Reidar Mosvold
University of Stavanger
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Reidar Mosvold.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology | 2015
Uffe Thomas Jankvist; Reidar Mosvold; Janne Fauskanger; Arneº Jakobsen
In this article, we analyse three ‘classical’ cases of using history of mathematics in teacher training and reinterpret them using the framework of mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT). We continue with a discussion of the potential benefits of applying MKT as a framework for discussion in research related to the use of history in mathematics education. MKT serves as an example of a framework from general mathematics education research which has something to offer in this respect. We argue that the MKT framework provides a powerful language to communicate results from research on the uses of history of mathematics to researchers in other areas of mathematics education research.
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies | 2018
Deborah Lynn Sorton Larssen; Wasyl Cajkler; Reidar Mosvold; Raymond Bjuland; Nina Helgevold; Janne Fauskanger; Phil Wood; Fay Baldry; Arne Jakobsen; Hans Erik Bugge; Gro Næsheim-Bjørkvik; Julie Norton
Purpose n n n n nThe purpose of this paper is to conduct a structured review of literature on lesson study (LS) in initial teacher education (ITE). The focus was on how learning and observation were discussed in studies of LS in ITE. n n n n nDesign/methodology/approach n n n n nEach national team (in Norway and Britain) undertook independent searches of published peer-reviewed articles. The resulting articles were then combined, screened and collaboratively reviewed, the focus being on two areas of enquiry: how learning is represented and discussed; and the extent to which observation is described and used to capture evidence of learning. n n n n nFindings n n n n nThe literature review indicated that there was no universally held understanding of, or explanation for, the process of observation, how it should be conducted, and who or what should be the principal focus of attention. There was also a lack of clarity in the definition of learning and the use of learning theory to support these observations. n n n n nResearch limitations/implications n n n n nThis study was limited to a review of a selection of peer-reviewed journal articles, published in English. It arrives at some tentative conclusions, but its scope could have been broadened to include more articles and other types of published material, e.g. theses and book chapters. n n n n nPractical implications n n n n nResearch that investigates the use of LS in ITE needs to be more explicit about how learning is defined and observed. Furthermore, LS research papers need to assure greater clarity and transparency about how observations are conducted in their studies. n n n n nOriginality/value n n n n nThis literature review suggests that discussion of both learning and observation in ITE LS research papers should be strengthened. The review highlights three principal challenges that ITE LS researchers should consider: how to prepare student-teachers to observe (professional noticing being a promising option), the wide variation in the focus of classroom observation in ITE lesson studies, and discussion of what is understood by learning needs to stand at the heart of preparation for lesson studies in ITE.
Zdm | 2012
Janne Fauskanger; Arne Jakobsen; Reidar Mosvold; Raymond Bjuland
Teaching and Teacher Education | 2015
Raymond Bjuland; Reidar Mosvold
1-18 | 2008
Reidar Mosvold
Science Education | 2014
Reidar Mosvold; Arne Jakobsen; Uffe Thomas Jankvist
Journal on Mathematics Education | 2013
Reidar Mosvold; Janne Fauskanger
The Mathematics Enthusiast | 2016
Mark Hoover; Reidar Mosvold; Deborah Loewenberg Ball; Yvonne Lai
Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift | 2014
Janne Fauskanger; Reidar Mosvold
The Mathematics Enthusiast | 2012
Dicky Ng; Reidar Mosvold; Janne Fauskanger