Rebecca A. Clark
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rebecca A. Clark.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1985
Mark G. Kris; Richard J. Gralla; Rebecca A. Clark; Leslie Tyson; Joseph P. O'Connell; Michael Wertheim; David P. Kelsen
Although many trials have evaluated the severity and treatment of nausea and vomiting immediately after cisplatin administration, no studies have focused on vomiting occurring more than 24 hours after chemotherapy--delayed emesis. Two consecutive trials were undertaken to evaluate the incidence, course (trial 1), and severity (trial 2) of delayed nausea and emesis and to develop methods to study these conditions. Eighty-six patients receiving cisplatin (120 mg/m2) for the first time were entered. On the day of cisplatin treatment, all received intravenous (IV) metoclopramide (3 mg/kg X 2 doses) plus dexamethasone (20 mg IV X 1 dose) with either diphenhydramine (50 mg IV) or lorazepam (1.0 to 1.5 mg/m2). Sixty-two percent of patients experienced no vomiting during the 24 hours immediately after administration of cisplatin. Overall, 93% of studied patients experienced some degree of delayed nausea or vomiting from 24 to 120 hours after cisplatin. In trial 1, the incidence of delayed vomiting ranged from 21% to 61% and delayed nausea from 24% to 78% in 58 patients. The highest incidence of both delayed nausea and emesis occurred during the period from 48 to 72 hours after administration of cisplatin. Patients who had no emesis during the initial 24 hours after cisplatin were less likely to experience delayed emesis. The severity of delayed nausea and vomiting was evaluated in 28 patients in trial 2. The amount of delayed nausea and vomiting was assessed daily by patients using a visual analogue scale and by an observer rating. The highest nausea and vomiting scores were seen during the period from 48 to 72 hours after administration of cisplatin, with acceptable correlation between patient scores and observer ratings. Although the nausea and vomiting occurring 24 or more hours after cisplatin administration is not as severe as that seen during the initial 24 hours after administration of cisplatin in patients not receiving antiemetics, it is a common condition that merits both further study and specific treatment.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1989
M. G. Kris; Richard J. Gralla; Leslie Tyson; Rebecca A. Clark; C Cirrincione; Susan Groshen
The majority of patients receiving cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 experience delayed nausea and vomiting occurring between 24 and 120 hours after chemotherapy administration. Ninety-one patients who were receiving cisplatin (120 mg/m2) as initial chemotherapy were entered into this double-blind trial. All patients received intravenous (IV) metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam for the control of acute emesis during the period from 0 to 24 hours after cisplatin. Patients were then randomized to one of three treatment regimens: placebo; oral dexamethasone, 8 mg twice daily for two days, then 4 mg twice daily for two days; or the combination of oral metoclopramide, 0.5 mg/kg four times daily for four days, plus oral dexamethasone administered as above. Forty-eight percent of individuals who received the two-drug combination of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone experienced delayed vomiting as opposed to 65% who were administered dexamethasone alone and 89% who received placebo (P = .006). Scores assessing the severity of delayed nausea and vomiting were consistently worse in individuals receiving placebo. The incidences of sleepiness, restlessness, heartburn, hiccoughs, loose bowel movements, insomnia, and acute dystonic reactions did not differ significantly among the three regimens and were mild and self-limited. The two-drug combination of oral metoclopramide plus dexamethasone is well tolerated, safe, and more effective than dexamethasone alone or placebo in controlling delayed vomiting following cisplatin.
Cancer | 1985
Mark G. Kris; Richard J. Gralla; Leslie Tyson; Rebecca A. Clark; David P. Kelsen; Laura Reilly; Susan Groshen; George J. Bosl; Leonard A. Kalman
A series of consecutive trials were undertaken to determine whether higher doses of intravenous metoclopramide and combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine would improve antiemetic control or decrease treatment‐related side effects in patients receiving cisplatin at 120 mg/m2. Metoclopramide and dexamethasone were studied because of their proven efficacy as single agents and their differing mechanisms of action and side effects. Diphenhydramine was used because of its possible antiemetic properties and its ability to control acute dystonic reactions. Two hundred fifty‐five patients who had never received chemotherapy or antiemetics were observed in the hospital for the 24 hours following cisplatin administration. The addition of dexamethasone or dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine to intravenous metoclopramide 2 mg/kg produced both improved antiemetic control and a decrease in treatment‐associated diarrhea (P = 0.002). The use of metoclopramide alone at a dose of 3 mg/kg for only two doses appeared as effective as 2 mg/kg for five doses. When dexamethasone and diphenhydramine were given with metoclopramide 3 mg/kg for two intravenous dosages, 81% of patients experienced no emesis and 93% had two or fewer vomiting episodes. The antiemetic results of this 2‐hour “short‐course” regimen were superior to metoclopramide 2 mg/kg, with (P = 0.002) or without (P = 0.0001) dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. It was concluded that combinations of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine improve antiemetic control, facilitate the usage of higher doses of metoclopramide, and decrease the incidence of treatment‐related side effects.
Cancer | 1987
Mark G. Kris; Richard J. Gralla; Rebecca A. Clark; Leslie Tyson; Susan Groshen
Combinations of metoclopramide and dexamethasone given intravenously control vomiting caused by high doses of cisplatin. Lorazepam and diphenhydramine are useful adjuncts to antiemetics. In a double‐blind trial, 120 patients receiving high‐dose cisplatin (120 mg/m2) for the first time were randomly assigned to receive either lorazepam (1.5 mg/m2) or diphenhydramine (50 mg) intravenously, 45 minutes prior to cisplatin. In addition, all patients received intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg) 40 minutes prior to chemotherapy along with metoclopramide (3 mg/kg) 30 minutes before and 90 minutes after cisplatin. Patients were directly observed in the hospital after cisplatin administration and completed a subjective assessment questionnaire. Overall, 60% of patients experienced no vomiting, and 83% had two or fewer emetic episodes during the study. There were no significant differences in objective antiemetic control between the two regimens. Only 3% of patients receiving lorazepam experienced treatment‐related restlessness as opposed to 19% given diphenhydramine (P = 0.007). Less recall of chemotherapy administration (P < 0.001), more sedation (P = 0.003), and transient enuresis while sedated (P = 0.0002) were characteristic of patients receiving lorazepam. Patient‐generated ratings revealed less anxiety (P = 0.0001) for those individuals given the lorazepam‐containing combination. Both regimens were well accepted, with 89% of patients receiving the lorazepam combination and 83% of those given the diphenhydramine regimen wishing to receive the same drugs in the future. Some degree of delayed vomiting occurred in 85% of patients during the 4‐day period following this study. During the time that patients are at the greatest risk for emesis, the 24 hours immediately following cisplatin, three drug antiemetic combinations of either lorazepam or diphenhydramine with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone stopped cisplatin‐induced emesis for the majority of patients and lessen other treatment‐related side effects. Less restlessness and anxiety were observed among individuals receiving the lorazepam‐containing combination.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1988
M. G. Kris; Richard J. Gralla; Rebecca A. Clark; Leslie Tyson
GR-C507/75 (GR38032F) antagonizes the 5-HT3 (serotonin) receptor and prevents cisplatin-induced emesis in animals. In this dose-ranging trial, 44 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy known to produce nausea and vomiting (including cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) received three intravenous (IV) infusions of GR-C507/75 every two hours beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Ten dosage levels were explored, ranging from 0.04 mg/kg to 0.35 mg/kg in each of the three infusions. Toxicities were mild and included sedation, dizziness, headache, transient elevations of SGOT or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and dry mouth. No akathisia or acute dystonic reactions were observed. Antiemetic effects were seen in patients receiving cisplatin at 120 mg/m2. GR-C507/75 can be safely administered on this schedule at IV dosages up to 0.35 mg/kg in patients receiving chemotherapy. Further studies of this agent at higher dosages and by different schedules are appropriate.
Medical Clinics of North America | 1987
Richard J. Gralla; Leslie Tyson; Mark G. Kris; Rebecca A. Clark
This paper reviews one of the major side-effects of chemotherapy, emesis. Included are patient and treatment factors that can affect the control of nausea and vomiting as well as a summary of the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1988
M. G. Kris; Richard J. Gralla; Rebecca A. Clark; Leslie Tyson; Susan Groshen
Diarrhea commonly occurs following the administration of cisplatin. BW942C, a pentapeptide, is a synthetic enkephalin shown to control castor oil-induced and travelers diarrhea. To assess the safety and efficacy of BW942C in controlling diarrhea caused by cisplatin, 30 adults with lung cancer who had already experienced diarrhea (three or more loose bowel movements) during the 24-hour period following a prior cisplatin administration were randomized to receive either BW942C or placebo during the next cisplatin course. All patients received a concomitant antiemetic regimen including metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam during all courses. Patients administered BW942C experienced less diarrhea (27% v 67%, P = .02). Twenty-seven percent of patients given the pentapeptide had loose bowel movements as opposed to 93% who received placebo (P = .0002). There were no significant differences in the incidence and degree of vomiting and other treatment-related side effects observed between the placebo and treatment groups. We conclude that oral BW942C is more effective than placebo in controlling diarrhea following cisplatin chemotherapy.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 1993
Rebecca A. Clark; Richard J. Gralla
Delayed emesis remains a major factor limiting successful antiemetic treatment. It is well described in patients receiving cisplatin at doses of 100 mg/m2 or greater (occurring in nearly 90% of patients), but its incidence and severity in other settings is less well known. Several studies have indicated that combinations of oral metoclopramide plus dexamethasone can decrease the incidence of this problem by one-half; however, a large number of patients remain for whom delayed emesis is their main emetic problem. To date, studies with single-agent serotonin antagonists have not shown encouraging efficacy. In addition, it appears that delayed emesis may begin as early as 16 h after chemotherapy, yielding implications for new study designs. Proper methodology for clinical studies has been demonstrated in a few well-conducted trials, which should form a basis for future research.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1985
Leslie Tyson; Richard J. Gralla; Rebecca A. Clark; Mark G. Kris; Laurie A. Bordin; George J. Bosl
LEVONANTRADOL is a synthetic cannabinoid with demonstrated preclinical antiemetic activity. The current phase I trial was undertaken to determine: 1) the maximally tolerated dose; 2) the side effects at the different dosage levels; and 3) to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of levonantradol in patients receiving emesis-producing chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients received 52 courses of levonantradol. Concurrent chemotherapy most frequently consisted of high dose cisplatin (120 mg/m2), either alone or in combination with other agents. Levonantradol dosage was escalated through seven treatment levels (0.5–4.0 mg per dose) and was given intramuscularly every 4 hours. Toxicity was similar to that observed with other cannabinoids and primarily consisted of dizziness (65%), burning and erythema at the injection site (48%), mild sedation (44%), or-thostatic hypotension (37%), dysphoria (29%), and urinary retention (10%). Marked urinary retention occurred in three of seven patients at the 4.0 mg per dose level, and two of 24 patients at either the 2.5 mg and 3.0 mg levels. Major or minor antiemetic responses (0–2 or 3–5 emetic episodes, respectively) occurred in 23% of patients receiving cisplatin and in 53% of patients receiving non-cisplatin containing chemotherapy. Intramuscular levonantradol can be given safely at doses up to 3.0 mg/kg, with toxicity and antiemetic efficacy similar to that observed with other cannabinoids.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1989
Leslie Tyson; Richard J. Gralla; Mark G. Kris; Charles W. Young; Rebecca A. Clark
The present trial with high oral doses of metoclopramide was undertaken to (a) determine a well-tolerated dosage of oral metoclopramide; (b) measure the blood levels achieved with these oral doses; (c) determine the side effects of high doses; and (d) observe for antiemetic efficacy. Thirty-six patients receiving emesis-producing chemotherapy consisting primarily of high intravenous (i.v.) doses of cyclophosphamide plus adriamycin or cisplatin received 48 courses of oral metoclopramide. The metoclopramide dosage was escalated in six steps from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg and was given 1/2 h before chemotherapy, then 1½, 3½, 7½, 11½, and 15½ h after chemotherapy. Diphenhydramine (50 mg orally) was given with the first, third, and fifth dosages. Toxicity was generally mild, not dose related, and similar to that observed with the i.v. drug with the exception of an increased incidence of acute dystonic reactions. Antiemetic effects were observed at each dose level. In patients receiving oral metoclopramide doses of 2 or 3 mg/kg, all achieved serum levels > 1,000 ng/ml. High-dosage oral metoclopramide was well tolerated and demonstrated antiemetic effects at the dose levels explored. We recommend 2–3 mg/kg oral metoclopramide doses with 50 mg diphenhydramine for use in future trials.