Randal R. Betz

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis

Background: The lack of a reliable, universally acceptable system for classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has made comparisons between various types of operative treatment an impossible task. Furthermore, long‐term outcomes cannot be determined because of the great variations in the description of study groups. Methods: We developed a new classification system with three components: curve type (1 through 6), a lumbar spine modifier (A, B, or C), and a sagittal thoracic modifier (-, N, or +). The six curve types have specific characteristics, on coronal and sagittal radiographs, that differentiate structural and nonstructural curves in the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar regions. The lumbar spine modifier is based on the relationship of the center sacral vertical line to the apex of the lumbar curve, and the sagittal thoracic modifier is based on the sagittal curve measurement from the fifth to the twelfth thoracic level. A minus sign represents a curve of less than +10°, N represents a curve of 10° to 40°, and a plus sign represents a curve of more than +40°.Five surgeons, members of the Scoliosis Research Society who had developed the new system and who had previously tested the reliability of the King classification on radiographs of twenty‐seven patients, measured the same radiographs (standing coronal and lateral as well as supine side-bending views) to test the reliability of the new classification. A randomly chosen independent group of seven surgeons, also members of the Scoliosis Research Society, tested the reliability and validity of the classification as well. Results: The interobserver and intraobserver kappa values for the curve type were, respectively, 0.92 and 0.83 for the five developers of the system and 0.740 and 0.893 for the independent group of seven scoliosis surgeons. In the independent group, the mean interobserver and intraobserver kappa values were 0.800 and 0.840 for the lumbar modifier and 0.938 and 0.970 for the sagittal thoracic modifier. These kappa values were all in the good-to-excellent range (>0.75), except for the interobserver reliability of the independent group for the curve type (kappa = 0.74), which fell just below this level. Conclusions: This new two-dimensional classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, as tested by two groups of surgeons, was shown to be much more reliable than the King system. Additional studies are necessary to determine the versatility, reliability, and accuracy of the classification for defining the vertebrae to be included in an arthrodesis.

Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective study of two cohort groups of patients (one group receiving anterior instrumentation and the other posterior instrumentation) receiving treatment for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVE To present the 2-year postoperative results of a prospective multicenter study comparing the use of anterior instrumentation with that of posterior multisegmented hook instrumentation for the correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Despite reports of satisfactory results, problems have been reported with posterior systems, including worsening of the lumbar curve after surgery and failure to correct hypokyphosis. Theoretically, the advantages of anterior instrumentation include prevention of lumbar curve decompensation by shortening the convexity of the thoracic curve. In addition, by removing the disc, better correction of thoracic hypokyphosis could be obtained. METHODS Seventy-eight patients who underwent an anterior spinal fusion using flexible threaded rods and nuts (Harms-MOSS instrumentation, De Puy-Motech-Acromed, Cleveland, OH) were analyzed and compared with 100 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with multisegmented hook systems. Parameters of comparison included coronal and sagittal correction, balance, distal lumbar fusion levels, and complication. All patients had idiopathic thoracic curves of King Types II to V. The average age at surgery was 14 years in each group, the average preoperative curve 57 degrees, and the minimum duration of follow-up for all patients 24 months. All data were collected prospectively and analyzed via Epl into statistical analysis (Centers of Disease Control, Atlanta, GA). RESULTS Average coronal correction of the main thoracic curve was 58% in the anterior group and 59% in the posterior group (P = 0.92). Analysis of sagittal contour showed that the posterior systems failed to correct a preoperative hypokyphosis (sagittal T5 to T12 less than 20 degrees) in 60% of cases, whereas 81% were normal postoperatively in the anterior group. However, hyperkyphosis (sagittal T5 to T12 greater than 40 degrees) occurred after surgery in 40% of the anterior group when the preoperative kyphosis was greater than 20 degrees. Postoperative coronal balance was equal in both groups. An average of 2.5 (range, 0-6) distal fusion levels were saved using the anterior spinal instrumentation according to the criteria used for determining posterior fusion levels in this study. Selective fusion of the thoracic curve (distal fusion level T11, T12, L1) was performed in 76 of 78 patients (97%) in the anterior group as compared with only 18 of 100 (18%) in the posterior group. Surgically confirmed pseudarthrosis occurred in 4 of 78 patients (5%) in the anterior group and in 1 of 100 patients (1%) in the posterior group (P = 0.10). Loss of correction greater than 10 degrees occurred in 18 of 78 patients (23%) in the anterior group and in 12 of 100 patients (12%) in the posterior group (P = 0.01). Implant breakage occurred in 24 patients (31%) of the anterior group and in only 1 patient (1%) of the posterior group. CONCLUSIONS 1) Coronal correction and balance were equal in both the anterior and posterior groups, even though the anterior group had the majority of curves (97%) fused short or to L1, whereas only 18% were fused short or to L1 in the posterior group. 2) In the anterior group there was a better correction of sagittal profile in those with a preoperative hypokyphosis less than 20 degrees. However, hyperkyphosis (with a mean of 54 degrees) occurred in 40% of those in the anterior group with a preoperative kyphosis of more than 20 degrees. 3) An average of 2.5 lumbar levels can be saved with anterior fusion and instrumentation according to the criteria used for choosing posterior fusion levels in this study. 4) Using the 3.2-mm flexible rod in this study, loss of correction, pseudarthrosis, and rod breakage were unacceptably highe

Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth.

Study Design. Prospective study of the sagittal plane alignment of the spine and pelvis in the normal pediatric population. Objectives. To document the sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis and its change during growth in the normal pediatric population. Summary of Background Data. Pelvic morphology as well as sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the pediatric population are poorly defined in the literature. Methods. Five parameters were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs of 180 normal study participants 4 to 18 years of age: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student t tests and Pearson’s coefficients (level of significance = 0.01). Results. The mean thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence values were 43.0°, 48.5°, 41.2°, 7.2° and 48.4°, respectively. There was no significant difference between males and females. Thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence were found to be weakly correlated with age, while sacral slope remained stable with growth. Conclusions. Pelvic morphology, as measured by the pelvic incidence angle, tends to increase during childhood and adolescence before stabilizing into adulthood, most likely to maintain an adequate sagittal balance in view of the physiologic and morphologic changes occurring during growth. Pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis, two position-dependent parameters, also react by increasing with age, most likely to avoid inadequate anterior displacement of the body center of gravity. Sacral slope is achieved with the standing posture and is not further significantly influenced by age. These results are important to establish baseline values for these measurementsin the pediatric population, in view of the reported association between pelvic morphology and the development of various spinal disorders such as spondylolisthesis and scoliosis.

Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of anterior and posterior fusions for treatment of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES To evaluate both the instrumented thoracic and the spontaneous lumbar curve corrections after treatment of the primary thoracic scoliosis by either anterior or posterior fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Recent reports of thoracic scoliosis fusions have concentrated on the thoracic correction obtained by posterior segmental instrumentation systems. Coronal decompensation occurring because of curve progression with imbalance of the unfused lumbar spine has also been investigated. No report comparing spontaneous lumbar curve response after selective anterior versus posterior thoracic scoliosis fusions are available. METHODS One hundred twenty-three cases of primary thoracic-compensatory lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were treated by selective thoracic instrumentation and fusion with either an anterior (n = 70) or posterior (n = 53) single approach. Thoracic and lumbar Cobb measurements and lumbar apical translation parameters were assessed before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and 2 years after surgery on upright coronal radiographs. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS At 2-year follow-up, the percentage of thoracic curve correction was superior for the anterior (58%) versus the posterior (38%) group (P < 0.05), whereas the spontaneous lumbar curve correction was also superior for the anterior (56%) group versus the posterior (37%) group for all curve types investigated (P < 0.05). Both treatment groups consistently improved lumbar apical positioning after the thoracic fusion procedure. CONCLUSIONS Spontaneous lumbar curve correction occurs consistently after both selective anterior and posterior thoracic fusion implying intrinsic ability of the lumbar spine to follow thoracic spine correction. In the current study, using multisegmented hook-rod systems posteriorly with intentional limitation of posterior thoracic correction to avoid decompensation, instrumented thoracic and spontaneous lumbar curve correction was statistically better after anterior thoracic instrumentation and fusion, with the results most dramatic for lumbar curve Type C (true King II curves).

An Innovative Technique of Vertebral Body Stapling for the Treatment of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis : A Feasibility, Safety, and Utility Study

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objectives. To report the feasibility, safety, and utility of vertebral body stapling without fusion as an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The success rate of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ranges from 50% to 82%. However, poor self-image and brace compliance are issues for the patient. An alternative method of treatment such as a motion-preserving vertebral body stapling to provide curve stability would be desirable. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients (27 curves) with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with vertebral body stapling. Patients were immature as defined by Risser sign ≤2. Results. The concept of vertebral body stapling of the convex side of a patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is feasible. The procedure was safe, with no major complications and three minor complications. One patient had an intraoperative segmental vein bleed resulting in an increased estimated blood loss of 1500 cc as compared to the average estimated blood loss of 247 cc for all patients. One patient had a chylothorax and one pancreatitis. No patient has had a staple dislodge or move during the follow-up period (mean 11 months, range 3–36 months), and no adverse effects specifically from the staples have been identified. Utility (defined as curve stability) was evaluated in 10 patients with stapling with greater than 1-year follow-up (mean 22.6 months) and preoperative curve <50°. Progression of ≥6° or beyond 50° was considered a failure of treatment. Of these 10 patients, 6 (60%) remained stable or improved and 4 (40%) progressed. One of 10 (10%) in the stapling group had progressed beyond 50° and went on to fusion. Six patients required stapling of a second curve, three as part of the primary surgery, and three as a second stage, because a second untreated curve progressed. The results need to be considered with caution, as the follow-up is still short. Conclusions. The data demonstrate that vertebral body stapling for the treatment of scoliosis in the adolescent was feasible and safe in this group of 21 patients. In the short-term, stapling appears to have utility in stabilizing curves of progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Classification of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The system described by King et al. is the standard method for the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although it is widely used and referenced, its reliability and reproducibility among scoliosis surgeons are unknown. We used a scoliosis case-presentation format to examine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the system of King et al. Eight active, current members of the Scoliosis Research Society reviewed twenty-seven full-length radiographs that had been made before operative correction of the scoliotic deformity. On the basis of these images, which included posteroanterior and lateral radiographs made with the patient standing as well as right and left forced-side-bending radiographs made with the patient supine, the reviewers assigned a type to each curve according to the classification system of King et al. Kappa coefficients were used to test statistical reliability. The mean interobserver reliability of the classification was only 64 per cent (range, 54 to 77 per cent) when the responses of seven of the reviewers were compared with those of one of the originators of the classification. The mean kappa coefficient was 0.49 (range, 0.27 to 0.73), which indicates poor reliability. When each reviewers responses were compared with those of the other reviewers, the reliability was similarly poor (interobserver reliability, 55 per cent [range, 33 to 81 per cent] and mean kappa coefficient, 0.40 [range, 0.21 to 0.63]). Intraobserver reliability was evaluated in a trial in which five reviewers in a group setting were shown the same radiographs in a different order at two different viewings. Comparison of the results at the two viewings revealed a mean intraobserver reliability of 69 per cent (range, 56 to 85 per cent) and a mean kappa coefficient of 0.62 (range, 0.34 to 0.95), which indicates fair reliability. The current method of classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not appear to have sufficient intraobserver or interobserver reliability among scoliosis surgeons to portray curve types accurately. Thus, it may not help to guide treatment with use of modern spinal fixation methods.

Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions.

Autogenous cancellous bone is widely regarded as an ideal construct for graft procedures, supplying osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and a structural scaffold. However, procurement morbidity and constraints on obtainable quantities limit its use. Allograft is the next best alternative at present; however, minor immunogenic rejection and risk of disease transmission are unresolved issues. Although synthetic grafting materials eliminate these risks, these materials do not transfer osteoinductive or osteogenic elements to the host site. To offer the advantages of autograft and allograft, a composite graft may be considered. Such a graft can combine a synthetic scaffold with biologic elements to stimulate cell infiltration and new bone formation.

Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN For this retrospective study, preoperative and postoperative radiographs of posterior spinal fusions for idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence and possible causes of proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Proximal kyphosis has been anecdotally noted after the insertion of Harrington rods and after use of the new posterior multisegmented hook/rod systems. In this study no attempt was made to determine whether this condition is painful or an adverse outcome for the patient or just a radiographic abnormality; however, it is suspected that this may be a problem in the long term, and it may be worthwhile to try to avoid it if predictive values can be ascertained. METHODS Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who had undergone posterior spinal fusion not extending above T3 with good-quality radiographs of the proximal thoracic spine and a minimum 2-year follow-up were studied. Of the 106 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion from 1990 through 1994, 69 met the inclusion criteria. Abnormal kyphosis from T2 to the proximal level of the instrumented fusion was defined as kyphosis of more than 5 degrees above the summed normal angular segments. RESULTS Of 69 patients, 37 (54%) had normal proximal kyphosis, and 32 (46%) of the 69 were defined as having abnormal proximal kyphosis. In the 32 patients with abnormal proximal kyphosis, the measurement from T2 to the fusion was 10.3 degrees before surgery and 21.2 degrees after surgery. The normal group had kyphosis measuring 2.7 degrees from T2 to fusion before surgery and 5.3 degrees after surgery (P < 0.00001). Junctional kyphosis in the kyphosis group measured 6.5 degrees before surgery and 12.6 degrees after surgery, compared with normal kyphosis of 1.7 degrees and 2.6 degrees, respectively (P < 0.00001). When analyzing who would develop proximal kyphosis, preoperative one-level junctional kyphosis of more than 5 degrees above the proposed proximal instrumented vertebrae was shown to have the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (84%). CONCLUSIONS In this study, 32 (46%) of 69 patients had abnormal proximal kyphosis after undergoing posterior spinal fusion. A preoperative junctional kyphosis of more than 5 degrees above the proposed proximal instrumented vertebrae indicates that extending the fusion to a higher level in the thoracic spine would be beneficial in avoiding this problem.

Prospective pulmonary function evaluation following open thoracotomy for anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Study Design. Prospective study. Objectives. To prospectively evaluate sequential pulmonary function tests (PFTs) at a minimum 2-year follow-up after an open anterior spinal fusion (ASF) with instrumentation for thoracic AIS. Summary of Background Data. Anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation is currently undergoing evaluation as an alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the effect of an open thoracotomy on pulmonary function in these patients is unknown. Methods. Fifty-one patients with thoracic AIS with an average age of 15+0 (range 11+2 to 20+5) had PFTs consisting of volume (FVC), flow (FEV-1), and total lung capacity (TLC). Parameters were obtained preoperatively, and at 3 months, 1 year, and a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients had a single or double open thoracotomy with the diaphragm kept intact. Fusion levels ranged from T4 (most proximal) to L1 (most distal). The average preoperative thoracic coronal Cobb measurement was 53° (range 38° to 80°), and the average postoperative coronal measurement was 24° (range 7° to 49°). The average preoperative thoracic sagittal kyphosis (T5–T12) averaged 22° (range 10° to 58°), and the average postoperative sagittal kyphosis measured 29° (range 7° to 67°). Results. There was a significant decline (P ≤0.05) in PFT absolute values (L) of 19%-FVC, 15%-FEV-1, and 11%-TLC at 3 months postoperatively with subsequent improvement and no statistical difference between preoperative and 2-year postoperative values. When evaluating percent predicted values, there was a statistical decline (P ≤0.05) at 3 months postoperatively averaging 19% FVC, 14% FEV-1, and 12% TLC. These values returned to within 94% to 96% of baseline by the 2-year follow-up visit, but were still statistically less than the preoperative values (P ≤0.05). Conclusions. Pulmonary function following thoracotomy with ASF with instrumentation demonstrated a significant decline of 3-month postoperative PFT values, but returned to preoperative baseline absolute values (L) by the 2-year follow-up visit. The percent predicted values returned to within 95% of baseline 2 years postoperatively. Scoliosis surgeons should be aware of these findings when deciding upon the approach (anterior versusposterior) utilized for thoracic AIS.

A Multicenter Study of the Outcomes of the Surgical Treatment Of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcome Instrument

Study Design. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS 24). Objective. To evaluate the patient based outcome of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. A paucity of information exists with respect to patient measures of outcome regarding the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. To our knowledge, no prospective outcome study on this topic thus far exists. Methods. Using the SRS 24 questionnaire, seven scoliosis centers agreed to prospectively assess outcome for surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data were collected before surgery and at 24 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using paired and independent samples t test for all seven SRS 24 questionnaire domains (Pain, General Self-Image, Postoperative Self-Image, Postoperative Function, Function From Back Condition, General Level of Activity, and Satisfaction) using Statistical Package for Social Science. The domains were analyzed with respect to the total cohort, gender, curve magnitude, and type of surgery using independent-samples t tests. Results. A total of 242 patients were included in our analysis. A baseline preoperative pain level of 3.68 of 5 was found. This improved to 4.63 after surgery, representing an improvement of 0.95 points. Surgical intervention was associated with improving outcome when compared with preoperative status. Pain, General Self-Image, Function From Back Condition, and Level of Activity all demonstrated statistically significant improvement as compared with preoperative status (P < 0. 001). Overall, patients were highly satisfied with the results of surgery. Conclusion. Preoperative pain exists in our adolescent scoliosis population. Pain scores were improved in our study population at the 2-year postsurgical follow-up. Statistically significant improvements were likewise seen in the General Self-Image, Function From Back Condition, and Level of Activity domains. The present study demonstrates the ability of surgery to improve the outcome of patients afflicted with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.