Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ricard Vilalta is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ricard Vilalta.


Optics Express | 2013

Experimental demonstration of an OpenFlow based software-defined optical network employing packet, fixed and flexible DWDM grid technologies on an international multi-domain testbed

Mayur Channegowda; Reza Nejabati; M. Rashidi Fard; Shuping Peng; Norberto Amaya; Georgios Zervas; Dimitra Simeonidou; Ricard Vilalta; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Raul Muñoz; Lei Liu; Takehiro Tsuritani; Itsuro Morita; Achim Autenrieth; J.P. Elbers; Pawel Kostecki; Pawel Kaczmarek

Software defined networking (SDN) and flexible grid optical transport technology are two key technologies that allow network operators to customize their infrastructure based on application requirements and therefore minimizing the extra capital and operational costs required for hosting new applications. In this paper, for the first time we report on design, implementation & demonstration of a novel OpenFlow based SDN unified control plane allowing seamless operation across heterogeneous state-of-the-art optical and packet transport domains. We verify and experimentally evaluate OpenFlow protocol extensions for flexible DWDM grid transport technology along with its integration with fixed DWDM grid and layer-2 packet switching.


Journal of Lightwave Technology | 2013

Field Trial of an OpenFlow-Based Unified Control Plane for Multilayer Multigranularity Optical Switching Networks

Lei Liu; Dongxu Zhang; Takehiro Tsuritani; Ricard Vilalta; Ramon Casellas; Linfeng Hong; Itsuro Morita; Hongxiang Guo; Jian Wu; Ricardo Martínez; Raul Muñoz

Software defined networking and OpenFlow, which allow operators to control the network using software running on a network operating system within an external controller, provide the maximum flexibility for the operator to control a network, and match the carriers preferences given its centralized architecture, simplicity, and manageability. In this paper, we report a field trial of an OpenFlow-based unified control plane (UCP) for multilayer multigranularity optical switching networks, verifying its overall feasibility and efficiency, and quantitatively evaluating the latencies for end-to-end path creation and restoration. To the best of our knowledge, the field trial of an OpenFlow-based UCP for optical networks is a world first.


IEEE\/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking | 2013

Control and management of flexi-grid optical networks with an integrated stateful path computation element and OpenFlow controller [invited]

Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Raul Muñoz; Ricard Vilalta; Lei Liu; Takehiro Tsuritani; Itsuro Morita

A path computation element (PCE) is briefly defined as a control plane functional component (physical or logical) that is able to perform constrained path computation on a graph representing (a subset of) a network. A stateful PCE is a PCE that is able to consider the set of active connections, and its development is motivated by the fact that such knowledge enables the deployment of improved, more efficient algorithms. Additionally, a stateful PCE is said to be active if it is also able to affect (modify or suggest the modification of) the state of such connections. A stateful active PCE is thus able not only to use the knowledge of the active connections as available information during the computation, but also to reroute existing ones, resulting in a more efficient use of resources and the ability to dynamically arrange and reoptimize the network. An OpenFlow controller is a logically centralized entity that implements a control plane and configures the forwarding plane of the underlying network devices using the OpenFlow protocol. From a control plane perspective, an OpenFlow controller and the aforementioned stateful PCE have several functions in common, for example, in what concerns network topology or connection management. That said, both entities also complement each other, since a PCE is responsible mainly for path computation accessible via an open, standard, and flexible protocol, and the OpenFlow controller assumes the task of the actual data plane forwarding provisioning. In other words, the stateful PCE becomes active by virtue of relying on an OpenFlow controller for the establishment of connections. In this framework, the integration of both entities presents an opportunity allowing a return on investment, reduction of operational expenses, and reduction of time to market, resulting in an efficient approach to operate transport networks. In this paper, we detail the design, implementation, and experimental evaluation of a centralized control plane based on a stateful PCE, acting as an OpenFlow controller, targeting the control and management of optical networks. We detail the extensions toboth the OpenFlow and the PCE communication protocol (PCEP), addressing the requirements of elastic optical networks as well as the system performance, obtained when deployed in a laboratory trial.


Journal of Lightwave Technology | 2015

Transport Network Orchestration for End-to-End Multilayer Provisioning Across Heterogeneous SDN/OpenFlow and GMPLS/PCE Control Domains

Raul Muñoz; Ricard Vilalta; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Frederic Francois; Mayur Channegowda; Ali Hammad; Shuping Peng; Reza Nejabati; Dimitra Simeonidou; Noboru Yoshikane; Takehiro Tsuritani; Victor Lopez; Achim Autenrieth

A multidomain optical transport network composed of heterogeneous optical transport technologies (e.g., flexi/fixed-grid optical circuit switching and optical packet switching) and control plane technologies (e.g., centralized OpenFlow or distributed GMPLS) does not naturally interoperate, and a network orchestration mechanism is required. A network orchestrator allows the composition of end-to-end network service provisioning across multidomain optical networks comprising different transport and control plane technologies. Software-defined networking (SDN) is a key technology to address this requirement, since the separation of control and data planes makes the SDN a suitable candidate for end-to-end provisioning service orchestration across multiple domains with heterogeneous control and transport technologies. This paper presents two different network orchestrations architectures based on the application-based network operations (ABNO) which is being defined by IETF based on standard building blocks. Then, we experimentally assesses in the international testbed of the STRAUSS project, an ABNO-based network orchestrator for end-to-end multi-layer (OPS and Flexi-grid OCS) and multidomain provisioning across heterogeneous control domains (SDN/OpenFlow and GMPLS/Stateful PCE) employing dynamic domain abstraction based on virtual node aggregation.


IEEE\/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking | 2015

Integrated SDN/NFV management and orchestration architecture for dynamic deployment of virtual SDN control instances for virtual tenant networks [invited]

Raul Muñoz; Ricard Vilalta; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Thomas Szyrkowiec; Achim Autenrieth; Victor Lopez; Diego R. Lopez

Software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) have emerged as the most promising candidates for improving network function and protocol programmability and dynamic adjustment of network resources. On the one hand, SDN is responsible for providing an abstraction of network resources through well-defined application programming interfaces. This abstraction enables SDN to perform network virtualization, that is, to slice the physical infrastructure and create multiple coexisting application-specific virtual tenant networks (VTNs) with specific quality-of-service and service-levelagreement requirements, independent of the underlying optical transport technology and network protocols. On the other hand, the notion of NFV relates to deploying network functions that are typically deployed in specialized and dedicated hardware, as software instances [called virtual network functions (VNFs)] running on commodity servers (e.g., in data centers) through software virtualization techniques. Despite all the attention that has been given to virtualizing IP functions (e.g., firewall; authentication, authorization, and accounting) or Long-Term Evolution control functions (e.g., mobility management entity, serving gateway, and packet data network gateway), some transport control functions can also be virtualized and moved to the cloud as a VNF. In this work we propose virtualizing the tenant SDN control functions of a VTN and moving them into the cloud. The control of a VTN is a key requirement associated with network virtualization, since it allows the dynamic programming (i.e., direct control and configuration) of the virtual resources allocated to the VTN. We experimentally assess and evaluate the first SDN/NFV orchestration architecture in a multipartner testbed to dynamically deploy independent SDN controller instances for each instantiated VTN and to provide the required connectivity within minutes.


Journal of Lightwave Technology | 2014

PCE: What is It, How Does It Work and What are Its Limitations?

Raul Muñoz; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Ricard Vilalta

In GMPLS-controlled optical networks, the utilization of source-based path computation has some limitations, especially in large networks with stringent constraints (e.g., optical impairments) or in multilayer and multidomain networks, which leads to suboptimal routing solutions. The path computation eElement (PCE) can mitigate some weaknesses of GMPLS-controlled optical networks. The main idea behind the PCE is to decouple the path computation function from the GMPLS controllers into a dedicated entity with an open and well-defined interface and protocol. A (stateless) PCE is capable of computing a network path or route based on a network graph (i.e., the traffic engineering database-TED) and applying computational constraints. First, we present an overview of the PCE architecture and its communication protocol (PCEP). Then, we present in detail the considered source-routing shortcomings in GMPLS-controlled networks, namely, impairment-aware path computation, multidomain path computation and multilayer path computation, as well as the different PCE-based solutions that have been proposed to overcome each one of these problems. However, PCE-based computation also presents some limitations that lead to an increase in the path computation blocking or to suboptimal path computations. The stateful PCE overcomes the limitations of the stateless PCE, such as the outdated TED, the lack of global LSP state (i.e., set of computed paths and reserved resources in use in the network), and the lack of control of path reservations. A passive stateful PCE allows optimal path computation and increased path computation success, considering both the network state (TED) and the Label Switched Paths (LSP) state (LSP Database-LSPDB). Additionally, an active stateful PCE can modify existing LSPs (i.e., connections), and optionally, setup and/or release existing LSPs. Finally, the formal decoupling of the path computation allows more flexibility in the deployment of PCEs in other control paradigms outside their original scope (MPLS/GMPLS). In this sense, we provide an overview of three PCE deployment models in the software defined network (SDN) control architecture.


Journal of Lightwave Technology | 2015

SDN-Based Network Orchestration of Variable-Capacity Optical Packet Switching Network Over Programmable Flexi-Grid Elastic Optical Path Network

Yuki Yoshida; Akihiro Maruta; Ken-ichi Kitayama; Masato Nishihara; Toshiki Tanaka; Tomoo Takahara; Jens C. Rasmussen; Noboru Yoshikane; Takehiro Tsuritani; Itsuro Morita; Shuangyi Yan; Yi Shu; Yan Yan; Reza Nejabati; Georgios Zervas; Dimitra Simeonidou; Ricard Vilalta; Raul Muñoz; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Alejandro Aguado; Victor Lopez; Jaume Marhuenda

A multidomain and multitechnology optical network orchestration is demonstrated in an international testbed located in Japan, the U.K., and Spain. The application-based network operations architecture is proposed as a carrier software-defined network solution for provisioning end-to-end optical transport services through a multidomain multitechnology network scenario, consisting of a 46-108 Gb/s variable-capacity OpenFlow-capable optical packet switching network and a programmable, flexi-grid elastic optical path network.


Journal of Lightwave Technology | 2016

SDN-Enabled Sliceable BVT Based on Multicarrier Technology for Multiflow Rate/Distance and Grid Adaptation

Michela Svaluto Moreolo; Josep M. Fabrega; Laia Nadal; Francisco Javier Vílchez; Arturo Mayoral; Ricard Vilalta; Raul Muñoz; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Masato Nishihara; Toshiki Tanaka; Tomoo Takahara; Jens C. Rasmussen; Christoph Kottke; Michael Schlosser; Ronald Freund; Fanchao Meng; Shuangyi Yan; Georgios Zervas; Dimitra Simeonidou; Yuki Yoshida; Ken-ichi Kitayama

We propose a sliceable bandwidth variable transceiver (S-BVT) architecture suitable for metro/regional elastic networks and highly scalable data center applications. It adopts multicarrier modulation, either OFDM or DMT, and a cost-effective optoelectronic front-end. The high-capacity S-BVT is programmable, adaptive, and reconfigurable by an SDN controller for efficient resource usage, enabling unique granularity, flexibility, and grid adaptation, even in the conventional fixed-grid networks. We experimentally demonstrate its multiple advanced functionalities in a four-node photonic mesh network. This includes SDN-enabled rate/distance adaptive multiflow generation and routing/switching, slice-ability, flexibility, and adaptability for the mitigation of spectrum fragmentation, as well as for a soft migration toward the flexi-grid paradigm.


european conference on networks and communications | 2015

The need for a Control Orchestration Protocol in research projects on optical networking

Ricard Vilalta; Victor Lopez; Arturo Mayoral; Noboru Yoshikane; Marco Ruffini; Domenico Siracusa; R. Martínez; Thomas Szyrkowiec; Achim Autenrieth; Shuping Peng; Ramon Casellas; Reza Nejabati; Dimitra Simeonidou; X. Cao; Takehiro Tsuritani; Itsuro Morita; Juan Pedro Fernández-Palacios; R. Munoz

The Control Orchestration Protocol (COP) abstracts a common set of control plane functions used by an various SDN controllers, allowing the interworking of heterogeneous control plane paradigms (i.e., OpenFlow, GMPLS/PCE). COP has been defined using YANG model language and can be transported using RESTconf, which is being incorporated by industry. COP has been defined in the scope of STRAUSS due to the need for an overarching control plane protocol for network orchestration. In this paper, several research projects describe how the COP could fit in their architecture and propose a use case for COP usage. The proposed COP use cases cover the following research projects: STRAUSS, IDEALIST, DISCUS, COMBO, INSPACE.


optical fiber communication conference | 2016

End-to-end SDN orchestration of IoT services using an SDN/NFV-enabled edge node

Ricard Vilalta; Arturo Mayoral; David Pubill; Ramon Casellas; Ricardo Martínez; Jordi Serra; Christos V. Verikoukis; Raul Muñoz

We propose an SDN/NFV-enabled edge node for IoT Services by means of orchestration of integrated Cloud/Fog and network resources. Network connectivity is provided between IoT gateways and deployed virtual machines allocated at the edge node.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ricard Vilalta's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Josep M. Fabrega

Polytechnic University of Catalonia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge