Ravit Nahum

The influence of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcome.

To examine whether body mass index (BMI) influences the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF).

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity

To examine whether the choice of the GnRH analogues used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), may influence endometrial receptivity, we studied 712 IVF cycles, in patients undergoing COH with GnRH agonist or antagonist and with the transfer of at least one top-quality embryo. The GnRH agonist group showed significantly higher endometrial thickness and higher pregnancy rate, suggestive of a higher endometrial receptivity, compared with the GnRH antagonist group.

What is the preferred GnRH analogue for polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization

In an attempt to evaluate the influence of the GnRH analogue used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on the outcome of IVF cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, we studied 152 IVF cycles. The PCOS patients undergoing COH using the GnRH agonist protocol (n = 50) showed a significantly higher pregnancy rate (36% vs. 19.6%, respectively), compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 102).

HMG improves IVF outcome in patients with high basal FSH/LH ratio: a preliminary study

In an attempt to examine the role of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) administration in patients with high basal FSH/LH ratio, patients undergoing at least two IVF cycles, where one included HMG (HMG group) and the other included recombinant FSH (rFSH) only (FSH group), were studied. The use of HMG, in this specific group of patients, produced significantly higher number of top-quality embryos (3.9 +/- 3.1 versus 2.5 +/- 1.7, respectively; P < 0.05), higher implantation (27.9% versus 5.3%, respectively; P +/- 0.003) and clinical pregnancy rates (44.4% versus 11.1%, respectively; P < 0.02), as compared with rFSH. Moreover, while the HMG group achieved a significantly higher peak oestradiol concentration (P = 0.04), no differences were observed between the groups in the other ovarian stimulation variables. In conclusion, the use of HMG in patients with high basal FSH/LH ratio, produced significantly higher number of top-quality embryos, and higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, compared with rFSH.

Does day 3 luteinizing-hormone level predict IVF success in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues?

To examine whether day 3 LH level or FSH-LH ratio predict IVF outcome, we studied patients with a favorable prognosis a priori undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH agonist (agonist group; n = 131) or antagonist (antagonist group; n = 137). Although LH level could not predict IVF outcome, patients undergoing COH using the GnRH antagonist or agonist protocols with FSH-LH ratios >2 or >3, respectively, achieved significantly lower pregnancy rates (11.1% vs. 27.7% and 8.3% vs. 31.9%, respectively).

Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure does not impair future fertility

Abstract Aims: To examine whether misoprostol treatment for first trimester missed abortion affects future fertility. Patients and methods: In a historical prospective approach, we analyzed our database for patients treated with misoprostol. All eligible patients underwent an interview according to a questionnaire, which includes their demographic characteristics, obstetric, gynecologic and infertility history. They were asked about the side effects, intention and subsequent ability to conceive. Their future pregnancy rates were calculated and compared to the acceptable figures in the literature. Results: The infertility rates among our patients were similar to those reported in the general population. Pregnancy rates 2 years after treatment were similar to the previously published reports, except for lower rates during the first three months post-treatment. Although no between-group differences were observed in the subsequent pregnancy rates, 2 years following misoprostol treatment in ≤35 versus >35 years old patients, primi- versus multigravida and nulli- versus parous women, higher pregnancy rates were observed in patients ≤35 versus >35 years old, primi- versus multigravida and nulli- versus, parous, during the first 3 months following misoprostol treatment. Conclusion: Misoprostol treatment, for women with first trimester missed abortion and favorable reproductive history, is an acceptable treatment with no detrimental effect on future fertility.

Follitropin-α (Gonal-F) versus follitropin-β (Puregon) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization : is there any difference?

In an attempt to examine and compare the effect of the two commercially available recombinant FSH on ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF cycle outcome, we studied 264 IVF cycles in patients with a favorable prognosis a priori, 198 in patients using follitropin-alpha, and 68 in patients using follitropin-beta. Although both groups achieved a comparable number of retrieved oocytes, the use of follitropin-beta was associated with a tendency toward a lower clinical pregnancy rate (PR), and with significantly higher E(2) levels despite the use of significantly lower total gonadotropin dose.

GnRH-agonist ovulation trigger in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF with ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol

Objective: To evaluate, whether Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist (GnRH-agonist or GnRH-ag) trigger in patients undergoing the ultrashort GnRH-ag/GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol is as effective as in patients at high risk to develop severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), who undergo the multidose GnRH-ant protocol. Design: Cohort study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: All consecutive women aged ≤35 years admitted to our IVF unit from January 2011 to October 2011 who reached the ovum pick-up stage. Interventions: Triggering final oocytes maturation by GnRH-ag instead of hCG, in high-responder patients undergoing either the ultrashort GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant or the multidose GnRH-antagonist controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols. Main outcome measures: Ovarian stimulation characteristics, percentage of mature oocytes, fertilization and pregnancy rates. Results: No inbetween groups differences were observed in ovarian-stimulation related variable, percentage of mature oocytes, fertilization or pregnancy rates. No case of moderate-severe OHSS was reported in the study, or the control groups. Conclusions: Three consecutive doses of daily GnRH-ag administration at the beginning of ultrashort flare GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant COH protocol, did not interfere with the ability of the GnRH-ag to trigger final oocytes maturation at the end of the COH cycle.

Human menopausal gonadotropin versus highly purified-hMG in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in-vitro fertilisation: does purity improve outcome?

Objectives. To examine and compare the effect of the two commercially available menotropins (highly purified-human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) and the traditional human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)) on ovarian stimulation characteristics and in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle outcome. Study Design. We studied 36 patients undergoing at least two controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles for IVF, with the same GnRH-analogue protocols, where one included HP-hMG and the other included hMG. Ovarian stimulation characteristics and outcome were compared between the two groups. Results. Patients in the HP-hMG group achieved significantly higher implantation (20.0% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.03; respectively) and pregnancy rates (47.2% vs. 19.4%, p < 0.009; respectively) compared to the hMG group. Although no in-between group difference was observed in the number of top-quality embryos per patient, the proportion of the total number of top-quality embryos per total number of generated embryos was significantly higher in the HP-hMG group (88/196 vs. 72/204, p < 0.049; respectively) as compared to the hMG group. Conclusions. Patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF that includes HP-hMG preparations produce significantly higher implantation and pregnancy rates, as compared to the traditional hMG.