Randi E. Zinberg
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Randi E. Zinberg.
Genetics in Medicine | 2013
Omri Gottesman; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; W. Andrew Faucett; Rongling Li; Teri A. Manolio; Saskia C. Sanderson; Joseph Kannry; Randi E. Zinberg; Melissa A. Basford; Murray H. Brilliant; David J. Carey; Rex L. Chisholm; Christopher G. Chute; John J. Connolly; David R. Crosslin; Joshua C. Denny; Carlos J. Gallego; Jonathan L. Haines; Hakon Hakonarson; John B. Harley; Gail P. Jarvik; Isaac S. Kohane; Iftikhar J. Kullo; Eric B. Larson; Catherine A. McCarty; Marylyn D. Ritchie; Dan M. Roden; Maureen E. Smith; Erwin P. Bottinger
The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network is a National Human Genome Research Institute–funded consortium engaged in the development of methods and best practices for using the electronic medical record as a tool for genomic research. Now in its sixth year and second funding cycle, and comprising nine research groups and a coordinating center, the network has played a major role in validating the concept that clinical data derived from electronic medical records can be used successfully for genomic research. Current work is advancing knowledge in multiple disciplines at the intersection of genomics and health-care informatics, particularly for electronic phenotyping, genome-wide association studies, genomic medicine implementation, and the ethical and regulatory issues associated with genomics research and returning results to study participants. Here, we describe the evolution, accomplishments, opportunities, and challenges of the network from its inception as a five-group consortium focused on genotype–phenotype associations for genomic discovery to its current form as a nine-group consortium pivoting toward the implementation of genomic medicine.Genet Med 15 10, 761–771.Genetics in Medicine (2013); 15 10, 761–771. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.72
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2016
Saskia C. Sanderson; Michael D. Linderman; Sabrina A. Suckiel; George A. Diaz; Randi E. Zinberg; Kadija Ferryman; Melissa P. Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; Eric E. Schadt
Whole exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS) is increasingly offered to ostensibly healthy individuals. Understanding the motivations and concerns of research participants seeking out personal WGS and their preferences regarding return-of-results and data sharing will help optimize protocols for WES/WGS. Baseline interviews including both qualitative and quantitative components were conducted with research participants (n=35) in the HealthSeq project, a longitudinal cohort study of individuals receiving personal WGS results. Data sharing preferences were recorded during informed consent. In the qualitative interview component, the dominant motivations that emerged were obtaining personal disease risk information, satisfying curiosity, contributing to research, self-exploration and interest in ancestry, and the dominant concern was the potential psychological impact of the results. In the quantitative component, 57% endorsed concerns about privacy. Most wanted to receive all personal WGS results (94%) and their raw data (89%); a third (37%) consented to having their data shared to the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). Early adopters of personal WGS in the HealthSeq project express a variety of health- and non-health-related motivations. Almost all want all available findings, while also expressing concerns about the psychological impact and privacy of their results.
Genome Medicine | 2013
Saskia C. Sanderson; Michael D. Linderman; Andrew Kasarskis; Ali Bashir; George A. Diaz; Milind Mahajan; Hardik Shah; Melissa P. Wasserstein; Randi E. Zinberg; Micol Zweig; Eric E. Schadt
BackgroundMultiple laboratories now offer clinical whole genome sequencing (WGS). We anticipate WGS becoming routinely used in research and clinical practice. Many institutions are exploring how best to educate geneticists and other professionals about WGS. Providing students in WGS courses with the option to analyze their own genome sequence is one strategy that might enhance students’ engagement and motivation to learn about personal genomics. However, if this option is presented to students, it is vital they make informed decisions, do not feel pressured into analyzing their own genomes by their course directors or peers, and feel free to analyze a third-party genome if they prefer. We therefore developed a 26-hour introductory genomics course in part to help students make informed decisions about whether to receive personal WGS data in a subsequent advanced genomics course. In the advanced course, they had the option to receive their own personal genome data, or an anonymous genome, at no financial cost to them. Our primary aims were to examine whether students made informed decisions regarding analyzing their personal genomes, and whether there was evidence that the introductory course enabled the students to make a more informed decision.MethodsThis was a longitudinal cohort study in which students (N = 19) completed questionnaires assessing their intentions, informed decision-making, attitudes and knowledge before (T1) and after (T2) the introductory course, and before the advanced course (T3). Informed decision-making was assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale.ResultsAt the start of the introductory course (T1), most (17/19) students intended to receive their personal WGS data in the subsequent course, but many expressed conflict around this decision. Decisional conflict decreased after the introductory course (T2) indicating there was an increase in informed decision-making, and did not change before the advanced course (T3). This suggests that it was the introductory course content rather than simply time passing that had the effect. In the advanced course, all (19/19) students opted to receive their personal WGS data. No changes in technical knowledge of genomics were observed. Overall attitudes towards WGS were broadly positive.ConclusionsProviding students with intensive introductory education about WGS may help them make informed decisions about whether or not to work with their personal WGS data in an educational setting.
Teaching and Learning in Medicine | 2006
Margaret M. McGovern; Melanie Johnston; Karen Brown; Randi E. Zinberg; Devra Cohen
Background and Purpose: To study the effectiveness of a standardized patient (SP) program in increasing the competence of medical students in assessing genetic risks and communicating genetic information to patients. Methods: Third-year medical students at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine had two encounters from 2001 to 2003 with the same SP, who portrayed a woman at risk for hereditary breast cancer. Assessment instruments included student self-assessment of skills, SP assessment of student communication skills, an observer checklist, grading of the student-drawn pedigree, and a knowledge test. Students also completed an evaluation form after the debriefing session at the end of each of the SP sessions. Results: The SP program was completed by 136 students. The student self-evaluation of skills instrument revealed that students who completed the SP program felt more competent in their ability to draw a pedigree, assess genetic risks based on family history and pedigree information, and communicate genetic risks compared to students at the same level of training who did not participate in the SP program. Of participating students, 90% agreed that the program allowed them to identify areas for improvement in their skills, and 95% agreed that the exercise increased their confidence for having a similar patient interaction in the future. Conclusions: The use of SPs in undergraduate medical genetics education may be one means for increasing the confidence of medical students in skills that are related to genetic encounters.
Genetics in Medicine | 2015
Saskia C. Sanderson; Michael D. Linderman; Randi E. Zinberg; Ali Bashir; Andrew Kasarskis; Micol Zweig; Sabrina A. Suckiel; Hardik Shah; Milind Mahajan; George A. Diaz; Eric E. Schadt
Purpose:Health-care professionals need to be trained to work with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in their practice. Our aim was to explore how students responded to a novel genome analysis course that included the option to analyze their own genomes.Methods:This was an observational cohort study. Questionnaires were administered before (T3) and after the genome analysis course (T4), as well as 6 months later (T5). In-depth interviews were conducted at T5.Results:All students (n = 19) opted to analyze their own genomes. At T5, 12 of 15 students stated that analyzing their own genomes had been useful. Ten reported they had applied their knowledge in the workplace. Technical WGS knowledge increased (mean of 63.8% at T3, mean of 72.5% at T4; P = 0.005). In-depth interviews suggested that analyzing their own genomes may increase students’ motivation to learn and their understanding of the patient experience. Most (but not all) of the students reported low levels of WGS results–related distress and low levels of regret about their decision to analyze their own genomes.Conclusion:Giving students the option of analyzing their own genomes may increase motivation to learn, but some students may experience personal WGS results–related distress and regret. Additional evidence is required before considering incorporating optional personal genome analysis into medical education on a large scale.Genet Med 17 11, 866–874.
Clinics in Perinatology | 2001
Randi E. Zinberg; Ruth Kornreich; Lisa Edelmann; Robert J. Desnick
In the Ashkenazi Jewish population there are at least nine severely debilitating autosomal recessive disorders that can be prevented by carrier screening and genetic counseling. There are common mutations that permit carrier identification with greater than 95% delectability. Simultaneous screening of both partners is recommended to avoid the anxiety associated with sequential screening when the first tested partner is found to be a carrier. Pretest and post-test genetic counseling should be provided, and screening of couples where only one member is Jewish is recommended. Experience with multiplex carrier screening in the Ashkenazi Jewish population has proved effective and provides a prototype for future mass carrier screening for genetic diseases in the general population.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2003
Margaret M. McGovern; Marta Benach; Randi E. Zinberg
The availability of molecular genetic tests for the identification of mutant gene carriers, and for assessing individual genetic response to pharmacologic agents, infectious agents, and other environmental exposures, is expected to result in the increased use of the molecular genetic testing laboratory by primary care physicians. However, a number of concerns have been raised about such testing including the need for safeguards to protect patient privacy, and if the interface between genetic testing laboratories and the ordering physician facilitates the appropriate clinical use of the test result. In this study, genetic counselors were surveyed to determine their practices with regard to the clinical issues of informed consent and confidentiality in the context of genetic testing, and to assess their level of satisfaction with the reporting practices of molecular genetic testing laboratories. The results of this survey revealed that there is variability in the practices of genetic counselors with regard to obtaining informed consent, and that there are areas for improvement with regard to molecular genetic test reports, particularly in terms of interpretation of results.
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2017
Saskia C. Sanderson; Michael D. Linderman; Sabrina A. Suckiel; Randi E. Zinberg; Melissa P. Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; George A. Diaz; Eric E. Schadt
Providing ostensibly healthy individuals with personal results from whole-genome sequencing could lead to improved health and well-being via enhanced disease risk prediction, prevention, and diagnosis, but also poses practical and ethical challenges. Understanding how individuals react psychologically and behaviourally will be key in assessing the potential utility of personal whole-genome sequencing. We conducted an exploratory longitudinal cohort study in which quantitative surveys and in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted before and after personal results were returned to individuals who underwent whole-genome sequencing. The participants were offered a range of interpreted results, including Alzheimers disease, type 2 diabetes, pharmacogenomics, rare disease-associated variants, and ancestry. They were also offered their raw data. Of the 35 participants at baseline, 29 (82.9%) completed the 6-month follow-up. In the quantitative surveys, test-related distress was low, although it was higher at 1-week than 6-month follow-up (Z=2.68, P=0.007). In the 6-month qualitative interviews, most participants felt happy or relieved about their results. A few were concerned, particularly about rare disease-associated variants and Alzheimers disease results. Two of the 29 participants had sought clinical follow-up as a direct or indirect consequence of rare disease-associated variants results. Several had mentioned their results to their doctors. Some participants felt having their raw data might be medically useful to them in the future. The majority reported positive reactions to having their genomes sequenced, but there were notable exceptions to this. The impact and value of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing when implemented on a larger scale remains to be seen.
BMC Medical Genomics | 2015
Michael D. Linderman; Ali Bashir; George A. Diaz; Andrew Kasarskis; Saskia C. Sanderson; Randi E. Zinberg; Milind Mahajan; Hardik Shah; Sabrina A. Suckiel; Micol Zweig; Eric E. Schadt
The growing gap between the demand for genome sequencing and the supply of trained genomics professionals is creating an acute need to develop more effective genomics education. In response we developed “Practical Analysis of Your Personal Genome”, a novel laboratory-style medical genomics course in which students have the opportunity to obtain and analyze their own whole genome. This report describes our motivations for and the content of a “practical” genomics course that incorporates personal genome sequencing and the lessons we learned during the first three iterations of this course.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2004
Lana T. Pho; Randi E. Zinberg; Theresa A. Hopkins-Boomer; Sylvan Wallenstein; Margaret M. McGovern
Sibling illness may contribute to an increased risk of adjustment problems in healthy siblings. Previous studies have reported a variety of effects on healthy individuals who have an ill sibling, but the psychosocial effects of treatable inherited disease on healthy siblings have not yet been investigated. We report the results of a survey study conducted in families with both unaffected and affected children with classic phenylketonuria (PKU), an inherited inborn error of metabolism. The survey included a knowledge test about PKU, and four previously validated instruments designed to assess psychosocial adjustment of unaffected siblings compared to age and sex matched norms. The responses revealed that unaffected adolescent and adult siblings had gaps in their knowledge about the genetic basis of PKU, and had evidence for the presence of adverse psychosocial sequelae. These findings suggest a role for genetic services providers, including genetic counselors, in assisting all members of a family adjust, when the diagnosis of an inborn error of metabolism has been made.