Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ricardo Robles-Campos.
Annals of Surgery | 2014
Erik Schadde; Victoria Ardiles; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Massimo Malago; Marcel Cerqueira Cesar Machado; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Olivier Soubrane; Andreas A. Schnitzbauer; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Christoph Tschuor; Henrik Petrowsky; Eduardo De Santibanes; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Objectives:To assess safety and outcomes of the novel 2-stage hepatectomy, Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS), using an international registry. Background:ALPPS induces accelerated growth of small future liver remnants (FLR) to allow curative resection of liver tumors. There is concern about safety based on reports of higher morbidity and mortality. Methods:A Web-based data entry system was created with password access and data pseudoencryption (NCT01924741). All patients with complete 90-day data were included. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for severe complications and mortality and volume growth of the FLR. Results:Complete data were available for 202 patients. A total of 141 (70%) patients had colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Median starting standardized future liver remnants of 21% increased by 80% within a median of 7 days. Ninety-day mortality was 19/202 (9%). Severe complications including mortalities (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIb) occurred in 27% of patients. Independent factors for severe complications were red blood cell transfusion [odds ratio (OR), 5.2), ALPPS stage I operating time greater than 300 minutes (OR, 4.4), age more than 60 years (OR, 3.8), and non-CRLM (OR, 2.7). Age, use of Pringle maneuver, and histologic changes led to less volume growth. In patients younger than 60 years with CRLM, 90-day mortality was similar to conventional 2-stage hepatectomies for CRLM. Conclusions:This is the first analysis of the ALPPS registry showing that ALPPS has increased perioperative morbidity and mortality in older patients but better outcomes in patients with CRLM.
Annals of Surgery | 2015
Erik Schadde; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Andreas A. Schnitzbauer; Ardiles; Christoph Tschuor; Mickael Lesurtel; Eddie K. Abdalla; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Marcel Autran Cesar Machado; Massimo Malago; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Henrik Petrowsky; Eduardo De Santibanes; Pierre-Alain Clavien
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify predictors of 90-day mortality after Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS), available after stage-1, either to omit or delay stage-2. BACKGROUND DATA ALPPS is a two-stage hepatectomy for patients with extensive liver tumors with predicted small liver remnants, which has been criticized for its high mortality rate. Risk factors for mortality are unknown. METHODS Patients in the International Registry undergoing ALPPS from April 2011 to July 2014 were analyzed. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Liver function after stage-1 was assessed using the criteria of the International Study Group for Liver Surgery (ISGLS) after stage-1 among others. A multivariable model was used to identify independent predictors of 90-day mortality. RESULTS Three hundred twenty patients registered by 55 centers worldwide were evaluated. Overall 90-day mortality was 8.8% (28/320). The predominant cause for 90-day mortality was postoperative liver failure in 75% of patients. Fourteen percent of patients developed liver failure according to ISGLS criteria already after stage-1 ALPPS. Those and patients with a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score more than 10 before stage-2 were at significantly higher risk for 90-day mortality after stage-2 with an odds ratio (OR) 3.9 [confidence interval (CI) 1.4-10.9, P = 0.01] and OR 4.9 (CI 1.9-12.7, P = 0.006), respectively. Other factors, such as size of future liver remnant (FLR) before stage-2 and time between stages, were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS This analysis of the largest cohort of ALPPS patients so far identifies those patients in whom stage-2 ALPPS surgery should be delayed or even denied. These findings may help to make ALPPS safer.
Annals of Surgery | 2016
Michael Linecker; Gregor A. Stavrou; Karl J. Oldhafer; Robert M. Jenner; Burkhardt Seifert; Georg Lurje; Jan Bednarsch; Ulf P. Neumann; Ivan Capobianco; Silvio Nadalin; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Eduardo De Santibanes; Massimo Malago; Mickael Lesurtel; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Henrik Petrowsky
Objectives: To create a prediction model identifying futile outcome in ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy) before stage 1 and stage 2 surgery. Background: ALPPS is a 2-stage hepatectomy, which incorporates parenchymal transection at stage 1 enabling resection of extensive liver tumors. One of the major criticisms of ALPPS is the associated high mortality rate up to 20%. Methods: Using the International ALPPS Registry, a risk analysis for futile outcome (defined as 90-day or in-hospital mortality) was performed. Futility was modeled using multivariate regression analysis and a futility risk score formula was computed on the basis of the relative size of logistic model regression coefficients. Results: Among 528 ALPPS patients from 38 centers, a futile outcome was observed in 47 patients (9%). The pre-stage 1 model included age 67 years or older [odds ratio (OR) = 5.7], and tumor entity (OR = 3.8 for biliary tumors) as independent predictors of futility from multivariate analysis. For the pre-stage 1 model scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were associated with futile risk of 2.7%, 4.9%, 8.6%, 15%, 24%, and 37%. The pre-stage 2 model included major complications (grade ≥ 3b) after stage 1 (OR = 3.4), serum bilirubin (OR = 4.4), serum creatinine (OR = 5.4), and cumulative pre-stage 1 risk score (OR = 1.9). The model predicted futility risk of 5%, 10%, 20%, and 50% for patients with scores of 3.9, 4.7, 5.5, and 6.9, respectively. Conclusions: Both models have an excellent prediction to assess the individual risk of futile outcome after ALPPS surgery and can be used to avoid futile use of ALPPS.
Surgery | 2017
Pim B. Olthof; Joost Huiskens; Dennis A. Wicherts; Pablo Huespe; Victoria Ardiles; Ricardo Robles-Campos; René Adam; Michael Linecker; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Miriam Koopman; Cornelis Verhoef; Cornelis J. A. Punt; Thomas M. van Gulik; Eduardo De Santibanes
Background. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) allows the resection of colorectal liver metastases with curative intent which would otherwise be unresectable and only eligible for palliative systemic therapy. This study aimed to compare outcomes of ALPPS in patients with otherwise unresectable colorectal liver metastases with matched historic controls treated with palliative systemic treatment. Methods. All patients with colorectal liver metastases from the international ALPPS registry were identified and analyzed. Survival data were compared according to the extent of disease. Otherwise unresectable ALPPS patients were defined by at least 2 of the following criteria: ≥6 metastasis, ≥2 future remnant liver metastasis, ≥6 involved segments excluding segment 1. These patients were matched with patients included in 2, phase 3, metastatic, colorectal cancer trials (CAIRO and CAIRO2) using propensity scoring in order to compare survival. Results. Of 295 patients with colorectal liver metastases in the ALPPS registry, 70 patients had otherwise unresectable disease defined by the proposed criteria. Two‐year overall survival was 49% and 72% for patients with ≥2 and <2 criteria, respectively (P = .002). Median disease‐free survival was 6 months compared to 12 months (P < .001) in the ≥2 and <2 criteria groups, respectively. Median overall survival was comparable between ALPPS patients with ≥2 criteria and case‐matched patients who received palliative treatment (24.0 vs 17.6 months, P = .088). Conclusion. Early oncologic outcomes of patients with advanced liver metastases undergoing ALPPS were not superior to results of matched patients receiving systemic treatment with palliative intent. Careful patient selection is essential in order to improve outcomes.
Annals of Surgery | 2017
Michael Linecker; Bergthor Björnsson; Gregor A. Stavrou; Karl J. Oldhafer; Georg Lurje; Ulf P. Neumann; René Adam; François-René Pruvot; Stefan A. Topp; Jun Li; Ivan Capobianco; Silvio Nadalin; Marcel Autran Cesar Machado; Sergey Voskanyan; Deniz Balci; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Fernando A. Alvarez; Eduardo De Santibanes; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Massimo Malago; Michelle L. de Oliveira; Mickael Lesurtel; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Henrik Petrowsky
Objective: To longitudinally assess whether risk adjustment in Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) occurred over time and is associated with postoperative outcome. Background: ALPPS is a novel 2-stage hepatectomy enabling resection of extensive hepatic tumors. ALPPS has been criticized for its high mortality, which is reported beyond accepted standards in liver surgery. Therefore, adjustments in patient selection and technique have been performed but have not yet been studied over time in relation to outcome. Methods: ALPPS centers of the International ALPPS Registry having performed ≥10 cases over a period of ≥3 years were assessed for 90-day mortality and major interstage complications (≥3b) of the longitudinal study period from 2009 to 2015. The predicted prestage 1 and 2 mortality risks were calculated for each patient. In addition, questionnaires were sent to all centers exploring center-specific risk adjustment strategies. Results: Among 437 patients from 16 centers, a shift in indications toward colorectal liver metastases from 53% to 77% and a reverse trend in biliary tumors from 24% to 9% were observed. Over time, 90-day mortality decreased from initially 17% to 4% in 2015 (P = 0.002). Similarly, major interstage complications decreased from 10% to 3% (P = 0.011). The reduction of 90-day mortality was independently associated with a risk adjustment in patient selection (P < 0.001; OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.36–1.93) and using less invasive techniques in stage-1 surgery (P = 0.019; OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18–0.86). A survey indicated risk adjustment of patient selection in all centers and ALPPS technique in the majority (80%) of centers. Conclusions: Risk adjustment of patient selection and technique in ALPPS resulted in a continuous drop of early mortality and major postoperative morbidity, which has meanwhile reached standard outcome measures accepted for major liver surgery.
Oncotarget | 2018
Victor Lopez-Lopez; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Robeto Brusadin; Asunción López-Conesa; Álvaro Navarro; Julio Arevalo-Perez; Pedro Jose Gil; Pascual Parrilla
When very large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCs) with insufficient future liver remnants are treated using associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), the outcome is often poor. We therefore tested the efficacy of a modified version of that technique, tourniquet-ALPPS. A review of the literature examining outcomes of HCC and IHCC patients treated with ALPPS revealed the incidences of morbidity ≥ III and postoperative mortality to be respectively 20.7% and 16.1% among HCC patients and 50% and 45.4% among IHCC patients. In the present case series, in which HCC and IHCC patients were treated with tourniquet-ALPPS, median tumor size was 100 mm (range: 70–200 mm). After surgical stage I, there was no morbidity, no mortality and the median future liver remnant had increased at day 7 by 76%. In surgical stage II, 100% of tumors were resectable (8 right trisectionectomies, 5 with inferior vena cava resection). Two patients experienced serious morbidity ≥ IIIB and 1 patient died (11%). One- and 3-year overall survival was 75% and 60%, respectively. Thus tourniquet-ALPPS appears to be an effective alternative to classical ALPPS for the treatment of patients with HCC or IHCC.
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2016
Jan G. D’Haese; Jens Neumann; Maximilian Weniger; Sebastian Pratschke; Bergthor Björnsson; Victoria Ardiles; William C. Chapman; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Olivier Soubrane; Ricardo Robles-Campos; M. Stojanovic; R. Dalla Valle; Albert C. Y. Chan; Michaela Coenen; Markus Guba; Jens Werner; Erik Schadde; Martin K. Angele
World Journal of Surgery | 2017
Kerollos N. Wanis; Suzana Buac; Michael Linecker; Victoria Ardiles; Mauro Enrique Tun-Abraham; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Massimo Malago; Eduardo De Santibanes; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
Transplantation proceedings | 2016
Paula Ramirez; L. Saenz; P.A. Cascales-Campos; M.R. González Sánchez; Erik Llàcer-Millán; M.I. Sánchez-Lorencio; E. Díaz-Rubio; V. De La Orden; B. Mediero-Valeros; J. L. Navarro; B. Revilla Nuin; Alberto Baroja-Mazo; J.A. Noguera-Velasco; B.F. Sánchez; J. de la Peña; J.A. Pons-Miñano; Francisco Sánchez-Bueno; Ricardo Robles-Campos; Pascual Parrilla
Annals of Surgery | 2018
Ricardo Robles-Campos; Roberto Brusadin; Asunción López-Conesa; Victor Lopez-Lopez; Pascual Parrilla