Raymund R. Razonable

Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND There are few data on the epidemiology and outcomes of influenza infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants. We aimed to establish the outcomes of pandemic influenza A H1N1 and factors leading to severe disease in a cohort of patients who had received transplants. METHODS We did a multicentre cohort study of adults and children who had received organ transplants with microbiological confirmation of influenza A infection from April to December, 2009. Centres were identified through the American Society of Transplantation Influenza Collaborative Study Group. Demographics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes were assessed. Severity of disease was measured by admission to hospital and intensive care units (ICUs). The data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Proportions were compared by use of chi(2) tests. We used univariate analysis to identify factors leading to pneumonia, admission to hospital, and admission to an ICU. Multivariate analysis was done by use of a stepwise logistic regression model. We analysed deaths with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. FINDINGS We assessed 237 cases of medically attended influenza A H1N1 reported from 26 transplant centres during the study period. Transplant types included kidney, liver, heart, lung, and others. Both adults (154 patients; median age 47 years) and children (83; 9 years) were assessed. Median time from transplant was 3.6 years. 167 (71%) of 237 patients were admitted to hospital. Data on complications were available for 230 patients; 73 (32%) had pneumonia, 37 (16%) were admitted to ICUs, and ten (4%) died. Antiviral treatment was used in 223 (94%) patients (primarily oseltamivir monotherapy). Seven (8%) patients given antiviral drugs within 48 h of symptom onset were admitted to an ICU compared with 28 (22.4%) given antivirals later (p=0.007). Children who received transplants were less likely to present with pneumonia than adults, but rates of admission to hospital and ICU were similar. INTERPRETATION Influenza A H1N1 caused substantial morbidity in recipients of solid-organ transplants during the 2009-10 pandemic. Starting antiviral therapy early is associated with clinical benefit as measured by need for ICU admission and mechanical ventilation. FUNDING None.

Chromosomally integrated human herpesvirus 6: questions and answers

Chromosomally integrated human herpesvirus 6 (ciHHV‐6) is a condition in which the complete HHV‐6 genome is integrated into the host germ line genome and is vertically transmitted in a Mendelian manner. The condition is found in less than 1% of controls in the USA and UK, but has been found at a somewhat higher prevalence in transplant recipients and other patient populations in several small studies. HHV‐6 levels in whole blood that exceed 5.5 log10 copies/ml are strongly suggestive of ciHHV‐6. Monitoring DNA load in plasma and serum is unreliable, both for identifying and for monitoring subjects with ciHHV‐6 due to cell lysis and release of cellular DNA. High HHV‐6 DNA loads associated with ciHHV‐6 can lead to erroneous diagnosis of active infection. Transplant recipients with ciHHV‐6 may be at increased risk for bacterial infection and graft rejection. ciHHV‐6 can be induced to a state of active viral replication in vitro. It is not known whether ciHHV‐6 individuals are put at clinical risk by the use of drugs that have been associated with HHV‐6 reactivation in vivo or in vitro. Nonetheless, we urge careful observation when use of such drugs is indicated in individuals known to have ciHHV‐6. Little is known about whether individuals with ciHHV‐6 develop immune tolerance for viral proteins. Further research is needed to determine the role of ciHHV‐6 in disease. Copyright

Delayed-Onset Primary Cytomegalovirus Disease and the Risk of Allograft Failure and Mortality after Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND During the contemporary era of antiviral prophylaxis, the impact of delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease on the outcome of kidney transplantation is not known. We evaluated the incidence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of CMV disease among high-risk kidney transplant recipients. METHODS The medical records of CMV-seronegative recipients of kidney transplants from CMV-seropositive donors were reviewed. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with CMV disease and to assess its impact on allograft loss and mortality. RESULTS None of the 176 CMV-seronegative recipients of kidney transplants from CMV-seropositive donors developed breakthrough CMV disease during a median of 92 days (interquartile range, 90-92 days) of oral ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis. Thereafter, 51 patients (29%) developed CMV disease at a median of 61 days (interquartile range, 40-143 days) after stopping antiviral prophylaxis. Early-onset bacterial and fungal infection (hazard ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-7.33; p < .001) and a Charlson comorbidity index > or =3 (hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.22; p = .011) were associated with a higher risk of delayed-onset primary CMV disease, and postrejection antiviral prophylaxis (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.94; P = .039) was associated with a lower risk of such CMV disease. A time-dependent Cox regression analysis revealed a statistically significant association between tissue-invasive CMV disease and allograft loss or mortality (hazard ratio, 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-6.67; P = .016). CONCLUSION This study of a large cohort of CMV-seronegative recipients of kidney transplants from CMV-seropositive donors illustrates the ongoing challenge of delayed-onset primary CMV disease and its impact on transplantation outcomes despite antiviral prophylaxis. Better strategies for CMV disease prevention after kidney transplantation are warranted.

Allograft Rejection Predicts the Occurrence of Late-Onset Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease among CMV-Mismatched Solid Organ Transplant Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with Oral Ganciclovir

The natural history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease associated with solid organ transplantation has been modified as a result of the widespread use of antiviral prophylaxis. Anecdotal reports have indicated a reduction of CMV disease at the expense of its later occurrence after completion of ganciclovir prophylaxis. The present study investigated the occurrence of CMV disease and its risk factors among 37 liver and kidney transplant recipients with CMV D+/R- status who received oral ganciclovir during the first 100 days posttransplantation. CMV disease occurred in 9 patients (24.3%) at a median of 144 days posttransplantation (range, 95-190 days). Allograft rejection was found to be strongly associated with the occurrence of late-onset CMV disease (risk ratio, 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-32.1; P=.02). Thus, CMV D+/R- solid organ transplant recipients receiving 3 months of oral ganciclovir who develop allograft rejection during the period of antiviral prophylaxis may benefit from extended and/or enhanced antiviral prophylaxis to prevent late-onset CMV disease.

New Developments in the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection after Solid Organ Transplantation

Despite remarkable advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for its management, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most important pathogens impacting on the outcome of transplantation. Not only does CMV directly cause morbidity and occasional mortality, it also influences many short-term and long-term indirect effects that collectively contribute to reduced allograft and patient survival. Prevention of CMV infection and disease is therefore key in ensuring the successful outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT).In this regard, antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are similarly effective in preventing CMV disease after transplantation. However, current guidelines prefer antiviral prophylaxis over pre-emptive therapy in preventing CMV disease in high-risk SOT recipients, such as CMV-seronegative recipients of organs from CMV-seropositive donors (CMV D+/R−), and lung, intestinal and pancreas transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis has the benefits of reducing not only the incidence of CMV disease, but also the indirect effects of CMV on allograft and patient survival. The major drawback of antiviral prophylaxis is delayed-onset CMV disease, which occurs in 15–38% of CMV D+/R−SOT recipients who received 3 months of prophylaxis. Allograft rejection, over-immunosuppression and lack of CMV-specific immunity are factors that predispose patients to delayed-onset CMV disease. A recent randomized trial in CMV D+/R−kidney recipients demonstrates a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV disease when valganciclovir prophylaxis is extended to 200 days (compared with the standard 100 days) after transplantation; however, the safety and cost of this prolonged approach has yet to be assessed. In some studies, delayed-onset CMV disease has been significantly associated with allograft loss and mortality. In the vast majority of patients, CMV disease responds to treatment with intravenous ganciclovir. Recently, oral valganciclovir was demonstrated to have an efficacy that is comparable to intravenous ganciclovir in treating mild to moderate cases of CMV disease in SOT recipients. Reduction in the degree of immunosuppression should complement antiviral treatment of CMV disease.Although it remains rare, ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease is increasingly seen in clinical practice, potentially fostered by the prolonged use of antivirals in high-risk over-immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Treatment of drug-resistant CMV is currently non-standardized and may include foscarnet, cidofovir, CMV hyperimmune globulins or leflunomide. The investigational drug marivabir had the potential to treat ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease as it acts through a different mechanism. However, the recent phase III clinical trial in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients showed that maribavir was not significantly better than placebo for the prevention of CMV disease. Similarly, the preliminary data in a liver transplant population suggests that maribavir was inferior to oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV disease. This article reviews the recent data and other developments in the management of CMV infection after SOT.

The clinical use of various blood compartments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in transplant recipients with CMV disease.

BACKGROUND The quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA is a cornerstone in the management of CMV disease in transplant recipients. However, a consensus as to what is the optimal blood compartment for the detection and quantitation of CMV DNA in peripheral blood is nonexistent. METHODS With an automated quantitative assay, we have simultaneously quantified the CMV DNA load in whole blood (WB), plasma (PL), peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in 319 samples from 17 transplant recipients with 19 episodes of CMV disease that were treated with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir. RESULTS Higher levels of CMV DNA were observed in WB than PL (PL minus WB mean difference, 0.67 log; 95% confidence interval, -1.02 to -0.32; P=0.0009). This observation was most evident before treatment with intravenous ganciclovir (pretreatment geometric mean CMV DNA was 45,412 copies per ml of WB vs. 14,995 copies per ml of PL). In contrast, the CMV DNA levels between PBL and PBMC were highly comparable throughout the course of CMV disease and its treatment. Intravenous ganciclovir exerted a uniform effect on the four blood compartments with no statistically significant difference in the degree and rate of CMV DNA decline between WB and PL and between PBL and PBMC. CONCLUSIONS Although our study demonstrates the adequacy of all blood compartments for CMV DNA quantification, the higher sensitivity of WB and its yield of higher CMV DNA render it an optimal sample for monitoring CMV DNA load during CMV disease in immunocompromised patients.

Role of the Laboratory in Diagnosis and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid-organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have become vital in the treatment of many illnesses that were previously considered fatal. In 1999, a total of 21,516 solid-organ transplant procedures were performed in the United States (Scientific registry, United Network for Organ Sharing

Emergence of drug‐resistant cytomegalovirus in the era of valganciclovir prophylaxis: therapeutic implications and outcomes

Abstract:  Background:  Valganciclovir prophylaxis is reportedly associated with a low incidence of ganciclovir‐resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV). We assessed the incidence, clinical features, and outcome of drug‐resistant CMV among solid organ transplant patients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis.

Selective Reactivation of Human Herpesvirus 6 Variant A Occurs in Critically Ill Immunocompetent Hosts

Reactivation of human beta-herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus [CMV], human herpesvirus [HHV]-6, and HHV-7) in nonimmunocompromised hosts is rare. Because these viruses are susceptible to reactivation by cytokines and stress-related mechanisms, the incidence of their reactivation was investigated among 120 patients during stress related to critical illness and compared with findings among 50 healthy volunteers. Human beta-herpesvirus DNA was found in 65% of critically ill patients (60% men; mean age, 63 years) who required admission to an intensive care unit for medical (40%) or surgical (53%) indications or trauma (7%). HHV-6 reactivation was higher in critically ill patients than in healthy volunteers (54/101 vs. 0/50; P=.001). All patients except 1 were confirmed as HHV-6 variant A (mean virus load, 5066 copies/10(6) peripheral blood leukocytes). The reactivation of HHV-6A did not affect disease severity and outcome. No significant reactivation of HHV-7 or CMV was demonstrated among the critically ill patients. These findings contribute to the less-defined epidemiology of HHV-6A infection.

Clinical Utility of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Serology Testing in High‐risk CMV D+/R− Transplant Recipients

Late‐onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem in D+/R− solid organ transplant (SOT) patients who receive antiviral prophylaxis. We assessed the clinical utility of CMV IgG and IgM serology testing for predicting late‐onset CMV disease. We evaluated 352 D+/R− transplant recipients who participated in a trial comparing 100 days of ganciclovir versus valganciclovir prophylaxis. CMV serology was assessed on day 28, 56, 100, and 6 and 12 months post‐transplant. IgG seroconversion occurred in 26.9% of patients by day 100, and in 63.4% and 75.3% by 6 and 12 months, respectively. IgM seroconversion occurred in 8.3%, 41.8% and 54.9% by day 100, month 6 and month 12, respectively. Seroconversion by day 100 (end of prophylaxis) was not predictive of subsequent CMV disease (CMV disease 13.3% if seropositive vs. 17.8% if seronegative; p = NS). However, at 6 months post‐transplant, IgG serostatus was predictive of subsequent CMV disease between month 6 and 12 (CMV disease 1.3% if seropositive vs. 10.0% if seronegative; p = 0.002). In D+/R− patients, CMV serology testing is for the most part not clinically useful for predicting subsequent disease. However, seroconversion by 6 months may be useful for identifying patients at risk of late‐onset CMV disease.