Rehan Haidry

Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case-Control Study

Background Barretts esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge, coupled with immunohistochemical staining for the biomarker Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3), could be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. Methods and Findings A case–control study was performed across 11 UK hospitals between July 2011 and December 2013. In total, 1,110 individuals comprising 463 controls with dyspepsia and reflux symptoms and 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy. The primary outcome measures were to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and accuracy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy. In all, 1,042 (93.9%) patients successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, and no serious adverse events were attributed to the device. The Cytosponge was rated favorably, using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of the test was 79.9% (95% CI 76.4%–83.0%), increasing to 87.2% (95% CI 83.0%–90.6%) for patients with ≥3 cm of circumferential BE, known to confer a higher cancer risk. The sensitivity increased to 89.7% (95% CI 82.3%–94.8%) in 107 patients who swallowed the device twice during the study course. There was no loss of sensitivity in patients with dysplasia. The specificity for diagnosing BE was 92.4% (95% CI 89.5%–94.7%). The case–control design of the study means that the results are not generalizable to a primary care population. Another limitation is that the acceptability data were limited to a single measure. Conclusions The Cytosponge-TFF3 test is safe and acceptable, and has accuracy comparable to other screening tests. This test may be a simple and inexpensive approach to identify patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE.

Improvement over time in outcomes for patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett's oesophagus-related neoplasia: 6-year experience from the first 500 patients treated in the UK patient registry

Background Barretts oesophagus (BE) is a pre-malignant condition leading to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Treatment of neoplasia at an early stage is desirable. Combined endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an alternative to surgery for patients with BE-related neoplasia. Methods We examined prospective data from the UK registry of patients undergoing RFA/EMR for BE-related neoplasia from 2008 to 2013. Before RFA, visible lesions were removed by EMR. Thereafter, patients had RFA 3-monthly until all BE was ablated or cancer developed (endpoints). End of treatment biopsies were recommended at around 12 months from first RFA treatment or when endpoints were reached. Outcomes for clearance of dysplasia (CR-D) and BE (CR-IM) at end of treatment were assessed over two time periods (2008–2010 and 2011–2013). Durability of successful treatment and progression to OAC were also evaluated. Results 508 patients have completed treatment. CR-D and CR-IM improved significantly between the former and later time periods, from 77% and 56% to 92% and 83%, respectively (p<0.0001). EMR for visible lesions prior to RFA increased from 48% to 60% (p=0.013). Rescue EMR after RFA decreased from 13% to 2% (p<0.0001). Progression to OAC at 12 months is not significantly different (3.6% vs 2.1%, p=0.51). Conclusions Clinical outcomes for BE neoplasia have improved significantly over the past 6 years with improved lesion recognition and aggressive resection of visible lesions before RFA. Despite advances in technique, the rate of cancer progression remains 2–4% at 1 year in these high-risk patients. Trial registration number ISRCTN93069556.

Risk stratification of Barrett's oesophagus using a non-endoscopic sampling method coupled with a biomarker panel: a cohort study

BACKGROUND Barretts oesophagus predisposes to adenocarcinoma. However, most patients with Barretts oesophagus will not progress and endoscopic surveillance is invasive, expensive, and fraught by issues of sampling bias and the subjective assessment of dysplasia. We investigated whether a non-endoscopic device, the Cytosponge, could be coupled with clinical and molecular biomarkers to identify a group of patients with low risk of progression suitable for non-endoscopic follow-up. METHODS In this multicentre cohort study (BEST2), patients with Barretts oesophagus underwent the Cytosponge test before their surveillance endoscopy. We collected clinical and demographic data and tested Cytosponge samples for a molecular biomarker panel including three protein biomarkers (P53, c-Myc, and Aurora kinase A), two methylation markers (MYOD1 and RUNX3), glandular atypia, and TP53 mutation status. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to compute the conditional probability of dysplasia status. We selected a simple model with high classification accuracy and applied it to an independent validation cohort. The BEST2 study is registered with ISRCTN, number 12730505. FINDINGS The discovery cohort consisted of 468 patients with Barretts oesophagus and intestinal metaplasia. Of these, 376 had no dysplasia and 22 had high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma. In the discovery cohort, a model with high classification accuracy consisted of glandular atypia, P53 abnormality, and Aurora kinase A positivity, and the interaction of age, waist-to-hip ratio, and length of the Barretts oesophagus segment. 162 (35%) of 468 of patients fell into the low-risk category and the probability of being a true non-dysplastic patient was 100% (99% CI 96-100) and the probability of having high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma was 0% (0-4). 238 (51%) of participants were classified as of moderate risk; the probability of having high-grade dysplasia was 14% (9-21). 58 (12%) of participants were classified as high-risk; the probability of having non-dysplastic endoscopic biopsies was 13% (5-27), whereas the probability of having high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma was 87% (73-95). In the validation cohort (65 patients), 51 were non-dysplastic and 14 had high-grade dysplasia. In this cohort, 25 (38%) of 65 patients were classified as being low-risk, and the probability of being non-dysplastic was 96·0% (99% CI 73·80-99·99). The moderate-risk group comprised 27 non-dysplastic and eight high-grade dysplasia cases, whereas the high-risk group (8% of the cohort) had no non-dysplastic cases and five patients with high-grade dysplasia. INTERPRETATION A combination of biomarker assays from a single Cytosponge sample can be used to determine a group of patients at low risk of progression, for whom endoscopy could be avoided. This strategy could help to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment in patients with Barretts oesophagus. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.

Clonal Selection and Persistence in Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus and Intramucosal Cancers After Failed Radiofrequency Ablation

OBJECTIVES:Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used to successfully eliminate Barretts esophagus (BE)-related dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma and aims to cause reversion to squamous epithelium. However, in 20% of cases RFA fails to return the epithelium to squamous phenotype. Follow-up studies show a similar dysplasia recurrence rate. We hypothesize that failed RFA is due to clonally mutated epithelial populations harbored in RFA-privileged sites and that RFA can select for the mutant clonal expansion.METHODS:A longitudinal case series of 19 patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma were studied. DNA was extracted from individual Barretts glands, deep esophageal glands within mucosal resections and biopsy specimens before and after RFA. Mutations were identified by targeted sequencing of genes commonly mutated in Barretts adenocarcinoma.RESULTS:Five patients demonstrated persistent post-RFA pathology with persistent mutations, sometimes detected in deep esophageal glands or neighboring squamous epithelium after several rounds of RFA preceded by mucosal resection. Recurrence of pathology in three other patients was characterized by de novo mutations.CONCLUSIONS:Protumorigenic mutations can be found in post-ablation squamous mucosa as well as in mutant deep esophageal glands; both are associated with dysplasia recurrence. Following RFA, non-dysplastic Barretts epithelium can contain mutant clones that are found in a subsequent adenocarcinoma. Ablation may also drive the clonal expansion of pre-existing clones after a “bottleneck” created by the RFA. Overall, recurrence of dysplasia post RFA reflects the multicentric origins of Barretts clones and highlights the role of clonal selection in carcinogenesis.

High resolution colonoscopy in a bowel cancer screening program improves polyp detection

AIM To compare high resolution colonoscopy (Olympus Lucera) with a megapixel high resolution system (Pentax HiLine) as an in-service evaluation. METHODS Polyp detection rates and measures of performance were collected for 269 colonoscopy procedures. Five colonoscopists conducted the study over a three month period, as part of the United Kingdom bowel cancer screening program. RESULTS There were no differences in procedure duration (χ² P = 0.98), caecal intubation rates (χ² P = 0.67), or depth of sedation (χ² P = 0.64). Mild discomfort was more common in the Pentax group (χ² P = 0.036). Adenoma detection rate was significantly higher in the Pentax group (χ² test for trend P = 0.01). Most of the extra polyps detected were flat or sessile adenomas. CONCLUSION Megapixel definition colonoscopes improve adenoma detection without compromising other measures of endoscope performance. Increased polyp detection rates may improve future outcomes in bowel cancer screening programs.

Comparing outcome of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s with high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: a prospective multicenter UK registry

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Mucosal neoplasia arising in Barretts esophagus can be successfully treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC) at baseline from the United Kingdom RFA registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prior to RFA, visible lesions and nodularity were removed entirely by EMR. Thereafter, patients underwent RFA every 3 months until all visible Barretts mucosa was ablated or cancer developed (end points). Biopsies were taken at 12 months or when end points were reached. RESULTS A total of 515 patients, 384 with HGD and 131 with IMC, completed treatment. Prior to RFA, EMR was performed for visible lesions more frequently in the IMC cohort than in HGD patients (77 % vs. 47 %; P < 0.0001). The 12-month complete response for dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were almost identical in the two cohorts (HGD 88 % and 76 %, respectively; IMC 87 % and 75 %, respectively; P = 0.7). Progression to invasive cancer was not significantly different at 12 months (HGD 1.8 %, IMC 3.8 %; P = 0.19). A trend towards slightly worse medium-term durability may be emerging in IMC patients (P = 0.08). In IMC, EMR followed by RFA was definitely associated with superior durability compared with RFA alone (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION The Registry reports on endoscopic therapy for Barretts neoplasia, representing real-life outcomes. Patients with IMC were more likely to have visible lesions requiring initial EMR than those with HGD, and may carry a higher risk of cancer progression in the medium term. The data consolidate the approach to ensuring that these patients undergo thorough endoscopic work-up, including EMR prior to RFA when necessary.

Long-term durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's-related neoplasia.

Purpose of review Here, we examine data on the long-term durability of endoscopic therapy in patients with mucosal neoplasia in Barretts esophagus. Recent findings Short-term success is seen in most patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barretts esophagus neoplasia, but long-term outcomes are only just becoming available. Summary The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to rise with poor survival seen in the majority of patients. The only known precursor to EAC is Barretts esophagus. Although the risk of progression from metaplastic Barretts esophagus to neoplasia is low, surveillance is advocated as patients who progress to mucosal neoplasia carry a significantly higher risk of progressing to invasive EAC. Minimally invasive endoscopic therapy with endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation are now the gold standard treatments for patients with intramucosal neoplasia in Barretts esophagus. After successful treatment, follow-up is still required as long-term durability is not 100% and recurrences are not rare. This review highlights the need for vigilant follow-up, but emphasizes the consensus that most patients have durable disease reversal.

Esophageal neoplasia arising from subsquamous buried glands after an apparently successful photodynamic therapy or radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s associated neoplasia

Abstract Objective. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective non-surgical options for the treatment of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) associated neoplasia. Development of subsquamous intestinal metaplasia after successful PDT and/or RFA is a recognized phenomenon; however, the occurrence of neoplasia arising from buried glands is a rare complication. Methods. This is a prospective case series of patients treated with PDT and/or RFA from 1999 to 2014 at University College London Hospital for neoplasia associated with BE, whose outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Prior to any ablative therapy any visible nodularity was removed with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). After successful PDT and/or HALO RFA treatment, defined as a complete reversal of dysplasia and metaplasia, patients underwent endoscopic follow up using the Seattle protocol. Results. A total of 288 patients were treated, 91 with PDT between 1999 and 2010, 173 with RFA between 2007 and 2014, and 24 with both PDT and RFA for neoplasia associated with BE. Subsquamous neoplasia occurred in seven patients (7/288, 2%). The first patient developed subsquamous invasive adenocarcinoma and underwent curative surgery. Another five patients with subsquamous neoplasia (either high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer) were treated successfully with EMR. The final patient developed subsquamous invasive esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma with liver metastases. Conclusion. Development of subsquamous neoplasia after an apparently successful PDT and/or RFA is a rare but recognized complication. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon and have a low threshold for performing an EMR. Thorough surveillance following successful PDT and/or RFA ensuring high-quality endoscopy is required.

Squamous cell carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's dysplasia

Barretts oesophagus (BO) is a usually indolent condition that occasionally requires endoscopic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective endoscopic treatment for high grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal cancer in BO. It has a good efficacy, durability and safety profile although complications can occur. Here we describe a case of RFA in a patient with high grade dysplasia. Although the response to treatment was initially very good with the development of neosquamous epithelium, the patient very rapidly developed a squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus confirmed on radiology, histology and immunohistochemistry. Sanger sequencing confirmed that the original HGD and the squamous cell cancer (SCC) were derived from separate clonal origins. The report highlights the fact that SCC of the oesophagus has been noted after endoscopic ablation for BO previously and suggest that ablation of BO may encourage the clonal expansion of cells carrying carcinogenic mutations once a dominant clonal population has been eradicated.

53 Six Year Disease Durability Outcomes on Patients Treated With Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett's Related Neoplasia From the UK Registry

Introduction Endoscopic therapy with combined Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is now the recommended first line treatment for patients with Barrett’s (BE) related neoplasia confined to the oesophageal mucosa. Method We examine prospective data from the United Kingdom registry of patients undergoing RFA/EMR for BE neoplasia since 2008. Before RFA, visible lesions and nodularity were entirely removed by EMR. Thereafter patients underwent RFA 3 monthly until all visible BE was ablated or cancer developed (endpoints). Biopsies were taken at 12 months or when endpoints reached. Follow up endoscopies were performed periodically in all patients to check for recurrences thereafter. All patients who had completed at least 12 months of follow up after successful treatment were included in the analysis to examine durability of disease reversal long term. Results 282 patients (81% male, mean age 70 years) have completed the 12 month treatment protocol with a minimum of 12 months follow up thereafter. At median follow up of 37 months (IQR 29–49), 93% of patients with successful disease reversal were still free of neoplasia and 88% free of intestinal metaplasia recurrence. Cancer progression at this same time was seen in 1.4% of patients. Kaplan Meier (KM) statistics demonstrated a predicted 3 year neoplasia free survival in 88% of patients. At 5 and 6 years this was 86%. Similarly KM analysis showed that at 3 years 81% of patients would be free form BE and at 5 and 6 years this figure was 73%. Conclusion We report long term outcomes of a large cohort of patients with BE neoplasia who have had successful endoscopic therapy with RFA/EMR. This approach appears to have a lasting disease free benefit in the majority of patients. Recurrences do occur in a minority of patients and highlights the need for follow up in those fit for endoscopy. All collaborators of the UK RFA registry are acknowledged for their contributions to data collection for this work. Disclosure of interest None Declared.