Raviraja N. Seetharam
Manipal University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Raviraja N. Seetharam.
Cell Proliferation | 2013
Sanjay Gottipamula; U. Kolkundkar; Raviraja N. Seetharam
The regenerative potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) holds great promise in using them for treatment of a wide range of debilitating diseases. Several types of culture media and systems have been used for large‐scale expansion of MSCs in vitro; however, the majority of them rely heavily on using foetal bovine serum (FBS)‐supplement for optimal cell proliferation. FBS‐based cultures pose the potential threat of spread of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy and bovine spongiform encephalopathy to MSCs and then to their recipients. A recent trend in cell culture is to change from serum‐use to serum‐free media (SFM). In this context, the current review focuses specifically on employment of various SFM for MSCs and discusses existences of various options with which to substitute FBS. In addition, we analyse MSC population growth kinetic patterns using various SFM for large‐scale production of MSCs.
Cell and Tissue Research | 2014
Sanjay Gottipamula; K. M. Ashwin; Suresh Kannan; Udaykumar Kolkundkar; Raviraja N. Seetharam
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) heralded a new beginning for regenerative medicine and generated tremendous interest as the most promising source for therapeutic application. Most cell therapies require stringent regulatory compliance and prefer the use of serum-free media (SFM) or xeno-free media (XFM) for the MSC production process, starting from the isolation onwards. Here, we report on serum-free isolation and expansion of MSCs and compare them with cells grown in conventional fetal bovine serum (FBS)-containing media as a control. The isolation, proliferation and morphology analysis demonstrated significant differences between MSCs cultured in various SFM/XFM in addition to their difference with FBS controls. BD Mosaic™ Mesenchymal Stem Cell Serum-Free media (BD-SFM) and Mesencult-XF (MSX) supported the isolation, sequential passaging, tri-lineage differentiation potential and acceptable surface marker expression profile of BM-MSCs. Further, MSCs cultured in SFM showed higher immune suppression and hypo-immunogenicity properties, making them an ideal candidate for allogeneic cell therapy. Although cells cultured in control media have a significantly higher proliferation rate, BM-MSCs cultured in BD-SFM or MSX media are the preferred choice to meet regulatory requirements as they do not contain bovine serum. While BM-MSCs cultured in BD-SFM and MSX media adhered to all MSC characteristics, in the case of few parameters, the performance of cells cultured in BD-SFM was superior to that of MSX media. Pre-clinical safety and efficiency studies are required before qualifying SFM or XFM media-derived MSCs for therapeutic applications.
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine | 2016
Sanjay Gottipamula; S. Chaansa; K. M. Ashwin; Nancy Priya; Udaykumar Kolkundkar; Swathi SundarRaj; Anish Sen Majumdar; Raviraja N. Seetharam
The regenerative potential of mesenchymal stromal or stem cells (MSCs) has generated tremendous interest for treating various degenerative diseases. Regulatory preference is to use a culture medium that is devoid of bovine components for stem cell expansion intended for therapeutic applications. However, a clear choice an alternative to fetal bovine serum (FBS) has not yet emerged. We have screened five different commercially available serum‐free media (SFM) for their ability to support the growth and expansion of pre‐isolated undifferentiated bone marrow‐derived MSCs (BM‐MSCs) and compared the results with cells grown in standard FBS‐containing medium as control. In addition, based on initial screening results, BD Mosaic™ Mesenchymal Stem Cell Serum‐free (BD‐SFM) medium was evaluated in large‐scale cultures for the performance and culture characteristics of BM‐MSCs. Of the five different serum‐free media, BD‐SFM enhanced BM‐MSCs growth and expansion in Cell STACK (CS), but the cell yield per CS‐10 was less when compared to the control medium. The characteristics of MSCs were measured in terms of population doubling time (PDT), cell yield and expression of MSC‐specific markers. Significant differences were observed between BD‐SFM and control medium in terms of population doublings (PDs), cell yield, CFU‐F and morphological features, whereas surface phenotype and differentiation potentials were comparable. The BD‐SFM‐cultured MSCs were also found to retain the differentiation potential, immune‐privileged status and immunosuppressive properties inherent to MSCs. Our results suggest that BD‐SFM supports large‐scale expansion of BM‐MSCs for therapeutic use. Copyright
Stem Cells Translational Medicine | 2017
Pawan Kumar Gupta; Murali Krishna; Anoop Chullikana; Sanjay Desai; Rajkumar Murugesan; Santanu Dutta; Uday Narayan Sarkar; Radhakrishnan Raju; Anita Dhar; Rajiv Parakh; L. Jeyaseelan; Pachaiyappan Viswanathan; Prasanth Kulapurathu Vellotare; Raviraja N. Seetharam; Charan Thej; Mathiyazhagan Rengasamy; Sudha Balasubramanian; Anish Sen Majumdar
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to Buerger’s disease is a major unmet medical need with a high incidence of morbidity. This phase II, prospective, nonrandomized, open‐label, multicentric, dose‐ranging study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of i.m. injection of adult human bone marrow‐derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSC) in CLI due to Buerger’s disease. Patients were allocated to three groups: 1 and 2 million cells/kg body weight (36 patients each) and standard of care (SOC) (18 patients). BMMSCs were administered as 40–60 injections in the calf muscle and locally, around the ulcer. Most patients were young (age range, 38–42 years) and ex‐smokers, and all patients had at least one ulcer. Both the primary endpoints—reduction in rest pain (0.3 units per month [SE, 0.13]) and healing of ulcers (11% decrease in size per month [SE, 0.05])—were significantly better in the group receiving 2 million cells/kg body weight than in the SOC arm. Improvement in secondary endpoints, such as ankle brachial pressure index (0.03 [SE, 0.01] unit increase per month) and total walking distance (1.03 [SE, 0.02] times higher per month), were also significant in the group receiving 2 million cells/kg as compared with the SOC arm. Adverse events reported were remotely related or unrelated to BMMSCs. In conclusion, i.m. administration of BMMSC at a dose of 2 million cells/kg showed clinical benefit and may be the best regimen in patients with CLI due to Buerger’s disease. However, further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the most appropriate dose. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:689–699
Biotechnology Letters | 2012
Sanjay Gottipamula; Archana Sharma; Sagar Krishnamurthy; Anish Sen Majumdar; Raviraja N. Seetharam
Archive | 2010
Rakhi Pal; Pawan Kumar Gupta; Prasanna Kumar Kemburu; Joyothi Prasanna; Satish Totey; Raviraja N. Seetharam; Umesh Baikunje Golithadka; Anish Sen Majumdar
Archive | 2016
Sudha Balasubramanian; Swathi Sundar Raj; Charan Thej; Ramesh Bhonde; Raviraja N. Seetharam; Anish Sen Majumdar
Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications | 2017
Sudha Balasubramanian; Charan Thej; Ankita Walvekar; Priyanka Swamynathan; Pawan Kumar Gupta; Raviraja N. Seetharam; Anish Sen Majumdar
Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications | 2017
Mukta Sachdev; Anoop Chullikana; Raviraja N. Seetharam; Rachana Shilpakar; R. Sapna; Keerthi Velugotla; Ritambhara; Anish Sen Majumdar; Pawan Kumar Gupta
Archive | 2015
Rakhi Pal; Pawan Kumar Gupta; Prasanna Kumar Kemburu; Jyothi Prasanna; Satish Totey; Raviraja N. Seetharam; Umesh Baikunje Golithadka; Anish Sen Majumdar