Ray Boswell

Current perspectives on gas hydrate resources

For the past three decades, discussion of naturally-occurring gas hydrates has been framed by a series of assessments that indicate enormous global volumes of methane present within gas hydrate accumulations. At present, these estimates continue to range over several orders of magnitude, creating great uncertainty in assessing those two gas hydrate issues that relate most directly to resource volumes – gas hydrate’s potential as an energy resource and its possible role in ongoing climate change. However, a series of recent field expeditions have provided new insights into the nature of gas hydrate occurrence; perhaps most notably, the understanding that gas hydrates occur in a wide variety of geologic settings and modes of occurrence. These fundamental differences - which include gas hydrate concentration, host lithology, distribution within the sediment matrix, burial depth, water depth, and many others - can now be incorporated into evaluations of gas hydrate energy resource and environmental issues. With regard to energy supply potential, field data combined with advanced numerical simulation have identified gas-hydrate-bearing sands as the most feasible initial targets for energy recovery. The first assessments of potential technically-recoverable resources are now occurring, enabling a preliminary estimate of ultimate global recoverable volumes on the order of ~3 × 1014 m3 (1016 ft3; ∼150 GtC). Other occurrences, such as gas hydrate-filled fractures in clay-dominated reservoirs, may also become potential energy production targets in the future; but as yet, no production concept has been demonstrated. With regard to the climate implications of gas hydrate, an analogous partitioning of global resources to determine that portion most prone to dissociation during specific future warming scenarios is needed. At present, it appears that these two portions of total gas hydrate resources (those that are the most likely targets for gas extraction and those that are the most likely to respond in a meaningful way to climate change) will be largely exclusive, as those deposits that are the most amenable to production (the more deeply buried and localized accumulations) are also those that are the most poorly coupled to oceanic and atmospheric conditions.

Toward Production From Gas Hydrates: Current Status, Assessment of Resources, and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Technology and Potential

Toward Production From Gas Hydrates: Current Status, Assessment of Resources, and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Technology and Potential George J. Moridis, SPE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Timothy S. Collett, SPE, US Geological Survey; Ray Boswell, US Department of Energy; M. Kurihara, SPE, Japan Oil Engineering Company; Matthew T. Reagan, SPE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Carolyn Koh and E. Dendy Sloan, SPE, Colorado School of Mines This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2008 SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference held in Keystone, Colorado, U.S.A., 10–12 February 2008. Abstract Gas hydrates are a vast energy resource with global distribution in the permafrost and in the oceans. Even if conservative estimates are considered and only a small fraction is recoverable, the sheer size of the resource is so large that it demands evaluation as a potential energy source. In this review paper, we discuss the distribution of natural gas hydrate accumulations, the status of the primary international RD Klauda and Sandler, 2005). Given the sheer magnitude of the resource, ever increasing global energy demand, and the finite volume of conventional fossil fuel reserves, gas hydrates are emerging as a potential energy source for a growing number of nations. The attractive- ness of gas hydrates is further enhanced by the environmental desirability of natural gas (as opposed to solid or liquid) fuels. Thus, the appeal of gas hydrate accumulations as future hydrocarbon gas sources is rapidly increasing and their production potential clearly demands technical and economic evaluation. The past decade has seen a marked acceleration in gas hydrate RD Paull et al., 2005), reservoir lithology, and rates and

Is Gas Hydrate Energy Within Reach

A new focus of the most recoverable gas hydrate deposits is shortening the timeline for the future production of natural gas from this vast resource. Technological advances have opened up natural gas resources that were previously unobtainable, including deep-water areas (depths >305 m) and unconventional resources, such as coal-bed methane, and gas in shale, that do not readily release their gas to wells. The next resource poised to be delivered is gas hydrates, which form from methane and water at low temperatures and moderate pressures. Gas hydrates occur in permafrost (1), but most of this vast resource occurs in marine sediments on the outer continental shelves (2). Physical barriers posed by Arctic and deep-water settings, as well as a lack of proven extraction methods, have made them an unexploited resource. However, a series of international field programs in the last 5 years, in conjunction with experimental studies and numerical simulations, show that it should be possible to extract the most favorable gas hydrates—those enclosed in sandy sediments that lay at the apex of the gas hydrate resource pyramid (see the figure)—with existing technologies.

Natural Gas Hydrates: A Review

A strong upward trend exists for the consumption of all energy sources as people throughout the world strive for a higher standard of living. Someday, possibly soon, the earths store of easily accessed hydrocarbons will no longer satisfy our growing economies and populations. By then, an unfamiliar but kindred hydrocarbon resource called natural gas hydrate may become a significant source of energy. Approximately 35 years ago, Russian scientists made what was then a bold assertion that gas hydrates, a crystalline solid of water and natural gas and a historical curiosity to physical chemists, should occur in abundance in the natural environment. Since this early start, the scientific foundation has been built for the realization that gas hydrates are a global phenomenon, occurring in permafrost regions of the arctic and in deep-water parts of most continental margins worldwide. The amount of natural gas contained in the worlds gas-hydrate accumulations is enormous, but these estimates remain highly speculative. Researchers have long speculated that gas hydrates could eventually be a commercial producible energy resource, yet technical and economic hurdles have historically made gas-hydrate development a distant goal instead of a near-term possibility. This view began to change in recent years with the realization that this unconventional resource could possibly be developed with the existing conventional oil and gas production technology. The pace of gas-hydrate energy assessment projects has significantly accelerated over the past several years, but many critical gas-hydrate exploration and development questions still remain. The exploitation and potential development of gas-hydrate resources is a complex technological problem. However, humans have successfully dealt with such complicated problems in the past to satisfy our energy needs; technical innovations have been key to our historical successes.

Challenges, Uncertainties, and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas-Hydrate Deposits

Challenges, Uncertainties and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas Hydrate Deposits G.J. Moridis, SPE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; T.S. Collett, SPE, US Geological Survey; M. Pooladi- Darvish, SPE, University of Calgary and Fekete; S. Hancock, SPE, RPS Group; C. Santamarina, Georgia Institute of Technology; R. Boswell, US Department of Energy; T. Kneafsey, J. Rutqvist and M. B. Kowalsky, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; M.T. Reagan, SPE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; E.D. Sloan, SPE, Colorado School of Mines; A.K. Sum and C. A. Koh, Colorado School of Mines Abstract The current paper complements the Moridis et al. (2009) review of the status of the effort toward commercial gas production from hydrates. We aim to describe the concept of the gas hydrate petroleum system, to discuss advances, requirement and suggested practices in gas hydrate (GH) prospecting and GH deposit characterization, and to review the associated technical, economic and environmental challenges and uncertainties, including: the accurate assessment of producible fractions of the GH resource, the development of methodologies for identifying suitable production targets, the sampling of hydrate-bearing sediments and sample analysis, the analysis and interpretation of geophysical surveys of GH reservoirs, well testing methods and interpretation of the results, geomechanical and reservoir/well stability concerns, well design, operation and installation, field operations and extending production beyond sand-dominated GH reservoirs, monitoring production and geomechanical stability, laboratory investigations, fundamental knowledge of hydrate behavior, the economics of commercial gas production from hydrates, and the associated environmental concerns. Introduction Background. Gas hydrates (GH) are solid crystalline compounds of water and gaseous substances described by the general chemical formula G•N H H 2 O, in which the molecules of gas G (referred to as guests) occupy voids within the lattices of ice- like crystal structures. Gas hydrate deposits occur in two distinctly different geographic settings where the necessary conditions of low temperature T and high pressure P exist for their formation and stability: in the Arctic (typically in association with permafrost) and in deep ocean sediments (Kvenvolden, 1988). The majority of naturally occurring hydrocarbon gas hydrates contain CH 4 in overwhelming abundance. Simple CH 4 - hydrates concentrate methane volumetrically by a factor of ~164 when compared to standard P and T conditions (STP). Natural CH 4 -hydrates crystallize mostly in the structure I form, which has a hydration number N H ranging from 5.77 to 7.4, with N H = 6 being the average hydration number and N H = 5.75 corresponding to complete hydration (Sloan and Koh, 2008). Natural GH can also contain other hydrocarbons (alkanes C  H 2+2 ,  = 2 to 4), but may also contain trace amounts of other gases (mainly CO 2 , H 2 S or N 2 ). Although there has been no systematic effort to map and evaluate this resource on a global scale, and current estimates of in-place volumes vary widely (ranging between 10 15 to 10 18 m 3 at standard conditions), the consensus is that the worldwide quantity of hydrocarbon within GH is vast (Milkov, 2004; Boswell and Collett, 2010). Given the sheer magnitude of the resource, ever increasing global energy demand, and the finite volume of conventional fossil fuel resources, GH are emerging as a potential energy source for a growing number of nations. The attractiveness of GH is further enhanced by the environmental desirability of natural gas, as it has the lowest carbon intensity of all fossil fuels. Thus, the appeal of GH accumulations as future hydrocarbon gas sources is rapidly increasing and their production potential clearly demands technical and economic evaluation. The past decade has seen a marked acceleration in gas hydrate R&D, including both a proliferation of basic scientific endeavors as well as the strong emergence of focused field studies of GH occurrence and resource potential, primarily within national GH programs (Paul et al., 2010). Together, these efforts have helped to clarify the dominant issues and challenges facing the extraction of methane from gas hydrates. A review paper by Moridis et al. (2009) summarized the status of the effort for production from gas hydrates. The authors discussed the distribution of natural gas hydrate accumulations, the status of the primary international research and development R&D programs (including current policies, focus and priorities), and the remaining science and technological challenges facing commercialization of production. After a brief examination of GH accumulations that are well characterized and appear to be models for future development and gas production, they analyzed the role of numerical simulation in the assessment of the hydrate production potential, identified the data needs for reliable predictions, evaluated the status of knowledge with regard to these needs, discussed knowledge gaps and their impact, and reached the conclusion that the numerical simulation capabilities are quite advanced and that the related gaps are either not significant or are being addressed. Furthermore, Moridis et al. (2009) reviewed the current body of literature relevant to potential productivity from different types of GH deposits, and determined that there are consistent indications of a large production potential at high rates over long periods from a wide variety of GH deposits. Finally, they identified (a) features, conditions, geology and techniques that are desirable in the selection of potential production targets, (b) methods to maximize production, and (c) some of the conditions and characteristics that render certain GH deposits undesirable for production.

INDIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN GAS HYDRATE PROSPECTS: RESULTS OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL GAS HYDRATE PROGRAM (NGHP) EXPEDITION 01

Studies of geologic and geophysical data from the offshore of India have revealed two geologically distinct areas with inferred gas hydrate occurrences: the passive continental margins of the Indian Peninsula and along the Andaman convergent margin. The Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP) Expedition 01 was designed to study the occurrence of gas hydrate off the Indian Peninsula and along the Andaman convergent margin with special emphasis on understanding the geologic and geochemical controls on the occurrence of gas hydrate in these two diverse settings. NGHP Expedition 01 established the presence of gas hydrates in KrishnaGodavari, Mahanadi and Andaman basins. The expedition discovered one of the richest gas hydrate accumulations yet documented (Site 10 in the Krishna-Godavari Basin), documented the thickest and deepest gas hydrate stability zone yet known (Site 17 in Andaman Sea), and established the existence of a fully-developed gas hydrate system in the Mahanadi Basin (Site 19).

SITE SELECTION FOR DOE/JIP GAS HYDRATE DRILLING IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO

Studies of geologic and geophysical data from the offshore of India have revealed two geologically distinct areas with inferred gas hydrate occurrences: the passive continental margins of the Indian Peninsula and along the Andaman convergent margin. The Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP) Expedition 01 was designed to study the occurrence of gas hydrate off the Indian Peninsula and along the Andaman convergent margin with special emphasis on understanding the geologic and geochemical controls on the occurrence of gas hydrate in these two diverse settings. NGHP Expedition 01 established the presence of gas hydrates in Krishna- Godavari, Mahanadi and Andaman basins. The expedition discovered one of the richest gas hydrate accumulations yet documented (Site 10 in the Krishna-Godavari Basin), documented the thickest and deepest gas hydrate stability zone yet known (Site 17 in Andaman Sea), and established the existence of a fully-developed gas hydrate system in the Mahanadi Basin (Site 19).

Gas Hydrates as a Potential Energy Source: State of Knowledge and Challenges

Gas hydrates are a vast energy resource with global distribution in the permafrost and in the oceans, and its sheer size demands evaluation as a potential energy source. Here we discuss the distribution of natural gas hydrate (GH) accumulations, the status of the international R&D programs. We review well-characterized GH accumulations that appear to be models for future gas production, and we analyze the role of numerical simulation in the assessment of their production potential. We discuss the productivity from different GH types, and consistent indications of the possibility for production at high rates over long periods using conventional technologies. We identify (a) features, conditions, geology, and techniques that are desirable in production targets, (b) methods to maximize production, and (c) some of the conditions and characteristics that render GH deposits undesirable. Finally, we review the remaining technical, economic, and environmental challenges and uncertainties facing gas production from hydrates.

Chapter 8 – Methane Hydrates

Gas hydrate is a solid, naturally occurring substance consisting predominantly of methane gas and water. Recent scientific drilling programs in Japan, Canada, the United States, Korea and India have demonstrated that gas hydrate occurs broadly and in a variety of forms in shallow sediments of the outer continental shelves and in Arctic regions. Field, laboratory and numerical modelling studies conducted to date indicate that gas can be extracted from gas hydrates with existing production technologies, particularly for those deposits in which the gas hydrate exists as pore-filling grains at high saturation in sand-rich reservoirs. A series of regional resource assessments indicate that substantial volumes of gas hydrate likely exist in sand-rich deposits. Recent field programs in Japan, Canada and in the United States have demonstrated the technical viability of methane extraction from gas-hydrate-bearing sand reservoirs and have investigated a range of potential production scenarios. At present, basic reservoir depressurisation shows the greatest promise and can be conducted using primarily standard industry equipment and procedures. Depressurisation is expected to be the foundation of future production systems; additional processes, such as thermal stimulation, mechanical stimulation and chemical injection, will likely also be integrated as dictated by local geological and other conditions. An innovative carbon dioxide and methane swapping technology is also being studied as a method to produce gas from select gas hydrate deposits. In addition, substantial additional volumes of gas hydrate have been found in dense arrays of grain-displacing veins and nodules in fine-grained, clay-dominated sediments; however, to date, no field tests, and very limited numerical modelling, have been conducted with regard to the production potential of such accumulations. Work remains to further refine: (1) the marine resource volumes within potential accumulations that can be produced through exploratory drilling programs; (2) the tools for gas hydrate detection and characterisation from remote sensing data; (3) the details of gas hydrate reservoir production behaviour through additional, well-monitored and longer duration field tests and (4) the understanding of the potential environmental impacts of gas hydrate resource development. The results of future production tests, in the context of varying market and energy supply conditions around the globe, will be the key to determine the ultimate timing and scale of the commercial production of natural gas from gas hydrates.

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE ECONOMICS OF GAS PRODUCTION FROM NATURAL GAS HYDRATES

Economic studies on simulated natural gas hydrate reservoirs have been compiled to estimate the price of natural gas that may lead to economically viable production from the most promising gas hydrate accumulations. As a first estimate, large-scale production of natural gas from North American arctic region Class 1 and Class 2 hydrate deposits will be economically acceptable at gas prices over