Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Reham Abdel-Wahab is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Reham Abdel-Wahab.


Gastroenterology | 2015

Obesity Early in Adulthood Increases Risk but Does Not Affect Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Manal Hassan; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Ahmed Kaseb; Ahmed S Shalaby; Alexandria T. Phan; Hashem B. El-Serag; Ernest T. Hawk; Jeffrey S. Morris; Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav; J. Lee; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Gehan Bortus; Harrys A. Torres; Christopher I. Amos; Robert A. Wolff; Donghui Li

BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite the significant association between obesity and several cancers, it has been difficult to establish an association between obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with HCC often have ascites, making it a challenge to determine body mass index (BMI) accurately, and many factors contribute to the development of HCC. We performed a case-control study to investigate whether obesity early in adulthood affects risk, age of onset, or outcomes of patients with HCC. METHODS We interviewed 622 patients newly diagnosed with HCC from January 2004 through December 2013, along with 660 healthy controls (frequency-matched by age and sex) to determine weights, heights, and body sizes (self-reported) at various ages before HCC development or enrollment as controls. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent effects of early obesity on risk for HCC and patient outcomes, respectively. BMI was calculated, and patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m(2) or greater were considered obese. RESULTS Obesity in early adulthood (age, mid-20s to mid-40s) is a significant risk factor for HCC. The estimated odds ratios were 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.4), 2.3 (95% CI, 1.2-4.4), and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.5-8.9) for the entire population, for men, and for women, respectively. Each unit increase in BMI at early adulthood was associated with a 3.89-month decrease in age at HCC diagnosis (P < .001). Moreover, there was a synergistic interaction between obesity and hepatitis virus infection. However, we found no effect of obesity on the overall survival of patients with HCC. CONCLUSIONS Early adulthood obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing HCC at a young age in the absence of major HCC risk factors, with no effect on outcomes of patients with HCC.


Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2017

Estrogen Replacement Reduces Risk and Increases Survival Times of Women With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Manal Hassan; Gehan Botrus; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Robert A. Wolff; Donghui Li; David J. Tweardy; Alexandria T. Phan; Ernest T. Hawk; Milind Javle; Ju Seog Lee; Harrys A. Torres; Asif Rashid; Renato Lenzi; Hesham M. Hassabo; Yasmin Abaza; Ahmed S Shalaby; Sahin Lacin; Jeffrey S. Morris; Yehuda Z. Patt; Christopher I. Amos; Saira A. Khaderi; John A. Goss; Prasun K. Jalal; Ahmed Kaseb

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Environmental factors have been identified that affect risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but little is known about the effects of sex hormones on liver cancer development or outcome. The authors investigated whether menopause hormone therapy (MHT) affects risk, age at onset, or outcome of HCC. METHODS: We performed a case–control study of 234 female patients treated for HCC at a tertiary medical center and with 282 healthy women (controls) from January 1, 2004 through May 31, 2015. We collected detailed information on environmental exposures, ages of menarche and menopause, hysterectomies, and uses of birth control and MHT. We performed multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses to determine the independent effects of factors associated with women on risk and clinical outcome in HCC. The primary outcomes were effect of MHT on HCC risk, the relationship between MHT with hepatitis virus infection on HCC development, and effect of MHT on age at HCC onset or survival after diagnosis of HCC. RESULTS: The estimated adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for HCC in women who ever used estrogen was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–0.88). This association was supported by the older age of HCC onset among estrogen users (mean, 64.5 ± 0.9 years) vs nonusers (mean 59.2 ± 1.1 years; P = .001) and the reduced risk of HCC among long‐term users (more than 5 years) (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20–0.63). Users of estrogen also had a reduced risk for hepatitis‐associated HCC: AOR for users, 4.37 (95% CI, 1.67–11.44) vs AOR for nonusers, 17.60 (95% CI, 3.88–79.83). Estrogen use reduced risk of death from HCC (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40–0.77; P = .01). Median overall survival times were 33.5 months for estrogen users (95% CI, 25.7–41.3 months) and 24.1 months for nonusers (95% CI, 19.02–29.30 months; P = .008). CONCLUSION: In a case–control study of women with HCC vs female control subjects at a single center, we associated use of estrogen MHT with reduced risk of HCC and increased overall survival times of patients with HCC. Further studies are needed to determine the benefits of estrogen therapy for women and patients with HCC, and effects of tumor expression of estrogen receptor.


The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology | 2018

Liver transplantation for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a prospective case-series

Keri E. Lunsford; Milind Javle; Kirk Heyne; Rachna T. Shroff; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Nakul Gupta; Constance M. Mobley; Ashish Saharia; David W. Victor; Duc T.M. Nguyen; Edward A. Graviss; Ahmed Kaseb; Robert McFadden; Thomas A. Aloia; Claudius Conrad; Xian Chang Li; Howard Paul Monsour; A. Osama Gaber; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; R. Mark Ghobrial

BACKGROUND At present, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a contraindication for liver transplantation. However, previous studies in this field did not preselect patients on the basis of chemosensitivity or disease trajectory after neoadjuvant therapy. Experience with hilar cholangiocarcinoma has indicated that neoadjuvant therapy followed by liver transplantation in patients without disease progression results in a long-term survival benefit. We aimed to establish the potential efficacy of liver transplantation in patients with biologically responsive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who have had sustained tumour stability or regression with neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS In this prospective case-series, patients with locally advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, without extrahepatic disease or vascular involvement, were treated at a single liver transplant centre according to a non-randomised, centre-approved clinical management protocol with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver transplantation. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine-cisplatin or gemcitabine-capecitabine, with second-line or third-line therapies given per institutional standards. Patients with a minimum of 6 months of radiographic response or stability were listed for liver transplantation. The primary endpoints were overall survival and recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation, assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. This report includes interim data from the initial case-series treated under this ongoing clinical management protocol, censored on Dec 1, 2017. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 1, 2017, 21 patients were referred for evaluation and 12 patients were accepted, of whom six patients have undergone liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Three patients received livers from extended criteria deceased donors that would otherwise have been discarded, two from domino living donors, and one from a standard criteria liver donor. Median duration from diagnosis to transplantation was 26 months (IQR 17-33) and median follow-up from transplantation was 36 months (29-51). All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy while awaiting liver transplantation. Overall survival was 100% (95% CI 100-100) at 1 year, 83·3% (27·3-97·5) at 3 years, and 83·3% (27·3-97·5) at 5 years. Three patients developed recurrent disease at a median of 7·6 months (IQR 5·8-8·6) after transplantation, with 50% (95% CI 11·1-80·4) recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years. Adverse events after liver transplantation included one patient with postoperative ileus (grade 3) and one patient with acute kidney injury requiring temporary dialysis (grade 4). INTERPRETATION Selected patients with locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who show pre-transplant disease stability on neoadjuvant therapy might benefit from liver transplantation. FUNDING None.


OncoTargets and Therapy | 2016

Phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib as a second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Ahmed Kaseb; Jeffrey S. Morris; Michiko Iwasaki; Humaid O. Al-Shamsi; Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav; Lauren Girard; Sheree Cheung; Van Nguyen; Khaled M. Elsayes; Lianchun Xiao; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Ahmed S Shalaby; Manal Hassan; Hesham M. Hassabo; Robert A. Wolff; James C. Yao

Trial registry Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01180959. Background Early clinical studies of bevacizumab and erlotinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a tolerable toxicity and a promising clinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of this combination as a second-line therapy for HCC refractory to sorafenib. Methods For this single-arm, Phase II study, we recruited patients with Child–Pugh class A or B liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and advanced HCC that was not amenable to surgical or regional therapies and treatment with sorafenib had failed (disease progressed or patient could not tolerate sorafenib). Patients received 10 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab every 14 days and 150 mg oral erlotinib daily for 28-day cycles until progression. Tumor response was evaluated every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The primary end point was the 16-week progression-free survival rate. Secondary end points included time to progression and overall survival. Results A total of 44 patients were enrolled and had a median follow-up time of 33.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.5 months – not defined). The 16-week progression-free survival rate was 43% (95% CI: 28%–59%), median time to progression was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.0–8.3 months), and median overall survival duration was 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.3–15.5 months). Grade 3–4 adverse events included fatigue (13%), acne (11%), diarrhea (9%), anemia (7%), and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (7%). Conclusion Bevacizumab plus erlotinib was tolerable and showed a signal of survival benefit in the second-line setting for patients with advanced HCC. Because standard-of-care options are lacking in this setting, further studies to identify predictors of response to this regimen are warranted.


Journal of gastrointestinal oncology | 2016

Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC somatic gene mutations in Arab patients with colorectal cancer: determination of frequency and distribution pattern

Humaid O. Al-Shamsi; Jeremy Clifton Jones; Yazan Fahmawi; Ibrahim Dahbour; Aziz Tabash; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Ahmed Os Abousamra; Kenna R. Shaw; Lianchun Xiao; Manal Hassan; Benjamin R. Kipp; Scott Kopetz; Amr S. Soliman; Robert R. McWilliams; Robert A. Wolff

BACKGROUND The frequency rates of mutations such as KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA in colorectal cancer (CRC) differ among populations. The aim of this study was to assess mutation frequencies in the Arab population and determine their correlations with certain clinicopathological features. METHODS Arab patients from the Arab Gulf region and a population of age- and sex-matched Western patients with CRC whose tumors were evaluated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) were identified and retrospectively reviewed. The mutation rates of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC were recorded, along with clinicopathological features. Other somatic mutation and their rates were also identified. Fishers exact test was used to determine the association between mutation status and clinical features. RESULTS A total of 198 cases were identified; 99 Arab patients and 99 Western patients. Fifty-two point seven percent of Arab patients had stage IV disease at initial presentation, 74.2% had left-sided tumors. Eighty-nine point two percent had tubular adenocarcinoma and 10.8% had mucinous adenocarcinoma. The prevalence rates of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, APC, SMAD, FBXW7 mutations in Arab population were 44.4%, 4%, 4%, 13.1%, 52.5%, 27.3%, 2% and 3% respectively. Compared to 48.4%, 4%, 4%, 12.1%, 47.5%, 24.2%, 11.1% and 0% respectively in matched Western population. Associations between these mutations and patient clinicopathological features were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to report comprehensive hotspot mutations using NGS in Arab patients with CRC. The frequency of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, TP53, APC and PIK3CA mutations were similar to reported frequencies in Western population except SMAD4 that had a lower frequency and higher frequency of FBXW7 mutation.


Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma | 2015

Type I insulin-like growth factor as a liver reserve assessment tool in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Reham Abdel-Wahab; Samir Shehata; Manal Hassan; Mouhammed A Habra; Ghazaleh Eskandari; Peggy T Tinkey; Jennifer Mitchell; J. Lee; Hesham M. Amin; Ahmed Kaseb

Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) encompass a wide range of illnesses, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and viral hepatitis. Deterioration of liver capacity, with subsequent progression into cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ultimately leads to a further decrease in the hepatic reserve. The Child–Turcotte–Pugh scoring system is the standard tool for assessing underlying liver reserve capacity in routine practice and in clinical trials of CLD and HCC. In this review, we highlight the clinical significance of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the growth hormone (GH) signaling pathway in HCC. IGF-I could be a marker for liver reserve capacity in CLDs and HCC in clinical practice. This approach could improve the risk assessment and stratifications of patients on the basis of their underlying liver reserve, either before active treatment in routine practice or before they are enrolled in clinical trials.


OncoTargets and Therapy | 2017

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma: is there a role for the androgen receptor pathway?

Mahmoud A Ali; Sahin Lacin; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Mark Uemura; Manal Hassan; Asif Rashid; Dan G. Duda; Ahmed Kaseb

The epidemic of insulin resistance, obesity, and metabolic syndrome has led to the emergence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) as the most common cause of liver disease in the US. Patients with NASH are at an increased risk for hepatic disease-related morbidity and death, and chronic inflammation in NASH patients can lead to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The prevalence of HCC is higher in males than in females, and genetic studies have identified androgen and androgen receptors (ARs) as partially responsible for the gender disparity in the development of liver disease and HCC. Although many factors are known to play important roles in the progression of inflammation in NASH patients, the role of androgen and AR in the progression of NASH to HCC has been understudied. This review summarizes the evidence for a potential role of androgen and the AR pathway in the development of NASH-related HCC and in the treatment of HCC. It has been proposed that AR plays a role in the progression of HCC: inhibitory roles in early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis and tumor-promoting roles in advanced stages. AR can be activated by several pathways, even in the absence of androgen. While AR has been explored as a potential therapeutic target in HCC, several clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit of antiandrogen drugs in HCC. This review discusses the potential reason for these observations and discuss the potential future trials design in this important setting.


Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma | 2016

Yttrium-90 resin microspheres as an adjunct to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Armeen Mahvash; Ravi Murthy; Bruno C. Odisio; Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav; Lauren Girard; Sheree Cheung; Van Nguyen; Joe Ensor; Sameer Gadani; Khaled M. Elsayes; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Manal Hassan; Ahmed S Shalaby; James C. Yao; Michael J. Wallace; Ahmed Kaseb

Purpose The safety and efficacy of the combined use of sorafenib and yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y90 RMS) to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not well established. We determined the incidence of adverse events with this combination therapy in patients with advanced HCC at our institution and analyzed the treatment and survival outcomes. Materials and methods We reviewed the records of 19 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class B or C HCC who underwent treatment with Y90 RMS (for 21 sessions) while receiving full or reduced doses of sorafenib between January 2008 and May 2010. Therapy response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We evaluated median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as hepatic and extrahepatic disease PFS and incidence of adverse events. Results The median patient age was 67 years, and portal or hepatic venous invasion was present in eight patients (42%). Ten patients received reduced doses of sorafenib. The median Y90 radiation activity delivered was 41.2 mCi. The partial response of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was observed in four patients (19%). The median hepatic disease PFS was 7.82 months, extrahepatic disease PFS was 8.94 months, OS was 19.52 months, and PFS was 6.63 months. Ninety days after treatment with Y90 RMS, five patients (26%) had grade II adverse events and four patients (21%) had grade III adverse events. Conclusion OS and PFS outcomes were superior to those observed in prior studies evaluating sorafenib alone in patients with a similar disease status, warranting further study of this treatment combination.


Journal of Clinical Medicine | 2018

Baseline Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Predictor of Response to Liver-Directed Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Andrew Niekamp; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Joshua Kuban; Bruno C. Odisio; Armeen Mahvash; Manal Hassan; Aliya Qayyum; Ahmed Kaseb; Rahul A. Sheth

Predicting outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo locoregional therapies remains a substantial clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate pre-procedure diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as an imaging biomarker for tumoral response to therapy for patients with HCC undergoing drug eluting embolic (DEE) chemoembolization and radioembolization. A retrospective review of HCC patients who underwent DEE chemoembolization or radioembolization was performed. Of the 58 patients who comprised the study population, 32 underwent DEE chemoembolization and 26 underwent radioembolization. There was no significant difference in median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values across the two treatment groups (1.01 × 10−3 mm2/s, P = 0.25). The immediate objective response (OR) rate was 71% (40/56). Tumors with high ADC values were found to have a higher probability of OR within 90 days (odds ratio 4.4, P = 0.03). Moreover, index lesion specific progression free survival (PFS) was greater for high ADC tumors, independent of conventional predictors of treatment response (hazard ratio 0.44, P = 0.01). Low ADC was associated with poorer PFS (P = 0.02). Pre-procedure ADC < 1.01 × 10−3 mm2/s is an independent predictor of poorer immediate OR and index lesion specific PFS in patients with HCC undergoing DEE chemoembolization or radioembolization.


Gastroenterology | 2015

Reply: To PMID 25836985.

Manal Hassan; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Donghui Li; Ahmed Kaseb

BMI) in early adulthood was significantly correlated with increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but was not associated with prognosis of patients with HCC. Thus, they concluded that obesity had no effect on outcomes of HCC. Coincidentally, several other studies also showed the irrelevance between BMI and prognosis of HCC. This may be due to a high prevalence (ranged from 5.2% to 68%) of metabolically healthy obesity, which is lack of obesity-associated metabolic disorders, among populations with general obesity. However, we believe that central obesity, which is indicated by a high level of waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), visceral abdominal fat, or other indicators, may truly affect outcomes of HCC. First, the liver disease that links between obesity and HCC is non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome (MetS). NAFLD is associated with both general and central obesity. However, a relevant meta-analysis performed by our team demonstrated that, compared to general obesity, central obesity induces more NAFLD risk. Second, the degree of hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis is a crucial prognostic factor for HCC. Adipokines such as adiponectin and free fatty acids secreted from adipose tissue play a major role in the development of fibrosis, indicating the potential relationship between central obesity and hepatic fibrosis. As a consequence, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, central obesity rather than elevated BMI significantly correlates with the degree of fibrosis and negatively affects sustained viral response. Similarly, previous study also suggested that, elevated WC, but not BMI, strongly increased the probability of developing significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B carriers. Third, it has also been demonstrated that visceral adipose tissue secretes various cytokines like IL-6 and TNF-a and induces a condition of chronic systemic inflammation predisposing the liver to a pro-oncogenic environment. Thus, central obesity is implicated in the formation and progression of several gastrointestinal cancers including HCC. Furthermore, emerging clinical and epidemiological evidence shows that the association between obesity and carcinogenesis is mediated mainly by central obesity rather than general obesity. Based on existing evidence, we ever proposed that central obesity might induce a greater risk of HCC than general obesity. Fourth, HCC patients with central obesity have high risk of postoperative complications related to MetS. Moreover, a recent cohort study conducted in Japan highlighted that central obesity, but not general obesity, was a significant predictor of survival in HCC patients. In conclusion, central obesity rather than general obesity may be a true determinant of HCC prognosis. In view of the dramatically increasing prevalence and dangers of central obesity while little data available on the significance of elevated WC or WHR in the prognosis of HCC, future research should place a greater emphasis on central obesity to provide more rational approaches for improving the prognosis and prolonging survival of HCC patients. QING PANG KAI QU CHANG LIU Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine Xi’an, China

Collaboration


Dive into the Reham Abdel-Wahab's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manal Hassan

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed Kaseb

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert A. Wolff

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed S Shalaby

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey S. Morris

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lianchun Xiao

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C. Yao

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Milind Javle

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Asif Rashid

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge