Renata R. Urban

Ovarian cancer in younger vs older women: a population-based analysis

To compare the clinico-pathologic prognostic factors and survival of younger vs older women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer. Demographic, clinico-pathologic, treatment, and surgery information were obtained from patients with ovarian cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1988 to 2001 and analysed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Of 28 165 patients, 400 were <30 years (very young), 11 601 were 30–60 (young), and 16 164 were >60 (older) years of age. Of the very young, young, and older patients, 261 (65.3%), 4664 (40.2%), and 3643 (22.5%) had stage I–II disease, respectively (P<0.001). Across all stages, very young women had a significant survival advantage over the young and older groups with 5-year disease-specific survival estimates at 78.8% vs 58.8 and 35.3%, respectively (P<0.001). This survival difference between the age groups persists even after adjusting for race, stage, grade, and surgical treatment. Reproductive age (16–40 years) women with stage I–II epithelial ovarian cancer who received uterine-sparing procedures had similar survivals compared to those who underwent standard surgery (93.3% vs 91.5%, P=0.26). Younger women with epithelial ovarian cancer have a survival advantage compared to older patients.

The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13 918 patients

The aim of the study is to determine the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program reported between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analysis. Of 13 918 women with stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer (median age: 64 years), 87.9% were Caucasian, 5.6% African Americans, and 4.4% Asians. A total of 4260 (30.6%) underwent lymph node dissections with a median number of six nodes reported. For all patients, a more extensive lymph node dissection (0, 1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with an improved 5-year disease-specific survival of 26.1, 35.2, 42.6, 48.4, 47.5, and 47.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Of the stage IIIC patients with nodal metastases, the extent of nodal resection (1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with improved survivals of 36.9, 45.0, 47.8, 48.7, and 51.1%, respectively (P=0.023). On multivariate analysis, the extent of lymph node dissection and number of positive nodes were significant independent prognosticators after adjusting for age, year at diagnosis, stage, and grade of disease. The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved disease-specific survival of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Lymphadenectomy in endometrioid uterine cancer staging: How many lymph nodes are enough? A study of 11,443 patients

The purpose of the current study was investigate the association between the number of lymph nodes examined and the probability of detecting at least a single lymph node involved by metastatic disease in patients with endometrioid corpus cancer.

Gynecologic malignancies in female-to-male transgender patients: the need of original gender surveillance.

We report a case of uterine cancer and invasive cervical cancer, detected incidentally during the female-to-male sex reassignment surgery. The management of these patients is presented. Such individuals may not be receiving regular gynecologic care appropriate to their remaining genital organs; symptoms of malignant disease may be missed.

Survival differences of Asian and Caucasian epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the United States

OBJECTIVE To compare the racial differences in treatment and survival of Asian-Americans and White patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program between 1988 and 2009 and analyzed using Chi-squared tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 52,260 women, 3932 (7.5%) were coded as Asian, and 48,328 (92.5%) were White. The median age of Asians at diagnosis was 56 vs. 64 years for the Whites (p<0.001). Asians were more likely to undergo primary surgery, have an earlier stage of disease, have a diagnosis of a non-serous histology, and have lower grade tumors. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of Asians was higher compared to Whites (59.1% vs. 47.3%, p<0.001). On a subset analysis, Vietnamese, Filipino, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and Asian Indian/Pakistani ethnicities had 5-year DSS of 62.1%, 61.5%, 61.0%, 59.0%, 54.6%, and 48.2%, respectively (p=0.015). On multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, race, surgery, stage, and tumor grade were all independent prognostic factors for survival. Asians were further stratified to U.S. born versus those who were born in Asia and immigrated. Asian immigrants presented at a younger age compared to U.S. born Asians. Immigrants were found to have an improved 5-year DSS when compared to U.S. born Asians and Whites of 55%, 52%, and 48%, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Asians were more likely to be younger, undergo primary surgery, have an earlier stage of disease, non-serous histology, lower grade tumors, and higher survival.

Ovarian cancer outcomes: Predictors of early death

OBJECTIVE To describe the outcomes and mortality in advanced ovarian cancer patients in a population-based cohort in the 90 days after diagnosis. METHODS Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified a cohort of women with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2007. A χ(2) test was used to assess demographic and clinical factors. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess factors associated with variation in survival. RESULTS Of the 9491 patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer identified from the SEER/Medicare system, 4131 (43.6%) patients died in the first year after diagnosis. Of these, 2472 (26.0%) patients died in the first 90 days after diagnosis. Over the study period, the number of patients who died in the first 90 days after diagnosis slightly increased (p=0.053). Older age (>75 years of age), increased comorbidity, stage IV disease, lack of a visit with a gynecologic oncologist, and surgery were associated with an increase in 90-day mortality. Chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Approximately 25% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer in our study period died within 90 days of diagnosis, and more than 40% died within the first year of diagnosis. In addition, a substantial proportion of patients did not receive any treatment. Further research into the characteristics of these patients should be performed to elucidate clinical areas for intervention to either prevent these poor outcomes or allocate appropriate resources to patients with extremely poor prognoses.

Comprehensive care in gynecologic oncology: The importance of palliative care

• Comprehensive care includes symptom management at diagnosis and extending through treatment.

Ovarian cancer rates after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate ovarian and peritoneal cancer rates after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign conditions. METHODS: All patients after hysterectomy for benign disease from 1988 to 2006 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health organization. Incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated. RESULTS: Of 56,692 patients, the majority (54%) underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; 7% had hysterectomy with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 39% had hysterectomy alone. There were 40 ovarian and eight peritoneal cancers diagnosed during follow-up. Median age at ovarian and peritoneal cancer diagnosis was 50 and 64 years, respectively. Age-standardized rates (per 100,000 person-years) of ovarian or peritoneal cancer were 26.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16–37.5) for those with hysterectomy alone, 22.8 (95% CI 0.0–46.8) for hysterectomy and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 3.9 (95% CI 1.5–6.4) for hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rates of ovarian cancer were 26.2 (95% CI 15.5–37) for those with hysterectomy alone, 17.5 (95% CI 0.0–39.1) for hysterectomy and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 1.7 (95% CI 0.4–3) for those with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Compared with women undergoing hysterectomy alone, those receiving an unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had a hazard ratio (HR) for ovarian cancer of 0.58 (95% CI 0.18–1.9) and those undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had an HR of 0.12 (95% CI 0.05–0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The removal of both ovaries decreases the incidence of ovarian and peritoneal cancers. Removal of one ovary might also decrease the incidence of ovarian cancer but warrants further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

Evaluation of Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) ovarian cancer quality surgical measures

OBJECTIVES The Society of Gynecologic Oncologists has developed two measures to assess and improve the surgical care of patients with ovarian cancer (1) description of residual disease following cytoreduction and (2) adequacy of surgical staging. Our aim was to establish baseline surgeon compliance with these two measures. METHODS A retrospective review of patients with ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer undergoing surgery between 7/1/2006 and 7/1/2011 for the purposes of staging and/or cytoreduction was performed at the University of Washington and Geisinger Medical Center. Operative and pathology reports were reviewed to obtain information pertaining to stage, histology, residual disease after surgery and the extent of surgical staging. RESULTS 537 cases were identified; 91% with ovarian cancer. 61% of patients had at least stage IIIC disease; 15% had recurrent disease and 16% had neoadjuvant therapy. For patients with stages I-IIIB disease, 74% had full surgical staging, 10% did not have full surgical staging but documented the reason for this in the operative report; 15% did not have full surgical staging, no reason was noted. 25% of all operative reports lacked documentation of residual disease with 40% documenting no gross residual disease, 18% with residual disease <1cm and 18% had suboptimal debulking with >1 cm disease remaining. There was a statistically significant increase in appropriate documentation of amount of residual disease over time (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our study sets benchmarks for evaluation of documentation in gynecologic oncology centers. Improved documentation and staging will allow for equivalent standards of care across institutions.

Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?

BACKGROUND Recent policy changes by insurance companies have been instituted to encourage vaginal hysterectomy (VH) as the preferred route for removal of the uterus. It is not known if advantages of VH for benign indications apply to women with gynecologic cancer. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess trends in surgical approach to hysterectomy among gynecologic cancer patients and to evaluate outcomes by approach. We hypothesized that, among gynecologic oncology patients, postoperative complications and hospital stay would differ by surgical approach, and that advantages of VH for benign indications may not apply to gynecologic cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of cervical, endometrial, or ovarian/fallopian tube cancer patients treated surgically in Washington State from 2004 through 2013 using the Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System. Surgery was categorized as abdominal hysterectomy (AH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), or VH. We determined rate of surgical approach by year and the association with length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and perioperative complications. RESULTS We identified 10,117 patients who underwent surgery for gynecologic cancer, with 346 (3.4%) VH, 2698 (26.7%) LH, and 7073 (69.9%) AH. Patients undergoing AH had more comorbidities than patients with VH or LH (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2: 11.3%, 7.9%, and 8.1%, respectively; P < .001). From 2004 through 2013 AH and VH declined (94.4-47.9% and 4.4-0.8%, respectively; P < .001) while LH increased from 1.2-51.4% in 2013 (P < .001). Mean length of stay was 4.6 days for women undergoing AH and was 1.9 days shorter for VH (95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.3 days) and 2.6 days shorter for LH (95% confidence interval, 2.4-2.7 days) (P < .001). Risk of 30-day readmission for patients undergoing LH was 40% less likely compared to AH but not different for VH vs AH. CONCLUSION AH and LH remain the preferred routes for hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology. Over the past decade, there has been a significant shift to LH with lower 30-day readmission and complication rates. There may be a limited role for VH in select patients. Current efforts to standardize the surgical approach to hysterectomy should not apply to patients with known or suspected gynecologic cancer.