Renée J. Fontenot
Georgia College & State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Renée J. Fontenot.
Journal of Computer Information Systems | 2013
Bryan Marshall; Peter W. Cardon; Amit Poddar; Renée J. Fontenot
This study examines 83 IS qualitative studies in leading IS journals for the following purposes: (a) identifying the extent to which IS qualitative studies employ best practices of justifying sample size; (b) identifying optimal ranges of interviews for various types of qualitative research; and (c) identifying the extent to which cultural factors (such as journal of publication, number of authors, world region) impact sample size of interviews. Little or no rigor for justifying sample size was shown for virtually all of the IS studies in this dataset. Furthermore, the number of interviews conducted for qualitative studies is correlated with cultural factors, implying the subjective nature of sample size in qualitative IS studies. Recommendations are provided for minimally acceptable practices of justifying sample size of interviews in qualitative IS studies.
Journal of Educators Online | 2015
Renée J. Fontenot; Richard E. Mathisen; Susan S. Carley; Randy Stuart
An exploratory study of undergraduate students enrolled in marketing courses at a Southeastern regional university was conducted to determine the motivations and characteristics of marketing students who plan to be online learners and examined for differences between those who have taken and those who have not taken online classes. An online survey of Likert scales, openended questions and demographic questions was sent via class learning management websites. A total of 165 students of the 438 invited to participate completed the survey. A structural model was developed using SMART-PLS to estimate the relationships of constructs that predict taking online courses. Results of the study showed differences in predictors of those that have taken online courses compared to those who plan on taking online courses. A significant predictor of those planning on taking online courses is quality of learning while a significant predictor of those who have taken online courses is scheduling and timing. The results can be used to examine ways to improve/enhance the student’s educational experience, as well as an institution’s effectiveness in attracting the growing body of online learners.
Archive | 2007
Joe Schwartz; Renée J. Fontenot
Archive | 2012
Renée J. Fontenot; Joe Schwartz; Douglas A. Goings; Judy J. Johnson
Association of Marketing Theory and Practice 2015 | 2015
Renée J. Fontenot; Rick Mathisen
Association of Marketing Theory and Practice 2014 | 2014
Renée J. Fontenot; Rick Mathisen
Association of Marketing Theory and Practice 2013 | 2013
Renée J. Fontenot; Rick Mathisen; Susan S. Carley; Randy Stuart
Association of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011 | 2011
Renée J. Fontenot; Rachel Smith
Association of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011 | 2011
Renée J. Fontenot; Rick Mathisen; Tom W. Miller
Journal of Applied Marketing Theory | 2010
Joe Schwartz; Rick Mathisen; Renée J. Fontenot; Mike Musante