Rémi Bardenet
Lille University of Science and Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rémi Bardenet.
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology | 2016
Ross H. Johnstone; Eugene T. Y. Chang; Rémi Bardenet; Teun P. de Boer; David J. Gavaghan; Pras Pathmanathan; Richard H. Clayton; Gary R. Mirams
Cardiac electrophysiology models have been developed for over 50 years, and now include detailed descriptions of individual ion currents and sub-cellular calcium handling. It is commonly accepted that there are many uncertainties in these systems, with quantities such as ion channel kinetics or expression levels being difficult to measure or variable between samples. Until recently, the original approach of describing model parameters using single values has been retained, and consequently the majority of mathematical models in use today provide point predictions, with no associated uncertainty. In recent years, statistical techniques have been developed and applied in many scientific areas to capture uncertainties in the quantities that determine model behaviour, and to provide a distribution of predictions which accounts for this uncertainty. In this paper we discuss this concept, which is termed uncertainty quantification, and consider how it might be applied to cardiac electrophysiology models. We present two case studies in which probability distributions, instead of individual numbers, are inferred from data to describe quantities such as maximal current densities. Then we show how these probabilistic representations of model parameters enable probabilities to be placed on predicted behaviours. We demonstrate how changes in these probability distributions across data sets offer insight into which currents cause beat-to-beat variability in canine APs. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges that this approach entails, and how it provides opportunities to improve our understanding of electrophysiology.
The Journal of Physiology | 2018
Kylie A. Beattie; Adam P. Hill; Rémi Bardenet; Yi Cui; Jamie I. Vandenberg; David J. Gavaghan; Teun P. de Boer; Gary R. Mirams
Ion current kinetics are commonly represented by current–voltage relationships, time constant–voltage relationships and subsequently mathematical models fitted to these. These experiments take substantial time, which means they are rarely performed in the same cell. Rather than traditional square‐wave voltage clamps, we fitted a model to the current evoked by a novel sum‐of‐sinusoids voltage clamp that was only 8 s long. Short protocols that can be performed multiple times within a single cell will offer many new opportunities to measure how ion current kinetics are affected by changing conditions. The new model predicts the current under traditional square‐wave protocols well, with better predictions of underlying currents than literature models. The current under a novel physiologically relevant series of action potential clamps is predicted extremely well. The short sinusoidal protocols allow a model to be fully fitted to individual cells, allowing us to examine cell–cell variability in current kinetics for the first time.
Wellcome Open Research | 2016
Ross H. Johnstone; Rémi Bardenet; David J. Gavaghan; Gary R. Mirams
Dose-response (or ‘concentration-effect’) relationships commonly occur in biological and pharmacological systems and are well characterised by Hill curves. These curves are described by an equation with two parameters: the inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50); and the Hill coefficient. Typically just the ‘best fit’ parameter values are reported in the literature. Here we introduce a Python-based software tool, PyHillFit , and describe the underlying Bayesian inference methods that it uses, to infer probability distributions for these parameters as well as the level of experimental observation noise. The tool also allows for hierarchical fitting, characterising the effect of inter-experiment variability. We demonstrate the use of the tool on a recently published dataset on multiple ion channel inhibition by multiple drug compounds. We compare the maximum likelihood, Bayesian and hierarchical Bayesian approaches. We then show how uncertainty in dose-response inputs can be characterised and propagated into a cardiac action potential simulation to give a probability distribution on model outputs.
Journal of the Royal Society Interface | 2016
Jochen Kursawe; Rémi Bardenet; Jeremiah J. Zartman; Ruth E. Baker; Alexander G. Fletcher
Tracking of cells in live-imaging microscopy videos of epithelial sheets is a powerful tool for investigating fundamental processes in embryonic development. Characterizing cell growth, proliferation, intercalation and apoptosis in epithelia helps us to understand how morphogenetic processes such as tissue invagination and extension are locally regulated and controlled. Accurate cell tracking requires correctly resolving cells entering or leaving the field of view between frames, cell neighbour exchanges, cell removals and cell divisions. However, current tracking methods for epithelial sheets are not robust to large morphogenetic deformations and require significant manual interventions. Here, we present a novel algorithm for epithelial cell tracking, exploiting the graph-theoretic concept of a ‘maximum common subgraph’ to track cells between frames of a video. Our algorithm does not require the adjustment of tissue-specific parameters, and scales in sub-quadratic time with tissue size. It does not rely on precise positional information, permitting large cell movements between frames and enabling tracking in datasets acquired at low temporal resolution due to experimental constraints such as phototoxicity. To demonstrate the method, we perform tracking on the Drosophila embryonic epidermis and compare cell–cell rearrangements to previous studies in other tissues. Our implementation is open source and generally applicable to epithelial tissues.
PLOS Computational Biology | 2015
Bernhard Knapp; Rémi Bardenet; Miguel O. Bernabeu; Rafel Bordas; Maria Bruna; Ben Calderhead; Jonathan Cooper; Alexander G. Fletcher; Derek Groen; Bram Kuijper; Joanna Lewis; Greg J. McInerny; Timo Minssen; James M. Osborne; Verena Paulitschke; Joe Pitt-Francis; Jelena Todoric; Christian A. Yates; David J. Gavaghan; Charlotte M. Deane
arXiv: Probability | 2016
Rémi Bardenet; Adrien Hardy
neural information processing systems | 2015
Rémi Bardenet; Michalis K. Titsias
IN2P3 School of Statistics (SOS2012) | 2013
Rémi Bardenet
ieee signal processing workshop on statistical signal processing | 2018
Rémi Bardenet; Adrien Hardy
arXiv: Probability | 2018
Rémi Bardenet; Adrien Hardy