Rene-Olivier Casasnovas
University of Burgundy
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rene-Olivier Casasnovas.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
John Raemaekers; Marc André; Massimo Federico; T. Girinsky; Reman Oumedaly; Ercole Brusamolino; Pauline Brice; Christophe Fermé; Richard W.M. van der Maazen; Manuel Gotti; Reda Bouabdallah; C. Sebban; Yolande Lievens; Allessandro Re; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Frank Morschhauser; Pieternella J. Lugtenburg; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Pierre Olivier; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Gustaaf W. van Imhoff; Tiana Raveloarivahy; Monica Bellei; Thierry Vander Borght; Stéphane Bardet; Annibale Versari; Martin Hutchings; Michel Meignan; Catherine Fortpied
PURPOSE Combined-modality treatment is standard treatment for patients with clinical stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We hypothesized that an early positron emission tomography (PET) scan could be used to adapt treatment. Therefore, we started the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL Intergroup H10 trial evaluating whether involved-node radiotherapy (IN-RT) could be omitted without compromising progression-free survival in patients attaining a negative early PET scan after two cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) as compared with standard combined-modality treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 15 to 70 years with untreated clinical stage I/II HL were eligible. Here we report the clinical outcome of the preplanned interim futility analysis scheduled to occur after documentation of 34 events in the early PET-negative group. Because testing for futility in this noninferiority trial corresponds to testing the hypothesis of no difference, a one-sided superiority test was conducted. RESULTS The analysis included 1,137 patients. In the favorable subgroup, 85.8% had a negative early PET scan (standard arm, one event v experimental arm, nine events). In the unfavorable subgroup, 74.8% had a negative early PET scan (standard arm, seven events v experimental arm, 16 events). The independent data monitoring committee concluded it was unlikely that we would show noninferiority in the final results for the experimental arm and advised stopping random assignment for early PET-negative patients. CONCLUSION On the basis of this analysis, combined-modality treatment resulted in fewer early progressions in clinical stage I/II HL, although early outcome was excellent in both arms. The final analysis will reveal whether this finding is maintained over time.
Blood | 2011
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Michel Meignan; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Stéphane Bardet; Anne Julian; Catherine Thieblemont; Pierre Vera; Serge Bologna; Josette Briere; Jean-Philippe Jais; Corinne Haioun; Bertrand Coiffier; Franck Morschhauser
The prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography (PET) interpreted according to visual criteria is a matter of debate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Maximal standardized uptake value reduction (ΔSUVmax) may better predict outcome. To compare the prognostic value of both methods, we analyzed PET done at baseline (PET0) and after 2 (PET2) and 4 (PET4) cycles in 85 patients with high-risk DLBCL enrolled on a prospective multicenter trial. All images were centrally reviewed and interpreted visually according to the International Harmonization Project criteria and by computing ΔSUVmax between PET0 and PET2 (ΔSUVmaxPET0-2) or PET4 (ΔSUVmaxPET0-4). Optimal cutoff to predict progression or death was 66% for ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 and 70% for ΔSUVmaxPET0-4. Outcomes did not differ significantly whether PET2 and PET4 were visually positive or negative. Inversely, ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 analysis (> 66% vs ≤ 66%) identified patients with significantly different 2-year progression-free survival (77% vs 57%; P = .0282) and overall survival (93% vs 60%; P < .0001). ΔSUVmaxPET0-4 analysis (> 70% vs ≤ 70%) seemed even more predictive for 2-year progression-free survival (83 vs 40%; P < .0001) and overall survival (94% vs 50%; P < .0001). ΔSUVmax analysis of sequential interim PET is feasible for high-risk DLBCL and better predicts outcome than visual analysis. The trial was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00498043.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012
Jehan Dupuis; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Anne Julian; Pauline Brice; Christelle Tychyj-Pinel; Hervé Tilly; Nicolas Mounier; Andrea Gallamini; Pierre Feugier; Pierre Soubeyran; Philippe Colombat; Guy Laurent; Nathalie Berenger; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Pierre Vera; Gaetano Paone; Luc Xerri; Gilles Salles; Corinne Haioun; Michel Meignan
PURPOSE [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used for the staging and restaging of patients with aggressive lymphoma, but less is known about the utility of PET in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). In a prospective study, we evaluated the prognostic value of PET performed during treatment and at the end of treatment in 121 patients with FL treated with first-line immunochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated high-tumor burden FL were treated with six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) plus two cycles of rituximab, without rituximab maintenance. PET was performed before treatment, after four cycles of R-CHOP (interim PET), and at the end of treatment (final PET). PET scans were centrally reviewed. RESULTS The total number of patients included was 121. Median age was 57 years. After central review, interim PET (n = 111) was negative in 76% of patients, and final PET (n = 106) was negative in 78%. With a median follow-up of 23 months, 2-year progression-free survival rates were 86% for interim PET-negative versus 61% for interim PET-positive patients (P = .0046) and 87% for final PET-negative versus 51% for final PET-positive patients (P < .001), respectively. Two-year overall survival also significantly differed according to final PET results: 100% versus 88% (P = .0128). CONCLUSION PET performed either after four cycles of R-CHOP or at the end of therapy was strongly predictive of outcome in this prospective study. Therapeutic intervention based on PET results during or after inductive treatment should be evaluated.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1992
Eric Solary; Denis Caillot; Bruno Chauffert; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Monique Dumas; Marc Maynadié; Henri Guy
PURPOSE We demonstrated previously that sera from quinine-treated patients reversed the multidrug resistance (MDR) of a human leukemic cell line. We now report a phase I and II clinical study that examined the toxicity of the combination of quinine with mitoxantrone and cytarabine (Ara-C). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifteen adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia were treated with quinine formiate (30 mg/kg/d in continuous intravenous (IV) infusion from day 1 through day 5 or 6) associated with Ara-C (1 g/m2 in 3-hour IV infusion twice a day for 5 days) and five increasing doses of mitoxantrone (from 8 mg/m2/d for 4 days to 12 mg/m2/d for 5 days). RESULTS The main toxicity was severe myelosuppression: the mean times to leukocyte recovery (> 500/microL), granulocytes recovery (> 500/microL), and platelet count recovery (> 50,000/microL) were 23 days (range, 17 to 29 days), 30.6 days (range, 17 to 48 days), and 35.4 days (range, 14 to 75 days), respectively. The nonhematopoietic toxicity of this regimen was acceptable. Nausea and vomiting were common, but severe mucositis was observed in only two patients. Cardiotoxicity was limited to transient episodes of moderate supraventricular tachycardia and a clinically well-tolerated bradycardia. Tinnitus and vertigo were observed in 10 cases (67%), and mild hearing loss and transient increase of serum bilirubin were observed in six patients (40%). Total quinine serum levels reached a steady-state concentration between 6.4 and 18 mg/L in 24 hours. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in eight of 14 (57%) assessable patients, and partial response (PR) was achieved in two additional patients (14%). P-glycoprotein expression was detected on blast cells from five of 13 studied patients before treatment. A response was observed in all P-glycoprotein-positive cases. CONCLUSION Quinine can be used safely as a potential reversing agent of MDR for the treatment of clinically resistant acute leukemias.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Nicolas Mounier; Pauline Brice; Marine Divine; Franck Morschhauser; Jean Gabarre; Jean-Yves Blay; Laurent Voillat; Pierre Lederlin; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Jacques Bienvenu; Michel Guiguet; Liliane Intrator; Monique Grandjean; Josette Briere; Christophe Fermé; Gilles Salles
PURPOSE Approximately 15% of patients with localized and 30% with disseminated classical Hodgkins lymphoma fail to respond or relapse after first-line treatment. Usual prognosis scoring systems are actually unable to identify this small subset of patients with good confidence, pointing out the need for additional prognostic biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively analyzed the prognosis value of plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), its soluble receptors TNF-R1 and TNF-R2, IL-10, IL1-RA, IL-6, and soluble CD30 (sCD30) when taken before any treatment in 519 consecutive patients with a first diagnosis of classical Hodgkins lymphoma. RESULTS Levels of TNF higher than 46 pg/mL, TNF-R1 higher than 3 ng/mL, TNF-R2 higher than 5 ng/mL, IL-10 higher than 30 pg/mL, IL1-RA higher than 668 pg/mL, IL-6 higher than 30 pg/mL, and sCD30 higher than 80 U/mL were associated with poor event-free and overall survival. In multivariate analysis, high levels of IL1-RA, IL-6, and sCD30 were independent poor prognosis factors, and the cytokine signature based on their combination allowed the stratification of patients in four prognosis classes, reaching a 5-year event-free survival probability of 92%, 85%, 76%, and 15%, respectively. This index was more potent than other scoring systems to predict patient event-free survival, and remained independent from the international prognostic score (P < .001), adding significant prognostic information to its predictive power. CONCLUSION Plasma cytokine signature is sufficient to predict disease-related outcome in classical Hodgkins lymphoma, and allows the identification of patients with very high risk of treatment failure.
The Lancet | 2016
Olivier Hermine; Eva Hoster; Jan Walewski; André Bosly; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Catherine Thieblemont; Michal Szymczyk; Reda Bouabdallah; Michael Kneba; Michael Hallek; Gilles Salles; Pierre Feugier; Vincent Ribrag; J. Birkmann; Roswitha Forstpointner; Corinne Haioun; Mathias Hänel; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Jürgen Finke; Norma Peter; Kamal Bouabdallah; Catherine Sebban; Thomas Fischer; Ulrich Dührsen; Bernd Metzner; Georg Maschmeyer; Lothar Kanz; Christian Schmidt; Richard Delarue; Nicole Brousse
BACKGROUND Mantle cell lymphoma is characterised by a poor long-term prognosis. The European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network aimed to investigate whether the introduction of high-dose cytarabine to immunochemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) improves outcome. METHODS This randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was done in 128 haemato-oncological hospital departments or private practices in Germany, France, Belgium, and Poland. Patients aged 65 years or younger with untreated stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma were centrally randomised (1:1), with computer-assisted random block selection, to receive either six courses of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy and ASCT (control group), or six courses of alternating R-CHOP or R-DHAP (rituximab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) followed by a high-dose cytarabine-containing conditioning regimen and ASCT (cytarabine group). Patients were stratified by study group and international prognostic index. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure from randomisation to stable disease after at least four induction cycles, progression, or death from any cause. Patients with stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma were included in the primary analysis if treatment was started according to randomisation. For safety analyses, patients were assessed according to the treatment actually started. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00209222. FINDINGS Of 497 patients (median age 55 years [IQR 49-60]) randomised from July 20, 2004, to March 18, 2010, 234 of 249 in the control group and 232 of 248 in the cytarabine group were included in the primary analysis. After a median follow-up of 6.1 years (95% CI 5.4-6.4), time to treatment failure was significantly longer in the cytarabine group (median 9.1 years [95% CI 6.3-not reached], 5 year rate 65% [95% CI 57-71]) than in the control group (3.9 years [3.2-4.4], 40% [33-46]; hazard ratio 0.56; p=0.038). During induction immunochemotherapy, patients who received high-dose cytarabine had increased grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity (haemoglobin 71 [29%] of 241m vs 19 [8%] of 227 controls; platelets 176 [73%] of 240 vs 21 [9%] of 225), grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia (39 [17%] of 230 vs 19 [8%] of 224), and grade 1 or 2 renal toxicity (creatinine 102 [43%] of 236 vs 22 [10%] of 224). The number of ASCT-related deaths was similar (eight [3.4%]) in both groups. INTERPRETATION Immunochemotherapy containing high-dose cytarabine followed by ASCT should be considered standard of care in patients aged 65 years or younger with mantle cell lymphoma. FUNDING European Commission, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and Roche.
Leukemia | 2003
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Fawzi Kara Slimane; Richard Garand; Gilbert C. Faure; Lydia Campos; Véronique Deneys; Michel Bernier; Annie Falkenrodt; Geneviève Lecalvez; Marc Maynadié; Marie-Christine Béné
Immunophenotyping is a major tool to assign acute leukemia blast cells to the myeloid lineage. However, because of the large heterogeneity of myeloid-related lineages, no clinically relevant immunological classification of acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) has been devised so far. To attempt at formulating such a classification, we analyzed the pattern of expression of selected antigens, on blast cells collected at AML diagnosis. Patients were eligible if they had a first diagnosis of de novo AML and a sufficient number of blast cells for proper immunophenotyping. The relative expression of CD7, CD13, CD14, CD15, CD33, CD34, CD35, CD36, CD65, CD117, and HLA-DR were analyzed by cytometry in a test series of 176 consecutive AML cases. Statistical tools of clusterization allowed to remove antigens with overlapping distribution, leading us to propose an AML classification that was validated in a second AML cohort of 733 patients. We identified five AML subsets (MA to ME) based on the expression of seven antigens within four groups (CD13/CD33/CD117, CD7, CD35/CD36, CD15).-MA and MB-AML have exclusively myeloid features with seldom extramedullary disease and rare expression of lymphoid antigens. No cases of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) were observed within MB AML. MC AML have either myeloid or erythroblastic features. MD AML have more frequently high WBC counts than other subsets, which were related to the expression of CD35/CD36 and CD14 and to monoblastic differentiation. ME AML lack CD13, CD33, and CD117 but display signs of terminal myeloid differentiation. Specific independent prognostic factors were related to poor overall survival in each immunological subset: CD34+ (P<3 × 10−4) in MA AML, CD7+ in MB AML, non-APL cases (P<0.03) in MC AML, CD34+ (P<0.002) and CD14+ (P<0.03) in MD AML, CD14+ in ME AML (P<0.01). The inclusion of seven key markers in the immunophenotyping of AML allows a stratification into clinically relevant subsets with individual prognostic factors, which should be considered to define high-risk AML populations.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
Isabelle Demeestere; Pauline Brice; Fedro Peccatori; Alain Kentos; Isabelle Gaillard; Pierre Zachée; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Eric Van Den Neste; Julie Dechene; Vivianne De Maertelaer; Dominique Bron; Yvon Englert
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in preventing chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure in patients treated for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma within the setting of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 18 to 45 years were randomly assigned to receive either the GnRHa triptorelin plus norethisterone (GnRHa group) or norethisterone alone (control group) concomitantly with alkylating agents containing chemotherapy. The primary end point was the premature ovarian failure (POF) rate (follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH] ≥ 40 IU/L) after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS Eighty-four of 129 randomly assigned patients completed the 1-year follow-up. The mean FSH values were higher in the control group than in the GnRHa group during chemotherapy; however, this difference was no longer observed after 6 months of follow-up. After 1 year, 20% and 19% of patients in the GnRHa and control groups, respectively, exhibited POF (P = 1.00). More than half of patients in each group completely restored their ovarian function (FSH < 10 IU/L), but the anti-Müllerian hormone values were higher in the GnRHa group than in the control group (1.4 ± 0.35 v 0.5 ± 0.15 ng/mL, respectively; P = .040). The occurrence of adverse events was similar in both groups with the exception of metrorrhagia, which was more frequently observed in the control group than the GnRHa group (38.4% v 15.6%, respectively; P = .024). CONCLUSION Approximately 20% of patients in both groups exhibited POF after 1 year of follow-up. Triptorelin was not associated with a significant decreased risk of POF in young patients treated for lymphoma but may provide protection of the ovarian reserve.
Leukemia | 1998
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Lydia Campos; Francine Mugneret; Christiane Charrin; Marie-Christine Béné; Richard Garand; Mireille Favre; Claudine Sartiaux; Isabelle Chaumarel; Michel Bernier; Gilbert C. Faure; Eric Solary
This study prospectively analysed the relationships between immunophenotypic and cytogenetic features of blast cells in 432 acute non-lymphoblastic leukemias (ANLL) at presentation. An abnormal karyotype was detected in 232 cases (54%). These abnormalities were related to immunophenotypic markers as detected using a consensual panel of monoclonal antibodies allowing lineage assignment and investigation of myeloid marker expression on blast cells. In univariate analysis, CD9, CD10, CD15, CD34 and TdT expression appeared significantly associated with chromosomal anomalies. Multivariate analysis identified CD34 and CD9 expression as independently predictive of the presence of at least one cytogenetic abnormality (P < 10−4 and P < 0.03, respectively). significant associations between immunophenotypic and karyotypic features were observed both within individual fab subgroups and independently from morphological criteria. specific features were seen in five anll entities: m0 or m1/b lineage antigen positivity/t(9;22) or del(11)(q23); m2/cd13−/t(8;21); M4/CD13+, CD34+, CD36+/inv(16); M4 or M5/lack of B lineage antigen/del(11)(q23) or t(9;11). More practically, and although the relationships demonstrated only represent a fraction of homogeneous immunophenotypic subgroups, identification of such immunophenotypic features should prompt careful karyotypic examination, eventually using molecular biology analysis on non-growing cells.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2014
Cédric Rossi; Salim Kanoun; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Olivier Humbert; Caroline Legouge; Marie Lorraine Chretien; Jean-Noël Bastie; François Brunotte; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas
PET performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (PET2) allows prediction of outcome in most patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Visual analysis using a 5-point scale was proposed to assess PET response, but a semiquantitative approach using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) reduction between baseline and interim PET was shown to be superior to the 5-point scale in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and may also improve the accuracy of interim PET interpretation in HL. To compare the clinical usefulness of both methods in HL patients, we analyzed PET2 according to visual and ΔSUVmax criteria in a retrospective single-center study. Methods: From 2007 to 2010, 59 consecutive patients with a first diagnosis of HL were treated with 4–8 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was performed in 19 responding patients with localized disease. PET was done at baseline (PET0) and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and treatment was not modified according to the PET2 result. PET2 was interpreted using the 5-point scale (positivity for score 4 or 5). The SUVmax reduction between PET0 and PET2 (ΔSUVmax) was computed for all patients, and patients with a ΔSUVmax greater than 71% were considered good responders. Results: When the 5-point scale was used, 46 patients (78%) achieved a negative PET2 result, 7 of whom failed treatment (negative predictive value, 85%). Forty-nine patients (83%) had a ΔSUVmax greater than 71%, 6 of whom failed treatment (negative predictive value, 88%). The PET2 positive predictive value was significantly better for ΔSUVmax (70%) than for the 5-point scale (46%). When ΔSUVmax was used, 6 (46%) of the 13 PET2-positive patients could be reclassified as good responders. Although visual PET2 positivity was related to a lower 4-y progression-free survival (45%) compared with PET2 negativity (81%, P < 0.002), ΔSUVmax (>71 vs ≤71%) was more accurate for identifying patients with different 4-y progression-free survivals (82% vs. 30%; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis using the international prognosis score and ΔSUVmax as covariates, ΔSUVmax remained the unique independent predictor for progression-free survival (P = 0.0001; relative risk, 8.1). Conclusion: Semiquantitative analysis was more accurate than visual analysis based on the 5-point scale to interpret PET2 and predict the outcome of HL patients. These encouraging results warrant further confirmation in larger and prospective series.