Raoul Bonan

Aspirin and dipyridamole in the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

To examine the role of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of arterial restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 376 patients. The active treatment consisted of an oral aspirin-dipyridamole combination (330 mg-75 mg) given three times daily, beginning 24 hours before PTCA. Eight hours before PTCA, the oral dipyridamole was replaced with intravenous dipyridamole at a dosage of 10 mg per hour for 24 hours, and oral aspirin was continued. Sixteen hours after PTCA, the initial combination was reinstituted. Treatment was continued in patients with a successfully dilated vessel until follow-up angiography four to seven months after PTCA--or earlier, if symptoms dictated. Of 249 patients who underwent follow-up angiography, 37.7 percent of patients receiving the active drug had restenosis in at least one segment, as compared with 38.6 percent of patients taking placebo (P not significant). The number of stenotic segments was virtually the same in the two groups. Among the 376 randomized patients, there were 16 periprocedural Q-wave myocardial infarctions--13 in the placebo group and 3 in the active-drug group (6.9 percent vs. 1.6 percent, P = 0.0113). Although the use of this antiplatelet regimen before and after PTCA did not reduce the six-month rate of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty, it markedly reduced the incidence of transmural myocardial infarction during or soon after PTCA. Thus, the short-term use of antiplatelet agents in relation to PTCA can be recommended.

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of the endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine-encapsulated stent for treatment of native coronary artery lesions : Clinical and angiographic results of the ENDEAVOR II trial

Background— The use of the Endeavor stent might reduce restenosis and stent thrombosis at 9 months. Methods and Results— Patients (n=1197) treated for single coronary artery stenosis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study and randomly assigned to receive the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine polymer–coated stent (n=598) or the same bare metal stent but without the drug or the polymer coating (n=599). The 2 groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. Diabetes was present in 20.1% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 mm; and the mean lesion length was 14.2 mm. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was reduced from 15.1% with the bare metal stent to 7.9% with the Endeavor (P=0.0001), and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was reduced from 14.4% with the bare metal stent to 7.3% with the Endeavor (P=0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was 4.6% with Endeavor compared with 11.8% with the bare metal stent (P=0.0001). The rate of stent thrombosis was 0.5% with the Endeavor, which was not significantly different from 1.2% with the bare metal stent. In 531 patients submitted to angiographic follow-up, late loss was reduced from 1.03±0.58 to 0.61±0.46 (P<0.001) in stent and from 0.72±0.61 to 0.36±0.46 (P<0.001) in segment. The rate of in-segment restenosis was reduced from 35.0% to 13.2% with Endeavor (P<0.0001). There was no excessive edge stenosis, aneurysm formation, or late acquired malapposition by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Differences in clinical outcome were maintained at 12 and 24 months (P<0.0001). Conclusions— Compared with bare metal stents, the Endeavor stent is safe and reduces the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis at 9, 12, and 24 months.

A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery

BACKGROUND Restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty. Directional coronary atherectomy was developed with the expectation that it would provide better results than angioplasty, including a lower rate of restenosis. We undertook a randomized, multicenter trial to compare the rates of restenosis for atherectomy and angioplasty when used to treat lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. METHODS Of 274 patients referred for first-time, non-surgical revascularization of lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, 138 were randomly assigned to undergo atherectomy and 136 to undergo angioplasty; 257 of 265 eligible patients (97 percent) underwent follow-up angiography at a median of 5.9 months. Computer-assisted quantitative measurements of luminal dimensions were determined from the angiograms obtained before and immediately after the procedure and at follow-up. The primary end point of restenosis was defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the vessels diameter at follow-up. RESULTS Quantitative analysis showed that the procedural success rate was higher in patients who underwent atherectomy than in those who had angioplasty (94 percent vs. 88 percent, P = 0.061); there was no significant difference in the frequency of major in-hospital complications (5 percent vs. 6 percent). At follow-up, the rate of restenosis was 46 percent after atherectomy and 43 percent after angioplasty (P = 0.71). Despite a larger initial gain in the minimal luminal diameter with atherectomy (mean [+/- SD], 1.45 +/- 0.47 vs. 1.16 +/- 0.44 mm; P < 0.001), there was a larger late loss (0.79 +/- 0.61 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.64 mm; P < 0.001), resulting in a similar minimal luminal diameter in the two groups at follow-up (1.55 +/- 0.60 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.68, P = 0.44). The clinical outcomes at six months were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The role of atherectomy in percutaneous coronary revascularization remains to be fully defined. However, as compared with angioplasty, atherectomy did not result in better late angiographic or clinical outcomes in patients with lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery.

2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce. METHODS We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. RESULTS In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration. CONCLUSIONS The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.

Coronary Thrombi Increase PTCA Risk Angioscopy as a Clinical Tool

BACKGROUND The presence of angiographically identified intracoronary thrombus has been variably associated with complications after coronary angioplasty. Angiography has been shown to be less sensitive than angioscopy for detecting subtle details of intracoronary morphology, such as intracoronary thrombi. The clinical importance of thrombi detectable by angioscopy but not by angiography is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS Percutaneous coronary angioscopy was performed in 122 patients undergoing conventional coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) at six medical centers. Unstable angina was present in 95 patients (78%) and stable angina in 27 (22%). Therapy was not guided by angioscopic findings, and no patient received thrombolytic therapy as an adjunct to angioplasty. Coronary thrombi were identified in 74 target lesions (61%) by angioscopy versus only 24 (20%) by angiography. A major in-hospital complication (death, myocardial infarction, or emergency bypass surgery) occurred in 10 of 74 patients (14%) with angioscopic intracoronary thrombus, compared with only 1 of 48 patients (2%) without thrombi (P = .03). In-hospital recurrent ischemia (recurrent angina, repeat PTCA, or abrupt occlusion) occurred in 19 of 74 patients (26%) with angioscopic intracoronary thrombi versus only 5 of 48 (10%) without thrombi (P = .03). Relative risk analysis demonstrated that angioscopic thrombus was strongly associated with adverse outcomes (either a major complication or a recurrent ischemic event) after PTCA (relative risk, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.28 to 7.60; P = .01) and that angiographic thrombi were not associated with these complications (relative risk, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.00; P = .91). CONCLUSIONS The presence of intracoronary thrombus associated with coronary stenoses is significantly underestimated by angiography. Angioscopic intracoronary thrombi, the majority of which were not detected by angiography, are associated with an increased incidence of adverse outcomes after coronary angioplasty.

Four-year follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy A report from then national heart, lung, and blood institute balloon valvuloplasty registry

OBJECTIVES This study reports the long-term outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy who were enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. BACKGROUND The NHLBI established the multicenter Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry in November 1987 to assess both short- and long-term safety and efficiency of percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy. METHODS Between November 1987 and October 1989, 736 patients > or = 18 years old underwent percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy at 23 registry sites in North America. The maximal follow-up period was 5.2 years. RESULTS The actuarial survival rate was 93 +/- 1% (mean +/- SD), 90 +/- 1.2%, 87 +/- 1.4% and 84 +/- 1.6% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Eighty percent of the patients were alive and free of mitral surgery or repeat balloon mitral commissurotomy at 1 year. The event-free survival rate was 80 +/- 1.5% at 1 year, 71 +/- 1.7% at 2 years, 66 +/- 1.8% at 3 years and 60 +/- 2.0% at 4 years. Important univariable predictors of actuarial mortality at 4 years included age > 70 years (51% survival), New York Heart Association functional class IV (41% survival) and baseline echocardiographic score > 12 (24% survival). Multivariable predictors of mortality included functional class IV, higher echocardiographic score and higher postprocedural pulmonary artery systolic and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy has a favorable effect on the hemodynamic variables of mitral stenosis, and long-term follow-up data suggest that it is a viable alternative with respect to surgical commissurotomy in selected patients.

Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: The montreal heart institute experience

Repeat coronary angiography was performed within 6 months after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in 178 of our first 181 patients (98%). The remaining 3 patients were symptom free, had negative treadmill exercise test results and were considered not to have had restenosis. A second follow-up angiogram was performed in 107 patients (59%), including all patients with persistent or recurrent anginal symptoms, between 7 and 18 months after PTCA. Fifty-one of the 181 patients (28%) had restenosis on 51 of 205 successfully dilated segments (25%). The stenosis was greater than or equal to 70% in 49 of these 51 segments; it was 65% and 55%, respectively, in the 2 remaining patients. Restenosis was documented angiographically at a median time of 4.7 +/- 4 months. However, 47 patients (92%) had restenosis documented within 6 months, 2 between 7 and 12 months and 2 between 13 and 18 months after PTCA. Stepwise logistic regression analysis selected the following factors as independent predictors of restenosis after PTCA: variant angina, multivessel disease, severity of residual stenosis and less reduction in the diameter of the stenosis on the angiogram immediately after PTCA. Of these 4 factors, the degree of residual stenosis immediately after PTCA was by far the most significant. It is concluded that restenosis occurs in approximately 25% of patients, almost always within the first 6 months, after successful PTCA. The degree of residual stenosis after PTCA is the most important predictor of restenosis. Increased experience and improved instrumentation may eventually lead to less residual stenosis and better late results after PTCA.

Effects of Probucol on Vascular Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty

BACKGROUND We have shown that probucol reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Whether probucol acted via prevention of neointimal formation or improvement in vascular remodeling could not be addressed by angiography and required the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS Beginning 30 days before angioplasty, 317 patients were randomly assigned to receive probucol, multivitamins, combined treatment, or placebo. Patients were then treated for 6 months after angioplasty. IVUS examination was performed immediately after angioplasty and at follow-up in 94 patients (111 segments). The cross section selected for serial analysis was the one at the angioplasty site with the smallest lumen area at follow-up. In the placebo group, lumen area decreased by -1. 21+/-1.88 mm2 at follow-up, and wall area and external elastic membrane (EEM) area increased by 1.50+/-2.50 and 0.29+/-2.93 mm2, respectively. Change in lumen area, however, correlated more strongly with the change in EEM area (r=0.53, P=0.002) than with the change in wall area (r=-0.13, P=0.49). Lumen loss was -1.21+/-1.88 mm2 for placebo, -0.83+/-1.22 mm2 for vitamins, -0.25+/-1.17 mm2 for combined treatment, and -0.15+/-1.70 mm2 for probucol alone (P=0.002 for probucol, P=0.84 for vitamins). Change in wall area was similar for all groups. EEM area increased by 0.29+/-2.93 mm2 for placebo, 0. 09+/-2.33 mm2 for vitamins only, 1.17+/-1.61 mm2 for combined treatment, and 1.74+/-1.80 mm2 for probucol only (P=0.005 for probucol). CONCLUSIONS Lumen loss after balloon angioplasty is due to inadequate vessel remodeling in response to neointimal formation. Probucol exerts its antirestenotic effects by improving vascular remodeling after angioplasty.

Low molecular weight heparin (reviparin) in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Results of a randomized, double-blind, unfractionated heparin and placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (REDUCE trial)

Resuhs. Using the intention to treat analysis for all patients. 102 (33.3%) in tbe reviparin group and 98 (32%) in the control group have rracbed a primary clinical end point (Rlative risk (RR) 1.04,95% conthlence intemal ICI) 0.83 to 131. p = 0.707). Likewise, no dilerence in late loss of minimal lumen diameter was evident for both groups. Acute events within 24 h oceuned in I2 p&W (3.9%) in the reviparin gmup and 25 (8.2%) in the control gmup (RR 0.49, 95% Cl 0.26 10 0.92. p = 0.027) during or immediately after the initial pmcedure. lo the control group. eight major bleeding complications occurrod, and in the mviparin group, seven were observed within 35 days after PITA. Cunc/i~~ians. Reviparin use during and after coronary angio- plasly did not lPduce the occulTence of mqjor clinical events or the incidence of angiographic restenosis over 30 weeks.

Comparative sensitivity of exercise, cold pressor and ergonovine testing in provoking attacks of variant angina in patients with active disease.

Exercise, ergonovine and the cold pressor test have been used to provoke variant angina attacks. The sensitivity of these three tests was compared in 34 hospitalized patients with well documented, active variant angina who had recently undergone coronary arteriography. The three tests were usually perfornmed on three consecutive days, and 28 of the 34 had the three tests within 1 week. Angina was provoked by ergonovine in all 34 patients, by exercise in 17 and by the cold pressor test in only five (p < 0.00). ST eltion developed during the ergonovine test in 32 (94%), during exercise in 10 (29%) and durin the cold preor test in only three (9%). With ergonovine, one patient had only ST depression and owe had no ECG changes. During the cold pressor test two patients had pseudonormalization of abnormally negative T waves and 29 had no ECG changes. Exercise induced T-wave pseudonormalization in four patiets, ST dess in nine others and no ECG changes in 11. ST elevation was more frequent with ergonovine than with either of the other tests (p < 0.0001). ST elevation or T-wave pseudonormalization occurred more often with exercise than with cold (p < 0.05), but both occurred less often than with ergnovine (p < 0.0001).We conclude that the sensitivity of the ergonovine test is very high in patients with active variant angina and that exercise will provoke angina with ST elevation in about 30% of these cases. In contrast, the sensitivity of the cold pressor test is too low to be of much clinical value in the diagnosis of variant angina.