienced radiologists are more accurate than less-experienced reviewers in the evaluation of abdominal radiographs, and that three types of air-fluid levels are highly predictive of the presence of SBO.

Physician Self-Referral of Lumbar Spine MRI With Comparative Analysis of Negative Study Rates as a Marker of Utilization Appropriateness

OBJECTIVE Financial interest in imaging equipment may affect the imaging referral patterns of ordering physicians. The purpose of this article is to determine whether ownership of MRI equipment by ordering physicians predicts the likelihood and prevalence of positive findings on lumbar spine MRI as a metric for comparison of utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive diagnostic lumbar spine MRI examinations in one radiology practice ordered by two separate referring physician groups serving the same geographic community: one with financial interest in the MRI equipment used (financial-interest group) and one without financial interest in the MRI equipment used (no-financial-interest group). Negative examinations and total number of lesions per positive study were recorded for each group. RESULTS Five hundred scans met inclusion criteria during the study period (250 in the financial-interest group and 250 in the no-financial-interest group). The negative scan frequency was 86% higher in the financial-interest group (p < 0.0001). Among positive scans, there was no significant difference in the average total number of positive lesions per scan (3.93 for the financial-interest group and 4.31 for the no-financial-interest group; p = 0.132). The average age of patients imaged by the financial-interest group was 49.8 years, versus 56.9 years for the no-financial-interest group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Lumbar spine MRI examinations referred by the financial-interest group were significantly more likely to be negative than those referred by the no-financial-interest group. Lesion frequency among positive scans suggests similar severity of disease between the two patient populations. Patients imaged by the financial-interest group were significantly younger than those imaged by the no-financial-interest group.

CT fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar steroid injections: safety, technique, and radiation dose parameters.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical epidural steroid injections are approached with trepidation because of concerns over safety, including direct spinal cord injury. CT fluoroscopy is an alternative to conventional fluoroscopy that could potentially help reduce the risk of injury by providing improved localization of the needle tip. We sought to determine rates of technical success and risk of complications in our initial cohort of patients treated with cervical interlaminar ESI performed under CTF guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we reviewed procedural details and CTF images of 53 consecutive cervical interlaminar ESIs performed on 50 patients over a period of 8 months. Rates of technical success, incidence of complications, procedure times, and factors that influence radiation exposure were examined. RESULTS: No symptomatic procedural complications were observed. A single case of intrathecal contrast injection was observed, from which the patient was asymptomatic. The remaining injections were all technically successful. Injections were performed at every cervical level, as high as C1-C2. Total procedure times averaged less than 20 minutes. Average CT fluoroscopic time was 24 seconds and median tube current was 70 mA. CONCLUSIONS: CTF-guided cervical interlaminar ESI can be performed at all levels in the cervical spine with a low rate of procedural complications. Short total procedure times, CT-fluoroscopy times, and reduced tube current make this procedure a practical alternative to cervical ESI performed under conventional fluoroscopy.

CT Fluoroscopy–Assisted Cervical Transforaminal Steroid Injection: Tips, Traps, and Use of Contrast Material

OBJECTIVE CT fluoroscopy-assisted cervical transforaminal steroid injection is an effective therapeutic option for cervical radiculopathy, yet it is approached with trepidation by some interventionalists. CT fluoroscopy is superior to conventional fluoroscopy for delineating complex anatomic relations in the neck but must be combined with careful technique to avoid rare but serious complications. We describe the anatomy of the neural foramen, our technique of CT fluoroscopy-assisted cervical transforaminal steroid injection, and the CT appearance of appropriate and inappropriate needle positions. CONCLUSION Understanding anatomy will help to avoid complications and optimize the therapeutic potential of cervical transforaminal steroid injection. Use of contrast material for CT fluoroscopic guidance facilitates appropriate needle positioning and reduces the risk of complications.

DWI findings of optic nerve ischemia in the setting of central retinal artery occlusion.

A 67‐year‐old African‐American male with untreated hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus presented with sudden, staggering, progressive loss of vision in his left eye over the course of 8 days. Ophthalmologic and fluorescein angiography exams confirmed central retinal artery conclusion, but revealed no embolus. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain serendipitously revealed restricted diffusion within the distal left optic nerve, illustrating a more proximal occlusion, which matched the fluorescein angiographic findings. Extensive workup revealed no embolic source, postulating primary hypertension as the underlying etiology.

Physician Self-Referral: Frequency of Negative Findings at MR Imaging of the Knee as a Marker of Appropriate Utilization

PURPOSE To determine whether ownership of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging equipment by ordering physicians affects the likelihood of positive findings at MR imaging of the knee and to evaluate rates of knee abnormalities seen at MR imaging as a metric for comparison of utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study and waived the need for informed consent. A retrospective review was performed of consecutive diagnostic MR images of the knee interpreted by one radiology practice between January and April 2009 for patients who had been referred by two separate physician groups serving the same geographic community: one with financial interest (FI) in the MR imaging equipment used and one with no FI (NFI) in the MR imaging equipment used. The percentage of examinations with negative results was tabulated for both groups, and the relative frequency of each abnormality subtype was calculated among the studies with positive findings in each group. To examine frequency differences among groups, χ(2) tests were used, and to examine mean differences among groups, t tests were used. RESULTS Of 700 examinations, 205 had negative results (117 of 350 in the FI group and 88 of 350 in the NFI group, P = .016). Among the examinations with positive results, the mean total number of positive abnormality subtypes per image did not significantly differ between groups: 1.52 for the FI group and 1.53 for the NFI group (P = .96). CONCLUSION MR images of the knee among patients referred by the FI group were significantly more likely to be negative than those among patients referred by the NFI group. Frequency of abnormality subtype and distribution among examinations with positive results suggests a highly similar distribution and severity of abnormalities between the two patient groups.

JOURNAL CLUB: Shoulder MRI Utilization: Relationship of Physician MRI Equipment Ownership to Negative Study Frequency

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to determine whether ownership of MRI equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative shoulder MRI scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed of 1140 consecutive shoulder MRI scans ordered by two separate referring physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group (financially incentivized) owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use. The second group (non-financially incentivized) did not own the scanners used and had no direct financial interest. All examinations were performed with identical protocols and were interpreted by a single radiologist group without financial interest in the imaging equipment used. The frequency of negative examinations and the number of abnormalities in each positive study was tabulated for each group. RESULTS A total of 1140 shoulder MRI scans met inclusion criteria; 255 were negative (142 for the financially incentivized group and 113 for the non-financially incentivized group). There were 25.6% more negative scans in the financially incentivized group (p=0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in the average number of lesions per positive scan (1.67 for the financially incentivized group and 1.71 for the non-financially incentivized group; p=0.34). No statistically significant difference was found in the frequency of 19 of 20 examined lesions. CONCLUSION Shoulder MRI examinations referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to be negative. Positive examinations exhibited no statistically significant difference in the number of lesions per scan or in the frequency of 19 of 20 lesion subtypes. This finding suggests a highly similar distribution and severity of disease among the two patient groups.

Intracranial Abscess as a Complication of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis

This case involves a common disease, allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), with the uncommon complication of intracranial abscess. Although AFS is known to result in bone erosion, invasive complications are rare.

Gliosarcoma Metastatic to the Leptomeninges and Dura

We describe a rare case of a patient with left frontotemporal gliosarcoma, which metastasized through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to the leptomeninges and pachymeninges. Pathologically confirmed, magnetic resonance imaging‐visible leptomeningeal spread of gliosarcoma via the CSF has not been previously reported.

Imaging Self-Referral: Here We Go Again

AJR 2013; 201:W658 0361–803X/13/2014–W658