Ravinder S. Vohra

Survival After Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis.

Objective: This network meta-analysis compared overall survival after neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or combinations of both (chemoradiotherapy, CRT) or surgery alone to identify the most effective approach. Summary Background Data: The optimal treatment for resectable esophageal cancer is unknown. Methods: A search for randomized controlled trials reporting on neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies was conducted. Using a network meta-analysis, treatments were ranked based on their effectiveness for improving survival. Results: In 33 eligible randomized controlled trials, 6072 patients were randomized to receive either surgery alone (N = 2459) or neoadjuvant CT (N = 1332), RT (N = 58), and CRT (N = 1196) followed by surgery or surgery followed by adjuvant CT (N = 542), RT (N = 383), and CRT (N = 102). Twenty-one comparisons were generated. Neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery compared with surgery alone was the only treatment to significantly improve survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.87]. When trials were grouped considering neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and surgery alone, neoadjuvant therapies combined with surgery compared with surgery alone showed a survival advantage (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.90), whereas surgery along with adjuvant therapies showed no significant survival advantage (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.14). A subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant therapies showed a superior effectiveness of neoadjuvant CRT and surgery compared with surgery alone (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68–0.87). Conclusions: This network meta-analysis showed neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery to be the most effective strategy in improving survival of resectable esophageal cancer. Resources should be focused on developing the most effective neoadjuvant CRT regimens for both adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus.

Meta-analysis of perioperative antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The effectiveness of perioperative antibiotics in reducing surgical‐site infection (SSI) and overall nosocomial infections in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic and low‐ and moderate‐risk cholecystitis (Tokyo classification) is unclear. A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed to assess this.

Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study of variation in practice of cholecystectomy and surgical outcomes (The CholeS study).

Introduction Cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgical operations performed. Despite level one evidence supporting the role of cholecystectomy in the management of specific gallbladder diseases, practice varies between surgeons and hospitals. It is unknown whether these variations account for the differences in surgical outcomes seen in population-level retrospective data sets. This study aims to investigate surgical outcomes following acute, elective and delayed cholecystectomies in a multicentre, contemporary, prospective, population-based cohort. Methods and analysis UK and Irish hospitals performing cholecystectomies will be recruited utilising trainee-led research collaboratives. Two months of consecutive, adult patient data will be included. The primary outcome measure of all-cause 30-day readmission rate will be used in this study. Thirty-day complication rates, bile leak rate, common bile duct injury, conversion to open surgery, duration of surgery and length of stay will be measured as secondary outcomes. Prospective data on over 8000 procedures is anticipated. Individual hospitals will be surveyed to determine local policies and service provision. Variations in outcomes will be investigated using regression modelling to adjust for confounders. Ethics and dissemination Research ethics approval is not required for this study and has been confirmed by the online National Research Ethics Service (NRES) decision tool. This novel study will investigate how hospital-level surgical provision can affect patient outcomes, using a cross-sectional methodology. The results are essential to inform commissioning groups and implement changes within the National Health Service (NHS). Dissemination of the study protocol is primarily through the trainee-led research collaboratives and the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (AUGIS). Individual centres will have access to their own results and the collective results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant surgical conferences.

The lifetime cost to English students of borrowing to invest in a medical degree: a gender comparison using data from the Office for National Statistics

Objective To evaluate this impact on male and female English medical graduates by estimating the total time and amount repaid on loans taken out with the UKs Student Loans Company (SLC). Setting UK. Participants 4286 respondents with a medical degree in the Labour Force Surveys administered by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) between 1997 and 2014. Outcomes Age-salary profiles were generated to estimate the repayment profiles for different levels of initial graduate debt. Results 2195 female and 2149 male medical graduates were interviewed by the ONS. Those working full-time (73.1% females and 96.1% males) were analysed in greater depth. Following standardisation to 2014 prices, average full-time male graduates earned up to 35% more than females by the age of 55. The initial graduate debt from tuition fees alone amounts to £39 945.69. Owing to interest charges on this debt the average full-time male graduate repays £57 303 over 20 years, while the average female earns less and so repays £61 809 over 26 years. When additional SLC loans are required for maintenance, the initial graduate debt can be as high as £81 916 and, as SLC debt is written off 30 years after graduation, the average female repays £75 786 while the average male repays £110 644. Conclusions Medical graduates on an average salary are unlikely to repay their SLC debt in full. This is a consequence of higher university fees and as SLC debt is written off 30 years after graduation. This results in the average female graduate repaying more when debt is low, but a lower amount when debt is high compared to male graduates.

The effect of trainee research collaboratives in the UK

Trainee-led networks have pioneered a novel collaborative approach to research in the UK. Established at a similar time to the UK National Institute for Health Research in 2006, collaborative groups have developed new pathways for doctors in full-time specialty training to design, disseminate, and deliver high-quality, multicentre research. In parallel, the National Institute for Health Research set up Clinical Research Networks (CRNs) to coordinate delivery of research across 30 clinical specialties and 15 English regional networks. Analogous networks have also been established by the devolved administrations in Scotland, Northen Ireland, and Wales. CRNs provide infrastructure to promote and coordinate research, including funding research support staff and providing research skills training. Using gastrointestinal surgery as an example, we sought to quantify trainee-led collaborative research network engagement and compare hospital participation with CRN studies. We only considered CRN and trainee-led collaborative studies involving ten or more hospitals with information available about participating sites. We searched the CRN portfolio for closed gastrointestinal and general surgery studies. We contacted trainee networks via a national mailing list to identify trainee studies. We derived denominators from the total number of hospitals offering emergency or major elective gastrointestinal surgery. Overall, 238 (99%) of 241 UK hospitals providing general surgery services participated in one or more trainee-led collaborative studies over the past decade compared with 191 (79%) of 241 for CRN studies. With the three trainee-led studies that had been adopted into the CRN portfolio excluded, participation in trainee-led research remained similar, at 236 (98%) of 241. Trainee groups delivered 15 studies overall: 12 observational studies and three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), coordinated by five regional and two national trainee networks (appendix). These numbers compared with three observational studies and eight RCTs coordinated by the CRN. We noted strong participation in trainee collaborative studies, even in regions with low CRN coverage, with the mean number of studies per hospital greater for collaboratives than for CRNs (appendix). Regions with a Royal College of Surgeons Surgical Trials Centre had greater participation in both trainee and CRN studies: the mean number of studies per hospital was 8·2 versus 6·0 in regions without. Trainee-led collaboratives have driven substantial additional research participation across the UK, on top of that achievable through CRNs alone, and have engaged additional gastrointestinal surgery units with little infrastructure or associated costs. This success is now being replicated in other specialties, with the British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative engaging 26 of 30 UK adult trauma-receiving neurosurgical units in the RESCUE-ASDH RCT. As the collaborative model is extended globally, it offers a powerful opportunity to promote a collaborative research culture and grow capacity with minimal investment. Synergy between trainee-led networks and CRNs could maximise delivery of high-quality research across the UK.

Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.

The aims of this prospective population‐based cohort study were to identify the patient and hospital characteristics associated with emergency cholecystectomy, and the influences of these in determining variations between hospitals.

A Comparison of Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy Between Populations From New York State and England

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare mortality following emergency laparotomy between populations from New York State and England. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Mortality following emergency surgery is a key quality improvement metric in both the United States and UK. Comparison of the all-cause 30-day mortality following emergency laparotomy between populations from New York State and England might identify factors that could improve care. METHODS Patient demographics, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes data were extracted from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England and the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative databases for all patients older than 18 years undergoing laparotomy for emergency open bowel surgery between April 2009 and March 2014. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality within 30 days of the index laparotomy. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to model independent demographic variables against mortality. A one-to-one propensity score matched dataset was created to compare the odd ratios of mortality between the 2 populations. RESULTS Overall, 137,869 patient records, 85,286 (61.9%) from England and 52,583 (38.1%) from New York State, were extracted. Crude 30-day mortality for patients was significantly higher in the England compared with New York State [11,604 (13.6%) vs 3633 (6.9%) patients, P < 0.001]. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in England had significantly higher risk of mortality compared with those in New York State (odds ratio 2.35, confidence interval 2.24-2.46, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The risk of mortality at 30 days is higher following emergency laparotomy in England as compared with New York State despite similar patient groups.

Achieving long term survival in oesophagectomy patients aged over 75

Aims Surgical resection is often the only curative treatment for oesophageal cancer. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyse outcomes following oesophageal resection in patients aged 75 years and older and the impact of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) program in this cohort. Methods Patients aged over 75 years undergoing oesophagectomy between 2003 and 2013 were identified from a single centre using an electronic database. Data on pre-operative comorbidity, tumour stage and length of hospital stay (LOS) were collected. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Thirty day, 1- and 5-year mortality rates were calculated. Results 147 patients were identified with a median age of 78.5 (IQR 76.7–80.9). 33% (n = 44) had a grade 3 complication or higher. Median LOS in hospital was 16 days (IQR 13.0–22.0). Thirty-day mortality was 3.4%, 1-year and 5-year survival was 65% and 21% respectively. 45% of patients were enrolled into an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program and they demonstrated a significantly reduced length of stay from 18 to 14 days (p = 0.005) and 30-day mortality from 6.2% to 0% (p = 0.04) compared to the time period before the program. Conclusion Long-term survival is achievable in patients aged over 75 years.

Influence of day of surgery on mortality following elective colorectal resections.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the increased mortality previously identified for surgery performed on Fridays was apparent following major elective colorectal resections and how this might be affected by case mix.

Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: A global survey of frontline medical professionals

Background The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been shown to reduce perioperative errors and complications and its implementation is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO). However, it is unknown how widely this intervention is used. We investigated attitudes and factors associated with use of WHO SSC in frontline medical professionals across the globe using a survey distributed through social networks. Methods A survey of usage and opinions regarding the SSC was posted on the Facebook and Twitter pages of a not-for-profit surgical news website for one month (March 2013). Respondents were grouped into four groups based on their countrys Gross National Income: high, upper middle, lower middle and low income. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate how different factors were associated with the use of the SSC. Results 6269 medical professionals from 69 countries responded to the survey: most respondents were from lower middle (47.4%) countries, followed by: high (35.0%), upper middle (14.6%), and low (3.0%) income countries. In total, 57.5% reported that they used the WHO SSC perioperatively. Fewer respondents used the WHO SSC in upper middle, lower middle and low income countries (LMICs) compared to high income countries (43.5% vs. 83.5%, p < 0.001). Female (61.3% vs. 56.4% males, p = 0.001), consultant surgeons (59.6% vs. 53.2% interns, p < 0.001) and working in university hospitals (61.4% vs. 53.7% non-university hospitals, p < 0.001) were more likely to use the SSC. Believing the SSC was useful, did not work or caused delays was independently associated with the respondents reported use of the SSC (OR 1.22 95% CI 1.07–1.39; OR 0.47 95% CI 0.36–0.60; OR 0.64 95% CI 0.53–0.77, respectively). Conclusion This study suggests the use of the WHO SSC is variable across countries, especially in LMICs where it has the most potential to improve patient safety. Critical appraisal of the documented benefits of the WHO SSC may improve its adoption by those not currently using it.