Raymond Nien-Chen Kuo

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Prognosis of Early Breast Cancer in Asia

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been implicated in influencing the survival duration of patients with breast cancer. However, less is known about the impact of DM and other comorbidities on the breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes of Asian patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The characteristics of female patients with newly diagnosed, early-stage breast cancer were collected from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database for 2003-2004. DM status and other comorbidities were retrieved from Taiwans National Health Insurance database. The BCS and OS times of patients according to DM status were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Coxs proportional hazard model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the effects of DM, comorbidities, and other risk factors on mortality. RESULTS In total, 4,390 patients were identified and 341 (7.7%) presented with DM. The 5-year BCS and OS rates were significantly greater in DM patients than in non-DM patients (BCS, 85% versus 91%; OS, 79% versus 90%). Furthermore, after adjusting for clinicopathologic variables and comorbidities, DM remained an independent predictor of shorter BCS (adjusted HR, 1.53) and OS (adjusted HR, 1.71) times. Subgroup analyses also demonstrated a consistent prognostic influence of DM across different groups. CONCLUSION In Asian patients with early-stage breast cancer, DM is an independent predictor of lower BCS and OS rates, even after adjusting for other comorbidities. The integration of DM care as part of the continuum of care for early-stage breast cancer should be emphasized.

Predicting healthcare utilization using a pharmacy-based metric with the WHO's Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical algorithm.

Background:Automated pharmacy claim data have been used for risk adjustment on health care utilization. However, most published pharmacy-based morbidity measures incorporate a coding algorithm that requires the medication data to be coded using the US National Drug Codes or the American Hospital Formulary Service drug codes, making studies conducted outside the US operationally cumbersome. Objective:This study aimed to verify that the pharmacy-based metric with the World Health Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) algorithm can be used to explain the variations in health care utilization. Research Design:The Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance enrollees was used in this study. We chose 2006 as the baseline year to predict the total cost, medication cost, and the number of outpatient visits in 2007. The pharmacy-based metric with 32 classes of chronic conditions was modified from a revised version of the Chronic Disease Score. Results:The ordinary least squares (OLS) model and log-transformed OLS model adjusted for the pharmacy-based metric had a better R2 in concurrently predicting total cost compared with the model adjusted for Deyo’s Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser’s Index. The pharmacy-based metric models also provided a superior performance in predicting medication cost and number of outpatient visits. For prospectively predicting health care utilization, the pharmacy-based metric models also performed better than the models adjusted by the diagnosis-based indices. Conclusions:The pharmacy-based metric with the WHO ATC algorithm and the matching ATC codes were tested and found to be valid for explaining the variation in health care utilization.

Treatment of patients with dual hepatitis C and B by peginterferon α and ribavirin reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality

Objective Whether peginterferon α and ribavirin combination therapy reduces risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or improves survival in patients dual-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is unknown. Since it is ethically impossible to conduct a randomised trial to learn the long-term efficacy, we rely upon the large database to explore the effectiveness of combination therapy among dual-infected patients. Design Data for this population-based retrospective cohort study were obtained from the treatment programme, Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance and death certification. We examined the risk of HCC, mortality and adverse events in 1096 treated and 18 988 untreated HCV–HBV dually-infected patients. Outcomes were analysed using the bias corrected inverse probability weighting (IPW) by propensity scores. Outcomes of HCV–HBV dually-infected and HCV mono-infected patients receiving the same treatment were compared using new user design with IPW estimators to adjust for confounding. Results After adjustment, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of HCC (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97), liver-related mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.6) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52). Nevertheless, the underlying HBV infection was still a risk factor for HCC and mortality after treatment. Treatment was associated with an increase in the incidence of thyroid dysfunction (HR 1.9, p<0.001) and mood disorders (HR 1.81, p=0.005). Conclusions This is the first evidence showing that combination therapy decreased the risk of HCC and improved survival in HCV–HBV dually-infected patients despite a slight increase in the incidence of thyroid and mood disorders.

The influence of socio-economic status and multimorbidity patterns on healthcare costs: a six-year follow-up under a universal healthcare system

IntroductionMultimorbidity has been linked to elevated healthcare utilization and previous studies have found that socioeconomic status is an important factor associated with multimorbidity. Nonetheless, little is known regarding the impact of multimorbidity and socioeconomic status on healthcare costs and whether inequities in healthcare exist between socioeconomic classes within a universal healthcare system.MethodsThis longitudinal study employed the claims database of the National Health Insurance of Taiwan (959 990 enrolees), adopting medication-based Rx-defined morbidity groups (Rx-MG) as a measurement of multimorbidity. Mixed linear models were used to estimate the effects of multimorbidity and socioeconomic characteristics on annual healthcare costs between 2005 and 2010.ResultsThe distribution of Rx-MGs and total costs presented statistically significant differences among gender, age groups, occupation, and income class (p < .001). Nearly 80% of the enrolees were classified as multimorbid and low income earners presented the highest prevalence of multimorbidity. After controlling for age and gender, increases in the number of Rx-MG assignments were associated with higher total healthcare costs. After controlling for the effects of Rx-MG assignment and demographic characteristics, physicians, paramedical personnel, and public servant were found to generate higher total costs than typical employees/self-employed enrolees, while low-income earners generated lower costs. High income levels were also found to be associated with lower total costs. It was also revealed that occupation and multimorbidity have a moderating effect on healthcare cost.ConclusionsIncreases in the prevalence of multimorbidity are associated with higher health care costs. This study determined that instances of multimorbidity varied according to socioeconomic class; likewise there were inequities in healthcare utilization among individuals of various occupations and income levels, even when demographic characteristics and multimorbidity were controlled for. This highlights the importance of socioeconomic status with regard to healthcare utilization. These results indicate that socioeconomic factors should not be discounted when discussing the utilization of healthcare by patients with multimorbidity.

Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients Receiving Curative Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus (DM) is closely associated with hepatocarcinogenesis. This study explores the prognostic impact of DM in patients who received curative therapy for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Patients who had been diagnosed with stage I or II HCC in 2003 and 2004 and received surgical resection or local ablation therapy were identified from the population-based Taiwan National Cancer Registry. Data pertaining to DM and other comorbidities were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. Liver cancer-specific survival (LCS), liver disease-related survival (LDS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between patients with and without DM. The presence of other comorbidities and tumor status were adjusted using multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 931 patients who fulfilled the study criteria were analyzed; 185 (20%) of them had DM (type 1 or type 2). The LCS, LDS, and OS rates were significantly worse for patients with DM than patients without DM (all p < .001). After adjusting for age, sex, tumor stage, treatment, and the presence of other comorbidities, DM remained an independent predictor of poorer LCS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57; p < .001), LDS (HR = 1.70; p < .001), and OS (HR = 1.69; p < .001). The associations between DM and mortality were consistent among subgroups, irrespective of tumor size, stage, treatment modality, and liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS DM is an independent factor for poorer prognosis in patients who received curative therapy for localized HCC.

Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in Taiwan

BackgroundAlthough performance measurement for assessing care quality is an emerging area, a system for measuring the quality of cancer care at the hospital level has not been well developed. The purpose of this study was to develop organization-based core measures for colorectal cancer patient care and apply these measures to compare hospital performance.MethodsThe development of core measures for colorectal cancer has undergone three stages including a modified Delphi method. The study sample originated from 2004 data in the Taiwan Cancer Database, a national cancer data registry. Eighteen hospitals and 5585 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. We used indicator-based and case-based approaches to examine adherences simultaneously.ResultsThe final core measure set included seventeen indicators (1 pre-treatment, 11 treatment-related and 5 monitoring-related). There were data available for ten indicators. Indicator-based adherence possesses more meaningful application than case-based adherence for hospital comparisons. Mean adherence was 85.8% (79.8% to 91%) for indicator-based and 82.8% (77.6% to 88.9%) for case-based approaches. Hospitals performed well (>90%) for five out of eleven indicators. Still, the performance across hospitals varied for many indicators. The best and poorest system performance was reflected in indicators T5-negative surgical margin (99.3%, 97.2% - 100.0%) and T7-lymph nodes harvest more than twelve(62.7%, 27.6% - 92.2%), both of which related to surgical specimens.ConclusionsIn this nationwide study, quality of colorectal cancer care still shows room for improvement. These preliminary results indicate that core measures for cancer can be developed systematically and applied for internal quality improvement.

Radiofrequency ablation is superior to ethanol injection in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma irrespective of tumor size.

Background Randomized trials suggest that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be more effective than percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the survival advantage of RFA needs confirmation in daily practice. Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance claim database and National Death Registry data from 2004 through 2009. Patients receiving PEI or RFA as first-line treatment for newly-diagnosed stage I-II HCC were enrolled. Results A total of 658 patients receiving RFA and 378 patients receiving PEI treatment were included for final analysis. The overall survival (OS) rates of patients in the RFA and PEI groups at 5-year were 55% and 42%, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to patients that received PEI, those that received RFA had lower risks of overall mortality and first-line treatment failure (FTF), with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.60 (0.50-0.73) for OS and 0.54 (0.46-0.64) for FTF. The favorable outcomes for the RFA group were consistently significant for patients with tumors > 2 cm as well as for those with tumors < 2 cm. Consistent results were also observed in other subgroup analyses defined by gender, age, tumor stage, and co-morbidity status. Conclusion RFA provides better survival benefits than PEI for patients with unresectable stage I-II HCC, irrespective of tumors > 2 cm or ≤ 2 cm, in contemporary clinical practice.

Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib efficacies as third-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE The epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, are used as standard salvage therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to compare their efficacies in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Taiwan Cancer Registry and the National Health Insurance claim databases were searched for newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC from 2004 to 2007 who received gefitinib or erlotinib as third-line therapy. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were determined from registered parameters. Treatment efficacies were compared by the log-rank test in total population and subsets with different clinical characteristics. The Coxs proportion hazard model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios in multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 984 patients who received gefitinib (67%) or erlotinib (33%) were included. Patients receiving gefitinib or erlotinib had similar OS (median, 10.2 versus 9.9 months, p=0.524) and TTF (median, 5.5 versus 3.4 months, p=0.103). In multivariate analyses, both treatment groups had similar risk of overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.04, p=0.629) and treatment failure (adjusted HR=0.94, p=0.417). Comparing the treatments in subgroups based on age, tumour histology and gender also revealed no differences in OS and TTF. For patients who received gefitinib or erlotinib for more than 3 or 6 months, there was no difference in TTF but patients who received erlotinib had longer OS. CONCLUSIONS Gefitinib and erlotinib had similar efficacies as salvage therapy for advanced NSCLC in Taiwan.

Differences in patient reports on the quality of care in a diabetes pay-for-performance program between 1 year enrolled and newly enrolled patients

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the quality of care from the perspective of patients who participated in the diabetes pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan. DESIGN A cross-sectional telephone interview to measure the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus. SETTING A stratified sampling according to the level and region of the health-care providers in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1796 patients with diabetes mellitus responded to the telephone survey. INTERVENTIONS The patients were divided into two groups according to the length of time they had participated in the program: (1) the case group, who had received comprehensive care for at least 1 year and (2) the control group, who were newly enrolled in the diabetes mellitus P4P program for <3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The compliance of diabetes self-care and the level of satisfaction with the quality of care from the perspective of the patients. RESULTS After controlling for the characteristics of the health-care providers involved, pattern of diabetes treatment, self-reported health status and other patient characteristics, the case group performed better in exercise, had regular medication and better foot care and showed overall compliance with diabetes self-care and perceived better quality of care than the control group. CONCLUSIONS The patients who had received comprehensive care for 1 year showed better compliance with self-care and were more satisfied with the quality of care they had received. The P4P program appears to be associated with this enhanced care.

Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of the nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) program for breast cancer care (BC-P4P) in Taiwan on care quality, patient survival, and recurrence. STUDY DESIGN A population-based observational study with cross-sectional design. METHODS Retrospective analysis of population based cancer registration and claims data was used in this study. A total of 4528 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed in 2002 or 2003 who received curative surgery were observed until the end of 2008. This study applied multivariate linear regression to explore the association between BC-P4P enrollment and quality of care. Cox regression was applied to examine the effect of BC-P4P enrollment on 5-year recurrence and overall survival among patients with breast cancer. RESULTS After controlling for age, stage, type of surgery, and other factors, BC-P4P enrollees were found to have received better quality care than nonenrollees (P = .001). Cox regression models also indicated that after controlling for patient characteristics, quality of care was related to better 5-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.212; P = .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.289; P <.001). Even when controlled by quality of care provided to patients and its interaction with status of BC-P4P enrollment, BC-P4P enrollment remained statistically significant regarding 5-year overall survival (OR, 0.167; P <.001) and recurrence (OR, 0.370; P = .002). CONCLUSION Patients with breast cancer enrolled in the BC-P4P program received better quality care and had better outcome than nonenrolled patients. Evidence from this study indicates that financial incentives in the payment design had a positive impact on outcome of breast cancer care.PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of the nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) program for breast cancer care (BC-P4P) in Taiwan on care quality, patient survival, and recurrence. STUDY DESIGN A population-based observational study with cross-sectional design. METHODS Retrospective analysis of population-based cancer registration and claims data was used in this study. A total of 4,528 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed in 2002 or 2003 who received curative surgery were observed until the end of 2008. This study applied multivariate linear regression to explore the association between BC-P4P enrollment and quality of care. Cox regression was applied to examine the effect of BC-P4P enrollment on 5-year recurrence and overall survival among patients with breast cancer. RESULTS After controlling for age, stage, type of surgery, and other factors, BC-P4P enrollees were found to have received better quality care than nonenrollees (P = .001). Cox regression models also indicated that after controlling for patient characteristics, quality of care was related to better 5-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.212; P = .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.289; P < .001). Even when controlled by quality of care provided to patients and its interaction with status of BC-P4P enrollment, BC-P4P enrollment remained statistically significant regarding 5-year overall survival (OR, 0.167; P < .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.370; P = .002). CONCLUSION Patients with breast cancer enrolled in the BC-P4P program received better quality care and had better outcome than nonenrolled patients. Evidence from this study indicates that financial incentives in the payment design had a positive impact on outcome of breast cancer care.