Raphael Dlugosch
Leibniz Association
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Raphael Dlugosch.
New Journal of Physics | 2011
M Müller-Petke; Raphael Dlugosch; U Yaramanci
The technique of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has found widespread use in geophysical applications for determining rock properties (e.g. porosity and permeability) and state variables (e.g. water content) or to distinguish between oil and water. NMR measurements are most commonly made in the laboratory and in boreholes. The technique of surface NMR (or magnetic resonance sounding (MRS)) also takes advantage of the NMR phenomenon, but by measuring subsurface rock properties from the surface using large coils of some tens of meters and reaching depths as much as 150 m. We give here a brief review of the current state of the art of forward modeling and inversion techniques.In laboratory NMR a calibration is used to convert measured signal amplitudes into water content. Surface NMR-measured amplitudes cannot be converted by a simple calibration. The water content is derived by comparing a measured amplitude with an amplitude calculated for a given subsurface water content model as input for a forward modeling that must account for all relevant physics.A convenient option to check whether the measured signals are reliable or the forward modeling accounts for all effects is to make measurements in a well-defined environment. Therefore, measurements on top of a frozen lake were made with the latest-generation surface NMR instruments. We found the measured amplitudes to be in agreement with the calculated amplitudes for a model of 100 % water content. Assuming then both the forward modeling and the measurement to be correct, the uncertainty of the model is calculated with only a few per cent based on the measurement uncertainty.
Near Surface Geophysics | 2011
Raphael Dlugosch; M. Mueller-Petke; Thomas Günther; Stephan Costabel; Ugur Yaramanci
The technique of magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) has shown several improvements in data processing, inversion and interpretation during the last years. Along with these improvements, detailed innovations on instrumentation have been demanded to support their use. Latest developments in surface nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) instrumentation promise to fulfil these hardware requirements such as decreased dead time, improved digital signal detection, multi-channel capabilities and improved reference techniques with the second generation surface NMR instruments. In this paper, we compare data from two generations of instruments and assess the impact of the improvements on practical issues, i.e., the increased accuracy of data due to shorter dead times and new noise reduction approaches and the feasibility for efficient 2D measuring schemes. Well-known and documented test sites and synthetic considerations are used to evaluate these developments. First, the relaxation signals of different devices using the same loop match each other. The inversion results coincide within the range of data errors. Decay time estimation appears to be more stable for the new generation instrument. Second, the potential of shorter effective dead times (considering a relaxation of the protons during the pulse) is investigated using statistical analysis of synthetic data sets with different decay times and noise levels. The additionally measured data at early times significantly improve the scope and accuracy of the determined parameters initial amplitude and T 2 * time and thus extend the range of formations to be characterized. A field example comparing an effective dead time of 18 ms and 45 ms is presented. Two different reference techniques were successfully applied for noise cancellation at the very noisy test site Nauen. We observed an equivalent signal improvement using the software-based and hardware-based technique. However, software noise cancellation approaches are easily adaptable and extendable. Finally, considerations are given how to efficiently carry out 2D surveys using multi-channel instruments. A 2D field data set using the GMR demonstrates that 2D surveys can already be realized in moderate measuring times. The new generation of instruments provides comparable results and improved capabilities that will enable surface NMR measurements to be applied in a wider range of applications.
Near Surface Geophysics | 2014
Raphael Dlugosch; Thomas Günther; Mike Müller-Petke; Ugur Yaramanci
Development in instrumentation and data analysis of surface nuclear magnetic resonance has recently moved on from one-dimensional (1D) soundings to two-dimensional (2D) surveys, opening the method to a larger field of hydrological applications. Current analysis of 2D data sets, however, does not incorporate relaxation times and is therefore restricted to the water content distribution in the subsurface. We present a robust 2D inversion scheme, based on the qt approach, which jointly inverts for water content and relaxation time by taking the complete data set into account. The spatial distribution of relaxation time yields structural information of the subsurface and allows for additional petrophysical characterization. The presented scheme handles separated loop configurations for increased lateral resolution. Assuming a mono-exponential relaxation in each model cell, using irregular meshes, and gate-integrating the signal, the size of the inverse problem is significantly reduced and can be handled on a standard personal computer. A synthetic study shows that contrasts in both the quantities – water content and relaxation time – can be imaged. Inversion of a field data set outlines a buried glacial valley and allows the distinguishing of two aquifers with different grain sizes, which can be concisely interpreted together with a resistivity profile. The impact of the anisotropic weighting factor and subsurface resistivity on the inversion result are shown and discussed. A comparison of the results obtained by the previously used initial value and time-step inversion approaches illustrates the improved stability and resolution capabilities of the 2D qt inversion scheme.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2014
Aaron Davis; Raphael Dlugosch; Matthias Queitsch; James Macnae; Ronny Stolz; Mike Müller-Petke
The noninvasive detection and characterization of subsurface aquifer structures demands geophysical techniques. Surface nuclear magnetic resonance (SNMR) is the only technique that is directly sensitive to hydrogen protons and, therefore, allows for unambiguous detection of subsurface water. Traditionally, SNMR utilizes large surface coils for both transmitting excitation pulses and recording the groundwater response. Recorded data are thus a voltage induced by the time derivative of the secondary magnetic field. For the first time, we demonstrate that the secondary magnetic field in a SNMR experiment can be directly detected using a superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer. Conducting measurements at a test site in Germany, we demonstrate not only the ability to detect SNMR signals on the order of femtoTesla but also we are able to satisfy the observed data by inverse modeling. This is expected to open up completely new applications for this exciting technology.
Exploration Geophysics | 2015
Aaron C. Davis. Mike Mueller-Petke; Raphael Dlugosch; Matthias Quietsch; James Macnae; Ronny Stolz
We discuss the theoretical development of the measurement of the T2* component from a surface nuclear magnetic resonance (SNMR) experiment using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDS) as a point B-field receiver. We discuss the differences between point receivers compared to traditional coincident-loop receivers, and demonstrate the first measurements of T2* with a SQUID sensor at the hydrogeophysical test site in Schillerslage, Germany.
Geophysics | 2013
Raphael Dlugosch; Thomas Günther; Mike Müller-Petke; Ugur Yaramanci
Geophysics | 2015
Mike Müller-Petke; Raphael Dlugosch; J.A. Lehmann-Horn; Mathias Ronczka
Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2010 | 2010
Raphael Dlugosch; Ugur Yaramanci
Geophysics | 2016
Stephan Costabel; Thomas Günther; Raphael Dlugosch; Mike Müller-Petke
Geophysics | 2016
Raphael Dlugosch; Thomas Günther; Tamàs Lukàcs; Mike Müller-Petke