Renata Belfort

Adiponectin receptors gene expression and insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic Mexican Americans with or without a family history of Type 2 diabetes.

Aims/hypothesisThe recent discovery of two adiponectin receptors (AdipoR1 and AdipoR2) will improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the insulin-sensitising effect of adiponectin. The aim of this study was to determine for the first time whether skeletal muscle AdipoR1 and/or AdipoR2 gene expression levels are associated with insulin resistance.MethodsUsing RT-PCR and northern analysis we measured AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 gene expression in skeletal muscle from healthy Mexican Americans with normal glucose tolerance who had (n=8) or did not have (n=10) a family history of Type 2 diabetes.ResultsGene expression profiling indicated that the AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 isoforms are highly expressed in human skeletal muscle, unlike in mice where AdipoR2 expression was highest in the liver, and AdipoR1 was highest in skeletal muscle. In the study subjects, the expression levels of AdipoR1 (p=0.004) and AdipoR2 (p=0.04), as well as plasma adiponectin concentration (p=0.03) were lower in people with a family history of Type 2 diabetes than in those with no family history of the disease. Importantly, the expression levels of both receptors correlated positively with insulin sensitivity (r=0.64, p=0.004 and r=0.47, p=0.048 respectively).Conclusions/interpretationCollectively, these data indicate that both isoforms of the adiponectin receptor play a role in the insulin-sensitising effect of adiponectin.

Fenofibrate Reduces Systemic Inflammation Markers Independent of Its Effects on Lipid and Glucose Metabolism in Patients with the Metabolic Syndrome

CONTEXT Fenofibrate is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist widely used in clinical practice, but its mechanism of action is incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess whether improvement in subclinical inflammation or glucose metabolism contributes to its antiatherogenic effects in insulin-resistant subjects with the metabolic syndrome (MetS). DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the research unit at an academic center. PATIENTS We studied 25 nondiabetic insulin-resistant MetS subjects. INTERVENTION(S) We administered fenofibrate (200 mg/d) and placebo for 12 wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Before and after treatment, we measured plasma lipids/apolipoproteins, inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6, intercellular adhesion molecule/vascular cell adhesion molecule), adipocytokines (adiponectin, TNFalpha, leptin), and insulin secretion (oral glucose tolerance test). We also assessed adipose tissue, hepatic and peripheral (muscle) insulin resistance fasting and during a euglycemic insulin clamp with (3)H glucose and (14)C palmitate infusion combined with indirect calorimetry. RESULTS Subjects displayed severe insulin resistance and systemic inflammation. Fenofibrate significantly reduced plasma triglyceride, apolipoprotein (apo) CII, apo CIII, and apo E (all P < 0.01), with a modest increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (+12%; P = 0.06). Fenofibrate markedly decreased plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein by 49.5 +/- 8% (P = 0.005) and IL-6 by 29.8 +/- 7% (P = 0.03) vs. placebo. However, neither insulin secretion nor adipose tissue, hepatic or muscle insulin sensitivity or glucose/lipid oxidation improved with treatment. Adiponectin and TNF-alpha levels were also unchanged. Improvement in plasma markers of vascular/systemic inflammation was dissociated from changes in triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apo CII/CIII, or free fatty acid concentrations or insulin secretion/insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS In subjects with the MetS, fenofibrate reduces systemic inflammation independent of improvements in lipoprotein metabolism and without changing insulin sensitivity. This suggests a direct peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-mediated effect of fenofibrate on inflammatory pathways, which may be important for the prevention of CVD in high-risk patients.

Reduction in hematocrit level after pioglitazone treatment is correlated with decreased plasma free testosterone level, not hemodilution, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Thiazolidinediones have gained widespread use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and other insulin resistance states, including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In thiazolidinedione‐treated patients a small reduction in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels often is observed, and this generally has been attributed to fluid retention. Because testosterone is a hematopoietic hormone, we investigated whether a reduction in plasma free testosterone concentration was associated with the decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels in 22 nondiabetic women (9 with normal glucose tolerance and 13 with impaired glucose tolerance; mean age, 29 ± 5 years; mean body mass index, 35.6 ± 5.8 kg/m2) with PCOS who were treated with pioglitazone, 45 mg/d. Before treatment and after 4 months, subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and measurement of total body water content with bioimpedance. Plasma testosterone, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels were evaluated at baseline and every month for 4 months. The fasting plasma glucose concentration (98 ± 9 mg/dL) was unchanged after pioglitazone treatment, whereas the 2‐hour plasma glucose concentration declined from 146 ± 41 to 119 ± 20 mg/dL (P = .002). Both the free androgen index and the free testosterone levels calculated according to Vermeulen et al decreased significantly (from 14.4 ± 7.1 to 10.6 ± 7.8 [P = .02] and from 59.4 ± 23.4 to 46.6 ± 23.3 [P = .03], respectively). The plasma androstenedione level declined from 259 ± 134 to 190 ± 109 ng/dL (P = .01), whereas the dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate level did not change significantly (from 139 ± 90 to 127 ± 84 μg/dL, P = .2 [not significant]). The levels of both hemoglobin (from 13.6 ± 1.0 to 12.8 ± 1.1 g/dL, P = .0002) and hematocrit (from 39.7% ± 2.2% to 37.9% ± 2.7%, P = .002) fell slightly after 4 months of pioglitazone administration. Collectively, before and after pioglitazone administration, the plasma free testosterone level according to Vermeulen et al correlated positively with the levels of hemoglobin (r = 0.49, P < .0001) and hematocrit (r = 0.40, P < .0001), as well as the free androgen index (r = 0.38 [P < .0003] with hemoglobin and r = 0.29 [P < .006] with hematocrit); the decrement in plasma free testosterone level and free androgen index also correlated with the decrements in the levels of both hemoglobin (r = 0.51 [P = .01] and r = 0.54 [P = .01], respectively) and hematocrit (r = 0.42 [P = .05] and r = 0.50 [P = .02], respectively). Body weight increased from 90.5 ± 17.3 to 92.4 ± 18.8 kg after pioglitazone administration (P = .05), as did body fat content (from 42.7 ± 15.3 to 44.8 ± 17.1 kg, P = .03), which could explain the increase in weight, because edema did not develop in any of the subjects. Total body water content did not change significantly after pioglitazone administration (from 37.7 ± 5.0 to 37.8 ± 4.9 L, P = .68 [not significant]). In summary, pioglitazone treatment is associated with a mild decline in hematocrit or hemoglobin level, which is correlated with the reduction in plasma testosterone level. These results suggest that increased body water content cannot explain the reduction in hematocrit or hemoglobin level in women with PCOS. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether the same scenario is applicable to normoandrogenic women and individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Chronic Low‐Dose Lipid Infusion in Healthy Patients Induces Markers of Endothelial Activation Independent of Its Metabolic Effects

Elevated plasma triglyceride/free fatty acid (FFA) levels and insulin resistance may promote atherosclerosis through endothelial activation (ie, increased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM-1]/vascular adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM-1], and endothelin-1 [ET-1]) in patients with the metabolic syndrome, but this has never been directly tested. The authors measured endothelial activation and insulin sensitivity (euglycemic insulin clamp with [3-(3)H]-glucose) after a 4-day low-dose lipid infusion that elevated plasma FFA to levels observed in the metabolic syndrome in 20 lean, non-diabetic insulin-resistant subjects with a strong family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (FH(+)) and 10 insulin-sensitive volunteers without a family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (FH(-)). Low-dose lipid infusion reduced insulin sensitivity by approximately 25% in insulin-sensitive FH(-)controls but did not worsen preexisting insulin resistance in FH(+). Low-dose lipid infusion elevated plasma ICAM and VCAM levels similarly in both groups (approximately 12%-18%; P<.01 vs baseline), while plasma ET-1 levels increased more in FH(+)vs FH(-)(46% vs 10%; P=.005). Increased plasma FFA levels closely correlated with elevated ICAM (r=0.60; P<.01), VCAM, and ET-1 levels (r=0.39 and r=0.42, respectively; P<.05). Low-dose lipid infusion induces endothelial activation in both lean insulin-resistant (FH(+)) and insulin-sensitive (FH(-)) healthy patients, regardless of changes in insulin sensitivity. These results prove that even a modest lipid oversupply may be sufficient to trigger a deleterious endothelial response.