Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Randal S. Weber is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Randal S. Weber.


American Journal of Pathology | 2000

Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Promoter Activity Is Induced Coincident with Invasion during Tumor Progression

Michael E. Kupferman; M. Elizabeth Fini; William J. Muller; Randal S. Weber; Yi Cheng; Ruth J. Muschel

Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9, also known as gelatinase B or 92-kd Type IV collagenase) is overexpressed in many human and murine cancers. We induced carcinomas in mice carrying a transgene that links the MMP-9 promoter to the reporter ss-galactosidase so that activation of the MMP-9 promoter would be indicated by ss-galactosidase. Mammary carcinomas were induced by mating the MMP-9 promoter reporter transgenic mice with mice carrying a transgene for murine mammary tumor virus promoter linked to polyoma middle T antigen, a transgene that leads to rapid development of mammary tumors in female mice. None of the hyperplastic mammary glands and none of the carcinomas in situ expressed ss-galactosidase. However, all invasive tumors had evidence of ss-galactosidase expression. In addition to the breast carcinomas, a malignant teratoma in a female and a papillary adenocarcinoma in the pelvic region of a male arose and were also ss-galactosidase positive. We also induced skin tumors in the mice with the MMP-9 reporter transgene with 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) treatment followed by phorbol 12 myristate 13-acetate (TPA). None of the papillomas or in situ carcinomas showed any ss-galactosidase expression, but expression was seen in invasive carcinoma. Although normal skin epithelial cells did not express ss-galactosidase, we did find staining in a few cells at the duct of the sebaceous gland at the base of the hair follicles. The MMP-9 reporter transgene did not lead to expression in the alveolar macrophages, confirming that additional upstream sequences are required for expression in macrophages. These experiments have revealed that MMP-9 promoter activity is induced coincident with invasion during tumor progression. Furthermore, this indicates that the more proximal upstream elements of the promoter are sufficient for MMP-9 transcription during tumor progression.


American Journal of Rhinology | 1999

Malignant tumors of the nose and paranasal sinuses: Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania experience 1990-1997

Ralph P. Tufano; Nahush A. Mokadam; Kathleen T. Montone; Gregory S. Weinstein; Ara A. Chalian; Patricia F. Wolf; Randal S. Weber

We reviewed our experience with sinonasal malignancies, which comprise less than 1% of all cancers, in order to determine the spectrum of disease and outcome after treatment. The medical records of 48 patients with sinonasal malignancies treated between 1990–1997 were reviewed for epidemiologic characteristics, tumor location and histology, treatment modalities, and tumor recurrence. Mean age was 58.5 years and 46% were male. Multiple sites of origin were common, including maxillary sinus (83%), ethmoid sinus (35%), and nasal cavity (40%). The histologic spectrum included squamous cell carcinoma (46%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (6%), and miscellaneous others (48%). Treatment included surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT) (58%), surgery alone (27%), XRT and chemotherapy (6%), surgery and chemotherapy (4%), and XRT alone (4%). Mean follow-up was 15 months (range 2–58). Recurrence was evident in nine patients (19%), 3 (33%) of whom had prior treatment before presenting to HUP. Of the six who recurred after initial treatment at HUP, five (83.3%) were treated with surgery and XRT and one (16.7%) was treated with surgery alone. Of the three that recurred after undergoing attempts at salvage (prior treatment and then treatment at HUP), one had received surgery alone followed by surgery and XRT, one had surgery and XRT followed by surgery and one had XRT followed by surgery alone. Our experience reveals surgery and XRT to be the modality of choice, particularly for advanced tumors, whereas surgery alone may be sufficient for small, well localized tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may offer improved local control; the future role of endoscopic surgery warrants further investigation.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Survival impact of planned restaging and early surgical salvage following definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx and hypopharynx

Sue S. Yom; Mitchell Machtay; Merrill A. Biel; Robert J. Sinard; Adel K. El-Naggar; Randal S. Weber; David I. Rosenthal

Objectives:Patients who have received definitive radiation therapy (RT) for a nonlaryngeal T3/4 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have a limited opportunity for post-RT surgical salvage. The authors reviewed the practice of planned post-RT restaging to determine its impact on the success of early surgical salvage. Methods:A retrospective review was performed for patients with resectable T3/4 cancers of the oropharynx and hypopharynx treated with RT ± chemotherapy who underwent planned restaging clinically, radiographically (CT or MRI), and by direct laryngoscopy with biopsy at 4 to 8 weeks post-RT. Chemotherapy was given as induction, concurrently, or both. Neck dissection was performed at time of restaging in patients with primary tumor control and initial N2/N3 neck disease or persistent lymphadenopathy. Results:A total of 54 patients had a median follow-up of 34.7 months (range, 7.6–97.8 months). Forty-two patients (78.8%) achieved a complete response (CR) at the primary site immediately after RT. Six developed late local failure at 9 to 61 months, of whom 2 were successfully salvaged. The ultimate 2-year local control among patients with initial CR was 94.8%. The 2-year organ preservation, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were was 92.5%, 87%, and 90%, respectively. Twelve patients did not achieve initial CR. Two patients with bulky stage IV disease had unresectable cancers. Ten underwent immediate surgical salvage and 7 achieved local control (1 of whom developed distant metastases) whereas 3 had continued local failure. For patients without initial CR, the 2-year ultimate local control rate was 46.7% and OS was 46.8%. For all patients, overall 2-year local control, organ preservation, and OS rates were 85.6%, 75.6%, and 81.8% respectively. The rate of local failure-free organ preservation was 71.5%. Conclusion:For patients with T3/4 resectable nonlaryngeal head and neck cancers, planned clinical, radiographic, and pathologic restaging at 1 to 2 months after definitive RT provides the opportunity for early surgical salvage in those who fail at the primary site. This practice produces improved overall local control and survival rates compared with the literature reports for delayed attempted salvage with timing based on the findings of routine postradiation clinical surveillance. Future efforts may focus on the improved selection of patients who would be most likely to require early surgical intervention.


Abstracts: AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Optimizing Survival and Quality of Life through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; April 23-25, 2017; San Diego, CA | 2017

Abstract 21: Grading dysphagia as a toxicity of head and neck cancer: Differences in severity classification based on MBS DIGEST and clinical CTCAE grades

Ryan P. Goepfert; Jan S. Lewin; Martha P. Barrow; Carla L. Warneke; Clifton D. Fuller; Stephen Y. Lai; Randal S. Weber; Katherine A. Hutcheson

Background: Clinician-reported toxicity grading through Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) stages dysphagia based on symptoms, diet, and tube dependence. The new Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) tool offers a similarly scaled 5-point ordinal summary grade of pharyngeal swallowing as determined through results of a modified barium swallow (MBS) study. This study aims to inform clinicians on the similarities and differences between dysphagia severity according to clinical CTCAE and MBS-derived DIGEST grading. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 95 MBS studies was randomly selected from a prospectively-acquired MBS database among patients treated with organ preservation strategies for head and neck cancer. MBS DIGEST and clinical CTCAE dysphagia grades were compared. Results: DIGEST and CTCAE dysphagia grades had “fair” agreement per weighted k of 0.358 (95% CI .231-.485). Using a threshold of DIGEST ≥3 as reference, CTCAE had an overall sensitivity of 0.50, specificity of 0.84, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 to identify severe MBS-detected dysphagia. At less than 6 months, sensitivity was 0.72, specificity was 0.76, and AUC was 0.75 while at greater than 6 months, sensitivity was 0.22, specificity was 0.90, and AUC was 0.56 for CTCAE to detect dysphagia as determined by DIGEST. Conclusions: Classification of pharyngeal dysphagia on MBS using DIGEST augments our understanding of dysphagia severity according to the clinically derived CTCAE while maintaining the simplicity of an ordinal scale. DIGEST likely complements CTCAE toxicity grading through improved specificity for physiologic dysphagia in the acute-phase and improved sensitivity for dysphagia in the late-phase. Citation Format: Ryan P. Goepfert, Jan S. Lewin, Martha P. Barrow, Carla L. Warneke, Clifton D. Fuller, Stephen Y. Lai, Randal S. Weber, Katherine A. Hutcheson. Grading dysphagia as a toxicity of head and neck cancer: Differences in severity classification based on MBS DIGEST and clinical CTCAE grades [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Optimizing Survival and Quality of Life through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; April 23-25, 2017; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(23_Suppl):Abstract nr 21.


Head and Neck Cancer#R##N#Emerging Perspectives | 2003

Chapter 28 – Thyroid Cancer

Stephen Y. Lai; Randal S. Weber

Publisher Summary nThis chapter begins with a review of the present understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms leading to thyroid cancer. After a brief review of the risk factors and staging of thyroid carcinomas, it discusses an algorithm for the evaluation of a thyroid nodule and the available diagnostic tools. A review of the different forms of thyroid cancer, ranging from well-differentiated carcinomas to anaplastic and other less common malignancies, is followed by a discussion of surgical management and postoperative adjuvant treatment. Although thyroid cancer is relatively rare, the incidence of thyroid nodules is significantly higher. Exposure to ionizing radiation increases a patients risk for the development of thyroid carcinoma. Although higher doses of ionizing radiation typically lead to the destruction of thyroid tissue, Hodgkins disease patients who receive 4000 cGy also have a higher incidence of thyroid cancer. A patient with a history of radiation exposure who presents with a thyroid nodule has up to a 50% chance of having a malignancy. Similarly, patients exposed to radiation from nuclear weapons and accidents have a higher incidence of thyroid cancer. Surgery is the primary modality for the treatment of thyroid carcinomas. Prior to any thyroid surgery, any voice changes or previous neck surgery should prompt an assessment of vocal-cord mobility by indirect laryngoscopy. Although many patients with thyroid carcinomas are euthyroid, necessary medical therapy should be instituted for patients demonstrating thyrotoxicosis or hypothyroidism to avoid intraoperative metabolic derangements, such as hypertensive crisis. The primary goals of surgical treatment should be to eradicate primary disease, to reduce the incidence of local/distant recurrence, and to facilitate the treatment of metastases, which should be achieved with minimal morbidity.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2002

Local recurrence in head and neck cancer: Relationship to radiation resistance and signal transduction

Anjali K. Gupta; W. Gillies McKenna; Charles N. Weber; Michael Feldman; Jeffrey D. Goldsmith; Rosemarie Mick; Mitchell Machtay; David I. Rosenthal; Vincent J. Bakanauskas; George J. Cerniglia; Eric J. Bernhard; Randal S. Weber; Ruth J. Muschel


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2004

Pilot study of postoperative reirradiation, chemotherapy, and amifostine after surgical salvage for recurrent head-and-neck cancer

Mitchell Machtay; David I. Rosenthal; Ara A. Chalian; Robert H. Lustig; Diane Hershock; Linda Miller; Gregory S. Weinstein; Randal S. Weber


American Journal of Otolaryngology | 2001

Advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy: Oncologic outcome and functional assessment

Albert S. DeNittis; Mitchell Machtay; David I. Rosenthal; Nicholas J. Sanfilippo; Jason H. Lee; Sarah Goldfeder; Ara A. Chalian; Gregory S. Weinstein; Randal S. Weber


Archive | 2010

Management of Thyroid Neoplasms

Stephen Y. Lai; Susan J. Mandel; Randal S. Weber


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2006

30 : Prediction of Neck Dissection (ND) Requirement Following Definitive Radiotherapy (RT) for Head And Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

Juliette Thariat; Anesa Ahamad; Adam S. Garden; Pamela K. Allen; William H. Morrison; David N. Rosenthal; Randal S. Weber; Lawrence E. Ginsberg; Adel K. El-Naggar; K.K. Ang

Collaboration


Dive into the Randal S. Weber's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David I. Rosenthal

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mitchell Machtay

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen Y. Lai

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam S. Garden

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ara A. Chalian

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K.K. Ang

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clifton D. Fuller

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jatin P. Shah

Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge