Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rebecca N. Bushon is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rebecca N. Bushon.


Water Research | 2012

Comparative effectiveness of membrane bioreactors, conventional secondary treatment, and chlorine and UV disinfection to remove microorganisms from municipal wastewaters

Donna S. Francy; Erin A. Stelzer; Rebecca N. Bushon; Amie M.G. Brady; Ashley G. Williston; Kimberly R. Riddell; Mark A. Borchardt; Susan K. Spencer; Terry M. Gellner

Log removals of bacterial indicators, coliphage, and enteric viruses were studied in three membrane bioreactor (MBR) activated-sludge and two conventional secondary activated-sludge municipal wastewater treatment plants during three recreational seasons (May-Oct.) when disinfection of effluents is required. In total, 73 regular samples were collected from key locations throughout treatment processes: post-preliminary, post-MBR, post-secondary, post-tertiary, and post-disinfection (UV or chlorine). Out of 19 post-preliminary samples, adenovirus by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was detected in all 19, enterovirus by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was detected in 15, and norovirus GI by qRT-PCR was detected in 11. Norovirus GII and Hepatitis A virus were not detected in any samples, and rotavirus was detected in one sample but could not be quantified. Although culturable viruses were found in 12 out of 19 post-preliminary samples, they were not detected in any post-secondary, post-MBR, post-ultraviolet, or post-chlorine samples. Median log removals for all organisms were higher for MBR secondary treatment (3.02 to >6.73) than for conventional secondary (1.53-4.19) treatment. Ultraviolet disinfection after MBR treatment provided little additional log removal of any organism except for somatic coliphage (>2.18), whereas ultraviolet or chlorine disinfection after conventional secondary treatment provided significant log removals (above the analytical variability) of all bacterial indicators (1.18-3.89) and somatic and F-specific coliphage (0.71 and >2.98). Median log removals of adenovirus across disinfection were low in both MBR and conventional secondary plants (no removal detected and 0.24), and few removals of individual samples were near or above the analytical variability of 1.2 log genomic copies per liter. Based on qualitative examinations of plots showing reductions of organisms throughout treatment processes, somatic coliphage may best represent the removal of viruses across secondary treatment in both MBR and conventional secondary plants. F-specific coliphage and Escherichia coli may best represent the removal of viruses across the disinfection process in MBR facilities, but none of the indicators represented the removal of viruses across disinfection in conventional secondary plants.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2012

Interlaboratory Comparison of Real-Time PCR Protocols for Quantification of General Fecal Indicator Bacteria

Orin C. Shanks; Mano Sivaganesan; Lindsay Peed; Catherine A. Kelty; Blackwood Ad; Greene Mr; Rachel T. Noble; Rebecca N. Bushon; Erin A. Stelzer; Julie L. Kinzelman; Anan'eva T; Christopher D. Sinigalliano; Wanless D; John F. Griffith; Yiping Cao; Stephen B. Weisberg; Valerie J. Harwood; Christopher Staley; Kevin H. Oshima; Manju Varma; Richard A. Haugland

The application of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technologies for the rapid identification of fecal bacteria in environmental waters is being considered for use as a national water quality metric in the United States. The transition from research tool to a standardized protocol requires information on the reproducibility and sources of variation associated with qPCR methodology across laboratories. This study examines interlaboratory variability in the measurement of enterococci and Bacteroidales concentrations from standardized, spiked, and environmental sources of DNA using the Entero1a and GenBac3 qPCR methods, respectively. Comparisons are based on data generated from eight different research facilities. Special attention was placed on the influence of the DNA isolation step and effect of simplex and multiplex amplification approaches on interlaboratory variability. Results suggest that a crude lysate is sufficient for DNA isolation unless environmental samples contain substances that can inhibit qPCR amplification. No appreciable difference was observed between simplex and multiplex amplification approaches. Overall, interlaboratory variability levels remained low (<10% coefficient of variation) regardless of qPCR protocol.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2013

Comparison of filters for concentrating microbial indicators and pathogens in lake-water samples

Donna S. Francy; Erin A. Stelzer; Amie M.G. Brady; Carrie Huitger; Rebecca N. Bushon; Hon S. Ip; Michael W. Ware; Eric N. Villegas; Vicente J. Gallardo; H. D. Alan Lindquist

ABSTRACT Bacterial indicators are used to indicate increased health risk from pathogens and to make beach closure and advisory decisions; however, beaches are seldom monitored for the pathogens themselves. Studies of sources and types of pathogens at beaches are needed to improve estimates of swimming-associated health risks. It would be advantageous and cost-effective, especially for studies conducted on a regional scale, to use a method that can simultaneously filter and concentrate all classes of pathogens from the large volumes of water needed to detect pathogens. In seven recovery experiments, stock cultures of viruses and protozoa were seeded into 10-liter lake water samples, and concentrations of naturally occurring bacterial indicators were used to determine recoveries. For the five filtration methods tested, the highest median recoveries were as follows: glass wool for adenovirus (4.7%); NanoCeram for enterovirus (14.5%) and MS2 coliphage (84%); continuous-flow centrifugation (CFC) plus Virocap (CFC+ViroCap) for Escherichia coli (68.3%) and Cryptosporidium (54%); automatic ultrafiltration (UF) for norovirus GII (2.4%); and dead-end UF for Enterococcus faecalis (80.5%), avian influenza virus (0.02%), and Giardia (57%). In evaluating filter performance in terms of both recovery and variability, the automatic UF resulted in the highest recovery while maintaining low variability for all nine microorganisms. The automatic UF was used to demonstrate that filtration can be scaled up to field deployment and the collection of 200-liter lake water samples.


Journal of Applied Microbiology | 2009

Comparison of traditional and molecular analytical methods for detecting biological agents in raw and drinking water following ultrafiltration

Donna S. Francy; Rebecca N. Bushon; Amie M.G. Brady; Erin E. Bertke; Christopher M. Kephart; Christina A. Likirdopulos; Brian E. Mailot; Frank W. Schaefer; H. D. Alan Lindquist

Aims:  To compare the performance of traditional methods to quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for detecting five biological agents in large‐volume drinking‐water samples concentrated by ultrafiltration (UF).


Journal of Applied Microbiology | 2009

Rapid detection of Escherichia coli and enterococci in recreational water using an immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate technique

Rebecca N. Bushon; Amie M.G. Brady; Christina A. Likirdopulos; J.V. Cireddu

Aims:  The aim of this study was to examine a rapid method for detecting Escherichia coli and enterococci in recreational water.


Water Research | 2009

Comparison of immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate rapid method to traditional culture-based method for E. coli and enterococci enumeration in wastewater

Rebecca N. Bushon; Christina A. Likirdopulos; Amie M.G. Brady

Untreated wastewater samples from California, North Carolina, and Ohio were analyzed by the immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate (IMS/ATP) method and the traditional culture-based method for E. coli and enterococci concentrations. The IMS/ATP method concentrates target bacteria by immunomagnetic separation and then quantifies captured bacteria by measuring bioluminescence induced by release of ATP from the bacterial cells. Results from this method are available within 1h from the start of sample processing. Significant linear correlations were found between the IMS/ATP results and results from traditional culture-based methods for E. coli and enterococci enumeration for one location in California, two locations in North Carolina, and one location in Ohio (r values ranged from 0.87 to 0.97). No significant linear relation was found for a second location in California that treats a complex mixture of residential and industrial wastewater. With the exception of one location, IMS/ATP showed promise as a rapid method for the quantification of faecal-indicator organisms in wastewater.


Letters in Applied Microbiology | 2010

Statistical assessment of DNA extraction reagent lot variability in real‐time quantitative PCR

Rebecca N. Bushon; Christopher M. Kephart; G.F. Koltun; Donna S. Francy; Frank W. Schaefer; H. D. Alan Lindquist

Aims:  The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability in lots of a DNA extraction kit using real‐time PCR assays for Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Vibrio cholerae.


Water intelligence online | 2011

Comparative Evaluation of Molecular and Culture Methods for Fecal Indicator Bacteria for Use in Inland Recreational Waters

Julie Kinzelman; Rebecca N. Bushon; Samuel Dorevitch; Rachel T. Noble

Rapid analytical methods are likely to be incorporated into revised recreational water quality criteria by the US EPA (2012). While epidemiological studies have demonstrated a correlation of health effects to fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) as quantified by QPCR, there is a need to examine the relationship between EPA-approved culture-based methods and their QPCR-based equivalents prior to implementation. In particular, inland waters, including lakes, streams/rivers, and wastewater through the treatment process (as a source of environmental DNA) need to be assessed to determine whether they can be accurately managed using rapid QPCR based techniques. The goal of this research was to determine how EPA-approved culture-based and QPCR-based methods compared when a) inhibition caused underestimation, b) target bacteria were viable and/or non-viable, c) using a variety of different QPCR quantification approaches, d) related to pathogen densities, and e) analyses were performed in multiple laboratories (precision, accuracy, and other sources of variability). Results indicate that all sites are not equal. While QPCR appeared to have satisfactory correlation to culture-based methods for FIB at some sites, including in process wastewater, it does not appear that the methods can be unilaterally applied across all inland water bodies. The lack of consistent correlation observed for some geographic locations and water body types could be attributed to different types of contamination sources (age and growth state of FIB), unresolved inhibition, method variability (between lab, development of calibration curves, extraction efficiency, method of result calculation, and limit of detection), and the relative contribution of DNA from viable vs. non-viable cells. This title belongs to WERF Research Report Series . ISBN: 9781843395454 (eBook)


Journal of Microbiological Methods | 2016

Multi-laboratory survey of qPCR enterococci analysis method performance in U.S. coastal and inland surface waters

Richard A. Haugland; Shawn Siefring; Manju Varma; Kevin H. Oshima; Mano Sivaganesan; Yiping Cao; Meredith Raith; John F. Griffith; Stephen B. Weisberg; Rachel T. Noble; A. Denene Blackwood; Julie Kinzelman; Tamara Anan’eva; Rebecca N. Bushon; Erin A. Stelzer; Valarie J. Harwood; Katrina V. Gordon; Christopher D. Sinigalliano

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has become a frequently used technique for quantifying enterococci in recreational surface waters, but there are several methodological options. Here we evaluated how three method permutations, type of mastermix, sample extract dilution and use of controls in results calculation, affect method reliability among multiple laboratories with respect to sample interference. Multiple samples from each of 22 sites representing an array of habitat types were analyzed using EPA Method 1611 and 1609 reagents with full strength and five-fold diluted extracts. The presence of interference was assessed three ways: using sample processing and PCR amplifications controls; consistency of results across extract dilutions; and relative recovery of target genes from spiked enterococci in water sample compared to control matrices with acceptable recovery defined as 50 to 200%. Method 1609, which is based on an environmental mastermix, was found to be superior to Method 1611, which is based on a universal mastermix. Method 1611 had over a 40% control assay failure rate with undiluted extracts and a 6% failure rate with diluted extracts. Method 1609 failed in only 11% and 3% of undiluted and diluted extracts analyses. Use of sample processing control assay results in the delta-delta Ct method for calculating relative target gene recoveries increased the number of acceptable recovery results. Delta-delta tended to bias recoveries from apparent partially inhibitory samples on the high side which could help in avoiding potential underestimates of enterococci--an important consideration in a public health context. Control assay and delta-delta recovery results were largely consistent across the range of habitats sampled, and among laboratories. The methodological option that best balanced acceptable estimated target gene recoveries with method sensitivity and avoidance of underestimated enterococci densities was Method 1609 without extract dilution and using the delta-delta calculation method. The applicability of this method can be extended by the analysis of diluted extracts to sites where interference is indicated but, particularly in these instances, should be confirmed by augmenting the control assays with analyses for target gene recoveries from spiked target organisms.


Lake and Reservoir Management | 2013

Comparing rapid and culture indicator bacteria methods at inland lake beaches

Donna S. Francy; Rebecca N. Bushon; Amie M.G. Brady; Christopher M. Kephart

Abstract A rapid method, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), for quantifying indicator bacteria in recreational waters is desirable for public health protection. We report that replacing current Escherichia coli standards with new US Environmental Protection Agency beach action values (BAVs) for enterococci by culture or qPCR may result in more advisories being posted at inland recreational lakes. In this study, concentrations of E. coli and enterococci by culture methods were compared to concentrations of Enterococcus spp. by qPCR at 3 inland lake beaches in Ohio. The E. coli and enterococci culture results were significantly related at all beaches; however, the relations between culture results and Enterococcus spp. qPCR results were not always significant and differed among beaches. All the qPCR results exceeded the new BAV for Enterococcus spp. by qPCR, whereas only 23.7% of culture results for E. coli and 79% of culture results for enterococci exceeded the current standard for E. coli or BAV for enterococci.

Collaboration


Dive into the Rebecca N. Bushon's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amie M.G. Brady

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna S. Francy

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher M. Kephart

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erin A. Stelzer

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald M. Stoeckel

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. D. Alan Lindquist

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian E. Mailot

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erin E. Bertke

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank W. Schaefer

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge