Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rebecca Landa is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rebecca Landa.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1997

Macrocephaly in children and adults with autism

Janet E. Lainhart; Joseph Piven; Maryann Wzorek; Rebecca Landa; Susan L. Santangelo; Hilary Coon; Susan E. Folstein

OBJECTIVE To explore the frequency and onset of macrocephaly in autism and its relationship to clinical features. METHOD Head circumferences at birth, during early childhood, and at the time of examination were studied in a community-based sample of autistic children and adults. The authors investigated whether head circumference at the time of examination was associated with clinical features. RESULTS Fourteen percent of the autistic subjects had macrocephaly: 11% of males and 24% of females. In most, the macrocephaly was not present at birth; in some it became apparent in early and middle childhood as a result of increased rate of head growth. A small relationship was noted between head circumference percentile and less severe core features of autism. Neither macrocephaly nor head circumference percentile was associated with nonverbal IQ, verbal status, seizure disorder, neurological soft signs or minor physical anomalies in the autistic subjects. CONCLUSION Macrocephaly is common in autism and usually is not present at birth. Rates of head growth may be abnormal in early and middle childhood in some (37%) children with autism. Macrocephaly does not define a homogeneous subgroup of autistic individuals according to clinical features.


American Journal of Medical Genetics - Neuropsychiatric Genetics | 1999

An autosomal genomic screen for autism

Stacey Barrett; John C. Beck; Raphael Bernier; Erica Bisson; Terry A. Braun; Thomas L. Casavant; Deb Childress; Susan E. Folstein; M. E. Garcia; Mary Beth Gardiner; Stephen E. Gilman; Jonathan L. Haines; Kelly Hopkins; Rebecca Landa; Nicole Meyer; Julie Ann Mullane; Daryl Y. Nishimura; Pat Palmer; Joseph Piven; Joy Purdy; Susan L. Santangelo; Charles Searby; Val C. Sheffield; Jennifer Singleton; Susan L. Slager; Tom Struchen; Sarah Svenson; Veronica J. Vieland; Kai Wang; Brian Winklosky

Autism is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder defined by social and communication deficits and ritualistic-repetitive behaviors that are detectable in early childhood. The etiology of idiopathic autism is strongly genetic, and oligogenic transmission is likely. The first stage of a two-stage genomic screen for autism was carried out by the Collaborative Linkage Study of Autism on individuals affected with autism from 75 families ascertained through an affected sib-pair. The strongest multipoint results were for regions on chromosomes 13 and 7. The highest maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD (MMLS/het) score is 3.0 at D13S800 (approximately 55 cM from the telomere) under the recessive model, with an estimated 35% of families linked to this locus. The next highest peak is an MMLS/het score of 2.3 at 19 cM, between D13S217 and D13S1229. Our third highest MMLS/het score of 2.2 is on chromosome 7 and is consistent with the International Molecular Genetic Study of Autism Consortium report of a possible susceptibility locus somewhere within 7q31-33. These regions and others will be followed up in the second stage of our study by typing additional markers in both the original and a second set of identically ascertained autism families, which are currently being collected. By comparing results across a number of studies, we expect to be able to narrow our search for autism susceptibility genes to a small number of genomic regions.


Pediatrics | 2009

Clinical Assessment and Management of Toddlers With Suspected Autism Spectrum Disorder: Insights From Studies of High-Risk Infants

Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Susan E. Bryson; Catherine Lord; Sally J. Rogers; Alice S. Carter; Leslie J. Carver; Kasia Chawarska; John N. Constantino; Geraldine Dawson; Karen R. Dobkins; Deborah Fein; Jana M. Iverson; Ami Klin; Rebecca Landa; Daniel S. Messinger; Sally Ozonoff; Marian Sigman; Wendy L. Stone; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Nurit Yirmiya

With increased public awareness of the early signs and recent American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations that all 18- and 24-month-olds be screened for autism spectrum disorders, there is an increasing need for diagnostic assessment of very young children. However, unique challenges exist in applying current diagnostic guidelines for autism spectrum disorders to children under the age of 2 years. In this article, we address challenges related to early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of autism spectrum disorders in this age group. We provide a comprehensive review of findings from recent studies on the early development of children with autism spectrum disorders, summarizing current knowledge on early signs of autism spectrum disorders, the screening properties of early detection tools, and current best practice for diagnostic assessment of autism spectrum disorders before 2 years of age. We also outline principles of effective intervention for children under the age of 2 with suspected/confirmed autism spectrum disorders. It is hoped that ongoing studies will provide an even stronger foundation for evidence-based diagnostic and intervention approaches for this critically important age group.


Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | 2002

Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations

Mikle South; Brenda J. Williams; William M. McMahon; Thomas Owley; Pauline A. Filipek; E. Shernoff; Christine Corsello; Janet E. Lainhart; Rebecca Landa; Sally Ozonoff

The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) was developed as a relatively easy, inexpensive aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of autism. This study examined the validity of the GARS when used with a sample of 119 children with strict DSM-IV diagnoses of autism, ascertained from both clinical and research settings. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that autistic children in this sample would be classified as having autism. The sample mean for the Autism Quotient, a hypothesized index of the likelihood of having autism, was 90.10, significantly below the reference mean of 100. Diagnostic classification according to criteria specified by the GARS resulted in a sensitivity of only .48. Limitations of rating scales in general and of the GARS specifically are discussed. It is recommended that clinicians and researchers using or considering using the GARS for autism diagnosis or ratings of autism severity recognize the need for further research regarding its use.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 2014

18-month predictors of later outcomes in Younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder: A baby siblings research consortium study

Katarzyna Chawarska; Frederick Shic; Suzanne Macari; Daniel Campbell; Jessica Brian; Rebecca Landa; Ted Hutman; Charles A. Nelson; Sally Ozonoff; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Gregory S. Young; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Ira L. Cohen; Tony Charman; Daniel S. Messinger; Ami Klin; Scott P. Johnson; Susan E. Bryson

OBJECTIVE Younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are at high risk (HR) for developing ASD as well as features of the broader autism phenotype. Although this complicates early diagnostic considerations in this cohort, it also provides an opportunity to examine patterns of behavior associated specifically with ASD compared to other developmental outcomes. METHOD We applied Classification and Regression Trees (CART) analysis to individual items of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) in 719 HR siblings to identify behavioral features at 18 months that were predictive of diagnostic outcomes (ASD, atypical development, and typical development) at 36 months. RESULTS Three distinct combinations of features at 18 months were predictive of ASD outcome: poor eye contact combined with lack of communicative gestures and giving; poor eye contact combined with a lack of imaginative play; and lack of giving and presence of repetitive behaviors, but with intact eye contact. These 18-month behavioral profiles predicted ASD versus non-ASD status at 36 months with 82.7% accuracy in an initial test sample and 77.3% accuracy in a validation sample. Clinical features at age 3 years among children with ASD varied as a function of their 18-month symptom profiles. Children with ASD who were misclassified at 18 months were higher functioning, and their autism symptoms increased between 18 and 36 months. CONCLUSION These findings suggest the presence of different developmental pathways to ASD in HR siblings. Understanding such pathways will provide clearer targets for neural and genetic research and identification of developmentally specific treatments for ASD.


Autism Research | 2016

Non-ASD outcomes at 36 months in siblings at familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

Tony Charman; Gregory S. Young; Jessica Brian; Alice S. Carter; Leslie J. Carver; Katarzyna Chawarska; Suzanne Curtin; Karen R. Dobkins; Mayada Elsabbagh; Stelios Georgiades; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Ted Hutman; Jana M. Iverson; Emily J.H. Jones; Rebecca Landa; Suzanne Macari; Daniel S. Messinger; Charles A. Nelson; Sally Ozonoff; Celine Saulnier; Wendy L. Stone; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Sara Jane Webb; Nurit Yirmiya; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum

We characterized developmental outcomes of a large sample of siblings at familial high‐risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), who themselves did not have ASD (n = 859), and low‐risk controls with no family history of ASD (n = 473). We report outcomes at age 3 years using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised (ADI‐R) and adaptive functioning on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Around 11% of high‐risk siblings had mild‐to‐moderate levels of developmental delay, a rate higher than the low‐risk controls. The groups did not differ in the proportion of toddlers with mild‐to‐moderate language delay. Thirty percent of high‐risk siblings had elevated scores on the ADOS, double the rate seen in the low‐risk controls. High‐risk siblings also had higher parent reported levels of ASD symptoms on the ADI‐R and lower adaptive functioning on the Vineland. Males were more likely to show higher levels of ASD symptoms and lower levels of developmental ability and adaptive behavior than females across most measures but not mild‐to‐moderate language delay. Lower maternal education was associated with lower developmental and adaptive behavior outcomes. These findings are evidence for early emerging characteristics related to the “broader autism phenotype” (BAP) previously described in older family members of individuals with ASD. There is a need for ongoing clinical monitoring of high‐risk siblings who do not have an ASD by age 3 years, as well as continued follow‐up into school age to determine their developmental and behavioral outcomes. Autism Res 2017, 10: 169–178.


Autism | 2007

Developmental regression and autism reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

Emily Jane Woo; Robert Ball; Rebecca Landa; Andrew W. Zimmerman; M. Miles Braun

We report demographic and clinical characteristics of children reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as having autism or another developmental disorder after vaccination. We completed 124 interviews with parents and reviewed medical records for 31 children whose records contained sufficient information to evaluate the childs developmental history. Medical record review indicated that 27 of 31 (87%) children had autism/ASD and 19 (61.3%) had evidence of developmental regression (loss of social, language, or motor skills). The proportion of VAERS cases of autism with regression was greater than that reported in population-based studies, based on the subset of VAERS cases with medical record confirmation. This difference may reflect preferential reporting to VAERS of autism with regression. In other respects, the children in this study appear to be similar to other children with autism. Further research might determine whether the pathogenesis of autism with developmental regression differs from that of autism without regression.


Molecular Autism | 2016

Commentary: sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino

Daniel S. Messinger; Gregory S. Young; Sara Jane Webb; Sally Ozonoff; Susan E. Bryson; Alice S. Carter; Leslie J. Carver; Tony Charman; Katarzyna Chawarska; Suzanne Curtin; Karen R. Dobkins; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Ted Hutman; Jana M. Iverson; Rebecca Landa; Charles A. Nelson; Wendy L. Stone; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum

Messinger et al. found a 3.18 odds ratio of male to female ASD recurrence in 1241 prospectively followed high-risk (HR) siblings. Among high-risk siblings (with and without ASD), as well as among 583 low-risk controls, girls exhibited higher performance on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, as well as lower restricted and repetitive behavior severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) than boys. That is, female-favoring sex differences in developmental performance and autism traits were evident among low-risk and non-ASD high-risk children, as well as those with ASD. Constantino (Mol Autism) suggests that sex differences in categorical ASD outcomes in Messinger et al. should be understood as a female protective effect. We are receptive to Constantino’s (Mol Autism) suggestion, and propose that quantitative sex differences in autism-related features are keys to understanding this female protective effect.


Journal of Psychiatric Research | 1993

A brief method of assessing communication in psychiatric patients

Rebecca Landa; Karen Swartz; Marshal F. Folstein

Abstract The Brief Communication Battery is a 10–15 minute instrument used to screen receptive and expressive grammar and semantics, discourse, reading, writing, and speech production of 31 healthy subjects and 82 patients. Alzheimers disease (AD), schizophrenic (SZ) and Huntington (HD) patients scored significantly lower than normal subjects, revealing communication difficulties in patients who are not classically aphasic and in patients with Mini-Mental Status Exam scores in the normal range (SZ, HD). The BCB proved to be a reliable and provisionally valid instrument for screening communication.


Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | 2007

Studying the emergence of autism spectrum disorders in high-risk infants: Methodological and practical issues

Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Audrey Thurm; Wendy L. Stone; Grace T. Baranek; Susan E. Bryson; Jana M. Iverson; Alice Kau; Ami Klin; Cathy Lord; Rebecca Landa; Sally J. Rogers; Marian Sigman

Collaboration


Dive into the Rebecca Landa's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sally Ozonoff

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy L. Stone

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alice S. Carter

University of Massachusetts Boston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge