Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Randy Hiebert is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Randy Hiebert.


Bioremediation Journal | 2003

Subsurface Biofilm Barriers for the Containment and Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater

Alfred B. Cunningham; Robert R. Sharp; Randy Hiebert; Garth A. James

An engineered microbial biofilm barrier capable of reducing aquifer hydraulic conductivity while simultaneously biodegrading nitrate has been developed and tested at a field-relevant scale. The 22-month demonstration project was conducted at the MSE Technology Applications Inc. test facility in Butte, Montana, which consisted of a 130 ft wide, 180 ft long, 21 ft deep, polyvinylchloride (PVC)-lined test cell, with an initial hydraulic conductivity of 4.2 × 10−2 cm/s. A flow field was established across the test cell by injecting water upgradient while simultaneously pumping from an effluent well located approximately 82 ft down gradient. A 30 ft wide biofilm barrier was developed along the centerline of the test cell by injecting a starved bacterial inoculum of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CPC211a, followed by injection of a growth nutrient mixture composed of molasses, nitrate, and other additives. A 99% reduction of average hydraulic conductivity across the barrier was accomplished after three months of weekly or bi-weekly injections of growth nutrient. Reduced hydraulic conductivity was maintained by additional nutrient injections at intervals ranging from three to ten months. After the barrier was in place, a sustained concentration of 100 mg/l nitrate nitrogen, along with a 100 mg/l concentration of conservative (chloride) tracer, was added to the test cell influent over a six-month period. At the test cell effluent the concentration of chloride increased to about 80 mg/l while the effluent nitrate concentration varied between 0.0 and 6.4 mg/l.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2016

Fracture Sealing with Microbially-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Field Study

Adrienne J. Phillips; Alfred B. Cunningham; Robin Gerlach; Randy Hiebert; Chiachi Hwang; Bartholomeus P. Lomans; Joseph Westrich; Cesar Mantilla; Jim Kirksey; Richard A. Esposito; Lee H. Spangler

A primary environmental risk from unconventional oil and gas development or carbon sequestration is subsurface fluid leakage in the near wellbore environment. A potential solution to remediate leakage pathways is to promote microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) to plug fractures and reduce permeability in porous materials. The advantage of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) over cement-based sealants is that the solutions used to promote MICP are aqueous. MICP solutions have low viscosities compared to cement, facilitating fluid transport into the formation. In this study, MICP was promoted in a fractured sandstone layer within the Fayette Sandstone Formation 340.8 m below ground surface using conventional oil field subsurface fluid delivery technologies (packer and bailer). After 24 urea/calcium solution and 6 microbial (Sporosarcina pasteurii) suspension injections, the injectivity was decreased (flow rate decreased from 1.9 to 0.47 L/min) and a reduction in the in-well pressure falloff (>30% before and 7% after treatment) was observed. In addition, during refracturing an increase in the fracture extension pressure was measured as compared to before MICP treatment. This study suggests MICP is a promising tool for sealing subsurface fractures in the near wellbore environment.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2015

In situ detection of subsurface biofilm using low-field NMR: A field study

Catherine M. Kirkland; Maria P. Herrling; Randy Hiebert; Andrew T. Bender; Elliot Grunewald; David O. Walsh; Sarah L. Codd

Subsurface biofilms are central to bioremediation of chemical contaminants in soil and groundwater whereby micro-organisms degrade or sequester environmental pollutants like nitrate, hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents and heavy metals. Current methods to monitor subsurface biofilm growth in situ are indirect. Previous laboratory research conducted at MSU has indicated that low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is sensitive to biofilm growth in porous media, where biofilm contributes a polymer gel-like phase and enhances T2 relaxation. Here we show that a small diameter NMR well logging tool can detect biofilm accumulation in the subsurface using the change in T2 relaxation behavior over time. T2 relaxation distributions were measured over an 18 day experimental period by two NMR probes, operating at approximately 275 kHz and 400 kHz, installed in 10.2 cm wells in an engineered field testing site. The mean log T2 relaxation times were reduced by 62% and 43%, respectively, while biofilm was cultivated in the soil surrounding each well. Biofilm growth was confirmed by bleaching and flushing the wells and observing the NMR signals return to baseline. This result provides a direct and noninvasive method to spatiotemporally monitor biofilm accumulation in the subsurface.


Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2015 | 2015

NMR for Near-surface Investigations (Development and Applications)

Emily Fay; Rosemary Knight; Denys Grombacher; Mike Müller-Petke; Ahmad A. Behroozmand; Gianluca Fiandaca; Esben Auken; M. Andy Kass; Neal J. Pastick; Bruce K. Wylie; Burke J. Minsley; Dana R. Nossov; Elliot Grunewald; Brent Barker; Matt Spurlin; Dave Walsh; James M. Finegan; Brady Flinchum; W. Steven Holbrook; Carole D. Johnson; Jason Sorenson; Kristal Kiel; John W. Lane; Kristina Keating; Carl Rosier; Kenneth H. Williams; Sarah L. Codd; Catherine M. Kirkland; Randy Hiebert; Samuel Falzone

In porous materials, susceptibility contrasts between the matrix and the pore fluid generate pore-scale inhomogeneities in the magnetic field that are referred to as internal gradients. Internal gradients impact NMR measurements, and can cause large errors in the calculated diffusion coefficient if they are not accounted for. The magnitude of the internal gradients is determined by the susceptibility contrast, the strength of the background magnetic field, and the pore geometry. We use statistical analysis to look for correlation between measured internal gradients and properties of sediment samples. The primary goal of this analysis was to identify parameters that could be used as predictors of internal gradient magnitudes. We measured internal gradients using two different NMR methods: Method 1 estimates an average effective gradient, and Method 2 calculates a distribution of effective gradients. The sediment properties that we consider are magnetic susceptibility, iron content, specific surface area, grain size, and measured NMR parameters including the mean log T2 and the T1/T2 ratio. In our preliminary analysis, conducted with data from 20 sediment samples, we observe linear trends between iron content and measured gradients, and between magnetic susceptibility and measured gradients. We also see that the mineral form of iron appears to impact the relationships between iron content, magnetic susceptibility, and internal gradients. The correlation observed between gradients measured with Method 1 and both the specific surface area and T2 could indicate that this method is biased by relaxation time; this relationship was not observed for the gradients measured with Method 2. We plan to collect data on more sediment samples to better understand these relationships and develop a model for the estimation of internal gradients. Such a model will enable us to include internal gradient values in diffusion coefficient calculations for a range of nearsurface applications.


International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2009

Biofilm enhanced geologic sequestration of supercritical CO2

Andrew Mitchell; Adrienne J. Phillips; Randy Hiebert; Robin Gerlach; Lee H. Spangler; Alfred B. Cunningham


Energy Procedia | 2014

Wellbore leakage mitigation using engineered biomineralization

Alfred B. Cunningham; Adrienne J. Phillips; E. Troyer; Ellen Lauchnor; Randy Hiebert; Robin Gerlach; Lee H. Spangler


Remediation Journal | 2005

In situ biofilm barriers: Case study of a nitrate groundwater plume, Albuquerque, New Mexico

Lomesh Dutta; H. Eric Nuttall; Al Cunningham; Garth A. James; Randy Hiebert


Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation | 2015

Biofilm Detection in a Model Well-Bore Environment Using Low-Field NMR

Catherine M. Kirkland; Randy Hiebert; Adrienne J. Phillips; Elliot Grunewald; David O. Walsh; Joseph D. Seymour; Sarah L. Codd


Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering | 2015

Design of a meso-scale high pressure vessel for the laboratory examination of biogeochemical subsurface processes

Adrienne J. Phillips; Joachim (Joe) Eldring; Randy Hiebert; Ellen Lauchnor; Andrew Mitchell; Alfred B. Cunningham; Lee H. Spangler; Robin Gerlach


GSA Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, USA - 2016 | 2016

DESIGN OF A SMALL-SCALE HIGH-PRESSURE REACTOR SYSTEM TO STUDY MICROBIAL BIOCONVERSION OF COAL TO METHANE

Margaux Meslé; Adrienne J. Phillips; Logan Hodgskiss; Joachim (Joe) Eldring; Randy Hiebert; Alfred B. Cunningham; Matthew W. Fields

Collaboration


Dive into the Randy Hiebert's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robin Gerlach

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Al Cunningham

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ellen Lauchnor

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah L. Codd

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Troyer

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge