Randall W. Smith

Open versus Laparoscopie Cholecystectomy a Comparison of Postoperative Pulmonary Function

Upper abdominal surgery is associated with characteristic changes in pulmonary function which increase the risk of lower lobe atelectasis. Sixteen patients undergoing open cholecystectomy and 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively evaluated by pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume [FEV-1], and forced expiratory flow [FEF] 25% to 75%) before operation and on the morning after surgery to determine if the laparoscopic technique lessens the pulmonary risk. Fraction of the baseline pulmonary function was calculated by dividing the postoperative pulmonary function by the preoperative pulmonary function and multiplying by 100%. Postoperative FVC measured 52% of preoperative function for open cholecystectomy and 73% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p = 0.002). Postoperative FEV-1 measured 53% of baseline function for open cholecystectomy and 72% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p = 0.006). Postoperative FEF 25% to 75% measured 53% for open cholecystectomy and 81% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p = 0.07). It is concluded that laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers improved pulmonary function compared to the open technique.

A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

ObjectiveThe authors determined whether there was an advantage to laparoscopic appendectomy when compared with open appendectomy. Summary/Background DataThe advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy were questioned because the recovery from open appendectomy is brief. MethodsFrom January 15, 1992 through January 15, 1993, 75 patients older than 9 years were entered into a study randomizing the choice of operation to either the open or the laparoscopic technique. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test. ResultsThirty-seven patients were assigned to the open appendectomy group and 38 patients were assigned to the laparoscopic appendectomy group. Two patients were converted intraoperatively from laparoscopic appendectomies to open procedures. Thirty-one patients (81%) in the open group had acute appendicitis, as did 32 patients (84%) in the laparoscopic group. Mean duration of surgery was 65 minutes for open appendectomy and 87 minutes for laparoscopic appendectomy (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in length of hospilalization, interval until resumption of a regular diet, or morbidity. Duration of both parenteral and oral analgesic use favored laparoscopic appendectomy (2.0 days versus 1.2 days, and 8.0 days versus 5.4 days, p < 0.05). All patients were instructed to return to full activities by 2 weeks postoperatively. This occurred at an average of 25 days for the open appendectomy group versus 14 days for the laparoscopic appendectomy group (p < 0.001). ConclusionsPatients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomies have a shorter duration of analgesic use and return to full activities sooner postoperatively when compared with patients who underwent open appendectomies. The authors consider laparoscopic appendectomy to be the procedure of choice in patients with acute appendicitis.

What are the contraindications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Acute cholecystitis, morbid obesity, and previous upper abdominal surgery have been reported as relative contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of 706 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at our institution was undertaken to determine if these relative contraindications led to increased morbidity, an increased rate of conversion to the open technique, or longer operating time. One hundred ninety-seven patients demonstrated one or more relative contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Morbidity was not increased in patients with these risk factors, but conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in a greater percentage of patients with acute cholecystitis. We favor an attempt at laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with these risk factors; however, they should be counseled as to the increased risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy in the presence of acute cholecystitis.

Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, optimal management of common duct stones remains controversial. Seven hundred six patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution from January 1990 through January 1992. From this group of patients, 50 were identified as having clinical or radiographic evidence of common duct stones. Thirty-one patients demonstrated preoperative risk factors for common duct stones and underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The risk factors included jaundice (19%), pancreatitis (23%), elevated liver function tests (52%), and ultrasound evidence of choledocholithiasis (6%). Preoperative ERCP was performed in 94% of patients. There were two failures due to periampullary diverticula. Common duct stones were identified in 18 patients (62%) and successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy in all of these patients. Nineteen patients were found to have unsuspected common duct stones on intraoperative cholangiography. Eighteen patients (95%) underwent successful ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction. Overall, major morbidity was 2% and included one patient who experienced endoscopic sphincteroplasty. The three endoscopic failures were managed by open common duct exploration, laparoscopic duct exploration, and combined laparoscopic and open common duct exploration. We conclude that combined laparoscopic and endoscopic therapy is a viable option for the management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis.

Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy should be the standard of care for uncomplicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND In 2012, a protocol for routine outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis was published reflecting high success, low morbidity, and significant cost savings. Despite this, national data reflect that the majority of laparoscopic appendectomies are performed with overnight admission. This study updates our experience with outpatient appendectomy since our initial report, confirming the efficacy of this approach. METHODS In July 2010, a prospective protocol for outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy was adopted at our institution. Patients were dismissed from the postanesthesia recovery room or day surgery if they met predefined criteria for dismissal. Patients admitted to a hospital room as either full admission or observation status were considered failures of outpatient management. An institutional review board–approved retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis from July 2010 through December 2012 was performed to analyze success of outpatient management, postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as readmission rates. RESULTS Three hundred forty-five patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis during this time frame. There were 166 men and 179 women, with a mean age of 35 years. Three hundred five patients were managed as outpatients, with a success rate of 88%. Forty patients (12%) were admitted for preexisting comorbidities (15 patients), postoperative morbidity (6 patients), or lack of transportation or home support (19 patients). Twenty-three patients (6.6%) experienced postoperative morbidity. There were no mortalities. Four patients (1%) were readmitted for transient fever, nausea/vomiting, partial small bowel obstruction, and deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSION Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed with a high rate of success, a low morbidity, and a low readmission rate. This study reaffirms our original pilot study and should serve as the basis for a change in the standard of care for appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level V.

Open versus stereotactic breast biopsy

BACKGROUND Stereotactic breast biopsy has been developed as a less invasive means of performing biopsy for mammographic abnormalities. METHODS From July 1994 through June 1995, 103 women with mammographic abnormalities requiring biopsy were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-one women had open biopsy, and 52 women had stereotactic biopsy. The average age in both groups was 60 years. Pathology revealed malignancy in 12% of stereotactic biopsies and 13% of open biopsies. Complications occurred in 6% of the open biopsies and 4% of the stereotactic biopsies and were limited to hematomas or seromas. The average cost was

The Fort Hood Massacre: Lessons learned from a high profile mass casualty.

2400 for open biopsy and

Long-term consequences of open abdomen management

650 for stereotactic biopsy (P < 0.01). One hundred and one patients returned for a follow-up mammogram within 6 months, and 1 patient in each group required a second biopsy, which revealed benign pathology. A Patient Satisfaction Survey revealed no significant differences in patient satisfaction between the two types of procedures. CONCLUSION There were no differences between open and stereotactic biopsies in regards to diagnostic accuracy, complications, or patient satisfaction. A significant difference was noted in charges during the time frame of our study.

Early Postoperative Feeding After Elective Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND On November 5, 2009, an army psychiatrist at Fort Hood in Killeen, TX, allegedly opened fire at the largest US military base in the world, killing 13 and wounding 32. METHODS Data from debriefing sessions, news media, and area hospitals were reviewed. RESULTS Ten patients were initially transferred to the regional Level I trauma center. The remainder of the shooting victims were triaged to two other local regional hospitals. National news networks broadcasted the Level I trauma center’s referral phone line which resulted in more than 1,300 calls. The resulting difficulties in communication led to the transfer of two victims (one critical) to a regional hospital without a trauma designation. CONCLUSIONS Triage at the scene was compromised by a lack of a secure environment, leading to undertriage of several patients. Overload of routine communication pathways compounded the problem, suggesting redundancy is crucial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level V.

Tumor necrosis factor-α disruption of brain endothelial cell barrier is mediated through matrix metalloproteinase-9

Background There is little data on the long-term results of the open abdomen technique regarding subsequent bowel obstruction, enterocutaneous fistula and ventral hernia rates. This study represents our follow-up of these complications. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing open abdomen management was performed. Patient demographics and development of subsequent ventral hernia, enteric fistula and/or bowel obstruction were evaluated. Results Seventy-three men and 47 women with a mean age of 51 underwent open abdomen management; 85 for inflammatory conditions and 35 for haemorrhagic conditions. Only 27 patients did not achieve definitive fascial closure and were left open for secondary closure or had a biologic mesh bridge; 13 patients had component separation to achieve fascial closure. With a mean follow-up of 21 months, 30 patients (25%) developed a ventral hernia, 13 patients (11%) experienced an enterocutaneous fistula and two patients developed bowel obstruction. Ventral hernias and enterocutaneous fistulae occurred in 78% and 41%, respectively, of patients not definitively closed compared with 10% and 2%, respectively, of patients closed primarily at initial management (p < 0.05). Conclusions There is a high incidence of ventral hernia and enterocutaneous fistula when open abdomen management necessitates leaving the abdomen open or using a biologic mesh bridge. Strategies for primary fascia closure including component separation should be employed.