Rao Balusu
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rao Balusu.
Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering | 2011
Manoj Khanal; Deepak Adhikary; Rao Balusu
The selection of optimum chock (support) capacity is very crucial for a successful longwall mining. The selection of chock capacity depends on the site-specific geotechnical parameters, constraints and longwall panel geometry, which are generally not known in detail in priority. Hence, based on the field and laboratory data, various possible combinations should be analyzed to cater for the unforeseeable mining conditions. This paper discusses the use of numerical model for selecting an appropriate chock capacity based on the site-specific geological and geotechnical information and longwall panel geometry. The fracture mechanisms of immediate and main roofs are also discussed for various panel widths and support capacities. For the models considered, the chock convergence is predicted to increase by about 33% due to the increase in face width from 100 to 260 m. Similarly, the massive roof strata are found to yield higher chock convergence compared to bedded strata.
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | 2016
Manoj Khanal; Deepak Adhikary; Chandana T. Jayasundara; Rao Balusu
This paper investigates various multiseam mining related parameters using mine site specific data and numerical simulations. Two important mining effects—subsidence and stress—are analysed for different possible mining layouts. A geological mine dataset has been used to generate a numerical model. The predicted surface subsidence magnitude and surface profile have been compared under different scenarios to assess potential options in multiseam mining strategies. The effects that seam separation distances, mining offset, panel layout and panel orientation each have on surface subsidence and chain pillar stress magnitude have been investigated. The numerical simulation shows that ascending or descending mining directions have little impact on controlling the surface subsidence in multiseam mining and predicted an almost identical maximum stress development at the chain pillars. Numerical simulations infer that the orientation of the top panels control the subsidence profile.
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | 2012
Manoj Khanal; Deepak Adhikary; Rao Balusu
A mine scale numerical analysis of modern day longwall using a 3D Cosserat continuum method has been presented. The effect of mine specific geological conditions on viability of introducing a modern day longwall is comprehensively investigated and analysed in this paper. The various longwall parameters like chock (face support) convergence and strata caving mechanism are evaluated. The varying thickness of the sandstone present in the roof can be seen to have a strong impact on the magnitude and pattern of chock convergence. The paper also discusses the performance of chocks with different capacities under identical conditions. The effect of overlaying sandstone properties and width of the longwall panels have also been investigated. The analyses carried out in this study is expected to provide valuable process guidance during the mine design in relation to selecting the optimal mine geometry and support capacity so that the potential mining hazards could be minimized.
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering | 2016
Deepak Adhikary; Manoj Khanal; Chandana T. Jayasundara; Rao Balusu
The reliable prediction and management of mining-induced surface subsidence is one of the environmentally challenging issues for the coal mining industry. Because coal mining companies operate under strict environmental accountability, the absence of robust and reliable analysis tools may significantly affect the industry’s ability to gain approval and licenses when significant surface subsidence issues are involved. This issue becomes even more critical in multi-seam mining conditions, where high-stress concentration and large amounts of surface subsidence are expected to generate during multi-seam mining, hence could affect the feasibility and safety of all seams being mined. To obtain mining approval, it is, therefore, imperative to understand the geomechanical effect of mining in one seam on the mining of the underlying/overlying seams, and to accurately predict the magnitude and profile of surface subsidence. Various computer programs using empirical or numerical approaches have been developed to estimate the stresses at pillars and coal seams during multi-seam mining (Bigby et al. 2007; Ellenberger et al. 2003; Mark et al. 2007; SCT 2010; Sears and Heasley 2013). However, empirical-based models have severe limitations, which often make them inapplicable for assessing the feasibility of multi-seam mining at green field sites. Instead, numerical simulations are widely employed for this purpose. Due to the complexity of the problems and the computational times, researchers and engineers generally resort to twodimensional (2D) simulations. The present study assesses the performance of 2D and 3D numerical simulations and presents comparisons of subsidence profiles and stresses in pillars obtained during multi-seam mining. We modeled two different seams, each with four mining panels, using an in-house, 3D, finite element code called COSFLOW (Adhikary et al. 1996; Adhikary and Guo 2002). A unique feature of COSFLOW is the incorporation of Cosserat continuum theory in its formulation (Cosserat and Cosserat 1909). In the Cosserat model, interlayer interfaces (i.e., joints, bedding planes) are considered to be smeared across the mass. In other words, the effects of the interfaces are incorporated implicitly in the choice of stress–strain model formulation. The Cosserat model incorporates the bending rigidity of individual layers in its formulation, unlike other conventional implicit models. COSFLOW produced very accurate results when simulating surface subsidence due to longwall mining at Appin Colliery in New South Wales in Australia (Guo et al. 2004).
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | 2017
Brett Poulsen; Deepak Adhikary; Rao Balusu
With advances in technology increasing the economic depth limit of open-cut mines, including those in sedimentary strata, the design of stable slopes has become more critical. Increased use of geophysical logging to compliment more traditional geological and geotechnical logging provides an unprecedented detailed description of the rock mass from surface to sub-seam. Making full and best use of this data in a quantifiable, repeatable and transparent manner for the stability assessment of slopes requires a step beyond simplifying assumptions during limiting equilibrium and numerical stress analyses. By describing a repeatable deterministic model with parameterised input data we provide the basis for detailed probabilistic studies for the quantification of uncertainty. This paper considers the implication on slope stability, as measured by a Factor of Safety, of describing the strata at near geophysical log resolution. A comparison is made when representing the rock mass at increasing levels of detail with justifiable property estimates. We find that for deep pits in sedimentary rock masses a detailed description of the strata at near log resolution together with explicit representation of the near surface blast damaged zone becomes more critical as pit slope angle is optimised. This approach is demonstrated to capture the composite failure mode in sedimentary strata so that the predicted failure mode becomes a combination of low angle slip on weak units with high angle shear failure through stronger rock units as observed in the field. Compared to models with a simpler description of the rock mass, our model predicts that the mass of rock at failure becomes increasingly shallow and localised and is displaced near horizontally out of the pit slope, a failure mode observed in the field.
Mining Science and Technology (china) | 2011
Manoj Khanal; Deepak Adhikary; Rao Balusu
International journal of mining science and technology | 2012
Manoj Khanal; Deepak Adhikary; Rao Balusu
Procedia Earth and Planetary Science | 2009
Ting Xiang Ren; Rao Balusu
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | 2014
Brett Poulsen; Manoj Khanal; A. Manohar Rao; Deepak Adhikary; Rao Balusu
International journal of mining science and technology | 2015
Ramakrishna Morla; Rao Balusu; Krishna Tanguturi; Ren Ting
Collaboration
Dive into the Rao Balusu's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs