Ray Hachem

A Comparison of Two Antimicrobial-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters

BACKGROUND The use of central venous catheters impregnated with either minocycline and rifampin or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine reduces the rates of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection as compared with the use of unimpregnated catheters. We compared the rates of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with these two kinds of antiinfective catheters. METHODS We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial in 12 university-affiliated hospitals. High-risk adult patients in whom central venous catheters were expected to remain in place for three or more days were randomly assigned to undergo insertion of polyurethane, triple-lumen catheters impregnated with either minocycline and rifampin (on both the luminal and external surfaces) or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (on only the external surface). After their removal, the tips and subcutaneous segments of the catheters were cultured by both the roll-plate and the sonication methods. Peripheral-blood cultures were obtained if clinically indicated. RESULTS Of 865 catheters inserted, 738 (85 percent) produced culture results that could be evaluated. The clinical characteristics of the patients and the risk factors for infection were similar in the two groups. Catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin were 1/3 as likely to be colonized as catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (28 of 356 catheters [7.9 percent] vs. 87 of 382 [22.8 percent], P<0.001), and catheter-related bloodstream infection was 1/12 as likely in catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin (1 of 356 [0.3 percent], vs. 13 of 382 [3.4 percent] for those impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine; P<0.002). CONCLUSIONS The use of central venous catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin is associated with a lower rate of infection than the use of catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.

Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis with Posaconazole in Patients Who Are Refractory to or Intolerant of Conventional Therapy: An Externally Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Invasive aspergillosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Current treatments provide limited benefit. Posaconazole is an extended-spectrum triazole with in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus species. METHODS We investigated the efficacy and safety of posaconazole oral suspension (800 mg/day in divided doses) as monotherapy in an open-label, multicenter study in patients with invasive aspergillosis and other mycoses who were refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. Data from external control cases were collected retrospectively to provide a comparative reference group. RESULTS Cases of aspergillosis deemed evaluable by a blinded data review committee included 107 posaconazole recipients and 86 control subjects (modified intent-to-treat population). The populations were similar and balanced with regard to prespecified demographic and disease variables. The overall success rate (i.e., the data review committee-assessed global response at the end of treatment) was 42% for posaconazole recipients and 26% for control subjects (odds ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-11.04; P=.006). The differences in response between the modified intent-to-treat treatment groups were preserved across additional, prespecified subsets, including infection site (pulmonary or disseminated), hematological malignancy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, baseline neutropenia, and reason for enrollment (patient was refractory to or intolerant of previous antifungal therapy). An exposure-response relationship was suggested by pharmacokinetic analyses. CONCLUSIONS Although the study predates extensive use of echinocandins and voriconazole, these findings demonstrate that posaconazole is an alternative to salvage therapy for patients with invasive aspergillosis who are refractory to or intolerant of previous antifungal therapy.

Central Venous Catheters Coated with Minocycline and Rifampin for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Colonization and Bloodstream Infections: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

See related articles on pp 257-266 and 275-280 and editorial comment on pp 304-306. Central venous catheters are indispensable in the treatment of critically and chronically ill patients, but they are the leading cause of primary nosocomial bloodstream infection [1, 2]. A study of hospitals in the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System, conducted between 1986 and 1990, showed that rates of bloodstream infection were substantially higher in patients who were in intensive care units and had intravascular devices than in those who did not have such devices [3]. To decrease the risk for catheter colonization and infection, antiseptic and antibiotic agents have been applied topically at the insertion site [4-6]. More recently, the use of antimicrobial flush solutions has been proposed [7]. However, coating venous catheters with antiseptic or antimicrobial agents may have an even more pronounced protective effect against colonization and infection, particularly if both the external and internal surfaces of the device are coated. Since 1990, several types of antiseptic or antimicrobial vascular catheter coatings have been developed and studied [8, 9]. Maki and colleagues [9] investigated central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine; the coated catheters seemed less likely than the uncoated catheters to be associated with bloodstream infections. We recently coated vascular catheters with a combination of minocycline and rifampin after treatment with the tridodecylmethyl-ammonium chloride surfactant. In vitro, these catheters were shown to have broad-spectrum antimicrobial inhibitory activity that was significantly superior to the activity of catheters coated with chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine [10, 11]. The catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin were also found to be highly efficacious in preventing catheter colonization and subcutaneous infection in a rabbit model [11]. In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, we studied the efficacy of catheters that were treated with tridodecylmethyl-ammonium chloride and coated with minocycline and rifampin in preventing catheter colonization and bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients. Methods Study Sample Our study was conducted simultaneously at five university-based hospitals in the Texas Medical Center in Houston: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (518 beds), Veterans Administration Medical Center (1050 beds), Hermann Hospital (600 beds), Ben Taub General Hospital (580 beds), and The Methodist Hospital (904 beds). The study began on 1 September 1994 and ended on 27 March 1995. Hospitalized patients 18 years of age or older who required a triple-lumen polyurethane central venous catheter at a new insertion site were asked to participate. We excluded pregnant women, patients who were allergic to rifampin or tetracycline, patients with dermatitis or a burn over the insertion site, and patients for whom the anticipated duration of catheterization was less than 3 days. All patients gave informed consent. Randomization All catheters were triple-lumen, polyurethane, 7 French, and 20 cm long (Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, Indiana). The coated catheters were pretreated with tridodecylmethyl-ammonium chloride and then coated, 18 hours later, with minocycline and rifampin. The levels of minocycline and rifampin on the external and internal surfaces of coated catheters before insertion, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were 139.3 g/cm and 13.9 g/cm, respectively. Control catheters were untreated and uncoated. All catheters were gas sterilized and placed in identical trays, and each tray was assigned an identification number. The trays were then randomly assigned into blocks of six: three with coated catheters and three with control catheters. Each block of trays was placed in boxes by Cook Critical Care, and the boxes were shipped to the five hospitals. When a patient was determined to be eligible, a tray was removed from the box (trays were removed one at a time, in sequential order from top to bottom), and that catheter was used for the patient. The catheter identification number was recorded on a data entry form and on the patients medical chart; neither the patient nor the clinician who inserted the device knew which catheter (coated or uncoated) had been used. Catheter Insertion and Care Study catheters were inserted into the subclavian vein, internal jugular vein, or femoral vein of patients who had no other indwelling catheter. Study catheters were not exchanged over guidewires. Maximal sterile barrier precautions were taken, including use of a sterile gown, sterile gloves, full sterile drapes, a mask, and a cap. At the time of catheter insertion and at each dressing change, the insertion site was cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate (at The Methodist Hospital) or 10% povidone-iodine scrub (at all other hospitals). In each case, the preparation was applied to the skin for 2 minutes before catheter insertion. The insertion site was then covered with sterile gauze and taped securely. The insertion site was inspected every 72 hours (during a dressing change) for evidence of infection, such as erythema, purulence, swelling, or tenderness over the catheter. During follow-up, the following information was obtained for all patients: site of catheter insertion; dates of catheter placement and removal; occurrence of difficulties and violations of aseptic technique during insertion or removal, if any; reason for using the catheter (chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition, administration of blood products, or a combination of these reasons); type of dressing; and reason for catheter removal. In addition, clinical data were obtained on underlying disease, neutrophil and platelet counts, antibiotic therapy administration, other therapeutic interventions administered during the period of catheterization, and the presence or absence of fever and infection during catheterization. The catheter remained in place until it was no longer needed; until a specific event, such as catheter-related infection, necessitated its removal; or for 28 days, whichever occurred first. Microbiological Methods Quantitative Cultures of Central Venous Catheters The entire catheter was removed aseptically, and 4-cm segments were cut from the catheter tip and the subcutaneous section. These segments were semiquantitatively cultured by using the roll-plate method; the same segment was then quantitatively cultured by using the sonication method [12-14]. Organisms recovered by either method were fully identified according to standard microbiological methods. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were classified as gram-positive cocci in clusters that produced catalase but not coagulase and were categorized according to species by using the Staph-Ident System (Analytab Products, Plainview, New Jersey). All hospitals used the same methods for culture. Skin Cultures To determine whether bacteria became resistant to the antibiotics that coated the study catheters, skin samples obtained from the insertion site were cultured at the time of insertion and within 24 hours after catheter removal, as described elsewhere [15]. Organisms recovered from the insertion site were fully identified by using standard microbiological methods. Antimicrobial Resistance We used the modified Kirby-Bauer technique to test the antimicrobial activity of the catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin against all organisms isolated from indwelling coated catheters at the time of catheter removal [16]. The zones of inhibition against staphylococci cultured from coated catheters were compared with those of uncoated catheters. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of minocycline hydrochloride (Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, New York) and rifampin (Ciba-Geigy Corp., Summit, New Jersey) against staphylococcal organisms that colonized the catheter tip, subcutaneous segments, and adjacent skin insertion sites of the coated catheters was determined. A microbroth dilution method was used to determine the MIC in accordance with guidelines established by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [17]. Definitions The definitions adopted for our study were proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [18]. Colonization of a central venous catheter was defined as 1) the isolation from either the tip or the subcutaneous segment of 15 or more colony-forming units of any organism by the rollplate technique or 2) isolation of more than 1000 colony-forming units of any organism by the sonication technique. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was defined as the isolation of microorganisms from the bloodstream (blood was obtained through venipuncture, not through the catheter) of a patient who had concurrent clinical manifestations of sepsis and no source for the bloodstream infection other than the vascular catheter. In addition, the catheter had to be colonized with the same organism (same species and same antibiogram). To confirm the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection, DNA molecular typing done using pulse-field gel electrophoresis was performed on organisms that were of the same species, had the same antibiogram, and were isolated from the catheter and blood during the period of catheterization. Patients were considered to have fever if the oral body temperature was greater than 38 C. Neutropenia was defined as a polymorphonuclear count of fewer than 1000 cells/mm3. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of fewer than 100 000 cells/mm3. Molecular Typing Molecular typing was performed by using pulse-field gel electrophoresis. Identical organisms with similar DNA profiles that were isolated from a segment of the colonized catheter and from the bloodstream confirmed the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. However, a mismatch did not rule out such a diagnosis because catheter coloniza

Comparative Activities of Daptomycin, Linezolid, and Tigecycline against Catheter-Related Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteremic Isolates Embedded in Biofilm

ABSTRACT In the setting of catheter-related bloodstream infections, intraluminal antibiotic lock therapy could be useful for the salvage of vascular catheters. In this in vitro study, we investigated the efficacies of the newer antibiotics daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline, in comparison with those of vancomycin, minocycline, and rifampin, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) embedded in biofilm. We also assessed the emergence of MRSA strains resistant to these antibiotics, alone or in combination with rifampin, after 4-hour daily use for catheter lock therapy. Minocycline, daptomycin, and tigecycline were more efficacious in inhibiting MRSA in biofilm than linezolid, vancomycin, and the negative control (P < 0.001) after the first day of exposure to these antibiotics, with minocycline being the most active, followed by daptomycin and then tigecycline, and with vancomycin and linezolid lacking activity, similar to the negative control. After 3 days of 4-hour daily exposures, daptomycin was the fastest in eradicating MRSA from biofilm, followed by minocycline and tigecycline, which were faster than linezolid, rifampin, and vancomycin (P < 0.001). When rifampin was used alone, it was the least effective in eradicating MRSA from biofilm after 5 days of 4-hour daily exposures, as it was associated with the emergence of rifampin-resistant MRSA. However, when rifampin was used in combination with other antibiotics, the combination was significantly effective in eliminating MRSA colonization in biofilm more rapidly than each of the antibiotics alone. In summary, daptomycin, minocycline, and tigecycline should be considered further for antibiotic lock therapy, and rifampin should be considered for enhanced antistaphylococcal activity but not as a single agent.

Efficacy and toxicity of caspofungin in combination with liposomal amphotericin B as primary or salvage treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies

Caspofungin (CAS) as salvage therapy for refractory invasive aspergillosis (IA) had a response rate of 45% among a heterogeneous group of patients. The use of CAS with other agents is appealing given its unique mechanism of action. Therefore, the authors retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of CAS plus liposomal amphotericin B (LipoAMB) in patients with documented (definite or probable) or possible IA.

Posaconazole as Salvage Treatment for Invasive Fusariosis in Patients with Underlying Hematologic Malignancy and Other Conditions

BACKGROUND Conventional amphotericin B-based antifungal therapy for invasive fusariosis in patients with a hematologic malignancy results in a > or = 70% failure rate. Posaconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent with in vitro and in vivo activity against Fusarium species. METHODS In this retrospective analysis of patients from 3 open-label clinical trials, we evaluated posaconazole for the treatment of invasive fusariosis. Twenty-one patients with proven or probable invasive fusariosis who had disease refractory to or who were intolerant of standard antifungal therapy received oral posaconazole suspension (800 mg per day in divided doses) as salvage therapy. RESULTS Successful outcome occurred in 10 (48%) of all 21 patients. Among patients with leukemia who received posaconazole therapy for >3 days, the overall success rate was 50%; for patients who recovered from myelosuppression, the success rate was 67%, compared with 20% for those with persistent neutropenia. CONCLUSION These results suggest that posaconazole is useful for the treatment of invasive fusariosis.

The changing epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: Candida glabrata and Candida krusei as the leading causes of candidemia in hematologic malignancy.

The objective of the current retrospective study was to compare the epidemiology of candidemia and its risk factors in patients who had hematologic malignancies(HM) with those in patients who had solid tumors (ST).

Posaconazole: a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal

Posaconazale is a new triazole drug being investigated in phase III clinical trials for the treatment and prevention of invasive fungal infections. In-vitro and in-vivo studies showed that posaconazole has broad-spectrum activity against most Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus species, Fusarium species, zygomycetes, and endemic fungi. Posaconazole is given orally two to four times daily. This triazole is widely distributed in the body, metabolised mainly by the liver, and is well tolerated, even in long-term courses. Adverse events are generally mild and include headache and gastrointestinal complaints. Posaconazole has shown promising clinical efficacy against life-threatening fungal infections that are often refractory to the currently available antifungal therapies-eg, invasive aspergillosis, fusariosis, and the emerging zygomycosis.

Candidemia in patients with hematologic malignancies in the era of new antifungal agents (2001-2007): stable incidence but changing epidemiology of a still frequently lethal infection.

The incidence, epidemiology, Candida species distribution, resistance patterns, and outcome of candidemia in high‐risk hematologic malignancy and/or stem cell transplantation patients have not been extensively described since the introduction of new antifungal agents.

Antibiotics and prevention of microbial colonization of catheters

Slime-producing staphylococci frequently colonize catheters, and when they are embedded in biofilm, they become resistant to various antibiotics. In the study that is described, the comparative efficacies of vancomycin, clindamycin, novobiocin, and minocycline, alone or in combination with rifampin, were tested in an in vitro model of colonization. The model consisted of the modified Robbins device with antibiotic-impregnated cement filling the lumen of catheter segments. The synergistic combination of minocycline and rifampin was the most efficacious in preventing bacterial colonization of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus to catheter surfaces. A similar trend was observed when the inhibitory activities of polyurethane catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin were compared with the inhibitory activities of catheters coated with other antimicrobial agents. The inhibitory activities of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin against S. epidermidis, S. aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis strains, for example, were significantly better than those of catheters coated with vancomycin (P < 0.05). The inhibitory activities of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin against gram-negative bacilli and Candida albicans were comparable to those of catheters coated with ceftazidime and amphotericin B, respectively. We found that the combination of minocycline and rifampin is unique and highly effective in preventing the colonization of catheters with slime-producing staphylococci and that it also displays a broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against gram-negative bacteria and yeast cells.