Revathi Ananthakrishnan

The Optical Stretcher: A Novel Laser Tool to Micromanipulate Cells

When a dielectric object is placed between two opposed, nonfocused laser beams, the total force acting on the object is zero but the surface forces are additive, thus leading to a stretching of the object along the axis of the beams. Using this principle, we have constructed a device, called an optical stretcher, that can be used to measure the viscoelastic properties of dielectric materials, including biologic materials such as cells, with the sensitivity necessary to distinguish even between different individual cytoskeletal phenotypes. We have successfully used the optical stretcher to deform human erythrocytes and mouse fibroblasts. In the optical stretcher, no focusing is required, thus radiation damage is minimized and the surface forces are not limited by the light power. The magnitude of the deforming forces in the optical stretcher thus bridges the gap between optical tweezers and atomic force microscopy for the study of biologic materials.

Stretching biological cells with light

The radiation pressure of two counter-propagating laser beams traps and stretches individual biological cells. Using non-focused laser beams, cells stay viable when irradiated with up to 1.4 W of 780 nm Ti-sapphire laser light for several minutes. Fluorescence microscopy has demonstrated that the essential features of the cytoskeleton, excluding stress fibres, are maintained for stretched cells in suspension. The optical stretcher provides accurate measurements of whole cell elasticity and thus can distinguish between different cells by their cytoskeletal characteristics. A model has been derived for the forces on the surface of a spherical cell that explains the observed deformations. The peak stresses on the surface of cells are 1-150 Pa for light powers of 0.2-1.4 W and depending on the refractive index of the cell trapped. Precursors of rat nerve cells exhibit a homogeneous Youngs modulus E of 500±25 Pa, whereas for osmotically inflated, spherical red blood cells (RBCs) the homogeneous Youngs modulus is E = 11.0±0.5 Pa. Thus, PC12 cells are about 40-50 times more elastic than RBCs.

Actin network architecture and elasticity in lamellipodia of melanoma cells

Cell migration is an essential element in the immune response on the one hand and in cancer metastasis on the other hand. The architecture of the actin network in lamellipodia determines the elasticity of the leading edge and contributes to the regulation of migration. We have implemented a new method for the analysis of actin network morphology in the lamellipodia of B16F1 mouse melanoma cells. This method is based on fitting multi-layer geometrical models to electron microscopy images of lamellipodial actin networks. The chosen model and F-actin concentrations are thereby deterministic parameters. Using this approach, we identified distinct structural features of actin networks in lamellipodia. The mesh size which defines the elasticity of the lamellipodium was determined as 34 and 78?nm for a two-layer network at a total actin concentration of 9.6?mg?ml?1. These data lead to estimates of the low frequency elastic shear moduli which differ by more than a magnitude between the two layers. These findings indicate an anisotropic shear modulus of the lamellipodium with the stiffer layer being the dominant structure against deformations in the lamellipodial plane and the softer layer contributing significantly at lower indentations perpendicular to the lamellipodial plane. This combination creates a material that is optimal for pushing forward as well as squeezing through narrow spaces.

A mitotic kinesin-6, Pav-KLP, mediates interdependent cortical reorganization and spindle dynamics in Drosophila embryos.

We investigated the role of Pav-KLP, a kinesin-6, in the coordination of spindle and cortical dynamics during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. In vitro, Pav-KLP behaves as a dimer. In vivo, it localizes to mitotic spindles and furrows. Inhibition of Pav-KLP causes defects in both spindle dynamics and furrow ingression, as well as causing changes in the distribution of actin and vesicles. Thus, Pav-KLP stabilizes the spindle by crosslinking interpolar microtubule bundles and contributes to actin furrow formation possibly by transporting membrane vesicles, actin and/or actin regulatory molecules along astral microtubules. Modeling suggests that furrow ingression during cellularization depends on: (1) a Pav-KLP-dependent force driving an initial slow stage of ingression; and (2) the subsequent Pav-KLP-driven transport of actin- and membrane-containing vesicles to the furrow during a fast stage of ingression. We hypothesize that Pav-KLP is a multifunctional mitotic motor that contributes both to bundling of interpolar microtubules, thus stabilizing the spindle, and to a biphasic mechanism of furrow ingression by pulling down the furrow and transporting vesicles that deliver new material to the descending furrow.