Rhonda R. Whitson

Clinical Policy for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department

[American College of Emergency Physicians: Clinical policy for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med May 1998;31:663-677.].Abstract [American College of Emergency Physicians: Clinical policy for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med May 1998;31:663-677.]

Clinical policy: Critical issues in the prescribing of opioids for adult patients in the emergency department

This clinical policy deals with critical issues in prescribing of opioids for adult patients treated in the emergency department (ED). This guideline is the result of the efforts of the American College of Emergency Physicians, in consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Food and Drug Administration. The critical questions addressed in this clinical policy are: (1) In the adult ED patient with noncancer pain for whom opioid prescriptions are considered, what is the utility of state prescription drug monitoring programs in identifying patients who are at high risk for opioid abuse? (2) In the adult ED patient with acute low back pain, are prescriptions for opioids more effective during the acute phase than other medications? (3) In the adult ED patient for whom opioid prescription is considered appropriate for treatment of new-onset acute pain, are short-acting schedule II opioids more effective than short-acting schedule III opioids? (4) In the adult ED patient with an acute exacerbation of noncancer chronic pain, do the benefits of prescribing opioids on discharge from the ED outweigh the potential harms?

Clinical Policy: Neuroimaging and Decisionmaking in Adult Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting

This clinical policy provides evidence-based recommendations on select issues in the management of adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the acute setting. It is the result of joint efforts between the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and was developed by a multidisciplinary panel. The critical questions addressed in this clinical policy are: (1) Which patients with mild TBI should have a noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department (ED)? (2) Is there a role for head magnetic resonance imaging over noncontrast CT in the ED evaluation of a patient with acute mild TBI? (3) In patients with mild TBI, are brain specific serum biomarkers predictive of an acute traumatic intracranial injury? (4) Can a patient with an isolated mild TBI and a normal neurologic evaluation result be safely discharged from the ED if a noncontrast head CT scan shows no evidence of intracranial injury? Inclusion criteria for application of this clinical policys recommendations are nonpenetrating trauma to the head, presentation to the ED within 24 hours of injury, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or 15 on initial evaluation in the ED, and aged 16 years or greater. The primary outcome measure for questions 1, 2, and 3 is the presence of an acute intracranial injury on noncontrast head CT scan; the primary outcome measure for question 4 is the occurrence of neurologic deterioration.

Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Seizures

This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is the revision of a 2004 policy on critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with seizures in the emergency department. A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following critical questions: (1) In patients with a first generalized convulsive seizure who have returned to their baseline clinical status, should antiepileptic therapy be initiated in the emergency department to prevent additional seizures? (2) In patients with a first unprovoked seizure who have returned to their baseline clinical status in the emergency department, should the patient be admitted to the hospital to prevent adverse events? (3) In patients with a known seizure disorder in which resuming their antiepileptic medication in the emergency department is deemed appropriate, does the route of administration impact recurrence of seizures? (4) In emergency department patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus who continue to have seizures despite receiving optimal dosing of a benzodiazepine, which agent or agents should be administered next to terminate seizures? A literature search was performed, the evidence was graded, and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.

Clinical Policy for the Initial Approach to Patients Presenting With a Chief Complaint of Seizure Who Are Not in Status Epilepticus

Abstract [American College of Emergency Physicians: Clinical policy for the initial approach to patients presenting with a chief complaint of seizure who are not in status epilepticus. Ann Emerg Med May 1997;29:706-724.]

Clinical Policy for the Initial Approach to Patients Presenting With Penetrating Extremity Trauma

Abstract [American College of Emergency Physicians: Clinical policy for the initial approach to patients presenting with penetrating extremity trauma. Ann Emerg Med May 1999;33:612-636.]

Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation of Adult Patients With Suspected Transient Ischemic Attack in the Emergency Department

This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians addresses key issues for adults presenting to the emergency department with suspected transient ischemic attack. A writing subcommittee conducted a systematic review of the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to answer the following clinical questions: (1) In adult patients with suspected transient ischemic attack, are there clinical decision rules that can identify patients at very low short-term risk for stroke who can be safely discharged from the emergency department? (2) In adult patients with suspected transient ischemic attack, what imaging can be safely delayed from the initial emergency department workup? (3) In adult patients with suspected transient ischemic attack, is carotid ultrasonography as accurate as neck computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography in identifying severe carotid stenosis? (4) In adult patients with suspected transient ischemic attack, can a rapid emergency department-based diagnostic protocol safely identify patients at short-term risk for stroke? Evidence was graded and recommendations were made based on the strength of the available data.

Clinical Policy for the Initial Approach to Patients Presenting With Acute Blunt Trauma

[American College of Emergency Physicians: Clinical policy for the initial approach to patients presenting with acute blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med March 1998;31:422-454.].

Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

&NA; This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians addresses key issues in the evaluation and management of patients with suspected non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes. A writing subcommittee conducted a systematic review of the literature to derive evidence‐based recommendations to answer the following clinical questions: (1) In adult patients without evidence of ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome, can initial risk stratification be used to predict a low rate of 30‐day major adverse cardiac events? (2) In adult patients with suspected acute non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome, can troponin testing within 3 hours of emergency department presentation be used to predict a low rate of 30‐day major adverse cardiac events? (3) In adult patients with suspected non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome in whom acute myocardial infarction has been excluded, does further diagnostic testing (eg, provocative, stress test, computed tomography angiography) for acute coronary syndrome prior to discharge reduce 30‐day major adverse cardiac events? (4) Should adult patients with acute non–ST‐elevation myocardial infarction receive immediate antiplatelet therapy in addition to aspirin to reduce 30‐day major adverse cardiac events? Evidence was graded and recommendations were made based on the strength of the available data.

Clinical Policy: Emergency Department Management of Patients Needing Reperfusion Therapy for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the world. More than half a million patients present to emergency departments across the United States each year with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. Timely reperfusion is critical to saving myocardium at risk. Multiple studies have been conducted that demonstrate that improved care processes are linked to improved survival in patients having an acute myocardial infarction. This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians addresses key issues in reperfusion for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A writing subcommittee conducted a systematic review of the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to answer the following clinical questions: (1) In adult patients having an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, are there patients for whom treatment with fibrinolytic therapy decreases the incidence of major adverse cardiac events when percutaneous coronary intervention is delayed? (2) In adult patients having an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, does transfer to a percutaneous coronary intervention center decrease the incidence of major adverse cardiac events? (3) In adult patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, should opioids be avoided to prevent adverse outcomes? Evidence was graded and recommendations were made based on the strength of the available data.