Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ribka Amsalu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ribka Amsalu.


American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2012

Malaria Survey in Post-Earthquake Haiti—2010

David Townes; Alexandre Existe; Jacques Boncy; Roc Magloire; Jean Francois Vely; Ribka Amsalu; Marleen De Tavernier; James Muigai; Sarah Hoibak; Michael Albert; Meredith McMorrow; Laurence Slutsker; S. Patrick Kachur; Michelle Chang

Haitis Ministry of Public Health and Population collaborated with global partners to enhance malaria surveillance in two disaster-affected areas within 3 months of the January 2010 earthquake. Data were collected between March 4 and April 9, 2010 by mobile medical teams. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were used for case confirmation. A convenience sample of 1,629 consecutive suspected malaria patients was included. Of these patients, 1,564 (96%) patients had malaria RDTs performed, and 317 (20.3%) patients were positive. Of the 317 case-patients with a positive RDT, 278 (87.7%) received chloroquine, 8 (2.5%) received quinine, and 31 (9.8%) had no antimalarial treatment recorded. Our experience shows that mobile medical teams trained in the use of malaria RDTs had a high rate of testing suspected malaria cases and that the majority of patients with positive RDTs received appropriate antimalarial treatment. Malaria RDTs were useful in the post-disaster setting where logistical and technical constraints limited the use of microscopy.


Conflict and Health | 2014

Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda

Diane Morof; Kate Kerber; Barbara Tomczyk; Joy E Lawn; Curtis Blanton; Samira Sami; Ribka Amsalu

BackgroundOver 40% of all deaths among children under 5 are neonatal deaths (0–28 days), and this proportion is increasing. In 2012, 2.9 million newborns died, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Many of the countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally are currently or have recently been affected by complex humanitarian emergencies. Despite the global burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality and risks inherent in complex emergency situations, research investments are not commensurate to burden and little is known about the epidemiology or best practices for neonatal survival in these settings.MethodsWe used the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology to prioritize research questions on neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. Experts evaluated 35 questions using four criteria (answerability, feasibility, relevance, equity) with three subcomponents per criterion. Using SAS 9.2, a research prioritization score (RPS) and average expert agreement score (AEA) were calculated for each question.ResultsTwenty-eight experts evaluated all 35 questions. RPS ranged from 0.846 to 0.679 and the AEA ranged from 0.667 to 0.411. The top ten research priorities covered a range of issues but generally fell into two categories– epidemiologic and programmatic components of neonatal health. The highest ranked question in this survey was “What strategies are effective in increasing demand for, and use of skilled attendance?”ConclusionsIn this study, a diverse group of experts used the CHRNI methodology to systematically identify and determine research priorities for neonatal health and survival in complex humanitarian emergencies. The priorities included the need to better understand the magnitude of the disease burden and interventions to improve neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. The findings from this study will provide guidance to researchers and program implementers in neonatal and complex humanitarian fields to engage on the research priorities needed to save lives most at risk.


Conflict and Health | 2012

Neonatal survival interventions in humanitarian emergencies: a survey of current practices and programs.

Jennifer O. Lam; Ribka Amsalu; Kate Kerber; Joy E Lawn; Basia Tomczyk; Nadine Cornier; Alma J Adler; Anne Golaz; William J. Moss

BackgroundNeonatal deaths account for over 40% of all deaths in children younger than five years of age and neonatal mortality rates are highest in areas affected by humanitarian emergencies. Of the ten countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally, six are currently or recently affected by a humanitarian emergency. Yet, little is known about newborn care in crisis settings. Understanding current policies and practices for the care of newborns used by humanitarian aid organizations will inform efforts to improve care in these challenging settings.MethodsBetween August 18 and September 25, 2009, 56 respondents that work in humanitarian emergencies completed a web-based survey either in English or French. A snow ball sampling technique was used to identify organizations that provide health services during humanitarian emergencies to gather information on current practices for maternal and newborn care in these settings. Information was collected about continuum-of-care services for maternal, newborn and child health, referral services, training and capacity development, health information systems, policies and guidelines, and organizational priorities. Data were entered into MS Excel and frequencies and percentages were calculated.ResultsThe majority of responding organizations reported implementing components of neonatal and maternal health interventions. However, multiple barriers exist in providing comprehensive care, including: funding shortages (63.3%), gaps in training (51.0%) and staff shortages and turnover (44.9%).ConclusionsNeonatal care is provided by most of the responding humanitarian organizations; however, the quality, breadth and consistency of this care are limited.


The Lancet | 2018

Implementing sexual and reproductive health care in humanitarian crises

Sarah K Chynoweth; Ribka Amsalu; Sara E. Casey; Therese McGinn

1770 www.thelancet.com Vol 391 May 5, 2018 one in five women in complex emergencies having suffered sexual violence. Clinical management of rape is a minimum standard in the delivery of humanitarian health services, as set forth in guidance from the InterAgency Standing Committee and WHO. Nevertheless, implementation of this life-saving care remains on an ad-hoc basis, even in settings where ample evidence exists that sexual violence is widespread, such as in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Further research and innovation relating to health in humanitarian crises are needed; however, research and innovation alone are insufficient to meet the health needs of crisis-affected populations. It is important that humanitarian actors apply existing evidence to reduce preventable mortality and morbidity, and to promote wellbeing. During humanitarian crises, donors, aid agencies, and ministries of health should prioritise and reinforce the application of the highest standard of health care, including for sexual and reproductive health. We already know that these interventions save lives and are feasible in humanitarian settings—now we must systematically use this evidence.


BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2018

Understanding health systems to improve community and facility level newborn care among displaced populations in South Sudan: A mixed methods case study

Samira Sami; Ribka Amsalu; Alexander Dimiti; Debra Jackson; Solomon Kenyi; Janet Meyers; Luke C. Mullany; Elaine Scudder; Barbara Tomczyk; Kate Kerber

BackgroundTargeted clinical interventions have been associated with a decreased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. In conflict-affected countries such as South Sudan, however, implementation of lifesaving interventions face barriers and facilitators that are not well understood. We aimed to describe the factors that influence implementation of a package of facility- and community-based neonatal interventions in four displaced person camps in South Sudan using a health systems framework.MethodsWe used a mixed method case study design to document the implementation of neonatal interventions from June to November 2016 in one hospital, four primary health facilities, and four community health programs operated by International Medical Corps. We collected primary data using focus group discussions among health workers, in-depth interviews among program managers, and observations of health facility readiness. Secondary data were gathered from documents that were associated with the implementation of the intervention during our study period.ResultsKey bottlenecks for implementing interventions in our study sites were leadership and governance for comprehensive neonatal services, health workforce for skilled care, and service delivery for small and sick newborns. Program managers felt national policies failed to promote integration of key newborn interventions in donor funding and clinical training institutions, resulting in deprioritizing newborn health during humanitarian response. Participants confirmed that severe shortage of skilled care at birth was the main bottleneck for implementing quality newborn care. Solutions to this included authorizing the task-shifting of emergency newborn care to mid-level cadre, transitioning facility-based traditional birth attendants to community health workers, and scaling up institutions to upgrade community midwives into professional midwives. Additionally, ongoing supportive supervision, educational materials, and community acceptance of practices enabled community health workers to identify and refer small and sick newborns.ConclusionsImproving integration of newborn interventions into national policies, training institutions, health referral systems, and humanitarian supply chain can expand emergency care provided to women and their newborns in these contexts.


Reproductive Health Matters | 2017

“You have to take action”: changing knowledge and attitudes towards newborn care practices during crisis in South Sudan

Samira Sami; Kate Kerber; Barbara Tomczyk; Ribka Amsalu; Debra Jackson; Elaine Scudder; Alexander Dimiti; Janet Meyers; Kemish Kenneth; Solomon Kenyi; Caitlin E. Kennedy; Kweku Ackom; Luke C. Mullany

Abstract Highest rates of neonatal mortality occur in countries that have recently experienced conflict. International Medical Corps implemented a package of newborn interventions in June 2016, based on the Newborn health in humanitarian settings: field guide, targeting community- and facility-based health workers in displaced person camps in South Sudan. We describe health workers’ knowledge and attitudes toward newborn health interventions, before and after receiving clinical training and supplies, and recommend dissemination strategies for improved uptake of newborn guidelines during crises. A mixed methods approach was utilised, including pre–post knowledge tests and in-depth interviews. Study participants were community- and facility-based health workers in two internally displaced person camps located in Juba and Malakal and two refugee camps in Maban from March to October 2016. Mean knowledge scores for newborn care practices and danger signs increased among 72 community health workers (pre-training: 5.8 [SD: 2.3] vs. post-training: 9.6 [SD: 2.1]) and 25 facility-based health workers (pre-training: 14.2 [SD: 2.7] vs. post-training: 17.4 [SD: 2.8]). Knowledge and attitudes toward key essential practices, such as the use of partograph to assess labour progress, early initiation of breastfeeding, skin-to-skin care and weighing the baby, improved among skilled birth attendants. Despite challenges in conflict-affected settings, conducting training has the potential to increase health workers’ knowledge on neonatal health post-training. The humanitarian community should reinforce this knowledge with key actions to shift cultural norms that expand the care provided to women and their newborns in these contexts.


PLOS ONE | 2017

Twelve-month contraceptive continuation among women initiating short- and long-acting reversible contraceptives in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Sara E. Casey; Amy Cannon; Benjamin Mushagalusa Balikubirhi; Jean-Bosco Muyisa; Ribka Amsalu; Maria Tsolka

Context Despite the inclusion of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in the minimum standards of health care in humanitarian settings, access to SRH services, and especially to contraception, is often compromised in war. Very little is known about continuation and switching of contraceptive methods in these settings. An evaluation of a contraceptive services program in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) was conducted to measure 12-month contraceptive continuation by type of contraceptive method (short-acting or long-acting). Methods A stratified systematic sample of women who initiated a contraceptive method 12–18 months prior to data collection was selected retrospectively from facility registers. A total of 548 women was interviewed about their contraceptive use: 304 who began a short-acting method (pills, injectables) and 244 who began a long-acting method (intra-uterine devices, implants). Key characteristics of short-acting method versus long-acting method acceptors were compared using chi-square statistics for categorical data and t-tests for continuous data. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios were estimated to assess factors associated with discontinuation. Results At 12 months, 81.6% women reported using their baseline contraceptive method continuously, with more long-acting than short-acting contraceptive acceptors (86.1% versus 78.0%, p = .02) continuing contraceptive use. Use of a short-acting method (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.74 [95%CI 1.13–2.67]) and desiring a child within two years (HR 2.58 [95%CI 1.45–4.54]) were associated with discontinuation within the first 12 months of use. The vast majority (88.3%) of women reported no prior contraceptive use. Conclusion This is the first study of contraceptive continuation in a humanitarian setting. The high percentages of women continuing contraceptive use found here demonstrates that women will choose to initiate and continue use of their desired contraceptive method, even in a difficult, unstable and low contraceptive prevalence setting like North Kivu.


Conflict and Health | 2011

Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries

Therese McGinn; Judy Austin; Katherine Anfinson; Ribka Amsalu; Sara E. Casey; Shihab Ibrahim Fadulalmula; Anne Langston; Louise Lee-Jones; Janet Meyers; Frederick Kintu Mubiru; Jennifer Schlecht; Melissa Sharer; Mary Yetter


The Lancet Global Health | 2017

Clinical training and trainee follow-up systems to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception in conflict settings

Ribka Amsalu; Maria Tsolka; Jean Bosco Muyisa; Felipe Rojas Lopez; Amy Cannon


Reproductive Health | 2017

State of newborn care in South Sudan’s displacement camps: a descriptive study of facility-based deliveries

Samira Sami; Kate Kerber; Solomon Kenyi; Ribka Amsalu; Barbara Tomczyk; Debra Jackson; Alexander Dimiti; Elaine Scudder; Janet Meyers; Jean Paul De Charles Umurungi; Kemish Kenneth; Luke C. Mullany

Collaboration


Dive into the Ribka Amsalu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Tomczyk

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samira Sami

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Solomon Kenyi

International Medical Corps

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Debra Jackson

University of the Western Cape

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge