Raquel Aranguren

Moving from Histopathology to Molecular Tools in the Diagnosis of Molluscs Diseases of Concern under EU Legislation

One of the main factors limiting molluscs production is the presence of pathogens and diseases. Disease agent transfer via transfers of live molluscs has been a major cause of disease outbreaks and epizootics. Because of that, the European Union has adopted several decisions and directives, the last in 2006 (2006/88/EC) to control movements of marine organisms over the European countries. Once the disease is established in a determined area its eradication is a complicated task because life cycle of pathogens are not completely known and only a good and early diagnosis of the disease could be the most appropriate way to deal with it. Besides, molluscs do not have an adaptive immune response and vaccination strategies are not possible. Molluscs listed diseases under EU legislation are mainly protozoan parasites, thats why histological techniques are recognized for their diagnosis. However, molecular techniques are being increasingly used primarily as confirmatory techniques of the presence of the pathogens but also in disease monitoring programs. Research perspectives are mainly focussed in the optimization, of the already described techniques to gain in sensitivity and sensibility and in the development of new molecular biology techniques (quantitative real time PCRs), that are faster and easier to apply and that allow a positive diagnosis even in early stages of infection. However, molecular tools detect DNA sequences of the pathogen which does not imply that pathogen is viable in the cell host and the infection is established. Consequently, it needs to be validated against other techniques, such as histology or in situ hybridization, so that its reliability can be determined.

A Status Assessment of Perkinsiosis, Bonamiosis, and Mateiliosis in Commercial Marine Bivalves from Southern Brazil

ABSTRACT The protozoans Perkinsus marinus, Perkinsus olseni, Bonamia ostreae, Bonamia exitiosa, and Marteilia refringens are responsible for some of the most detrimental diseases in the production of cultivated shellfish worldwide and are classified as notifiable diseases by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). This study examined the general health status of wild and cultured bivalves from southern Brazil and included diagnostic tests for the presence of Perkinsus sp., Bonamia sp., andMarteilia sp. Cultured bivalves included the mangrove oyster Crassostrea gasar (syn. Crassostrea brasiliana), the brown mussel Perna perna, the lions paw scallop Nodipecten nodosus, andwing pearl oyster Pteria hirundo. Themangrove oyster Crassostrea rhizophorae and the carib pointed venus clam Anomalocardia brasiliana (syn. Anomalocardia flexuosa) were collected from wild populations. A variety of parasitic or commensal organisms were detected by histology including Ancistrocoma-like and Spenophrya-like organisms; Bucephalus genus, Nematopsis sp., Steinhausia sp., and Tylocephalum sp.; unidentified trematode; unknown protozoan and metazoans; and an amoeba parasite. Hemocytic infiltration was most commonly associated with parasitized animals. Histological, culture and molecular diagnostic tests did not find any evidence of the presence of OIE-listed pathogens or related species in this study. Although the current survey did not identify any pathogens or diseases of concern, it provides baseline health assessment data for these species against which any future disease developments or significant changes in population health can be compared. These data are also valuable with respect to the development and implementation of public policies related to aquatic animal health.

Parasites in two coexisting bivalves of the Patagonia coast, southwestern Atlantic Ocean: The Puelche oyster (Ostrea puelchana) and false oyster (Pododesmus rudis)

The purpose of this study was to compare the parasites of two coexisting bivalves, the edible Puelche oyster (Ostrea puelchana) and the false oyster (Pododesmus rudis) that lives attached to O. puelchana shells, and to investigate their host specificity. Samples from wild populations, 465 O. puelchana and 131 P. rudis, were collected seasonally during two years in the San José Gulf (northern Patagonia, Argentina) and were processed using standard histological techniques. To increase the natural low prevalences of Bonamia spp. and Perkinsus spp. that are present in wild populations, an in situ experiment was performed by maintaining captive sentinel bivalves at high densities inside a plastic mesh bag to enhance parasite transmission. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were used to test for apparent Bonamia sp. infections among captive sentinel O. puelchana specimens (n = 80), and Rays fluid thioglycollate medium (RFTM) assays and histological immunoassays tested for apparent Perkinsus sp. infections among captive sentinel P. rudis specimens (n = 100). Despite histological observations that revealed the presence of microcells resembling Bonamia sp. infecting hemocytes of some Puelche oysters, PCR assays did not confirm that parasite identification. Among captive sentinel P. rudis that showed histological evidence of Perkinsus sp. infections, neither RFTM nor immunoassays confirmed such parasites. Ostrea puelchana from wild populations were occasional hosts for both Rickettsia-like organism (RLOs) and Urastoma-like turbellarians. In contrast, six parasite taxa infected P. rudis from coexisting populations, including RLOs, Urastoma-like turbellarians, an intracellular gregarine species, Nematopsis-like oocysts, an unidentified coccidian and a Perkinsus qugwadi-like protozoan. These results demonstrated specific infection patterns of the identified parasites in relation to their hosts.