Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Raymond J. Jones is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Raymond J. Jones.


Family Business Review | 2016

Entrepreneurial Exploration and Exploitation in Family Business: A Systematic Review and Future Directions

Sanjay Goel; Raymond J. Jones

In entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation have been considered central activities for the survival, growth, and renewal of businesses. In this review we systematically examine research on these topics in family business. Our review comprises 59 publications examining exploration and/or exploitation in family firms published between 2001 and 2015 in 32 publications. The article highlights the contributions of family business in this area and reveals additional areas where a stronger connection between these concepts and the family business field could be developed. We suggest several new research directions that may enhance the understanding of these entrepreneurial activities in family business.


Management Decision | 2011

Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability

Manjula S. Salimath; Raymond J. Jones

Purpose – The paper has dual objectives. First, the paper aims to consolidate prior research in the area of population ecology theory and provide a review and critique of this influential organizational theory. The review is both broad and extensive, covering all major theoretical streams in population ecology. Second, the paper aims to highlight a new and hitherto unexplored area for future research, which lies at the intersection of population ecology and sustainability.Design/methodology/approach – The extensive and broad review included all salient published scholarly work on the topic of population ecology from 1996‐2010. Findings are reported in nine separate tables, classified by primary research focus, chronology, author, etc. Additionally, a brief summary of prior research on sustainability is provided.Findings – Population ecology continues as a valuable and influential perspective for organizational scholars. In comparison, sustainability is a relatively new entrant in the organizational litera...


Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal | 2016

Racial dissimilarity and diversity climate effect organizational identification

Brooklyn M. Cole; Raymond J. Jones; Lisa M. Russell

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the relationship between psychological diversity climate (PDC) and organizational identification (OID) when influenced by racial dissimilarity between the subordinate and supervisor. Design/methodology/approach Ordinary least squares hierarchical regression analysis was run for hypotheses testing. Findings Three of the four hypothesized relationships were supported. Support was found for the direct relationship between PDC and OID. The moderator race was significant thus also supported. The moderator of dissimilarity was not supported. Finally the three-way interaction with race and dissimilarity was supported. Practical implications OID is an important variable for overall organizational success. OID influences a wealth of organizationally relevant outcomes including turnover intentions. Considering higher turnover exists for minority employees, understanding how diversity climate perceptions vary by employee race and therefore impact OID differently, helps managers when making decisions about various initiatives. Originality/value This study is the first the authors know of to investigate the impact of dissimilarity on the PDC-OID relationship.


Social Enterprise Journal | 2017

The Hobby Lobby decision: legal formation for social enterprises made easier

Roger Reinsch; Raymond J. Jones; Randy Skalberg

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the choices social enterprises in the USA have about the legal formation of their business. Recently, new legal forms have been developed in the USA to ensure social goals are legally embedded into the firm. While the development of these new alternative supports social missions, organizations should be aware of both the benefits and drawbacks, which are outlined in this paper. Additionally, we draw on the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby case to illustrate how social enterprises can embed their social mission into their legal foundation using traditional legal structures, accomplishing the same purpose as the new socially oriented alternatives. Design/methodology/approach The authors provide a detailed assessment of the social-oriented legal forms of business based on precedent set in the US Supreme Court Hobby Lobby case. Findings Based on precedent in the Hobby Lobby case, the authors’ view is that traditional US legal business structures can be as effective as alternative socially oriented legal forms in the US as a method to legally prevent mission drift by legally embedding social goals into the legal structure of the firm. Practical implications By highlighting how social enterprises can use traditional US legal business forms to ensure their social mission as part of the organizational goals, the authors provide another legal avenue, and so US-based social enterprises can continue to focus on addressing social issues without worrying about mission drift from legal pressures. Social implications There is quite a lot of hype surrounding the development and adoption of socially oriented legal business forms in the USA with little discussion about the actual need for these new forms. The alternative perspective by the authors informs social enterprises how they can operate within the traditional US legal system while still focusing on their social mission. Originality/value The authors are one of the first to argue, based on precedent in the Hobby Lobby case, that US social enterprises need to critically examine which type of legal form is right for their business and what will offer them most benefit to their social mission in the long run.


Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management | 2017

Gender Makes a Difference: Investigating Consumer Purchasing Behavior and Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility Policies

Raymond J. Jones; Timothy M. Reilly; Marcus Z. Cox; Brooklyn M. Cole


Journal of Business Strategies | 2012

Strategic Management: Is It an Academic Discipline?

Marcus Z. Cox; Josh Daspit; Erin McLaughlin; Raymond J. Jones


Journal of Family Business Strategy | 2017

Mixed methodology in family business research: Past accomplishments and perspectives for the future

Timothy M. Reilly; Raymond J. Jones


Technovation | 2018

Properties of opportunity creation and discovery: Comparing variation in contexts of innovativeness

Raymond J. Jones; Anat BarNir


Academy of Management Proceedings | 2015

Architectural Dimensions of Social Venture Capital: Examining Strategy, Structure, and Performance

Raymond J. Jones; Manjula S. Salimath


Frontiers of entrepreneurship research | 2014

SOCIAL VENTURE CAPITAL FIRM STRATEGY: SOCIALNESS OF INVESTMENTS AND PERFORMANCE (SUMMARY)

Raymond J. Jones; Manjula S. Salimath

Collaboration


Dive into the Raymond J. Jones's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcus Z. Cox

Stephen F. Austin State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anat BarNir

University of North Texas

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa M. Russell

Indiana University Southeast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sanjay Goel

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge