Raquel E. Reinbolt

Bone Health in Adult Cancer Survivorship

Optimizing health outcomes, including prevention of osteoporotic fractures, is essential for promoting the well-being of the growing number of cancer survivors. Medical providers who participate in the care of cancer survivors should be aware that various cancer treatments may cause bone loss, which can increase the risk of subsequent of osteoporosis. Healthy bone remodeling is a balanced and dynamic equation between new bone formation and bone resorption. Aging, natural menopause, and cancer treatments such as surgical oophorectomy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, androgen deprivation therapy, and aromatase inhibitors can all promote bone loss. The WHO Fracture Assessment Tool can be used as a clinical aid to assess an individuals osteoporotic fracture risk, with or without bone mineral density measurements obtained from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Preventative strategies include adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation and modifying risk factors such as alcohol intake, tobacco use, and lack of exercise. Bisphosphonate therapy and rank-ligand monoclonal antibody therapy are the most commonly used agents for management of bone loss resulting from cancer treatment. This review will summarize the mechanisms by which cancer treatments cause bone loss as well provide screening and treatment recommendations for the management of bone loss.

The Role of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies annually account for over 91,000 new cancer cases and approximately 28,000 deaths in the United States. Although there have been advancements in cytotoxic chemotherapies, there has not been significant improvement in overall survival in these patients. While targeted therapies have shown some benefit in many solid tumors, further development of these agents is needed for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) catalyzes the polyADP-ribosylation of proteins involved in DNA repair. Inhibitors of PARP were originally developed for cancers with homologous recombination deficiencies, such as those harboring mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. However, pre-clinical research and clinical trials have suggested that the activity of PARP inhibitors is not limited to those with BRCA mutations. PARP inhibitors may have activity in cancers deficient in other DNA repair genes, signaling pathways that mitigate DNA repair, or in combination with DNA-damaging agents independent of DNA repair dysfunction. Currently there are seven different PARP inhibitors in clinical development for cancer. While there has been promising clinical activity for some of these agents, there are still significant unanswered questions regarding their use. Going forward, specific questions that must be answered include timing of therapy, use in combination with cytotoxic agents or as single-agent maintenance therapy, and whether there is a predictive biomarker that can be used with PARP inhibition. Even with large strides in the treatment of many gynecologic malignancies in recent years, it is imperative that we develop newer agents and methods to identify patients that may benefit from these compounds. The focus of this review will be on pre-clinical data, current clinical trials, and the future of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer.

Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia in an Atypical Host

Pneumocystis jiriveci pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal pathogen of the lungs. First diagnosed as a cause of pneumonia among premature and malnourished infants in the post-World War II era, it is now typically seen in immunocompromised hosts, like patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with T-helper cell counts (CD4) less than 200 (cells/millimeter3) or patients with hematologic malignancies.1,2 However, PCP is rare in the solid tumor population.

Stabilization of bone marrow infiltration by metastatic breast cancer with continuous doxorubicin

Complete bone marrow infiltration with profound pancytopenia is very uncommon in breast cancer. Bone marrow metastasis can frequently occur following development of metastatic breast cancer. However, bone marrow failure as the herald of this disease is not typically seen. Very limited data exists as to the safest and most efficacious manner to treat patients with profound pancytopenia due to metastatic solid tumor involvement. In this case, the patient’s thrombocytopenia was particularly worrisome, requiring daily platelet transfusions. There was also concern that cytotoxic chemotherapy would exacerbate the patient’s thrombocytopenia and increase bleeding risk. The patient’s dramatic response to chemotherapy with full platelet recovery is also highly unusual. For our patient, continuous doxorubicin successfully “unpacked” the bone marrow despite a low baseline platelet level, and without increasing the need for more frequent platelet transfusion or risk of catastrophic bleeding. Given the rarity of this presentation, it is currently unknown if the majority of similar patients experience near full recovery of hematopoietic function after initiation of appropriate systemic treatment for metastatic disease.

OATP1B2 deficiency protects against paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity

Paclitaxel is among the most widely used anticancer drugs and is known to cause a dose-limiting peripheral neurotoxicity, the initiating mechanisms of which remain unknown. Here, we identified the murine solute carrier organic anion–transporting polypeptide B2 (OATP1B2) as a mediator of paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity. Additionally, using established tests to assess acute and chronic paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity, we found that genetic or pharmacologic knockout of OATP1B2 protected mice from mechanically induced allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and changes in digital maximal action potential amplitudes. The function of this transport system was inhibited by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib through a noncompetitive mechanism, without compromising the anticancer properties of paclitaxel. Collectively, our findings reveal a pathway that explains the fundamental basis of paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity, with potential implications for its therapeutic management.

Abstract OT2-05-03: Does minocycline mitigate chemotherapy induced neuroinflammation? A phase II randomized placebo controlled study

Background: Many breast cancer (BC) patients, particularly those who receive chemotherapy (chemo), experience affective symptoms and cognitive changes that can negatively impact their quality of life. Causal links between inflammatory mediators and the development of depressive-like behavior and cognitive defects, have been established in mouse models, including studies by our group showing increased microglial activation following chemo (A.C DeVries et al). Microglia are resident immune cells of the brain, which release proinflammatory cytokines when activated. Doxorubicin (DOX) induces microglial activation in the brain. Minocycline, a second generation tetracycline, has been shown to suppress inflammation by inhibiting microglial activation in CNS disease models. We hypothesize that (1) chemo activates microglia in the brains of women being treated for BC, which can precipitate or exacerbate depression, anxiety and cognitive deficits and (2) Minocycline administration during neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemo will prevent chemo-induced microglial activation and will reduce affective and cognitive symptom burden. Trial Design: This is a single center, Phase II, double blinded randomized study of minocycline (100 mg twice a day) vs placebo twice a day in women with BC receiving DOX-based or other chemo for BC. Pts will be randomized to either oral minocycline or placebo for up to a 1 week loading period plus chemo treatment period and an optional subsequent 2 week period. Eligibility Criteria: Women diagnosed with BC stages I-III initiating first line adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemo. Aims: (1) to evaluate symptoms related to anxiety and depression and cognitive changes during and after chemo completion (2) to evaluate markers of neuro inflammation as assessed by blood based inflammatory cytokines and central markers of inflammation and microglia activation using 1 F-Fludeoxyglucose and 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography. Primary endpoints are changes in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and State Trait Anxiety Index (STAI) from baseline to end of study after minocycline vs placebo intervention. Secondary endpoints are changes in cognitive function during chemo using validated cognitive testing including N-Back Test, Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire Ability Scale (MMQ). Statistical Methods: Primary analysis for efficacy will be intention-to-treat. The main objective is to preliminarily evaluate the effect of minocycline on chemo-induced depressive symptoms in terms of changes in CES-D and STAI scores. Mixed models will be used to evaluate cognitive function changes. A sample size of 23 per group, will give 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.74 standard deviation (SD) difference between the 2 groups at significance level of 0.10 based on a 2 sided two-sample t-test. From our experience, attrition of less than 20% is expected for studies in this patient population in our center, and to account for this, we plan to recruit up to 60 patients. 16 of 46 evaluable pts have been accrued to date. Accrual started in January 2016. Funded by Pelotonia grant from The OSUCCC. Contact: Study PI: Maryam.lustberg@osumc.edu Citation Format: Boutrid H, Reinbolt R, Knopp M, Williams N, VanDeusen J, Sardesai S, Noonan A, Flora L, Gleich E, Pan X, Berger M, Vargo C, Wesolowski R, Ramaswamy B, DeVries AC, Lustberg M. Does minocycline mitigate chemotherapy induced neuroinflammation? A phase II randomized placebo controlled study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-05-03.

A hedgehog pathway-dependent gene signature is associated with poor clinical outcomes in Luminal A breast cancer

PurposeHigh expression of glioma-associated oncogene homolog-1 (GLI1) is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers. We sought to define a GLI1-dependent gene signature in ER-positive tumors that could further stratify patients at higher risk for disease recurrence and potentially lead to novel combination therapies.MethodsWe identified an inverse correlation between GLI1 expression and distant disease-free survival (DFS) using a dataset developed at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Hatzis dataset) containing clinical data from 508 breast cancer patients. Using a qPCR-based microarray platform, we identified genes differentially regulated by GLI1 in MCF7 cells and then determined if expression of these genes correlated with GLI1 expression in patient tumor samples. Statistical comparison between the groups was performed by ANOVA. Direct comparison of two groups was done by a two-tailed t test. Correlations between variables were done by Pearson’s method.ResultsExpression of GLI1 and its target genes correlated significantly with worse distant DFS in breast cancer patients with Luminal A molecular subtype. Particularly, co-expression of GLI1 with EGFR and/or SNAI1, two of the identified GLI1 targets, was predictive of worse distant DFS in this subtype. Furthermore, patients with Luminal A tumors with a high GLI1 signature had a shorter distant DFS compared to the Luminal B subtype and the outcome for this group was comparable to patients with HER2-positive or basal-like tumors.ConclusionWe have identified a novel GLI1 gene signature that is associated with worse clinical outcomes among the patients with Luminal A subtype of breast cancer.

Abstract CT033: Phase 1b study of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced, triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02474173)

Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone that is required for proper folding and stabilization of proteins. Client proteins of HSP90 include many mediators of signal transduction known to be over-activated in triple negative breast cancer such as AKT, EGFR, members of RAS/MAPK signaling pathways and androgen receptor. Expression of HSP90 has been found to be upregulated in multiple triple negative breast cancer cell lines and associated with poor outcome of breast cancer patients. In addition, over-expression of HSP90 client proteins such as AKT and c-RAF has been implicated in paclitaxel resistance. Onalespib (AT13387) is a synthetic non-ansamycin small molecule that acts as an inhibitor of HSP90 by binding to the amino terminal of the protein and has dissociation constant (Kd) of 0.71 nM. Materials and Methods: Patients with inoperable or metastatic triple negative or weakly hormone receptor positive breast cancer are treated with onalespib and paclitaxel on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days. Paclitaxel is given at a standard dose of 80 mg/m2 while the dose of onalespib is gradually increased using standard 3+3 design (see table). In order to assess the effect of each drug on pharmacokinetics of the other drug, onalespib is given on day -7 prior to cycle 1 and skipped on day 1 of cycle 1 during which paclitaxel in administered alone. The primary objective of the study is to determine recommended phase 2 dose and assess the toxicity profile of the combination. The secondary objectives include effect of onalespib on pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and effect of paclitaxel on pharmacokinetics of onalespib. Overall response rate, response duration and progression-free survival will also be assessed. Conclusion: The study opened to accrual on January 15, 2016 and is currently enrolling the first 3 patients to dose level 1. Citation Format: Robert Wesolowski, Maryam B. Lustberg, Ewa Mrozek, Rachel Layman, Raquel Reinbolt, Ming Poi, Nadia Osman, Andrea Lively, Julie Stephens, Michael Grever, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy. Phase 1b study of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced, triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02474173). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT033.

Endocrine therapy in breast cancer: the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic approach.

OBJECTIVES To review the rationale for endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic breast cancer setting and to highlight clinical considerations unique to this treatment. DATA SOURCES Contemporary literature, clinical guidelines, and national statistics. CONCLUSION Endocrine therapy represents an important strategy in the management of both early and advanced hormone positive breast cancer. Additional research is required to better define the role of neoadjuvant therapy and the optimal duration of treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses play a pivotal role in the identification and management of endocrine therapy-associated symptoms. Prompt symptom intervention may improve therapy adherence and ultimately, may improve long-term disease outcomes.

Effects of chemotherapy on quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

112 Background: Women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer often experience side effects that can impact quality of life and tolerance of planned therapy. This can lead to poor outcomes. By understanding these changes, we can intervene and improve the treatment for women. We hypothesized that chemotherapy would be associated with changes in functional status and nutrition related symptoms in breast cancer survivors. METHODS Patients were prospectively recruited prior to initiation of their neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Body mass index (BMI) was abstracted from records. The patients functional status was assessed using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) characterized nutrition-related symptoms of patients. Participants completed these questionnaires prior to initiating the first cycle chemotherapy (time point 1), during the second cycle (time point 2), and during the last cycle of chemotherapy, 12-20 weeks after initiation of treatment (time point 3). Changes in BMI, functional status, and symptomatology were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS Twenty-five women enrolled; 19 women with a median age of 51 (range 33-66) completed the study. There was no significant change in BMI (p = 0.18) over the duration of chemotherapy. Analysis of DASI data indicated that there was a significant decline in peak oxygen uptake (p = 0.005), showing a decrease in functional capacity from before the first cycle to both the second and the last cycles. This suggests that functional capacity dropped significantly once chemotherapy began and stayed below baseline. There was also a significant change in PG-SGA (p = 0.005), indicating significant reported nutrition-related symptoms. PG-SGA scores were significantly higher during the second cycle compared to the other two time points, indicating that patients showed the highest degree of symptoms shortly after initiation of treatment and then improved. CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy is associated with symptomatology and a decrease in functional capabilities. Improved understanding of symptom burden during chemotherapy will allow more specific interventions to be designed that can help improve quality of life.