Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ricarda Mewes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ricarda Mewes.


Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2010

Updates on the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder: A population-based survey

Ulrike Buhlmann; Heide Glaesmer; Ricarda Mewes; Jeanne M. Fama; Sabine Wilhelm; Elmar Brähler; Winfried Rief

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is characterised by a preoccupation with perceived defects in ones appearance, which leads to significant distress and/or impairment. Although several studies have investigated the prevalence of BDD, many studies have methodological limitations (e.g., small sample sizes and student populations), and studies on the prevalence of BDD in the general population are limited. In the current study, 2510 individuals participated in a representative German nationwide survey. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria for BDD and associated characteristics such as suicidality and the prevalence of plastic surgeries were examined using self-report questionnaires. The prevalence of current BDD was 1.8% (N=45). Further, individuals with BDD, relative to individuals without BDD, reported significantly more often a history of cosmetic surgery (15.6% vs. 3.0%), higher rates of suicidal ideation (31.0% vs. 3.5%) and suicide attempts due to appearance concerns (22.2% vs. 2.1%). The current findings are consistent with previous findings, indicating that self-reported BDD is a common disorder associated with significant morbidity.


British Journal of Health Psychology | 2012

Psychometric properties and population-based norms of the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R).

Heide Glaesmer; Winfried Rief; Alexandra Martin; Ricarda Mewes; Elmar Brähler; Markus Zenger; Andreas Hinz

OBJECTIVES The relevance of the construct optimism in health psychology has been convincingly demonstrated in numerous studies. Population-based studies about dispositional optimism and the psychometric properties of the Life Orientation Test LOT-R as well as population-based norms are lacking. DESIGN A representative population survey in Germany was conducted to investigate psychometric properties of the LOT-R and to deliver population-based norms. METHODS A representative sample of 2,372 adults aged 18-93 years were screened using self-rating instruments. Results. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed two factors. Optimism and pessimism are negatively correlated (r=-.20). Indications for convergent validity were demonstrated with depression, satisfaction with life, subjective state of health and health care utilization. Optimism is more strongly related to all indicators than pessimism. Since there are only marginal age and gender differences, norm data are given for the entire population. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms the bi-dimensionality of the LOT-R and thus underpins that optimism and pessimism are two independent constructs rather than a single bipolar trait. Psychometric properties were found to be satisfactory. Together with the norm values reported in the paper, this instrument can, thus, be employed to measure dispositional optimism or pessimism in individual diagnostics as well as in epidemiological research.


Psychiatrische Praxis | 2009

Sind Migranten häufiger von psychischen Störungen betroffen

Heide Glaesmer; Ulla Wittig; Elmar Brähler; Alexander Martin; Ricarda Mewes; Winfried Rief

OBJECTIVES There are few, methodically heterogeneous and unsatisfactory studies about the mental health of immigrants. Commonly, these studies refer to a single group of immigrants and in consequence general statements about the mental health of immigrants are impossible. METHODS In a representative population survey in Germany (N = 2 510) depressive and somatoform symptoms were screened with the Patients Health Questionnaire, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder was screened with the PTDS. If at least one parent was born abroad, people are classified as immigrants. RESULTS 11.1 % of the sample are immigrants, which are mostly better integrated ones. There are no significant differences in the prevalence of the investigated mental disorders of immigrants compared to the native population. CONCLUSION The sample includes a large variety of immigrants living in Germany and does not refer to a single group. Asylum seekers and undocumented migrants are not included, those immigrants with low language skills might be underrepresented because of the methodology. Against our expectations, no differences in the mental health between imigrants and native Germans could be proven. This finding stands in a marked contrast to the well established deficit-oriented point of view on the health of immigrants.


Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease | 2011

Lifetime traumatic experiences and posttraumatic stress disorder in the German population: results of a representative population survey.

Robin Hauffa; Winfried Rief; Elmar Brähler; Alexandra Martin; Ricarda Mewes; Heide Glaesmer

Abstract Only a few European population-based studies on the epidemiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are available to date. This study aims to broaden the epidemiological knowledge of traumatic experiences (TEs), PTSD, and comorbid mental conditions in a representative German sample (N = 2510). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview list of traumatic events, the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 as well as PHQ-15 were used in this survey. Main results were low frequencies of TEs (24%) and PTSD (2.9%). Older participants (>60 years) reported significantly more TEs and more posttraumatic symptoms, whereas there was no significant difference in PTSD prevalence. A third of the subjects diagnosed with PTSD were found positive for depressive syndromes, and 27% were found positive for somatization syndrome. The results show that TEs and posttraumatic symptoms are frequent in senior citizens and thus have to be considered when treating older patients with mental health conditions.


Psychosomatic Medicine | 2010

Are psychological features useful in classifying patients with somatic symptoms

Winfried Rief; Ricarda Mewes; Alexandra Martin; Heide Glaesmer; Elmar Braehler

Objective: To evaluate psychological characteristics that could be used for the classification of somatic syndromes requesting medical care. Positive psychological classification criteria are needed to justify the classification of somatic syndromes as Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- or International Classification of Diseases-10 section F/mental disorders diagnosis. Methods: From a population-based sample of 2510 people, subsamples reporting high scores for somatic symptoms (SOM+; n = 154) versus average scores for somatic symptoms (SOM−; n = 167) were defined. Telephone interviews (e.g., structured interviews for diagnoses, healthcare use, symptom history, possible psychological characteristics), self-rating scales (e.g., Pain Disability Index, depression scale Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and general practitioners reports were collected for these subsamples. In addition to somatic symptoms, we used healthcare use and disability as major external validation criteria. Results: There was strong evidence for ten of the 28 binary coded psychological variables to identify those people with somatic symptoms who needed medical help and/or were seriously disabled. These variables included “avoidance of physical activities,” “bias for somatic illness attributions,” “self-concept of being physically weak,” and “desperation because of somatic symptoms.” The relevance of these psychological characteristics was partially further confirmed by stepwise regression analyses, which showed incremental validity compared with variables like somatic symptoms and depression. Conclusions: This study identified several psychological characteristics of people with somatic complaints who need medical care. These features can be assessed, using binary variables that are more feasible for classification processes. These psychological criteria should be included in classification rules for people with somatic syndromes (e.g., somatoform disorders). PHQ = Patient Health Questionnaire; PDI = Pain Disability Index.


Pain | 2009

What is “normal” disability? An investigation of disability in the general population

Ricarda Mewes; Winfried Rief; Nikola Stenzel; Heide Glaesmer; Alexandra Martin; Elmar Brähler

ABSTRACT Many studies have investigated the highly relevant association between pain and disability in clinical groups using the Pain Disability Index (PDI). To interpret these results, knowledge of disability in the general population is crucial. Moreover, to investigate criterion validity of the PDI, the influence on health care utilisation (HCU) is of special interest. In the present study, a broadened version of the PDI was psychometrically evaluated with a large representative sample of the general population. The independent impact of disability on HCU was also investigated. A representative sample of the German general population (N = 2510) was screened for disability, somatic complaints, mental health (PHQ) and HCU. Following a psychometric evaluation of the PDI, data are provided about the distribution of disability in the general population. For the prediction of HCU, stepwise linear regression analysis was calculated. The psychometric evaluation of the PDI revealed a one‐factor solution, high reliability, and satisfactory construct validity. Percentage scores for the distribution of disability are provided for those people reporting at least one pain/somatic symptom. These data allow a better description of disability in clinical samples. Somatic complaints, disability, unemployment or retirement, depression and anxiety explained 26% of the variance for HCU. The PDI is an economical, reliable and valid self‐rating instrument for assessing disability caused by physical symptoms. HCU in the general population is determined by the number and severity of somatic complaints and also by disability. Symptoms and disability play a crucial but somewhat independent role.


Psychosomatic Medicine | 2011

Evaluating new proposals for the psychiatric classification of patients with multiple somatic symptoms.

Winfried Rief; Ricarda Mewes; Alexandra Martin; Heide Glaesmer; Elmar Brähler

Objectives: The current DSM-IV classification of somatoform disorders has been criticized, and several new proposals for classification have been suggested (e.g., DSM-V work group: complex somatic symptom disorder [CSSD]). Our aim was to empirically validate and compare new proposals for the classification of people with multiple somatic complaints. Methods: Three hundred twenty-one participants were selected from a general population sample of more than 2500; half were selected from a subgroup with increased somatization scores (Patient Health Questionnaire 15-item somatic symptom subscale). Clinical and psychological variables and health care use were assessed with interviews and self-ratings to validate the new proposals. In addition, a high-risk group was defined to check whether new classification proposals could identify people in this a priori defined group; criteria for this high-risk group were disabling medically unexplained somatic symptoms and increased health care use. To analyze the stability of the syndromes, participants were recontacted 1 year later (completion rate, 76%). Results: The DSM-V proposal for CSSD shows good validity in the identification of people with disability and people requiring medical treatment. It is still restrictive but to a much lesser degree than the current somatization disorder: 29% of our a priori high-risk group was identified, whereas none of the participants fulfilled criteria for somatization disorder. For most proposals, the temporal stability is satisfactory yet substantially lower than expected for clinical samples. Classification criteria that include psychological features are advantageous in identifying people with health care needs. Conclusions: Whereas some validation criteria for the new proposals (including CSSD) are satisfactory, most of the new proposals are still restrictive.CSSD = complex somatic symptom disorder; HCU = health care use; SSI = somatic symptom index; PHQ = Patient Health Questionnaire; MSD = multisomatoform disorder; PSDD = polysymptomatic distress disorder; PDI = Pain Disability Index; BDD = bodily distress disorder


General Hospital Psychiatry | 2008

Lower decision threshold for doctor visits as a predictor of health care use in somatoform disorders and in the general population

Ricarda Mewes; Winfried Rief; Elmar Brähler; Alexandra Martin; Heide Glaesmer

OBJECTIVE Somatization is related to elevated health care utilization (HCU) and high health care costs. However, it is unclear whether HCU in somatizers and nonsomatizers in the general population is determined by existing symptoms or by lower thresholds for doctor visits. METHOD A representative sample of the German general population (N=2510) was screened for psychopathology and HCU in the prior 12 months. The sample was subdivided into somatizers (n=712) and controls (n=1796), using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15). A general tendency to visit doctors even for minor reasons was assessed. Demographic and psychopathological variables were additionally entered into regression analyses to predict HCU for the whole investigated sample and the two subsamples. RESULTS Higher somatization, unemployment or retirement, a lower decision threshold for doctor visits and higher posttraumatic symptomatology were consistent and unique positive predictors of HCU in the prior 12 months. CONCLUSION Not only symptoms per se but also a lower decision threshold for doctor visits contribute to increased HCU. Psychopathological and demographic variables can further predict HCU in somatizing persons and controls. Although somatization and reduced thresholds for doctor visits are associated, they have to be distinguished from each other and contribute independently to increased costs.


Psychoneuroendocrinology | 2016

Stress exacerbates pain in the everyday lives of women with fibromyalgia syndrome—The role of cortisol and alpha-amylase

Susanne Fischer; Johanna M. Doerr; Jana Strahler; Ricarda Mewes; K. Thieme; Urs M. Nater

OBJECTIVE Although fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic condition, its cardinal symptom pain is known to fluctuate over the day. Stress has often been claimed to exacerbate pain; however, there is barely any evidence on whether or not this is true on a day-to-day basis (and, alternatively, on whether pain leads to increased stress levels). Using an ecologically valid measurement design, we tested whether and how stress and pain are intertwined in participants with FMS. We additionally examined the role of the two major stress-responsive systems, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system, as potential mediators of this relationship. METHODS An ambulatory assessment study was conducted over the course of 14 days. On each day, 32 females with FMS provided six diary entries on momentary stress and pain levels. Saliva samples were collected at the same time points to determine cortisol and alpha-amylase as indicators of stress-responsive systems. RESULTS Higher stress at a given measurement time point was associated with higher reported pain levels at the subsequent time point (UC=1.47, p<0.001), but not vice versa (UC<0.01, p=0.179). The stress-pain relationship was neither mediated by momentary cortisol nor by alpha-amylase; however, momentary cortisol was independently associated with momentary pain (UC=0.27, p=0.009). CONCLUSION Stress seems to be a powerful exacerbating factor for pain as experienced by patients with FMS in their everyday lives. Cortisol may be involved in the diurnal fluctuation of pain levels in patients with FMS. Future studies should identify relevant daily stressors in persons with FMS and scrutinize the mechanisms underlying the cortisol-pain relationship.


Chronic Respiratory Disease | 2014

The impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related fears on disease-specific disability

Daniel C Keil; Nikola Stenzel; Kerstin Kühl; Isabelle Vaske; Ricarda Mewes; Winfried Rief; Klaus Kenn

Anxiety is frequently observed in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although anxiety in persons with COPD is multifaceted, it is mostly assessed as a general psychopathological condition. Consequently, the objectives of this study were to revise an existing questionnaire assessing relevant anxieties for use in clinical practice and research, to examine the association between COPD-related fears and disability, and finally to develop norms for COPD-related fears. Disease severity (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage, use of long-term oxygen), sociodemographic characteristics, COPD-specific disability (COPD assessment test), and psychopathology (depression, general anxiety, somatoform symptoms, and disease-related fears) were obtained from a sample of 1025 individuals with COPD via the Internet. We used the COPD Anxiety Questionnaire (German: CAF) for the assessment of different fears that have been found to be relevant in COPD: fear of dyspnea, fear of physical activity, fear of progression, fear of social exclusion, and sleep-related worries. Mean COPD-specific disability was high (22.87). After explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses, a revised version of the CAF was constructed. The economical and user-friendly CAF-R showed adequate reliability and expected correlations with convergent and discriminant constructs. Gender-specific norms are provided for use in clinical practice and research. Even after controlling for GOLD stage, sociodemographic variables, and psychopathology, COPD-related fears contributed incrementally to disease-specific disability. The CAF-R is an economical and reliable tool to assess different specific fears in COPD. Results indicate that disease-specific fears have an impact on disability, supporting the assumption that detailed assessment of anxiety in COPD should be included in clinical practice.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ricarda Mewes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sefik Tagay

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wolfgang Senf

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge