Rebecca Gerlach

Naloxone fails to reverse pain thresholds elevated by acupuncture: acupuncture analgesia reconsidered.

Abstract We were unable to demonstrate the reversal of dental acupunctural analgesia following the injection of 0.4 mg naloxone using evoked potential methodology. Since our findings differed from those of Mayer, Price and Rafii who used pain threshold methods, we attempted to replicate their study. Subjects who demonstrated acupunctural analgesia during electrical stimulation of the LI‐4 point on the hands received either 1.2 mg naloxone or normal saline under double blind conditions. Pain thresholds elevated by acupuncture failed to reverse when naloxone was given. Review of experimental design issues, other related human subjects research, and animal studies on acupunctural analgesia provided little convincing evidence that endorphins play a significant role in acupunctural analgesia. Because endorphins can be released in response to a Stressor, endorphin presence sometimes correlates with acupunctural treatment in animal studies and some human studies, especially those involving pain patients. The primary analgesia elicited by acupunctural stimulation seems to involve other mechanisms.

STIMULUS INTENSITY AND INTER-STIMULUS INTERVAL EFFECTS ON PAIN-RELATED CEREBRAL POTENTIALS

Abstract The inter-relationship between stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval (ISI) on pain-related evoked vertex potentials was studied. Sixteen subjects were tested with 4 stimulus intensities at 4 different ISIs forming 16 averaged event-related potentials for each subject. Data were analyzed in 2 ways: first by multiple regression analysis of peak-to-peak amplitudes and secondly by single-trial analysis for each subject based on a linear model employing principal component loadings as basis functions, from which were derived separate time-dependent functions describing the contributions of intensity and ISI. Peak-to-peak amplitudes of the averaged waves increased with increases in either intensity or ISI. There are no significant interactions. However, single-trial analysis revealed subtle, but consistent, differences in the peak latencies between stimulus and ISI components, suggesting that the components arise from distinct sources.

Effects of nitrous oxide, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and their combination on brain potentials elicited by painful stimulation.

Combinations of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) and inhalation of nitrous oxide with oxygen have been used for surgical pain control and this report explored the possible synergism of these two treatments. During painful dental stimulation, 18 subjects gave pain reports while event-related potentials were recorded at vertex. Electrical stimulation was delivered bilaterally at the LI-4 acupuncture points on the hands at 20 Hz, mean=9.65 mA intensity. Inhalation treatment was nitrous oxide 33% with oxygen. Testing was done on two days to permit evaluation of each treatment alone and their combination. Treatment sequence was counterbalanced. Base-to-peak amplitude and peak latency scores were derived for the event-related potentials under each testing condition. Both stimulation and inhalation treatments altered event-related potential scores and pain report. The combination treatment was significantly more effective than stimulation alone but was not significantly more effective than nitrous oxide alone. Nitrous oxide with oxygen alone reduced peak amplitude at 250 ms and 350 ms, as well as pain report. It increased peak latency at 100 ms. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation alone decreased peak amplitude and latency at 150 ms and increased peak latency at 350 ms. Decreased peak amplitude at 250 ms and increased peak latency at 150 ms were observed when inhalation was added to stimulation, and there was also a significant reduction in pain report. Nine control subjects were studied to demonstrate that analgesic changes were not due to repeated testing. These outcomes demonstrated no synergism between the stimulation and inhalation treatments. The data suggest that nitrous oxide blocks the effects of electrical stimulation at LI-4.

Comparison of short-latency trigeminal evoked potentials elicited by painful dental and gingival stimulation.

Painful stimulation of tooth pulp and of the maxillary gingiva was undertaken in 16 volunteers. Short-latency evoked potentials (15-50 msec) were recorded over 800 trials in each case at F3-P3 of F4-P4, and the resultant averaged wave forms were compared. The gingival wave was distinct in all subjects and could be averaged across subjects while the dental waves were either noise or very inconsistent over subjects. Averaging of the dental wave forms across subjects yielded an uninterpretable result. It was clear that dental evoked potentials could not be recorded at the sites. These findings could be explained by either or both of two hypotheses: dental afferents are predominantly small fiber, nociceptive end organs that conduct more slowly than soft tissue afferents whereas gingival stimulation activates both large and small fiber populations; and dental representation in somatosensory cortex is different and phylogenetically more primitive than that of neighboring soft tissue. Therefore, the location of the generator sites in cortex and the orientation of the dipole may be different for dental than for gingival wave forms.

Stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval effects on pain-related cerebral potentials : Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 62 (1985) 352–363

The inter-relationship between stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval (ISI) on pain-related evoked vertex potentials was studied. Sixteen subjects were tested with 4 stimulus intensities at 4 different ISIs forming 16 averaged event-related potentials for each subject. Data were analyzed in 2 ways: first by multiple regression analysis of peak-to-peak amplitudes and secondly by single-trial analysis for each subject based on a linear model employing principal component loadings as basis functions, from which were derived separate time-dependent functions describing the contributions of intensity and ISI. Peak-to-peak amplitudes of the averaged waves increased with increases in either intensity of ISI. There were no significant interactions. However, single-trial analysis revealed subtle, but consistent, differences in the peak latencies between stimulus and ISI components, suggesting that the components arise from distinct sources.