Renée A. Douma

Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.

IMPORTANCE D-dimer measurement is an important step in the diagnostic strategy of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but its clinical usefulness is limited in elderly patients. OBJECTIVE To prospectively validate whether an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff, defined as age × 10 in patients 50 years or older, is associated with an increased diagnostic yield of D-dimer in elderly patients with suspected PE. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PATIENTS A multicenter, multinational, prospective management outcome study in 19 centers in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland between January 1, 2010, and February 28, 2013. INTERVENTIONS All consecutive outpatients who presented to the emergency department with clinically suspected PE were assessed by a sequential diagnostic strategy based on the clinical probability assessed using either the simplified, revised Geneva score or the 2-level Wells score for PE; highly sensitive D-dimer measurement; and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Patients with a D-dimer value between the conventional cutoff of 500 µg/L and their age-adjusted cutoff did not undergo CTPA and were left untreated and formally followed-up for a 3-month period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the failure rate of the diagnostic strategy, defined as adjudicated thromboembolic events during the 3-month follow-up period among patients not treated with anticoagulants on the basis of a negative age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff result. RESULTS Of the 3346 patients with suspected PE included, the prevalence of PE was 19%. Among the 2898 patients with a nonhigh or an unlikely clinical probability, 817 patients (28.2%) had a D-dimer level lower than 500 µg/L (95% CI, 26.6%-29.9%) and 337 patients (11.6%) had a D-dimer between 500 µg/L and their age-adjusted cutoff (95% CI, 10.5%-12.9%). The 3-month failure rate in patients with a D-dimer level higher than 500 µg/L but below the age-adjusted cutoff was 1 of 331 patients (0.3% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.7%]). Among the 766 patients 75 years or older, of whom 673 had a nonhigh clinical probability, using the age-adjusted cutoff instead of the 500 µg/L cutoff increased the proportion of patients in whom PE could be excluded on the basis of D-dimer from 43 of 673 patients (6.4% [95% CI, 4.8%-8.5%) to 200 of 673 patients (29.7% [95% CI, 26.4%-33.3%), without any additional false-negative findings. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Compared with a fixed D-dimer cutoff of 500 µg/L, the combination of pretest clinical probability assessment with age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff was associated with a larger number of patients in whom PE could be considered ruled out with a low likelihood of subsequent clinical venous thromboembolism. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01134068.

Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts.

Objectives In older patients, the the D-dimer test for pulmonary embolism has reduced specificity and is therefore less useful. In this study a new, age dependent cut-off value for the test was devised and its usefulness with older patients assessed. Design Retrospective multicentre cohort study. Setting General and teaching hospitals in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Patients 5132 consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Intervention Development of a new D-dimer cut-off point in patients aged >50 years in a derivation set (data from two multicentre cohort studies), based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. This cut-off value was then validated with two independent validation datasets. Main outcome measures The proportion of patients in the validation cohorts with a negative D-dimer test, the proportion in whom pulmonary embolism could be excluded, and the false negative rates. Results The new D-dimer cut-off value was defined as (patient’s age×10) μg/l in patients aged >50. In 1331 patients in the derivation set with an “unlikely” score from clinical probability assessment, pulmonary embolism could be excluded in 42% with the new cut-off value versus 36% with the old cut-off value (<500 μg/l). In the two validation sets, the increase in the proportion of patients with a D-dimer below the new cut-off value compared with the old value was 5% and 6%. This absolute increase was largest among patients aged >70 years, ranging from 13% to 16% in the three datasets. The failure rates (all ages) were 0.2% (95% CI 0% to 1.0%) in the derivation set and 0.6% (0.3% to 1.3%) and 0.3% (0.1% to 1.1%) in the two validation sets. Conclusions The age adjusted D-dimer cut-off point, combined with clinical probability, greatly increased the proportion of older patients in whom pulmonary embolism could be safely excluded.

Performance of 4 Clinical Decision Rules in the Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND Several clinical decision rules (CDRs) are available to exclude acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but they have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVE To directly compare the performance of 4 CDRs (Wells rule, revised Geneva score, simplified Wells rule, and simplified revised Geneva score) in combination with d-dimer testing to exclude PE. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING 7 hospitals in the Netherlands. PATIENTS 807 consecutive patients with suspected acute PE. INTERVENTION The clinical probability of PE was assessed by using a computer program that calculated all CDRs and indicated the next diagnostic step. Results of the CDRs and d-dimer tests guided clinical care. MEASUREMENTS Results of the CDRs were compared with the prevalence of PE identified by computed tomography or venous thromboembolism at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS Prevalence of PE was 23%. The proportion of patients categorized as PE-unlikely ranged from 62% (simplified Wells rule) to 72% (Wells rule). Combined with a normal d-dimer result, the CDRs excluded PE in 22% to 24% of patients. The total failure rates of the CDR and d-dimer combinations were similar (1 failure, 0.5% to 0.6% [upper-limit 95% CI, 2.9% to 3.1%]). Even though 30% of patients had discordant CDR outcomes, PE was not detected in any patient with discordant CDRs and a normal d-dimer result. LIMITATION Management was based on a combination of decision rules and d-dimer testing rather than only 1 CDR combined with d-dimer testing. CONCLUSION All 4 CDRs show similar performance for exclusion of acute PE in combination with a normal d-dimer result. This prospective validation indicates that the simplified scores may be used in clinical practice. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Academic Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Maastricht University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center, and Maasstad Hospital.

Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To review the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing in older patients (>50 years) with suspected venous thromboembolism, using conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values. Design Systematic review and bivariate random effects meta-analysis. Data sources We searched Medline and Embase for studies published before 21 June 2012 and we contacted the authors of primary studies. Study selection Primary studies that enrolled older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism in whom D-dimer testing, using both conventional (500 µg/L) and age adjusted (age×10 µg/L) cut-off values, and reference testing were performed. For patients with a non-high clinical probability, 2×2 tables were reconstructed and stratified by age category and applied D-dimer cut-off level. Results 13 cohorts including 12 497 patients with a non-high clinical probability were included in the meta-analysis. The specificity of the conventional cut-off value decreased with increasing age, from 57.6% (95% confidence interval 51.4% to 63.6%) in patients aged 51-60 years to 39.4% (33.5% to 45.6%) in those aged 61-70, 24.5% (20.0% to 29.7% in those aged 71-80, and 14.7% (11.3% to 18.6%) in those aged >80. Age adjusted cut-off values revealed higher specificities over all age categories: 62.3% (56.2% to 68.0%), 49.5% (43.2% to 55.8%), 44.2% (38.0% to 50.5%), and 35.2% (29.4% to 41.5%), respectively. Sensitivities of the age adjusted cut-off remained above 97% in all age categories. Conclusions The application of age adjusted cut-off values for D-dimer tests substantially increases specificity without modifying sensitivity, thereby improving the clinical utility of D-dimer testing in patients aged 50 or more with a non-high clinical probability.

Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded.

Background D-dimer testing to rule out deep vein thrombosis is less useful in older patients because of a lower specificity. An age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value increased the proportion of older patients (>50 years) in whom pulmonary embolism could be excluded. We retrospectively validated the efficacy of this cut-off combined with clinical probability for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis. Design and Methods Five management study cohorts of 2818 consecutive outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis were used. Patients with non-high or unlikely probability of deep vein thrombosis were included in the analysis; four different D-dimer tests were used. The proportion of patients with a normal D-dimer test and the failure rates were calculated using the conventional (500 μg/L) and the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (patients age x 10 μg/L in patients >50 years). Results In 1672 patients with non-high probability, deep vein thrombosis could be excluded in 850 (51%) patients with the age-adjusted cut-off value versus 707 (42%) patients with the conventional cut-off value. The failure rates were 7 (0.8; 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.7%) for the age-adjusted cut-off value and 5 (0.7%, 0.2-1.6%) for the conventional cut-off value. The absolute increase in patients in whom deep vein thrombosis could be ruled out using the age-adjusted cut-off value was largest in patients >70 years: 19% among patients with non-high probability. Conclusions The age-adjusted cut-off of the D-dimer combined with clinical probability greatly increases the proportion of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded.

Incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: prevalence and consequence

INTRODUCTION Careful re-evaluation of CT-scans for cancer staging frequently reveals unsuspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) on CT-scans. However, it is unknown how often these findings lead to anticoagulant treatment in daily clinical practice. METHODS Reports from thoracic and/or abdominal CT-scans performed in a consecutive series of patients to stage cancer were retrospectively evaluated to determine the prevalence of incidental venous thromboembolism (iVTE). Presence of pre-existing signs of VTE, anticoagulant treatment and 3-month follow-up were analysed in patients with iVTE. RESULTS A total of 1466 staging scans (838 patients) from the year 2006 were included in the analysis. The prevalence of VTE in patients was 2.5% (21/838 patients, 95% confidence interval 1.6-3.8%); the prevalence of VTE on scans was 1.4% (21/1466 scans, 95% CI 0.9-2.2%). Incidental PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was observed in 11 (1.3%, 0.7-2.3%) and abdominal vein thrombosis in 9 patients (1.1%, 0.6-2.0%; in the portal (5), mesenteric (3) and renal vein (1), respectively). Nine out of eleven patients with PE/DVT were treated with anticoagulants, while none of the patients with thrombosis in other locations received anticoagulants. One of these patients developed symptomatic PE one month later; otherwise, follow up was uneventful in the untreated patients. CONCLUSION The prevalence of iVTE in patients with cancer in clinical practice is relatively low and most patients with PE or DVT are treated with anticoagulants. For patients with thrombi in other locations, further research is necessary to understand the natural history of these thrombi in order to develop adequate guidelines.

Wells Rule and D-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) cannot be based on clinical features alone because the signs and symptoms of PE are not specific (1). Objective imaging tests, including computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), are therefore warranted to confirm or refute the presence of PE (2). Only 15% to 25% of presenting patients have PE (3), so CTPA is not an appropriate first-line test because of radiation exposure, costs, and risk for contrast-induced nephropathy. To guide decisions about who should be referred for imaging, various diagnostic algorithms have been developed over the past 2 decades. They aim to identify patients at low risk for PE in whom imaging and anticoagulant treatment can be safely withheld. One frequently used algorithm consists of the sequential application of the dichotomized Wells rule (4), which estimates the clinical probability of PE, and d-dimer testing. Pulmonary embolism can be considered ruled out in patients with a Wells score of 4 or less and a negative d-dimer test result (conventionally 500 g/L) (5). This combination is present in approximately 30% to 40% of those with suspected PE (3). The latter proportion is commonly called the efficiency of the algorithm. The proportion of these patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 3-month follow-up (the failure rate) is less than 1% (3). It has recently been shown that the efficiency can be safely increased by applying an age-adjusted d-dimer positivity threshold, which is defined as the age of patients multiplied by 10 g/L in those older than 50 years (6). Although many studies have validated the clinical utility and safety of the dichotomized Wells rule combined with d-dimer testing in excluding PE, an individual-patient data (IPD) meta-analysis can address important questions with greater precision and power. First, what is the overall efficiency and safety of the Wells rule and fixed d-dimer testing? Second, what is the performance of this strategy in clinically important subgroups? Third and most important, how do the efficiency and safety of age-adjusted d-dimer testing compare with fixed d-dimer testing? To answer these questions, we did a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis combining patient-level data from 6 large, prospective outcome studies in which diagnostic management of clinically suspected PE had been guided by the Wells rule and d-dimer testing. Using the fixed and age-adjusted d-dimer thresholds, we estimated the efficiency and failure rate of this diagnostic algorithm overall; in inpatients; and in persons with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), age 75 years or older, previous VTE, and delayed presentation. Methods We developed a protocol (Supplement) and followed the guidance of the PRISMA-IPD (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data) Statement (7). Supplement. Supplementary Material Supplement. Statistical Code Data Sources and Searches We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1 January 1998 (the year in which the Wells score was introduced) (8) to 13 February 2016. The search was based on a previously published search strategy (3), which included terms for pulmonary embolism and d-dimer, and an adapted search filter for diagnostic and prognostic studies (9). We restricted the search to original studies in adults. No language restrictions were applied. The full search strategy is provided in Appendix Table 1. Two authors (N.E. and T.H.) independently screened the titles and abstracts of the identified articles and independently assessed the full-text articles for eligibility. Conflicts were resolved by discussion. Appendix Table 1. Full Electronic Search Strategy Study Selection Eligible studies included those that had prospectively enrolled, consecutive, hemodynamically stable adults presenting in a secondary care setting (emergency department or inpatient ward) with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute PE. At the individual level, the clinical probability of PE had to be assessed by the Wells rule and followed by quantitative d-dimer testing in patients with a Wells score of 4 or less (indicating PE unlikely). According to the study protocol, patients with a PE-unlikely Wells score and a negative d-dimer test result were to be managed without imaging and anticoagulant therapy but prospectively followed for 3 months to document the occurrence of VTE (Appendix Figure). By applying these criteria, we aimed to identify all studies that prospectively evaluated the current diagnostic management of patients with suspected PE in a secondary care setting. Appendix Figure. Diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism in the present IPD meta-analysis. IPD= individual-patient data; PE= pulmonary embolism. * The Wells score is a sum score of the following 7 variables: alternative diagnosis less likely than PE (3 points), clinical signs and symptoms of deep venous thrombosis (3 points), previous deep venous thrombosis or PE (1.5 points), tachycardia (1.5 points), immobilization or surgery within the past 4 wk (1.5 points), active cancer (treatment in the past 6 mo, current treatment, or palliative care; 1 point), and hemoptysis (1 point). Fixed d-dimer testing (500 g/L) or age-adjusted d-dimer testing (age10 g/L in patients aged >50 years), according to study protocol. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment Authors of studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were invited to provide IPD, and all agreed. We sought study-level information on d-dimer assays used; imaging tests done to confirm PE; and definitions of the outcomes, regardless of whether outcome measures were adjudicated by an independent committee. Patient-level data collected at baseline included information on demographics, risk factors for VTE, Wells score items, d-dimer levels (converted to g/L), and results of imaging tests. We also collected follow-up data about anticoagulant treatment for reasons other than VTE, symptomatic VTE, mortality, or loss to follow-up. We followed the subgroup definitions used in each study without any adjustments and ascertained these definitions by the case report forms of the studies and variable labels in the study databases. Two authors who were not involved in the original studies independently assessed each study for potential sources of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool (10). Data Synthesis and Analysis Our analysis focused on the efficiency and failure rate of the diagnostic strategy. Efficiency was defined as the number of patients with a Wells score of 4 or less and a negative d-dimer test result relative to the total number of patients. We evaluated the efficiency of 2 d-dimer positivity thresholds: the conventional, fixed threshold of 500 g/L and an age-adjusted threshold, which was defined as the age of patients multiplied by 10 g/L in patients older than 50 years. For example, the age-adjusted strategy in a patient aged 75 years would lead to a d-dimer positivity threshold of 750 g/L. To evaluate age-adjusted d-dimer testing in our study, we reclassified patients enrolled in studies that evaluated fixed d-dimer testing according to the age-adjusted d-dimer threshold post hoc. The failure rate was defined as the proportion of patients with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, nonfatal PE, or fatal PE during 3-month follow-up or objectively confirmed PE at baseline that was previously ruled out on the basis of a Wells score of 4 or less and a negative d-dimer test result. Death was considered to be caused by PE if it was confirmed by autopsy, if an imaging test for PE yielded positive results just before death, or in the case of sudden death due to unknown reasons. The efficiency and failure rates were calculated overall and in clinically important high-risk subgroups, including inpatients and patients with cancer, COPD, age 51 to 74 years, age 75 years or older, previous VTE, and symptoms lasting more than 7 days. Statistical Analysis To avoid bias associated with excluding missing data (11), we used multiple imputation separately within each study (10 times). The proportion of missing values is reported in Appendix Table 2. Results across the multiply imputed data sets were combined by using the Rubin rule (12) (Appendix). Appendix Table 2. Proportion of Missing Values in Each Study* A single-stage meta-analytic approach was used (13, 14) to analyze the efficiency and failure rates. The overall efficiency (the proportion of patients in whom imaging could be withheld) was estimated using a multilevel logistic regression model (also called a generalized linear mixed-effects model), with the combination of a Wells score of 4 or less and a negative d-dimer test result as the outcome variable. To account for the clustering of observations within studies, we specified a random effect for the intercept. For the analysis in subgroups, we used a full random-effects model (13) by adding the subgroup indicator as a covariate and allowing a study-specific random effect. From these models, we calculated the marginal probabilities (with 95% CIs) of having a PE-unlikely Wells score and a negative d-dimer test result, both overall and in the different subgroups (Appendix). Differences in efficiency between subgroups were tested by using the Wald test statistic with the significance level set at 0.05. The absolute difference in the efficiency of the fixed and age-adjusted d-dimer testing strategies was calculated by subtracting the point estimates of the marginal probabilities from the 2 models. The 95% CIs around these estimates were obtained by repeating the analyses in 500 bootstrap samples (Appendix). Using similar methods, we estimated the failure ratethe proportion of patients with symptomatic VTE during 3-month follow-up in whom the Wells score and d-dimer test result had ruled out PE at baseline. The outcome variable in this multilevel logistic re

Quality of life after pulmonary embolism as assessed with SF-36 and PEmb-QoL

INTRODUCTION Although quality of life (QoL) is recognized as an important indicator of the course of a disease, it has rarely been addressed in studies evaluating the outcome of care for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). This study primarily aimed to evaluate the QoL of patients with acute PE in comparison to population norms and to patients with other cardiopulmonary diseases, using a generic QoL questionnaire. Secondary, the impact of time period from diagnosis and clinical patient characteristics on QoL was assessed, using a disease-specific questionnaire. METHODS QoL was assessed in 109 consecutive out-patients with a history of objectively confirmed acute PE (mean age 60.4 ± 15.0 years, 56 females), using the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the disease specific Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire (PEmb-QoL). The score of the SF-36 were compared with scores of the general Dutch population and reference populations with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), a history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), derived from the literature. Scores on the SF-35 and PEmb-QoL were used to evaluate QoL in the short-term and long-term clinical course of patients with acute PE. In addition, we examined correlations between PEmb-QoL scores and clinical patient characteristics. RESULTS Compared to scores of the general Dutch population, scores of PE patients were worse on several subscales of the SF-36 (social functioning, role emotional, general health (P<0.001), role physical and vitality (P<0.05)). Compared to patients with COPD and CHF, patients with PE scored higher (=better) on all subscales of the SF-36 (P ≤ 0.004) and had scores comparable with patients with AMI the previous year. Comparing intermediately assessed QoL with QoL assessed in long-term follow-up, PE patients scored worse on SF-36 subscales: physical functioning, social functioning, vitality (P<0.05), and on the PEmb-QoL subscales: emotional complaints and limitations in ADL (P ≤ 0.03). Clinical characteristics did not correlate with QoL as measured by PEmb-QoL. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated an impaired QoL in patients after treatment of PE. The results of this study provided more knowledge about QoL in patients treated for PE.

Zika virus and the risk of imported infection in returned travelers: Implications for clinical care

Since late 2015, an unprecedented outbreak of Zika virus is spreading quickly across Southern America. The large size of the current outbreak in The Americas will also result in an increase in Zika virus infections among travelers returning from endemic areas. We report five cases of imported Zika virus infection to The Netherlands. Although the clinical course is usually mild, establishing the diagnosis is important, mainly because of the association with congenital microcephaly and the possibility of sexual transmission.

Clot resolution after 3 weeks of anticoagulant treatment for pulmonary embolism: comparison of computed tomography and perfusion scintigraphy

Little is known about the natural history of clot resolution in the initial weeks of anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Clot resolution of acute PE was assessed with either computed tomography pulmonary angiography scan (CT‐scan) or perfusion scintigraphy scan (Q‐scan) after 3 weeks of treatment.