Raymond R. Price

World Health Assembly Resolution WHA68.15: “Strengthening Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anesthesia as a Component of Universal Health Coverage”—Addressing the Public Health Gaps Arising from Lack of Safe, Affordable and Accessible Surgical and Anesthetic Services

Abstract On May 22 2015, the 68th World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted resolution WHA68.15, “Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health coverage (UHC).” For the first time, governments worldwide acknowledged and recognized surgery and anesthesia as key components of UHC and health systems strengthening. The resolution details and outlines the highest level of political commitments to address the public health gaps arising from lack of safe, affordable, and accessible surgical and anesthetic services in an integrated approach. This article reviews the background of resolution WHA68.15 and discusses how it can be of use to surgeons, anesthetists, advanced practice clinicians, nurses, and others caring for the surgical patients, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

World Health Organization Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care: 2011 and Beyond

The worlds burden of surgical diseases is large and increasing. Unfortunately, <5 % of all surgical procedures are performed in countries ranked within the lowest one-third in terms of per-capita health expenditures [1]. The unmet need for surgical care results in unacceptable morbidity/mortality rates associated with a host of conditions (trauma, pregnancy-related complications, other emergencies). This is especially true for rural and marginalized populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recognizing that variations in the spectrum of surgical diseases are observed among and within countries, “essential” surgery and anesthesia may be viewed as a core group of services that can be delivered within the context of universal access. These high-priority interventions are those for which: (1) there is a large public health burden; (2) the treatment is highly successful; (3) the treatment is cost-effective [2]. To date, essential surgery and anesthesia have received minimal financial and political support as public health strategies because of the perception that the services are costly, are resource-intensive, require highly specialized training, and benefit only a fraction of the population relative to competing health interests. Evidence is amassing to refute these claims. The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (GIEESC) was launched in 2005. It is a global forum whose goal is to promote collaboration among a diverse group of stake-holders (individuals, institutions, societies, universities, ministries of health, other nongovernmental organizations) to strengthen the delivery of surgical services at the primary referral level in LMICs (http://www.who.int.surgery) [3–6]. The inaugural meeting was at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland in November 2005 [7], and subsequent biennial meetings were hosted by ministries of health in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania in September 2007) [8] and Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia in June 2009) [9]. There are currently more than 624 GIEESC members from 93 countries representing all six WHO regions. In all, 45 % of members are from LMICs. The LMICs with ≥10 GIEESC members are India, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Uganda. The WHO GIEESC members have contributed to a number of activities aimed at strengthening the delivery of essential surgical services in LMICs. One component involved the implementation, local adaptation, and translation of training tools that were developed by the WHOs Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (EESC) project, which was initiated in the Clinical Procedures Unit of the Department of Essential Health Technologies in 2004 [3–6]. These training tools include the WHO Integrated Management of Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (IMSCStoolkit [10] and the Manual of Surgical Care at the District Hospital [11]. These materials have been introduced in 39 countries through collaborations with the respective Ministry of Health (MoH) and WHO country offices. The materials have been translated into Mongolian, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Dari, and Farsi. A WHO situational analysis tool to assess the availability of EESC at the level of individual health facilities was developed in 2007. It was based on infrastructure, human resources, procedures, equipment, and supplies [12]. This questionnaire has now been utilized in more than 35 countries, and the data collected and entered in the WHO EESC Global Database has been published to highlight gross deficiencies in the availability of EESC [13–22]. The WHO EESC Global Database was created to facilitate data entry from different countries. The situational analysis tool has been integrated into the WHOs Service Availability Mapping (SAM) technology [23] with the goal of facilitating monitoring the availability of surgical services at the facilities level. This technology was introduced in Mongolia in 2009. Plans have been made to continue with a surgical module in the WHOs recent adaptation of facilities-based monitoring, Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA). A planning tool was developed to assist policymakers integrate EESC into their national health plans.An online Global MedNet serves as a platform for online discussions and for posting announcements and materials related to GIEESC (http://www.who.int/ surgery/globalinitiative/en/).

Global Surgery 2030: a roadmap for high income country actors

The Millennium Development Goals have ended and the Sustainable Development Goals have begun, marking a shift in the global health landscape. The frame of reference has changed from a focus on 8 development priorities to an expansive set of 17 interrelated goals intended to improve the well-being of all people. In this time of change, several groups, including the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, have brought a critical problem to the fore: 5 billion people lack access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. The magnitude of this problem and the worlds new focus on strengthening health systems mandate reimagined roles for and renewed commitments from high income country actors in global surgery. To discuss the way forward, on 6 May 2015, the Commission held its North American launch event in Boston, Massachusetts. Panels of experts outlined the current state of knowledge and agreed on the roles of surgical colleges and academic medical centres; trainees and training programmes; academia; global health funders; the biomedical devices industry, and news media and advocacy organisations in building sustainable, resilient surgical systems. This paper summarises these discussions and serves as a consensus statement providing practical advice to these groups. It traces a common policy agenda between major actors and provides a roadmap for maximising benefit to surgical patients worldwide. To close the access gap by 2030, individuals and organisations must work collectively, interprofessionally and globally. High income country actors must abandon colonial narratives and work alongside low and middle income country partners to build the surgical systems of the future.

Laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer: an evidence-based review

The initial enthusiastic application of laparoscopic techniques to colorectal surgical procedures was tempered in the early 1990s by reports of tumor implants in the laparoscopic incisions. Substantial evidence has accumulated, including evidence from randomized controlled trials, to support that laparoscopic resection results in oncologic outcomes similar to open resection, when performed by well-trained, experienced surgeons. This review was developed in conjunction with guidelines published by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Data from the surgical literature concerning laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer was evaluated regarding diagnostic evaluation, preoperative preparation, operative techniques, prevention of tumor implants, and training and experience. Recommendations are accompanied by an assessment of the level of supporting evidence available at the time of the development of the guidelines.

A Successful Model for Laparoscopic Training in Mongolia

The benefits of laparoscopic surgery have not been available to the majority of Mongolians. Mongolian surgical leaders requested assistance in expanding laparoscopy. A capacity-building approach for teaching laparoscopic cholecystectomy throughout Mongolia is reviewed. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program was developed. The program included a didactic course and an intensive 2-week practical operating experience. Courses were taught in Ulaanbataar and at 3 of the 4 regional diagnostic referral and treatment centers from 2006 to 2010. During this training period, a total of 303 teaching laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. There was one common bile duct injury and one duodenal injury. The conversion rate was 2.0%. This program has been successful in creating a self-sustaining practice of training. The traditional surgical approach to gallbladder disease in Mongolia has been challenged and has, in turn, been a stimulus for improvement in the medical community.

Surgical Care and Health Systems

BackgroundWhile surgical care impacts a wide variety of diseases and conditions with non-operative and operative services, both preventive and curative, there has been little discussion concerning how surgery might be integrated within the health system of a low and middle-income country (LMIC), nor how strengthening surgical services may improve health systems and population health.MethodsWe reviewed reports from several meetings of the working group on health systems strengthening of the Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, and also performed a review of the literature including the search terms “surgery,” “health system,” “developing country,” “health systems strengthening,” “health information system,” “financing,” “governance,” and “integration.”ResultsThe literature search revealed no reports which focused on the integration of surgical services within a health system or as a component of health system strengthening. A conceptual model of how surgical care might be integrated within a health system is proposed, based on the discussions of our working group, combined with sources from the medical literature, and utilizing the World Health Organization’s conceptual model of a health system.ConclusionsStrengthening the delivery of surgical services in LMICs will require inputs at multiple levels within a health system, and this effort will require the coalescence of committed individuals and organizations, supported by civil society.

Surgical care needs of low-resource populations: an estimate of the prevalence of surgically treatable conditions and avoidable deaths in 48 countries.

BACKGROUND Surgical care needs in low-resource countries are increasingly recognised as an important aspect of global health, yet data for the size of the problem are insufficient. The Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) is a population-based cluster survey previously used in Nepal, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. METHODS Using previously published SOSAS data from three resource-poor countries (Nepal, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone), a weighted average of overall prevalence of surgically treatable conditions was estimated and the number of deaths that could have been avoided by providing access to surgical care was calculated for the broader community of low-resource countries. Such conditions included, but were not limited to, injuries (road traffic incidents, falls, burns, and gunshot or stab wounds), masses (solid or soft, reducible), deformities (congenital or acquired), abdominal distention, and obstructed delivery. Population and health expenditure per capita data were obtained from the World Bank. Low-resource countries were defined as those with a per capita health expenditure of US

SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy

100 or less annually. The overall prevalence estimate from the previously published SOSAS data was extrapolated to each low-resource country. Using crude death rates for each country and the calculated proportion of avoidable deaths, a total number of deaths possibly averted in the previous year with access to appropriate surgical care was calculated. FINDINGS The overall prevalence of surgically treatable conditions was 11·16% (95% CI 11·15-11·17) and 25·6% (95% CI 25·4-25·7) of deaths were potentially avoidable by providing access to surgical care. Using these percentages for the 48 low-resource countries, an estimated 288·2 million people are living with a surgically treatable condition and 5·6 million deaths could be averted annually by the provision of surgical care. In the Nepal SOSAS study, the observed agreement between self-reported verbal responses and visual physical examination findings was 94·6%. Such high correlation helps to validate the SOSAS tool. INTERPRETATION Hundreds of millions of people with surgically treatable conditions live in low-resource countries, and about 25% of the mortality annually could be avoided with better access to surgical care. Strengthening surgical care must be considered when strengthening health systems and in setting future sustainable development goals. FUNDING None.

Global opportunities on 239 general surgery residency Web sites.

Surgical interventions during pregnancy should minimize fetal risk without compromising the safety of the mother. Favorable outcomes for the pregnant woman and fetus depend on accurate and timely diagnosis with prompt intervention. Surgeons must be aware of data regarding differences in techniques used for pregnant patients to optimize outcomes. This document provides specific recommendations and guidelines to assist physicians in the diagnostic workup and treatment of surgical conditions in pregnant patients, focusing on the use of laparoscopy.

Expansion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a resource limited setting, Mongolia: a 9-year cross-sectional retrospective review.

BACKGROUND Many general surgical residency programs lack a formal international component. We hypothesized that most surgery programs do not have international training or do not provide the information to prospective applicants regarding electives or programs in an easily accessible manner via Web-based resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS Individual general surgery program Web sites and the American College of Surgeons residency tool were used to identify 239 residencies. The homepages were examined for specific mention of international or global health programs. Ease of access was also considered. Global surgery specific pages or centers were noted. Programs were assessed for length of rotation, presence of research component, and mention of benefits to residents and respective institution. RESULTS Of 239 programs, 24 (10%) mentioned international experiences on their home page and 42 (18%) contained information about global surgery. Of those with information available, 69% were easily accessible. Academic programs were more likely than independent programs to have information about international opportunities on their home page (13.7% versus 4.0%, P = 0.006) and more likely to have a dedicated program or pathway Web site (18.8% versus 2.0%, P < 0.0001). Half of the residencies with global surgery information did not have length of rotation available. Research was only mentioned by 29% of the Web sites. Benefits to high-income country residents were discussed more than benefits to low- and middle-income country residents (57% versus 17%). CONCLUSIONS General surgery residency programs do not effectively communicate international opportunities for prospective residents through Web-based resources and should seriously consider integrating international options into their curriculum and better present them on department Web sites.