René-Jean Bensadoun

CONCOMITANT B.I.D. RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY WITH CISPLATIN AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN UNRESECTABLE SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE PHARYNX: CLINICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL DATA OF A FRENCH MULTICENTER PHASE II STUDY

PURPOSEnThe aim of this phase II study conducted on unresectable squamous cell carcinoma (USCC) of the oro- and hypopharynx was to associate twice-a-day (b.i.d.) continuous nonaccelerated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin (CP)-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, both given at full dose. Feasibility, efficacy, survival, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships were analyzed.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnFifty-four consecutive patients with strictly USCC of oro- and/or hypopharynx received continuous b.i.d. radiotherapy (RT) (2 daily fractions of 1.2 Gy, 5 days a week, with a 6-h minimal interval between fractions). Total RT dose was 80.4 Gy on the oropharynx and 75.6 Gy on the hypopharynx. Three chemotherapy (CT) courses of CP-5-FU were given during RT at 21-day intervals (third not delivered after the end of RT). CP dose was 100 mg/m2 (day 1) and 5-FU was given as 5-day continuous infusion (day 2-day 6: 750 mg/m2/day cycle 1, 750 mg total dose/day cycle 2 and 3). Pharmacokinetics was performed for 5-FU (105 h follow-up) and CP (single sample at 16 h). Special attention was paid to supportive care.nnnRESULTSnGood feasibility of RT was observed (85.2% of patients with total dose > 75 Gy). Five patients received 1 CT cycle, 34: 2 cycles, and 15: 3 cycles. The most frequent and severe acute toxicities were mucositis with grade 3-4 occurring in 28% at cycle 1 and 86% at cycle 2, as well as neutropenia (43% at cycle 2). Locoregional control at 6 months was observed in 66.7% of patients. No late toxicity above grade 2 RTOG was noticed. CP dose and 5-FU AUC(0-105h) were significantly linked to grade 3-4 neutropenia (cycle 2). Cumulative total platinum (Pt) concentration and Karnofsky index were the only independent predictors of locoregional control at 6 months. Finally, total RT dose and total Pt concentration were the only independent predictors of specific survival.nnnCONCLUSIONnThis protocol showed good locoregional response with an acceptable toxicity profile. Pharmacokinetic survey is probably an effective approach to further reduce toxicity and improve efficacy. A multicentric randomized phase III study, now underway, should confirm these encouraging results.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Protein Detection in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Many-Faceted Picture

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite intensive biomarker studies, a consensual method for assessing EGFR protein expression is still lacking. Here we set out to compare three EGFR detection methods in tumor specimens from HNSCC patients. Experimental Design: Tumors were prospectively excised from a series of 79 high-risk HNSCC patients enrolled in a GORTEC-sponsored clinical trial. EGFR expression was determined using a ligand-binding assay on membranes, Western blotting (WB) on membranes and total homogenates, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays. In addition, phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) was measured by WB on membranes. Results: Distributions and ranges of tumor EGFR expression were method dependent. Moderate positive correlations (Spearman coefficient r ≈ 0.50) were observed between EGFR expression measured by the binding assay and WB or IHC. pEGFR levels positively and significantly correlated with total EGFR expression measured by WB or ligand binding, but not by IHC. The highest correlation (r = 0.85) was observed between EGFR and pEGFR levels, both measured by WB on membranes. Interestingly, the fraction of phosphorylated receptor (pEGFR/EGFR both measured by WB on membranes) significantly declined with increasing tumor EGFR expression, by all assessment methods used. Conclusion: This study shows significant correlations between EGFR detection methods. The observed relationships between EGFR and pEGFR indicate that high-throughput pEGFR/EGFR analyses merit further investigations and consideration for routine use in patient samples. Clin Cancer Res; 18(5); 1313–22. ©2012 AACR.

Contrasted outcomes to gefitinib on tumoral IGF1R expression in head and neck cancer patients receiving postoperative chemoradiation (GORTEC trial 2004-02).

Purpose: Intermediate/high-risk operated patients with head and neck cancer may benefit from the addition of EGF receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib to chemoradiation. This study was designed to assess improved outcomes and identify predictive biomarkers. Experimental Design: Patients provided informed consent for tumor biomarker analyses and, when eligible, were further enrolled in the therapeutic CARISSA multicenter randomized phase II trial of postoperative irradiation with cisplatin + gefitinib (GORTEC 2004-02-NCT00169221). Results: Seventy-nine patients were included in the biomarker study, whereas 27 did not meet prerequisites for randomization between gefitinib and placebo. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 65.0% and did not differ between randomized patients treated with gefitinib or placebo (P = 0.85). The similarity of DFS curves between nonrandomized patients (n = 27), randomized patients without gefitinib (n = 27), and randomized patients receiving gefitinib (n = 25), and similar histoclinical parameter distributions for all groups, allowed us to conduct statistical analyses on the entire population. On multivariate analysis, elevated expression of PAK1 by Western blotting, CD31 and membranous insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) both by immunohistochemistry was significantly associated with shorter DFS. There was a significant interaction between IGF1R and gefitinib. Gefitinib abolished the prognostic discriminative power of high IGF1R expression; patients with elevated IGF1R expression benefited from gefitinib whereas those with low IGF1R fared worse. Conclusion: Gefitinib treatment affords no significant clinical benefit on DFS in an unselected population of patients with head and neck cancer. Our results point to the potential advantage of personalizing treatment for gefitinib based on tumoral IGF1R expression. This should foster confirmatory analyses in trials involving EGFR-targeting agents. Clin Cancer Res; 18(18); 5123–33. ©2012 AACR.

Étude de cas théoriques de faisceaux avec modulation d’intensité par la technique du step-and-shoot

To initiate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in our department, theoretical cases were used as a training, to define methods of measurements and to verify the software by comparing results of calculation and measurement on a PMMA phantom. Irradiation was performed with 6 and 25 MV X-rays from a linear accelerator. For measurements, films and ionization chambers have been chosen. The comparison between calculations and measurements shows some discrepancies at the level of junctions and also in areas of low doses especially when many segments were used. These theoretical cases provide a first step on the way towards treatments with intensity modulation.

Interest of Supportive and Barrier Protective Skin Care Products in the Daily Prevention and Treatment of Cutaneous Toxicity During Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Purpose: As many as 50% of patients with cancer develop acute skin reactions to some degree with radiotherapy. Proactive skin care is often recommended to minimise these skin reactions and maintain the integrity of the epidermal barrier; nevertheless, no consensual guidelines are systematically used. This multicentre, observational, prospective study evaluated the tolerability and benefit of supportive and barrier protective skin care products in preventing radiotherapy-induced skin reactions in 253 women initiating radiotherapy (exclusive or adjuvant) for breast cancer. Methods: Patients received a kit of 5 commercially available skin care products before the first radiotherapy treatment. The following variables were assessed: cutaneous adverse events, investigator-assessed skin reactions (oedema, erythema, dryness, desquamation) before and after radiotherapy course, investigator, and patient opinion on products benefit. Results were analysed by frequency of product use (heavy versus low). Results: Average age was 60u2009years (range: 34-85). Over 92% of patients reported good to excellent tolerance on irradiated skin for each product. During the 6-week radiotherapy period, we observed that heavy product users had less skin reactions than the low users, particularly within 10u2009days of radiotherapy initiation (8% versus 18%; pu2009=u2009.031). Positive physician’s opinion on product use was more frequent for high (66.6%) versus low (32%) users. Patient-assessed patient benefit index was generally >1, indicating relevant treatment benefit, with a tendency for better benefit in high versus low users. Conclusions: These results support recommendations to use skin care products to minimise the impact of secondary cutaneous reactions with radiotherapy cancer treatment.