Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rebecca E. Graff is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rebecca E. Graff.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2014

Mammographic Density Phenotypes and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E. Graff; Giske Ursin; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Laura Baglietto; Celine M. Vachon; Marije F. Bakker; Graham G. Giles; Kee Seng Chia; Kamila Czene; Louise Eriksson; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Ruth M. L. Warren; Greg Hislop; Anna M. Chiarelli; John L. Hopper; Kavitha Krishnan; Jingmei Li; Qing Li; Ian Pagano; Bernard Rosner; Chia Siong Wong; Christopher G. Scott; Jennifer Stone; Gertraud Maskarinec; Norman F. Boyd; Carla H. van Gils; Rulla M. Tamimi

BACKGROUND Fibroglandular breast tissue appears dense on mammogram, whereas fat appears nondense. It is unclear whether absolute or percentage dense area more strongly predicts breast cancer risk and whether absolute nondense area is independently associated with risk. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of 13 case-control studies providing results from logistic regressions for associations between one standard deviation (SD) increments in mammographic density phenotypes and breast cancer risk. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All tests were two-sided with P less than .05 considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS Among premenopausal women (n = 1776 case patients; n = 2834 control subjects), summary odds ratios were 1.37 (95% CI = 1.29 to 1.47) for absolute dense area, 0.78 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.86) for absolute nondense area, and 1.52 (95% CI = 1.39 to 1.66) for percentage dense area when pooling estimates adjusted for age, body mass index, and parity. Corresponding odds ratios among postmenopausal women (n = 6643 case patients; n = 11187 control subjects) were 1.38 (95% CI = 1.31 to 1.44), 0.79 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.85), and 1.53 (95% CI = 1.44 to 1.64). After additional adjustment for absolute dense area, associations between absolute nondense area and breast cancer became attenuated or null in several studies and summary odds ratios became 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.94; P heterogeneity = .02) for premenopausal and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.75 to 0.96; P heterogeneity < .01) for postmenopausal women. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that percentage dense area is a stronger breast cancer risk factor than absolute dense area. Absolute nondense area was inversely associated with breast cancer risk, but it is unclear whether the association is independent of absolute dense area.


JAMA | 2016

Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries

Lorelei A. Mucci; Jacob von Bornemann Hjelmborg; Jennifer R. Harris; Kamila Czene; David J. Havelick; Thomas H. Scheike; Rebecca E. Graff; Klaus K. Holst; Sören Möller; Robert H. Unger; Christina McIntosh; Elizabeth Nuttall; Ingunn Brandt; Kathryn L. Penney; Mikael Hartman; Peter Kraft; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kaare Christensen; Markku Koskenvuo; Niels V. Holm; Kauko Heikkilä; Eero Pukkala; Axel Skytthe; Hans-Olov Adami; Jaakko Kaprio

IMPORTANCE Estimates of familial cancer risk from population-based studies are essential components of cancer risk prediction. OBJECTIVE To estimate familial risk and heritability of cancer types in a large twin cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective study of 80,309 monozygotic and 123,382 same-sex dizygotic twin individuals (N = 203,691) within the population-based registers of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Twins were followed up a median of 32 years between 1943 and 2010. There were 50,990 individuals who died of any cause, and 3804 who emigrated and were lost to follow-up. EXPOSURES Shared environmental and heritable risk factors among pairs of twins. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was incident cancer. Time-to-event analyses were used to estimate familial risk (risk of cancer in an individual given a twins development of cancer) and heritability (proportion of variance in cancer risk due to interindividual genetic differences) with follow-up via cancer registries. Statistical models adjusted for age and follow-up time, and accounted for censoring and competing risk of death. RESULTS A total of 27,156 incident cancers were diagnosed in 23,980 individuals, translating to a cumulative incidence of 32%. Cancer was diagnosed in both twins among 1383 monozygotic (2766 individuals) and 1933 dizygotic (2866 individuals) pairs. Of these, 38% of monozygotic and 26% of dizygotic pairs were diagnosed with the same cancer type. There was an excess cancer risk in twins whose co-twin was diagnosed with cancer, with estimated cumulative risks that were an absolute 5% (95% CI, 4%-6%) higher in dizygotic (37%; 95% CI, 36%-38%) and an absolute 14% (95% CI, 12%-16%) higher in monozygotic twins (46%; 95% CI, 44%-48%) whose twin also developed cancer compared with the cumulative risk in the overall cohort (32%). For most cancer types, there were significant familial risks and the cumulative risks were higher in monozygotic than dizygotic twins. Heritability of cancer overall was 33% (95% CI, 30%-37%). Significant heritability was observed for the cancer types of skin melanoma (58%; 95% CI, 43%-73%), prostate (57%; 95% CI, 51%-63%), nonmelanoma skin (43%; 95% CI, 26%-59%), ovary (39%; 95% CI, 23%-55%), kidney (38%; 95% CI, 21%-55%), breast (31%; 95% CI, 11%-51%), and corpus uteri (27%; 95% CI, 11%-43%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this long-term follow-up study among Nordic twins, there was significant excess familial risk for cancer overall and for specific types of cancer, including prostate, melanoma, breast, ovary, and uterus. This information about hereditary risks of cancers may be helpful in patient education and cancer risk counseling.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2014

The Heritability of Prostate Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer

Jacob von Bornemann Hjelmborg; Thomas H. Scheike; Klaus K. Holst; Axel Skytthe; Kathryn L. Penney; Rebecca E. Graff; Eero Pukkala; Kaare Christensen; Hans-Olov Adami; Niels V. Holm; Elizabeth Nuttall; Steinbjørn Hansen; Mikael Hartman; Kamila Czene; Jennifer R. Harris; Jaakko Kaprio; Lorelei A. Mucci

Background: Prostate cancer is thought to be the most heritable cancer, although little is known about how this genetic contribution varies across age. Methods: To address this question, we undertook the worlds largest prospective study in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer cohort, including 18,680 monozygotic (MZ) and 30,054 dizygotic (DZ) same-sex male twin pairs. We incorporated time-to-event analyses to estimate the risk concordance and heritability while accounting for censoring and competing risks of death, essential sources of biases that have not been accounted for in previous twin studies modeling cancer risk and liability. Results: The cumulative risk of prostate cancer was similar to that of the background population. The cumulative risk for twins whose co-twin was diagnosed with prostate cancer was greater for MZ than for DZ twins across all ages. Among concordantly affected pairs, the time between diagnoses was significantly shorter for MZ than DZ pairs (median, 3.8 versus 6.5 years, respectively). Genetic differences contributed substantially to variation in both the risk and the liability [heritability = 58% (95% confidence interval, 52%–63%)] of developing prostate cancer. The relative contribution of genetic factors was constant across age through late life with substantial genetic heterogeneity even when diagnosis and screening procedures vary. Conclusions: Results from the population-based twin cohort indicate a greater genetic contribution to the risk of developing prostate cancer when addressing sources of bias. The role of genetic factors is consistently high across age. Impact: Findings affect the search for genetic and epigenetic markers and frame prevention efforts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(11); 2303–10. ©2014 AACR.


Cancer Discovery | 2015

A Large Multiethnic Genome-Wide Association Study of Prostate Cancer Identifies Novel Risk Variants and Substantial Ethnic Differences

Thomas J. Hoffmann; Stephen K. Van Den Eeden; Lori C. Sakoda; Eric Jorgenson; Laurel A. Habel; Rebecca E. Graff; Michael N. Passarelli; Clinton L. Cario; Nima C. Emami; Chun R. Chao; Nirupa R. Ghai; Jun Shan; Dilrini Ranatunga; Charles P. Quesenberry; David S. Aaronson; Joseph C. Presti; Zhaoming Wang; Sonja I. Berndt; Stephen J. Chanock; Shannon K. McDonnell; Amy J. French; Daniel J. Schaid; Stephen N. Thibodeau; Qiyuan Li; Matthew L. Freedman; Kathryn L. Penney; Lorelei A. Mucci; Christopher A. Haiman; Brian E. Henderson; Daniela Seminara

UNLABELLED A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of prostate cancer in Kaiser Permanente health plan members (7,783 cases, 38,595 controls; 80.3% non-Hispanic white, 4.9% African-American, 7.0% East Asian, and 7.8% Latino) revealed a new independent risk indel rs4646284 at the previously identified locus 6q25.3 that replicated in PEGASUS (N = 7,539) and the Multiethnic Cohort (N = 4,679) with an overall P = 1.0 × 10(-19) (OR, 1.18). Across the 6q25.3 locus, rs4646284 exhibited the strongest association with expression of SLC22A1 (P = 1.3 × 10(-23)) and SLC22A3 (P = 3.2 × 10(-52)). At the known 19q13.33 locus, rs2659124 (P = 1.3 × 10(-13); OR, 1.18) nominally replicated in PEGASUS. A risk score of 105 known risk SNPs was strongly associated with prostate cancer (P < 1.0 × 10(-8)). Comparing the highest to lowest risk score deciles, the OR was 6.22 for non-Hispanic whites, 5.82 for Latinos, 3.77 for African-Americans, and 3.38 for East Asians. In non-Hispanic whites, the 105 risk SNPs explained approximately 7.6% of disease heritability. The entire GWAS array explained approximately 33.4% of heritability, with a 4.3-fold enrichment within DNaseI hypersensitivity sites (P = 0.004). SIGNIFICANCE Taken together, our findings of independent risk variants, ethnic variation in existing SNP replication, and remaining unexplained heritability have important implications for further clarifying the genetic risk of prostate cancer. Our findings also suggest that there may be much promise in evaluating understudied variation, such as indels and ethnically diverse populations.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2016

Dietary lycopene intake and risk of prostate cancer defined by ERG protein expression

Rebecca E. Graff; Andreas Pettersson; Rosina T. Lis; Thomas U. Ahearn; Sarah C. Markt; Kathryn M. Wilson; Jennifer R. Rider; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Stephen Finn; Stacey A. Kenfield; Massimo Loda; Edward Giovannucci; Bernard Rosner; Lorelei A. Mucci

BACKGROUND There is limited evidence that supports etiologically distinct molecular subtypes of prostate cancer, the identification of which may improve prevention. Given their antioxidant properties, we hypothesized that lycopene and tomato sauce may be especially protective against diseases harboring the common gene fusion transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2):v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG). OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine associations between estimated lycopene and tomato sauce intake and the risk of prostate cancer defined by ERG protein expression subtype. DESIGN Our study population consisted of a prospective cohort of 46,719 men from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. TMPRSS2:ERG was assessed by ERG immunohistochemistry on tumor tissue microarrays constructed from radical prostatectomy specimens. We used multivariable competing risk models to calculate HRs and 95% CIs for the risk of ERG-positive and, separately, ERG-negative disease. We implemented inverse probability weighting to account for evaluating ERG status only in surgically treated cases. RESULTS During 23 y of follow-up, 5543 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer, among whom 884 were assayed for ERG (426 ERG-positive). With inclusion of only the latter cases, increasing cumulative average tomato sauce intake was associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer overall (≥2 servings/wk compared with <1 serving/mo; multivariable HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.95; P-trend = 0.002). With respect to molecular subtypes, cumulative average tomato sauce intake was associated with a decreased risk of ERG-positive disease (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.81; P-trend = 0.004) but not with ERG-negative disease (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.50; P-trend = 0.10) (P-heterogeneity = 0.04). Increasing quintiles of lycopene intake were associated with a decreased risk of both subtypes (P-heterogeneity = 0.79). Inverse probability weighting did not materially change the results. CONCLUSIONS Our results lend some support to the hypothesis that prostate cancers that harbor TMPRSS2:ERG may be etiologically distinct from fusion-negative cancers. In particular, tomato sauce consumption may play a role in reducing TMPRSS2:ERG-positive disease.


British Journal of Cancer | 2016

Pre-diagnostic circulating sex hormone levels and risk of prostate cancer by ERG tumour protein expression

Rebecca E. Graff; Allison Meisner; Thomas U. Ahearn; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Massimo Loda; Edward Giovannucci; Lorelei A. Mucci; Andreas Pettersson

Background:Experimental studies have shown androgen receptor stimulation to facilitate formation of the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion in prostate cell lines. No study has tested whether higher pre-diagnostic circulating sex hormone levels in men increase risk of developing TMPRSS2:ERG-positive prostate cancer specifically.Methods:We conducted a nested case–control study of 200 prostate cancer cases and 1057 controls from the Physicians’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We examined associations between pre-diagnostic circulating levels of total testosterone, free testosterone, DHT, androstanediol glucuronide, estradiol, and SHBG and risk of prostate cancer by TMPRSS2:ERG status. TMPRSS2:ERG was estimated by ERG immunohistochemistry. We used multivariable unconditional polytomous logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of ERG-positive (n=94) and, separately, ERG-negative (n=106) disease.Results:Free testosterone was significantly associated with the risk of ERG-positive prostate cancer (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05–1.77), but not ERG-negative prostate cancer (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.86–1.38) (Pdiff=0.17). None of the remaining hormones evaluated showed clear differential associations with ERG-positive vs ERG-negative disease.Conclusions:These findings provide some suggestive evidence that higher pre-diagnostic free testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk of developing TMPRSS2:ERG-positive prostate cancer.


The Prostate | 2015

The TMPRSS2:ERG fusion and response to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Rebecca E. Graff; Andreas Pettersson; Rosina T. Lis; Natalie DuPre; Kristina M. Jordahl; Elizabeth Nuttall; Jennifer R. Rider; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Howard D. Sesso; Stacey A. Kenfield; Massimo Loda; Edward Giovannucci; Bernard Rosner; Paul L. Nguyen; Christopher Sweeney; Lorelei A. Mucci

In the United States, half of men with prostate cancer harbor the androgen‐regulated gene fusion TMPRSS2:ERG. We hypothesized that men with TMPRSS2:ERG positive tumors are more responsive to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).


PLOS Genetics | 2017

Cis-eQTL-based trans-ethnic meta-analysis reveals novel genes associated with breast cancer risk

Joshua Hoffman; Rebecca E. Graff; Nima C. Emami; Caroline G. Tai; Michael N. Passarelli; Donglei Hu; Scott Huntsman; Dexter Hadley; Lancelote Leong; Arunabha Majumdar; Noah Zaitlen; Elad Ziv; John S. Witte

Breast cancer is the most common solid organ malignancy and the most frequent cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Previous research has yielded insights into its genetic etiology, but there remains a gap in the understanding of genetic factors that contribute to risk, and particularly in the biological mechanisms by which genetic variation modulates risk. The National Cancer Institute’s “Up for a Challenge” (U4C) competition provided an opportunity to further elucidate the genetic basis of the disease. Our group leveraged the seven datasets made available by the U4C organizers and data from the publicly available UK Biobank cohort to examine associations between imputed gene expression and breast cancer risk. In particular, we used reference datasets describing the breast tissue and whole blood transcriptomes to impute expression levels in breast cancer cases and controls. In trans-ethnic meta-analyses of U4C and UK Biobank data, we found significant associations between breast cancer risk and the expression of RCCD1 (joint p-value: 3.6x10-06) and DHODH (p-value: 7.1x10-06) in breast tissue, as well as a suggestive association for ANKLE1 (p-value: 9.3x10-05). Expression of RCCD1 in whole blood was also suggestively associated with disease risk (p-value: 1.2x10-05), as were expression of ACAP1 (p-value: 1.9x10-05) and LRRC25 (p-value: 5.2x10-05). While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated RCCD1 and ANKLE1 in breast cancer risk, they have not identified the remaining three genes. Among the genetic variants that contributed to the predicted expression of the five genes, we found 23 nominally (p-value < 0.05) associated with breast cancer risk, among which 15 are not in high linkage disequilibrium with risk variants previously identified by GWAS. In summary, we used a transcriptome-based approach to investigate the genetic underpinnings of breast carcinogenesis. This approach provided an avenue for deciphering the functional relevance of genes and genetic variants involved in breast cancer.


Nature Communications | 2017

Genome-wide association study of prostate-specific antigen levels identifies novel loci independent of prostate cancer

Thomas J. Hoffmann; Michael N. Passarelli; Rebecca E. Graff; Nima C. Emami; Lori C. Sakoda; Eric Jorgenson; Laurel A. Habel; Jun Shan; Dilrini Ranatunga; Charles P. Quesenberry; Chun R. Chao; Nirupa R. Ghai; David S. Aaronson; Joseph C. Presti; Tobias Nordström; Zhaoming Wang; Sonja I. Berndt; Stephen J. Chanock; Jonathan D. Mosley; Robert J. Klein; Mridu Middha; Hans Lilja; Olle Melander; Mark N. Kvale; Pui-Yan Kwok; Catherine Schaefer; Neil Risch; Stephen K. Van Den Eeden; John S. Witte

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been used for detection and surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa). However, factors other than PCa—such as genetics—can impact PSA. Here we present findings from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PSA in 28,503 Kaiser Permanente whites and 17,428 men from replication cohorts. We detect 40 genome-wide significant (P<5 × 10−8) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): 19 novel, 15 previously identified for PSA (14 of which were also PCa-associated), and 6 previously identified for PCa only. Further analysis incorporating PCa cases suggests that at least half of the 40 SNPs are PSA-associated independent of PCa. The 40 SNPs explain 9.5% of PSA variation in non-Hispanic whites, and the remaining GWAS SNPs explain an additional 31.7%; this percentage is higher in younger men, supporting the genetic basis of PSA levels. These findings provide important information about genetic markers for PSA that may improve PCa screening, thereby reducing over-diagnosis and over-treatment.


Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2017

Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer

Rebecca E. Graff; Sören Möller; Michael N. Passarelli; John S. Witte; Axel Skytthe; Kaare Christensen; Qihua Tan; Hans-Olov Adami; Kamila Czene; Jennifer R. Harris; Eero Pukkala; Jaakko Kaprio; Edward Giovannucci; Lorelei A. Mucci; Jacob von Bornemann Hjelmborg

Background & Aims We analyzed data from twins to determine how much the familial risk of colorectal cancer can be attributed to genetic factors vs environment. We also examined whether heritability is distinct for colon vs rectal cancer, given evidence of distinct etiologies. Methods Our data set included 39,990 monozygotic and 61,443 same‐sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. We compared each cancer’s risk in twins of affected co‐twins relative to the cohort risk (familial risk ratio [FRR]). We then estimated the proportion of variation in risk that could be attributed to genetic factors (heritability). Results From earliest registration in 1943 through 2010, there were 1861 individuals diagnosed with colon cancer and 1268 diagnosed with rectal cancer. Monozygotic twins of affected co‐twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4–3.8) relative to the cohort risk. Dizygotic twins of affected co‐twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7–2.7). We estimated that 40% (95% CI, 33%–48%) of the variation in colorectal cancer risk could be attributed to genetic factors; unique environment only accounted for the remaining liability. For colon cancer, the FRR was 3.3 (95% CI, 2.1–4.5) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7–3.5) for dizygotic twins. For rectal cancer, comparable estimates were 3.3 (95% CI, 1.5–5.1) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2–4.0) for dizygotic twins. Heritability estimates for colon and rectal cancer were 16% (95% CI, 0–46%) and 15% (95% CI, 0–50%), common environment estimates were 15% (95% CI, 0–38%) and 11% (95% CI, 0–38%), and unique environment estimates were 68% (95% CI, 57%–79%) and 75% (95% CI, 61%–88%), respectively. Conclusions Interindividual genetic differences could account for 40% of the variation in susceptibility to colorectal cancer; risk for colon and rectal cancers might have less of a genetic component than risk for colorectal cancer. Siblings, and particularly monozygotic co‐twins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening.

Collaboration


Dive into the Rebecca E. Graff's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John S. Witte

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge