Rebecca A. Snyder

Fine Needle Aspiration of the Thyroid: Correlation with Final Histopathology in a Surgical Series of 797 Patients

BACKGROUND Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is accepted as the diagnostic procedure of choice in the management of patients with thyroid nodules. Follicular/Hürthle cell neoplasms have traditionally been grouped under the category of indeterminate FNA results. This study examined the experience with FNA in a large cohort of patients undergoing thyroidectomy before adoption of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (BSTC) at a single academic medical center. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 797 consecutive patients with dominant nodules >1 cm who underwent FNA and thyroidectomy from 2003 to 2009 was performed. Patients were categorized into groups based on FNA results: malignant, benign, indeterminate, and nondiagnostic. The indeterminate group had FNA results that included follicular neoplasm, Hürthle cell neoplasm, and suspicion of papillary thyroid cancer. FNA results were compared with final histopathology after thyroidectomy. RESULTS FNA results included 147 (18%) positive for malignancy, 255 (32%) benign, 358 (45%) indeterminate, and 37 (5%) nondiagnostic. The overall malignancy rate on final histopathology was 369 of 797 (46%). Overall, there was a false positive rate of 2% and false negative rate of 8.6%. Among the 358 indeterminate FNA results, carcinoma was found in 81 (36%) of 223 follicular neoplasms, 18 (36%) of 50 Hürthle cell neoplasms, and 78 (92%) of 85 that were suspicious for papillary thyroid cancer. When FNA was nondiagnostic, cancer was present in 9 of 37 (24%). Among 39 patients with benign FNA who had cancer on final histopathology, 22 of 255 (8.6%) had cancer in the index thyroid nodule, and 81% of cancers were >1 cm. CONCLUSIONS Patients with FNA and dominant nodules >1 cm, who underwent thyroidectomy, had an overall rate of thyroid malignancy of 46%. There was a cancer prevalence of 8.6% in patients with benign FNA results referred for surgical resection. Despite not yet implementing the BSTC at this medical center, the majority of thyroidectomies were adequately performed for indeterminate FNAs with underlying malignancy.

Impact of implementation of a pediatric surgery fellowship on general surgery resident operative volume.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the initiation of a pediatric surgery fellowship on general surgery resident operative volume at 1 major academic institution. DESIGN Retrospective review of operative records obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) general surgery resident and pediatric surgery fellow case logs. Data collected included number and type of pediatric index cases per year, number of total pediatric surgery cases per year, and number of total cases logged as primary surgeon to date. SETTING Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Department of Surgery, which has an accredited general surgery program, finishes 7 chief residents per year during the study period, and instituted a new pediatric surgery fellowship in 2007. PARTICIPANTS Case logs submitted by third and fourth year general surgery residents and first and second year pediatric surgery fellows were studied. RESULTS The number of pediatric attending surgeons, relative value units (RVUs), and hospital admissions increased from 2003 to 2011. The median number of pediatric index cases performed by a resident decreased after the onset of fellowship from 34 cases to 23.5 cases per year (p < 0.001). The median number of total cases that residents performed on the pediatric surgery rotation also decreased from 74 to 53 cases per year after onset of the fellowship (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Even with an increase in the number of attending surgeons, RVUs, and admissions, the fellowship resulted in a decrease in general surgery resident index and overall case volume in pediatric surgery. Although operative volume is only 1 measure of surgical educational value, these findings suggest that the addition of surgical fellowships affects the educational experience of general surgery residents. We recommend that residency programs establish goals and calculate any potential impact on general surgery resident case volume before initiating a new surgical fellowship.

Does Shoe Insole Modification Prevent Stress Fractures? A Systematic Review

Stress fractures can be debilitating in athletes and military personnel. Insoles may lower stress fracture rates by improving biomechanics, lessening fatigue, and attenuating impact. The objective of this study was to systematically review the best evidence on the use of insoles as a method of stress fracture prevention in a high-risk population. Using MEDLINE, Cochrane, Current Controlled Trials, UK National Research Register, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and EMBASE, a review of randomized (level I) and quasi-randomized (level II) controlled trials was performed using an insole as the intervention and stress fracture incidence as the primary outcome measure. Five trials were included, and a random effects model was used to generate a summary estimate and an overall odds ratio. One study found a significant reduction in overall stress fracture incidence using a semirigid insole, while four studies found no overall reduction in military personnel. However, when the data are pooled, orthotic use was beneficial. When stratified by site, there was a reduction in femoral and tibial stress fracture incidence. Shoe insoles may reduce the overall femoral and tibial stress fracture incidence during military training. It is unclear if the use of insoles would prevent stress fractures in athletes. Additional studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of insoles in an athletic population.

Wound Classification in Pediatric General Surgery: Significant Variation Exists among Providers

BACKGROUND Risk-adjusted rates of surgical site infections (SSI) are used as a quality metric to facilitate improvement within a hospital system and allow comparison across institutions. The NSQIP-Pediatric, among others, uses surgical wound classification as a variable in models designed to predict risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity, including SSI rates. The purpose of this study was to measure the level of agreement in wound classification assignment among 3 providers: surgeons, operating room (OR) nurses, and NSQIP surgical clinical reviewers (SCR). STUDY DESIGN An analysis was performed of pediatric general surgery operations from 2010 to 2011. Wound classification was assigned at the time of operation by the OR nurse and surgeon, and by the NSQIP SCR postoperatively, according to NSQIP methodology. Disagreement was defined as any discrepancy in classification among the 3 providers, and the level of agreement was determined using the kappa statistic. RESULTS For the 374 procedures reviewed, there was an overall disagreement of 48% among all providers, kappa 0.48 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.53). When comparing wound classification by surgeon and NSQIP SCR, 23% of cases were in disagreement, kappa 0.74 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.78). Disagreement between OR nurse and either surgeon or NSQIP SCR was higher: 38%, kappa 0.45 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.53) and 40%, kappa 0.44 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.51). Fundoplication, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy demonstrated the highest overall disagreement (73%, 71%, and 60%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS There is significant variation in assigning surgical wound classification among health care providers. For future SSI comparative analyses, it will be critical to improve uniformity and understanding of wound class assignment among providers and institutions.

More donors or more delayed graft function? A cost-effectiveness analysis of DCD kidney transplantation

Expansion of the donor pool with expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors is essential. DCD grafts result in increased rates of primary non‐function (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF). However, long‐term patient and graft survival is similar between donation after brain death (DBD) donors and DCD donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of the use of DCD donors. A Markov‐based decision analytic model was created to simulate outcomes for two wait list strategies: (i) wait list composed of only DBD organs and (ii) wait list combining DBD and DCD organs. Baseline values and ranges were determined from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database and literature review. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model strength and parameter variability. The wait list strategy consisting of DBD donors only provided recipients 5.4 Quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) at

Trends in the use of evidence-based therapy for resectable gastric cancer

65 000/QALY, whereas a wait list strategy combining DBD + DCD donors provided recipients 6.0 QALYs at a cost of

Anatomic Definitions of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

56 000/QALY. Wait lists with DCD donors provide adequate long‐term survival despite more DGF. This equates to an improvement in quality of life and decreased cost when compared to remaining on dialysis for any period of time.

Epidemiology of Stress Fractures

Two pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the Intergroup (INT‐0116) and Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trials, demonstrated a survival benefit of multimodality therapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine utilization rates of these treatment regimens in the United States and to identify factors associated with receipt of evidence‐based care.

Teaching in the Operating Room: Results of a National Survey

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States and surgery offers the only opportunity for cure for patients who develop this disease. Indeed, a negative margin resection is considered one of the strongest prognostic factors for long-term survival. Improvement in imaging capabilities, specifically triple-phase contrasted computed tomography (CT) scans, has allowed clinicians to more accurately determine a patient’s likelihood of undergoing a margin-negative resection preoperatively. Historically, patients with tumor involvement of the mesenteric vasculature were considered to have unresectable disease due to high rates of positive margins following surgery; such patients were treated instead with palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiation. However, more recent data have demonstrated improved overall survival following multimodality therapy that includes surgical resection. Contemporary use of neoadjuvant therapy may allow for a subsequent margin-negative operation and may also improve patient selection to minimize the use of surgery in patients with biologically unfavorable disease. The concept of “borderline resectable pancreatic cancer” (BRPC) has simultaneously emerged. This stage designation is used for tumors that are at high risk for a margin-positive resection when surgery is used as an initial treatment approach. In this chapter, we will discuss the importance of this clinical category, review the relevant anatomy, and summarize specific definitions of BRPC within the current literature.