Réka Benczes

The Role of Alliteration and Rhyme in Novel Metaphorical and Metonymical Compounds

The playful function of language is well captured by witty (and often humorous) metaphorical and metonymical compounds that are based on phonological analogy (i.e., alliteration and/or rhyme). The main hypothesis of the article is that phonological analogy is exploited systematically in novel metaphorical and metonymical compounds, and might play an influential role in compound formation by motivating the selection of the component nouns. The article outlines the various patterns of alliteration and rhyme in novel metaphorical and metonymical compounds, and delineates its implications for cognitive grammar. It is also hypothesized that phonological analogy serves a number of functions: (a) as an attention-seeking device it enhances emphasis; (b) helps the reader/hearer decipher the meaning of a novel expression; (c) aids a novel expressions acceptability and long-term retention; (d) signals an informality of meaning; and (e) helps in the creation of a “social bond” between the participants of a speech situation.

Just a Load of Hibber-Gibber? Making Sense of English Rhyming Compounds

Rhyming compounds, such as helter-skelter or prime time, where the two constituents that make up the compound itself rhyme with one another, are one of the least investigated categories of English word formation. While they have been a regular feature of English for centuries, and are a common phenomenon in present-day English, too, they have often been overlooked in the literature on the grounds that they are a marginal, playful feature of the English language, which do not merit a systematic and proper analysis in their own right. However, there is much more to rhyming compounds than meets the eye. The paper challenges the marginality of rhyming compounds in general, and demonstrates that the meaning of such compounds is inextricably linked to the rhyming quality, i.e. the form. By an in-depth analysis of the five major semantic categories that lexicalized rhyming compounds denote, the paper comes to the conclusion that rhyme can be associated with four primary functions: imitation; intensification; diminution; and unconventionality. It is argued that these four functions lie at the heart of the semantic motivation of English rhyming compounds, thereby illustrating yet another facet of the non-arbitrariness of language.