Randi Hagemann
Statoil
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Randi Hagemann.
Toxicology | 1997
Martinus Løvik; Ann-Kristin Høgseth; Per Ivar Gaarder; Randi Hagemann; Ingvar Eide
The possible adjuvant effect of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) on the response to the model allergen ovalbumin (OA) was studied in BALB/c mice using the popliteal lymph node (PLN) assay. In addition to changes in PLN weight, cell numbers and cell proliferation, specific serum IgE anti-OA antibody levels were measured. OA inoculated together with DEP into one hind footpad gave a significantly augmented response (increase in weight, cell numbers and cell proliferation) in the draining popliteal lymph node as compared to DEP or OA alone. Also, the local lymph node response was of longer duration when DEP were given with the allergen. Experiments in thymus-deficient nu/nu mice indicated that the lymph node response observed in BALB/c mice was of a specific immunologic character and not an unspecific inflammatory reaction. The OA-specific IgE response was increased in mice receiving OA together with DEP as compared to the response in mice receiving OA without DEP. Carbon black (CB) was given with and without OA in some experiments, as a surrogate for the non-extractable core of DEP. CB was found to resemble DEP in its capacity to increase the local lymph node response and serum specific IgE response to OA, but CB appeared to be slightly less potent than DEP. Thus, both DEP and CB had a significant adjuvant effect on the local immune-mediated inflammatory response and on the systemic specific IgE response to allergen. The results indicate that the non-extractable particle core contributes substantially to the adjuvant activity of DEP.
Toxicology | 1997
Asbjørn Magne Nilsen; Randi Hagemann; Ingvar Eide
The adjuvant activity of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) on systemic IgE production to ovalbumin (OA) was studied in mice after intranasal administration. The main purpose was to elucidate which part of the particles was responsible for the effect, the carbon core and/or the adsorbed organic substances. Female Balb/cA mice were immunized with OA either alone or in combination with DEP or carbon black particles (CB), the latter used as a surrogate for the non-extractable carbon core of DEP. Controls were given DEP, CB or buffer alone. The animals were immunized four times. 1 and 2 weeks after the last immunization anti OA IgE antibody in serum was analysed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An increased response to the antigen was observed in animals receiving OA together with DEP or CB, compared with animals receiving OA alone. The increased response was seen as both increased number of responding animals and increased serum anti OA IgE antibody. For OA + DEP 37% of the animals showed a serum anti OA IgE response, whereas 22% of the OA + CB animals and 10% of the OA animals responded. In conclusion, this work shows that not only DEP, but also CB have an adjuvant activity for specific IgE production after intranasal instillation. However, the activity of DEP may be more pronounced than that of CB. The results imply that both the organic matter adsorbed to DEP and the non-extractable carbon core are responsible for the observed adjuvant effect.
Reproductive Toxicology | 2000
Richard H. McKee; G.W. Trimmer; F.T. Whitman; C.S. Nessel; C.R. Mackerer; Randi Hagemann; Robert A. J. Priston; A.J. Riley; G. Cruzan; B.J. Simpson; J.H. Urbanus
Gasoline (CAS 86290-81-5) is one of the worlds largest volume commercial products. Although numerous toxicology studies have been conducted, the potential for reproductive toxicity has not been directly assessed. Accordingly, a two-generation reproductive toxicity study in rats was conducted to provide base data for hazard assessment and risk characterization. The test material, vapor recovery unit gasoline (68514-15-8), is the volatile fraction of formulated gasoline and the material with which humans are most likely to come in contact. The study was of standard design. Exposures were by inhalation at target concentrations of 5000, 10 000, and 20 000 mg/m(3). The highest exposure concentration was approximately 50% of the lower explosive limit and several orders of magnitude above anticipated exposure during refueling. There were no treatment-related clinical or systemic effects in the parental animals, and no microscopic changes other than hyaline droplet nephropathy in the kidneys of the male rats. None of the reproductive parameters were affected, and there were no deleterious effects on offspring survival and growth. The potential for endocrine modulation was also assessed by analysis of sperm count and quality as well as time to onset of developmental landmarks. No toxicologically important differences were found. Therefore, the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity in this study was > or =20 000 mg/m(3). The only systemic effects, in the kidneys of the male rats, were consistent with an alpha-2 u-globulin-mediated process. This is a male rat-specific effect and not relevant to human health risk assessment.
Ecological Applications | 2015
Katherine J. Willis; Alistair W. R. Seddon; Peter R. Long; Elizabeth S. Jeffers; Neil Caithness; Milo Thurston; Mathijs G.D. Smit; Randi Hagemann; Marc Macias-Fauria
The local ecological footprinting tool (LEFT) uses globally available databases, modeling, and algorithms to, remotely assess locally important ecological features across landscapes based on five criteria: biodiversity (beta-diversity), vulnerability (threatened species), fragmentation, connectivity, and resilience. This approach can be applied to terrestrial landscapes at a 300-m resolution within a given target area. Input is minimal (latitude and longitude) and output is a computer-generated report and series of maps that both individually and synthetically depict the relative value of each ecological criteria. A key question for any such tool, however, is how representative is the remotely obtained output compared to what is on the ground. Here, we present the results from comparing remotely- vs. field-generated outputs from the LEFT tool on two distinct study areas for beta-diversity and distribution of threatened species (vulnerability), the two fields computed by LEFT for which such an approach is feasible. The comparison method consists of a multivariate measure of similarity between two fields based on discrete wavelet transforms, and reveals consistent agreement across a wide range of spatial scales. These results suggest that remote assessment tools such as LEFT hold great potential for determining key ecological features across landscapes and for being utilized in preplanning biodiversity assessment tools.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Peter R. Long; David Benz; Andrew C. Martin; Philip W. A. Holland; Marc Macias-Fauria; Alistair W. R. Seddon; Randi Hagemann; Tone Karin Frost; Andrew Simpson; David J. Power; Mark Slaymaker; Katherine J. Willis
Summary 1.The overall aim in the development of the Local Ecological Footprinting tool (LEFT) was to design a web-based tool that could provide quickly obtained quantitative data to assist landowners when making land-use change decisions and to help them minimise the environmental impact and determine areas of greatest ecological risk in their operations. 2.LEFT works for almost any region in the world and uses freely available satellite imagery, biotic and abiotic data from existing global databases, models and algorithms to deliver a customised report for a selected area within one hour of job submission. 3.Biotic data automatically obtained for a selected landscape includes terrestrial vertebrate and plant species occurrence data, information on their conservation status and remotely sensed vegetation productivity. Abiotic information obtained includes temperature, precipitation, water availability, insolation, topography, elevation, distribution of urban infrastructure, and location of wetlands. 4.The tool performs a number of analyses on the biotic and abiotic data to produce maps for the selected area at a 30m resolution depicting land cover type, numbers of globally threatened terrestrial vertebrate and plant species, beta-diversity of terrestrial vertebrates and plants, habitat intactness, wetland habitat connectivity, numbers of migratory species and vegetation resilience. Results are also aggregated to produce a summary map demonstrating areas of high and low ecological value across the selected area. 5.LEFT has been designed to be intuitive to use, requiring no specialised software or user expertise. Input is extremely easy and requires the user to highlight the area of interest on a map or using grid co-ordinates. Output is delivered via the web application and comprises a customised PDF containing the maps and a zip file of GIS data for the area requested. Users may run an unlimited number of LEFT analyses and download reports free of charge. In addition to the free tool described in this paper, there is also a paid service: individual LEFT analyses can be upgraded for a charge to allow access to the geographically subsetted datasets generated for each report. This data is supplied as a zip file containing raster datasets for the layers in the LEFT analysis in GeoTIFF format. These can be opened and queried in a Geographical Information System (GIS) software package. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Carcinogenesis | 1995
Ingvar Eide; Randi Hagemann; Kolbjørn Zahlsen; Eden Tareke; Margareta Törnqvist; Rajiv Kumar; Pavel Vodicka; Kari Hemminki
Biological Conservation | 2012
Katherine J. Willis; Elizabeth S. Jeffers; Carolina Tovar; Peter R. Long; Neil Caithness; Mathijs G.D. Smit; Randi Hagemann; C. Collin-Hansen; Jürgen Weissenberger
Toxicological Sciences | 1998
Craig S. Nessel; Robert A. J. Priston; Richard H. McKee; George Cruzan; Anthony J. Riley; Randi Hagemann; Robert T. Plutnick; Barry J. Simpson
CEC/SAE Spring Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exposition | 2000
Diane Hall; Richard Stradling; Peter J. Zemroch; Dave J. Rickeard; Nic Mann; Peter Heinze; Giorgio Martini; Randi Hagemann; Leena Rantanen; Jozsef Szendefi
Energy Procedia | 2011
Ingunn Saur Modahl; Cecilia Askham Nyland; Hanne Lerche Raadal; Olav Kårstad; Tore A. Torp; Randi Hagemann