Reid G. Meyer

A COMPARISON OF CYTOLOGY AND FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION FOR THE DETECTION OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA

PURPOSE We determine the relative sensitivities of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A mixture of fluorescent labeled probes to the centromeres of chromosomes 3, 7 and 17, and band 9p21 (P16/CDKN2A gene) was used to assess urinary cells for chromosomal abnormalities indicative of malignancy. A total of 280 urine specimens from 265 patients, including 150 with a history of urothelial carcinoma and 115 without a history of urothelial carcinoma, were analyzed. FISH analysis was performed without prior knowledge of clinical findings, that is biopsy, cystoscopy and cytology results. A positive result was defined as 5 or more urinary cells with gains of 2 or more chromosomes. RESULTS A total of 75 biopsies showed urothelial carcinoma at FISH analysis among the 265 patients. The sensitivity of urine cytology for pTa (36 cases), pTis (18) and pT1-pT4 (15) tumors was 47%, 78% and 60%, respectively, for an overall sensitivity of 58%. The sensitivity of FISH for pTa (37 cases), pTis (17) and pT1-pT4 (19) tumors was 65%, 100% and 95%, respectively, for an overall sensitivity of 81%. FISH was significantly more sensitive than cytology for pTis (p = 0.046), pT1-pT4 (p = 0.025), grade 3 (p = 0.003) and all tumors (p = 0.001). The specificity of cytology and FISH among patients without cystoscopic evidence of urothelial carcinoma and no history of urothelial carcinoma was 98% and 96%, respectively (p = 0.564). CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of FISH for the detection of urothelial carcinoma is superior to that of cytology, and the specificity of FISH and cytology for urothelial carcinoma are not significantly different. Further prospective studies are required but FISH has the potential to improve significantly the management of urothelial carcinoma.

The development of a multitarget, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine

The purpose of this study was to develop a multitarget, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma (UC) in urine specimens. Urinary cells obtained from voided urine specimens of 21 patients with UC and 9 normal donors were analyzed with nine different centromere enumeration probes and a single locus-specific indicator probe to determine an optimal set of FISH probes for UC detection. The four probes with the greatest sensitivity for UC detection were then labeled with a unique fluorophore and combined into a single probe set. The probes with the greatest combined sensitivity for UC detection were CEP3, CEP7, CEP17, and the 9p21 (P16) LSI. This probe set was used to evaluate urine specimens acquired from 179 patients for prospective testing (46 with biopsy-proven UC). FISH slides were evaluated by scanning the slide for cells with nuclear features suggestive of malignancy and assessing the FISH signal pattern of these cells for polysomy (ie, gains of two or more different chromosomes). A receiver operator characteristic curve revealed that a cutoff of 5 cells with polysomy as the positive criterion for cancer resulted in an overall sensitivity of 84.2% for patients with biopsy-proven UC and a specificity of 91.8% among patients with genitourinary disorders but no evidence of UC. This study demonstrates that a multitarget, multicolor FISH assay containing centromeric probes to chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and a locus-specific probe to band 9p21 has high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of UC in voided urine specimens.

A Comparison of BTA Stat, Hemoglobin Dipstick, Telomerase and Vysis Urovysion Assays for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma in Urine

PURPOSE We determine the sensitivity and specificity of various assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 280 voided urine specimens from 265 patients were obtained immediately before cystoscopy for BTA stat, (Bard Diagnostic, Redmond, Washington) hemoglobin dipstick, (Bayer, Elkhart, Indiana) telomerase and UroVysion (Vysis, a wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) analysis. RESULTS Of the 265 patients 75 had biopsy proven urothelial carcinoma, and the sensitivity of the assays was determined from these patients. From most sensitive to least sensitive, the overall sensitivity of UroVysion (73 cases), BTA stat (72), hemoglobin dipstick (73) and telomerase (70) was 81%, 78%, 74%, and 46%, respectively. Each of the first 3 tests was statistically significantly more sensitive than the telomerase assay (p <0.05). However, the differences in overall sensitivity of UroVysion, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick were not statistically significant. The specificity of the tests was calculated for 80 of the 265 patients in this study who had no history of urothelial carcinoma and negative cystoscopy findings despite common urological complaints. From most specific to least specific, the specificity of UroVysion, telomerase, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick was 96%, 91%, 74% and 51%, respectively. UroVysion and telomerase were statistically significantly (p <0.01) more specific than the BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick assays, and all of the assays were more specific than hemoglobin dipstick testing (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our study reveals that UroVysion is the most sensitive and specific assay among those tested for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Telomerase testing had good specificity but poor sensitivity. The BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick tests had good sensitivity but relatively poor specificity. UroVysion is a promising new assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens. However, further studies are needed to explore the role of the various assays in the treatment of patients with superficial urothelial carcinoma.

Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphomas with t(11;18)(q21;q21) and Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphomas with Aneuploidy Develop Along Different Pathogenetic Pathways

t(11;18)(q21;q21) and aneuploidy are recurrent chromosomal aberrations in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. To investigate their relationship and clinical significance, we developed a two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique to detect t(11;18) and aneuploidy in nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. Thirty-seven MALT lymphomas (all previously evaluated for t(11;18) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction), 1 large cell lymphoma (LCL) arising subsequent to MALT lymphoma, and 16 controls were tested by FISH using the t(11;18) probe set and multiple centromeric probes. t(11;18)(q21;q21) was present by FISH in 11 of 12 polymerase chain reaction-positive MALT lymphomas (92%). The LCL and its clonally identical antecedent MALT lymphoma both showed t(11;18). The LCL had trisomy 12, and a small subset of MALT lymphoma cells had trisomy 3 and/or 12. Only one other MALT lymphoma with t(11;18) showed aneuploidy (trisomy 3) in a small clone, whereas 15 of 25 t(11;18)-negative MALT lymphomas (60%) showed trisomy of chromosomes 18 (n = 12), 3 (n = 8), 7 (n = 2), and/or 11 (n = 1). t(11;18) and aneuploidy are primarily mutually exclusive events, suggesting different pathogenetic pathways in the development of MALT lymphomas. Both t(11;18) and aneuploidy were seen disproportionately in lung, and both were associated with recurrent disease.

Utility of subtelomeric fluorescent DNA probes for detection of chromosome anomalies in 425 patients

Purpose: A complete set of subtelomeric fluorescent DNA probes, except the acrocentric p-arms, was developed in 1996, was optimized in 1998, and is commercially available. These and other fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes have been used to detect anomalies of the subtelomere regions among groups of patients with idiopathic mental retardation (MR), developmental delay (DD), and/or nonspecific dysmorphic features (NDF), and individuals with multiple miscarriages (MM) who were karyotypically normal by standard G-banding techniques.Methods: A total of 425 patients were analyzed, of whom 372 had idiopathic MR/DD/NDF and 53 were involved in MM. An effort was made to select individuals for this study who were either normal karyotypically or who had subtle chromosomal anomalies that were inconclusive by banded chromosome analysis, although this was not always possible.Results: Anomalies involving the subtelomere regions were detected at a frequency of 6.8% in the MR/DD/NDF group. The cryptic or subtle anomalies are estimated to be about 3.4%. It was necessary to use M-FISH, chromosome, and locus specific FISH probes to clarify some of the abnormalities. No abnormalities were detected in the MM group. Deletion variants were present for 2qter, 7pter, and Xpter/Ypter subtelomeric regions ranging from <1 to 9.6%.Conclusions: The subtelomeric FISH probes are instrumental in the detection of subtelomeric anomalies in a significant proportion, although no more than 50% are subtle, of patients with idiopathic MR/DD/NDF. In some cases, however, it was necessary to use other FISH probes to clarify the nature of these abnormalities. No subtelomeric abnormalities were detected in our group of 53 MM patients, suggesting a relatively low frequency of occurrence in this patient population.

Comparison of peripheral blood interphase cytogenetics with bone marrow karyotype analysis in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.

In a prospective study of 42 patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) interphase cytogenetics and PB CD34 enumeration were performed concomitantly with BM karyotype analysis. Interphase cytogenetics was performed with a panel of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes that were capable of detecting most of the known recurrent cytogenetic lesions in MMM. There was a close concordance in the results of interphase cytogenetics between PB and BM, regardless of the PB CD34 count. In general, FISH‐detectable abnormalities were also detected by BM karyotype. Although complementary, interphase cytogenetics may not always provide the necessary karyotypic information in MMM.

A novel tricolor, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization method to detect BCR/ABL fusion in cells with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) associated with deletion of DNA on the derivative chromosome 9 in chronic myelocytic leukemia.

Dual-color, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) can accurately detect and quantify cells with BCR/ABL fusion in <1% of 500 nuclei in 80% of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) and t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). The remaining patients have one of three forms of atypical D-FISH patterns; these patterns have different sensitivities to detect disease. Neoplastic cells with one ABL, one BCR, and one BCR/ABL fusion are particularly problematic, because normal cells with coincidental overlap have the same pattern. For these patients, the normal cutoff for D-FISH is >23%. We tested a new method that incorporates an aqua-labeled probe for the argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) gene into the conventional BCR/ABL D-FISH probe set. This tricolor D-FISH (TD-FISH) method takes advantage of the aqua-labeled ASS probe to distinguish between neoplastic and normal cells. We used TD-FISH to study 20 normal specimens and 35 specimens from 20 patients with known loss of both BCR and ABL from the derivative chromosome 9. The results show that TD-FISH effectively discriminates between cells with overlapping BCR and ABL signals from cells with true BCR/ABL fusion and improves the ability to quantify minimal residual disease from >23% to >1% of 500 interphase nuclei.

Unbalanced cryptic 5p deletion/17p duplication identified by subtelomeric FISH in a family with a boy with chimerism and a balanced t(4;5)

The use of subtelomeric FISH probes has greatly supplemented conventional chromosome analysis in detecting cryptic anomalies in patients with mental retardation (MR), dysmorphic features, and congenital malformations. We report a 3‐month‐old boy who was diagnosed with ambiguous genitalia, dysmorphic features, and developmental delay. Standard chromosome studies on blood revealed a chimeric karyotype of 46,XY,t(4;5)(q31.1;q14)[46]/46,XX[4]. The boy had intra‐abdominal gonads that were testicular in origin by biopsy. Multiple dysmorphic features, marked hypotonia, developmental delay, poor growth, and relative macrocephaly were noted on physical exam. His 2.5‐year‐old sister also presented with hypotonia, developmental delay, relative macrocephaly, and similar dysmorphic stigmata. In addition, she was diagnosed with several internal malformations. Her karyotype was 46,XX. Due to the striking phenotypic similarity, subtelomeric FISH studies were initiated in the siblings. In addition to the known balanced karyotypic abnormalities, the boy was found to have a derivative chromosome 5 with a 5pter deletion and a 17pter duplication. This cryptic abnormality was also detected in his sister. Chromosome analysis of the father revealed a subtle balanced t(5;17)(p15.31;p13.1) which was confirmed by subtelomeric FISH, whereas the mothers chromosome complement was normal. This familial constellation illustrates the usefulness of subtelomeric FISH in the diagnosis of cryptic chromosome abnormalities in patients for whom conventional karyotype does not disclose findings sufficient to explain the observed phenotypic anomalies.

A Rare Pediatric Example of Subcutaneous Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of the Morphologic Differential Diagnosis.

Primary extraskeletal osteosarcoma is an exceedingly rare malignant neoplasm that accounts for approximately 1% of soft tissue sarcomas and most often occurs in the deep soft tissues of adults. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is characterized by the production of osteoid, bone, and/or chondroid matrix. The diagnosis of extraskeletal osteosarcoma requires careful radiologic and clinical correlation to ensure that the patient does not have an underlying bone primary. This is a case report of primary subcutaneous extraskeletal osteosarcoma arising in the thigh of a 15-year-old girl with a complex karyotype, and the morphologic differential diagnosis is reviewed.

A case of down syndrome with mirror-image duplication of chromosome 21

A Case of Down Syndrome With Mirror-Image Duplication of Chromosome 21 Ha Thi Minh Thi, Nguyen Viet Nhan, Noralane M. Lindor, Reid G. Meyer, Ruhi Rai, and Gopalrao V.N. Velagaleti* Department of Medical Genetics, Hue College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue City, Viet Nam Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota