Reetta Kariola

Molecular Analysis of Familial Endometrial Carcinoma: A Manifestation of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer or a Separate Syndrome?

PURPOSE Familial clustering of endometrial carcinoma (EC) may occur as part of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), a multiorgan cancer syndrome with mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. Clustering of EC alone, termed as familial site-specific EC, may constitute a separate entity. Because its genetic basis is unknown, our purpose was to characterize such families molecularly. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-three families with site-specific EC were identified among 519 consecutive patients diagnosed with EC during 1986 to 1997. Tumor tissues were examined for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, and MMR genes pinpointed by IHC changes were screened for germline mutations by exon-by-exon sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and direct tests for mutations common in the population. RESULTS Among 33 ECs from 23 families, MLH1 protein was lost in seven tumors (21%), MSH2 together with MSH6 was lost in four tumors (12%), and MSH6 alone was lost in five tumors (15%). A truncating germline mutation in MSH6 (3261insC) was identified in one family and a likely pathogenic missense mutation in MSH2 (D603N) was identified in another family. Among the original 519 patients, nine (all with colon cancer in the family) were diagnosed with HNPCC at the outset-six with MLH1 and three with MSH2 mutations. CONCLUSION Our study gives a minimum overall frequency of 2.1% (11 of 519) for germline MMR defects ascertained through EC in the index patients. The fact that only two of 23 families with site-specific EC (8.7%) had germline mutations in MMR genes suggests another as yet unknown etiology in most families with site-specific EC.

Comprehensive characterization of HNPCC-related colorectal cancers reveals striking molecular features in families with no germline mismatch repair gene mutations

A considerable fraction of families with HNPCC shows no germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. We previously detected ‘hidden’ MMR gene defects in 42% of such families, leaving the remaining 58% ‘truly’ mutation negative. Here, we characterized 50 colorectal carcinomas and five adenomas arising in HNPCC families; 24 truly MMR gene mutation negative and 31 MMR gene mutation positive. Among 31 tumors from MMR gene mutation positive families, 25 (81%) had active Wnt signaling as indicated by aberrant β-catenin localization with or without CTNNB1 mutations, compared to only 7/18 tumors from MMR gene mutation negative families (39%; P=0.005). CGH studies revealed stable profiles in 9/16 (56%) of MMR gene mutation negative tumors, which was significantly associated with membranous β-catenin (P=0.005). Tumors with membranous β-catenin from the MMR gene mutation negative group also showed low frequency of TP53 mutations compared to those with nuclear β-catenin. Thus, a majority of the MMR gene mutation negative cases exhibited a novel molecular pattern characterized by the paucity of changes in common pathways to colorectal carcinogenesis. This feature distinguishes the MMR gene mutation negative families from both HNPCC families linked to MMR defects and sporadic cases, suggesting the involvement of novel predisposition genes and pathways in such families.

HNPCC mutation MLH1 P648S makes the functional protein unstable, and homozygosity predisposes to mild neurofibromatosis type 1

Heterozygous germ‐line mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes predispose individuals to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), whereas with homozygous MMR gene mutations children are diagnosed at an early age with de novo neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and/or hematological malignancies. Here, we describe a mutation, MLH1 P648S, which was found in a typical HNPCC family, with one homozygous child displaying mild features of NF1 and no hematological cancers. To evaluate the pathogenicity of the mutation, we studied both the expression and the function of the mutated protein. It generally has been assumed that the predisposing mutations prevent the production of a functional protein. The mutated MLH1 P648S protein was found to be unstable but still functional in mismatch repair, suggesting that the cancer susceptibility in the family and possibly also the mild disease phenotype in the homozygous individual are linked to shortage of the functional protein.

MSH6 missense mutations are often associated with no or low cancer susceptibility

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in tumours from patients with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome is mainly caused by mutations in the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes. A major challenge in the clinical management of patients with suspected HNPCC is the frequent occurrence of missense mutations in MSH6. These can be considered neither deleterious nor clinically innocent a priori. To assess their significance we studied five novel MSH6 missense mutations in six patients derived from a series of consecutive endometrial and colorectal cancer patients selected for study after their tumours were determined to be microsatellite unstable. We tested each mutated protein for heterodimerisation with MSH2 and for in vitro MMR capability. Four mutations (R128L, P623L, K728T, G881K+S) showed no impairment of these functions while the fifth (E1193K) displayed marked impairment of both functions. These results, taken together with our previous similar findings concerning six other missense mutations in MSH6, allow us to conclude that many or most missense changes in MSH6 likely are clinically innocent, whereas some missense changes such as E1193K, which lead to impaired MMR, are likely to be clinically significant, but have low penetrance.

Pathogenicity of the hereditary colorectal cancer mutation hMLH1 del616 linked to shortage of the functional protein

BACKGROUND & AIMS Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is associated with mismatch repair deficiency. Most predisposing mutations prevent the production of functional mismatch repair protein. Thus, when the wild-type copy is also inactivated, the cell becomes mismatch repair deficient, and this leads to a high degree of microsatellite instability in tumors. However, tumors linked to nontruncating mutations may display positive or partly positive immunohistochemical staining of the mutated protein and low or atypical microsatellite instability status, which suggests impaired functional activity but not a total lack of mismatch repair. We found human mutL homology (hMLH) 1 del616, one of the most widespread recurring mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, segregating in a large hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family. Because the predicted coding change is a deletion of only 1 amino acid, the pathogenicity of the mutation was evaluated. METHODS Many analyses were performed to assess the pathogenicity of hMLH1 del616 and to study the expression and function of the mutated messenger RNA and protein. RESULTS Genetic and immunohistochemical evidence supported hMLH1-linked cancer predisposition in this family. Microsatellite instability varied from low to high, and the hMLH1 protein was lost in 2 tumors but was partly detectable in 1 tumor. Whereas similar optimal amounts of mutated hMLH1 del616 and wild-type hMLH1 proteins were equally functional in an in vitro mismatch repair assay, the amount of in vivo-expressed hMLH1 del616 was much lower than the amount of wild-type protein; this suggests that the deletion imparts instability to the mutant protein. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the pathogenicity of hMLH1 del616 is not linked to nonfunctionality, but to shortage of the functional protein.

Two mismatch repair gene mutations found in a colon cancer patient - which one is pathogenic?

Abstract. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a dominantly inherited cancer syndrome. Germline mutations in five different mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, MLH3, and PMS2 are linked to HNPCC. Here, we describe two colon cancer families in which the index patients carry missense mutations in both MSH2 and MSH6. The MSH2 mutation, I145M, is the same in both families, whereas the MSH6 mutations are different (R1095H and L1354Q). The families do not fulfil the international criteria for HNPCC, one family comprising two and the other family four colon cancer patients, all in one generation, resembling a recessive rather than dominant inheritance characteristic of HNPCC. The tumors of the index patients showed microsatellite instability. Functional analysis was performed to determine which one of the mutations could primarily underlie the cancer susceptibility in the families. MSH2 and MSH6 are known to form a heterodimeric complex (MutSα) responsible for mismatch recognition. The interaction of each mutated protein with its wild-type partner and with its mutated partner present in the colon cancer patient, and the MMR function of the mutated MutSα complexes were determined. Since none of the three mutations affected the MSH2–MSH6 interaction or the function of MutSα in an in-vitro MMR assay, our results suggest that alone the mutations do not cause MMR deficiency typical of HNPCC. However, our results do not exclude the possible compound pathogenicity of the two mutations.

Verification of the three‐step model in assessing the pathogenicity of mismatch repair gene variants

In order to assess whether variations affecting DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes are pathogenic and hence predisposing to Lynch syndrome (LS), a three‐step assessment model has been proposed. Where LS is suspected based on family history, STEP1 is dedicated to the identification of the causative MMR gene and the variation within it. Thereafter, in STEP2 of the assessment model, the effect of the variation on the function of the protein is assessed in an in vitro MMR and in silico assays. Where LS cannot be confirmed or ruled out in STEP2, the more specific biochemical laboratory assays such as analyzing the effect of the variation on expression, localization, and interaction of the protein are required in STEP3. Here, we verified the proposed three‐step assessment model and its ability to distinguish pathogenic MMR variations from variants of uncertain significance (VUS) by utilizing the clinical as well as the laboratory and in silico data of 37 MLH1, 26 MSH2, and 11 MSH6 variations. The proposed model was shown to be appropriate and proceed logically in assessing the pathogenicity of MMR variations. In fact, for MMR deficient MSH2 and MLH1 variations the first two steps seem to be sufficient as STEP3 provides no imperative information concerning the variant pathogenicity. However, the importance of STEP3 is seen in the assessment of MMR proficient variations showing discrepant in silico results as their pathogenicity cannot be confirmed or ruled out after STEP2. MSH6 variations may be applicable to the model if appropriate selection in terms of ruling out MLH1 and MSH2 variations and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is ensured prior to the completion of STEP2. In conclusion, taking into consideration the susceptibility gene the three‐step model can be utilized in an appropriate and efficient manner to determine the pathogenicity of MMR gene variations. Hum Mutat 32:107–115, 2011.

MutSβ exceeds MutSα in dinucleotide loop repair

Backround:The target substrates of DNA mismatch recognising factors MutSα (MSH2+MSH6) and MutSβ (MSH2+MSH3) have already been widely researched. However, the extent of their functional redundancy and clinical substance remains unclear. Mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumours are strongly associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and the degree and type of MSI seem to be dependent on the MMR gene affected, and is linked to its substrate specificities. Deficiency in MSH2 and MSH6 is associated with both mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeat instability. Although no pathogenic MSH3 mutations have been reported, its deficiency is also suggested to cause low dinucleotide repeat instability.Methods:To assess the substrate specificities and functionality of MutSα and MutSβ we performed an in vitro MMR assay using three substrate constructs, GT mismatch, 1 and 2 nucleotide insertion/deletion loops (IDLs) in three different cell lines.Results:Our results show that though MutSα alone seems to be responsible for GT and IDL1 repair, MutSα and MutSβ indeed have functional redundancy in IDL2 repair and in contrast with earlier studies, MutSβ seems to exceed MutSα.Conclusion:The finding is clinically relevant because the strong role of MutSβ in IDL2 repair indicates MSH3 deficiency in tumours with low dinucleotide and no mononucleotide repeat instability.

APC and β-catenin protein expression patterns in HNPCC-related endometrial and colorectal cancers

Objective: The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and β-catenin (CTNNB1) genes are the two major components of the Wnt signaling pathway that has been shown to play an important role in the formation of certain cancers. The overactivation of the pathway, which results in abnormal accumulation of β-catenin protein in nuclei, contributes to most colorectal cancers (CRCs), both sporadic and hereditary, as well as sporadic endometrial cancers (ECs). Here, we studied the involvement of APC and β-catenin in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related ECs, and compared the expression patterns to those in HNPCC-related CRCs. Materials and methods: Nineteen ECs and 31 CRCs derived from HNPCC patients were immunohistochemically stained with anti-APC- and anti-β-catenin –antibodies. Results: Tumor-specific loss of APC was observed in 16 of endometrial cancers (3 of 19) and in 39 of colorectal cancers (12 of 31). Consistently, the loss of APC expression was associated with nuclear β-catenin staining. Altogether, aberrant β-catenin localization was observed in 53 of ECs (10 of 19) as compared to 84 of CRCs (26 of 31) (P=0.02).Conclusion: Our results suggest a frequent overactivation of the Wnt signaling pathway in hereditary endometrial cancer. In accordance with studies on sporadic cancers, abnormal accumulation of β-catenin protein in nuclei occurred much less frequently in HNPCC-related ECs than CRCs, which may reflect organ-specific differences in their pathogenesis.

Mismatch repair analysis of inherited MSH2 and/or MSH6 variation pairs found in cancer patients.

Mismatch repair (MMR) malfunction causes the accumulation of mismatches in the genome leading to genomic instability and cancer. The inactivation of an MMR gene (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, or PMS2) with an inherited mutation causes Lynch syndrome (LS), a dominant susceptibility to cancer. MMR gene variants of uncertain significance (VUS) may be pathogenic mutations, which cause LS, may result in moderately increased cancer risks, or may be harmless polymorphisms. Our study suggests that an inherited MMR VUS individually assessed as proficient may, however, in a pair with another MMR VUS found in the same colorectal cancer (CRC) patient have a concomitant contribution to the MMR deficiency. Here, eight pairs of MMR gene variants found in cancer patients were functionally analyzed in an in vitro MMR assay. Although the other pairs do not suggest a compound deficiency, the MSH2 VUS pair c.380A>G/c.982G>C (p.Asn127Ser/p.Ala328Pro), which nearly halves the repair capability of the wild‐type MSH2 protein, is presumed to increase the cancer risk considerably. Moreover, two MSH6 variants, c.1304T>C (p.Leu435Pro) and c.1754T>C (p.Leu585Pro), were shown to be MMR deficient. The role of one of the most frequently reported MMR gene VUS, MSH2 c.380A>G (p.Asn127Ser), is especially interesting because its concomitant defect with another variant could finally explain its recurrent occurrence in CRC patients. Hum Mutat 33:1294–1301, 2012.