Rebecca Fitzgerald

Update on Facial Aging

Facial aging was once thought to be the result of the relentless downward pull of gravity on skin and underlying fat. In turn, facial fat was believed to be a contiguous sheet of tissue. However, over the past four decades, a number of investigators have examined more closely the causes of facial aging, leading to a better understanding of age-related changes, and have confirmed and further explored the proposal by Gonzalez-Ulloa and Flores in 1965 that facial aging involves changes in muscle and bone, as well as skin and fat. Further, the recent work of Rohrich and Pessa (and other authors) has demonstrated that facial fat is not a sheet of tissue, but rather is compartmentalized throughout the face. This discovery has allowed the evolution of improved techniques for facial rejuvenation.

Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers conference: Assessing the State of the Science

The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, with the support of other sister societies, conducted the Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers: Assessing the State of the Science conference in December of 2009. The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons established a panel of leading experts in the field of soft-tissue fillers-from researchers to clinicians-and other stakeholders for the conference to examine and discuss issues of patient safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in relation to the approved and off-label use of soft-tissue fillers, and other factors, including the training and level of experience of individuals administering fillers. This report represents the systematic literature review that examines comprehensively the available evidence and gaps in the evidence related to soft-tissue fillers, to inform and support the work of the state-of-the-science conference panel. This evidence-based medicine review will serve as the foundation for future evidence-based medicine reports in this growing field.

Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers: Assessing the State of the Science conference—Proceedings report

The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, with the support of other sister societies, conducted the Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers: Assessing the State of the Science conference in December of 2009. The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons established a panel of leading experts in the field of soft-tissue fillers-from researchers to clinicians-and other stakeholders for the conference to examine and discuss issues of patient safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in relation to the approved and off-label use of soft-tissue fillers, and other factors, including the training and level of experience of individuals administering fillers. This report summarizes the deliberations and key points made by the panel and presenters to the panel, and includes a summary of the panels near-term and longer term recommendations for next steps to help guide future efforts to address the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of facial soft-tissue fillers. This report represents the panels assessment of the medical knowledge available on facial soft-tissue fillers at the time of the conference.

Appropriate Selection and Application of Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation Agents and Procedures: Panel Consensus Recommendations

As injectable products have been introduced and as clinicians have gained experience with them, applications and techniques for injection have evolved, with better cosmetic results, enhanced patient safety, and greatly improved patient satisfaction. Within the past four years, several consensus recommendation panels have been convened to summarize the accumulated clinical experience and knowledge about the application of these products. The guidelines that already exist in the literature are referred to, and suggested guidelines for the administration of poly-L-lactic acid-for which no consensus guidelines have previously been published-are included in this article.

Nonsurgical modalities to treat the aging face.

Injectable shaping agents include neurotoxins (botulinum toxin type A products), replacement fillers (hyaluronic acid [HA] agents), and biostimulatory fillers (calcium hydroxylapatite [CaHA], polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA], and poly-L-lactic acid [PLLA]). This article presents an overview of the agents currently available for use in facial rejuvenation in the United States.

Facial aesthetic analysis.

Consideration of the individual patients appearance based on systematic mapping and a three-dimensional evaluation of the four levels of facial structure (bone, muscle, fat, and skin) will help the clinician choose the most appropriate modalities for facial rejuvenation. This article addresses these concepts and also discusses universal perceptions of attractiveness.

Surgical versus nonsurgical rejuvenation.

The number of cosmetic procedures for facial rejuvenation has increased steadily over the past decade. The increase in the application of nonsurgical modalities, particularly injectable shaping agents, has been remarkable. As knowledge and experience about facial aging has increased, techniques and tools have improved, and it is increasingly apparent that surgical and nonsurgical/injectable modalities are complementary.

Calcium Hydroxyapatite (CaHA) Indication for Hand Rejuvenation

The recent approval in 2015 of Radiesse for injection into the hand by the FDA has spurred an increase in interest among patients and clinicians in nonsurgical hand rejuvenation using fillers. Application of the same techniques used to treat the face to the dorsum of the hands does not account for the unique nature of the skin and underlying anatomy, and can lead to suboptimal outcomes and an increased risk of adverse events such as the formation of nodules. Here, the authors discuss dilution strategies and injection techniques for hand rejuvenation using Radiesse for optimal patient safety and aesthetic outcomes.

Physiochemical Characteristics of Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA)

Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a synthetic, biocompatible, biodegradable polymer. For soft-tissue augmentation, the size and chemical attributes of the PLLA microparticles are central to this agents ability to promote a subclinical inflammatory response that stimulates deposition of collagen in the extracellular matrix. The resultant restoration of facial volume occurs in a controlled, predictable manner and is long lasting. The unique physiochemical and biostimulatory properties of PLLA differentiate it from other available treatments and are the foundation of the unique treatment methodology required for optimal results.

Expanding Treatment Options for Injectable Agents

Loss of facial volume and soft-tissue support are common to types of facial aging. Restoration of a youthful appearance relies upon correction of this loss, and can be achieved in various capacities through use of biostimulatory or hyaluronic acids (HA) injectable fillers. Here, the authors discuss the versatility of calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) in volume replacement and the applications and facial regions for which CaHA, poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and HA fillers are best suited.